Skip to content

Dementia Early Recognition and Response in Primary Care

Evidence-based Interventions In Dementia EVIDEM-ED: Early Recognition and Response in Primary Care

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00866099
Acronym
EVIDEM-ED
Enrollment
125
Registered
2009-03-20
Start date
2009-07-31
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2010-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dementia

Keywords

Dementia, primary care, early diagnosis, psychosocial interventions, cholinesterase inhibitors

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to develop and test an educational intervention for dementia in primary care, combining timely diagnosis, psychosocial support around the period of diagnosis and management concordant with guidelines.

Detailed description

Dementia presents many challenges for primary care. Early diagnosis is important as this allows those with dementia and their family care networks to engage with support services and plan for the future. These actions can relieve the significant psychological distress that people with dementia and close supporters may experience , and provide knowledge about the availability of medical and psycho-social support that can improved functioning and morale The main efforts to improve the identification and diagnosis of dementia should logically be targeted at primary care as this is the first point of contact for most individuals and their carers when faced with experiences of 'ill health'. There is, however, evidence that dementia remains under-detected and sub-optimally managed in general practice . An educational intervention that could enhance clinical practice, improving the skills of practitioners in the recognition of and response to dementia syndromes, could therefore be beneficial to people with dementia and their families, and potentially to health and social services.

Interventions

OTHEREducational Dementia training

Tailored learning activities on dementia, over a three-month period and will be given an electronic training manual (based on Microsoft packages) which they can run in the background during and after consultations with people with known or suspected dementia syndrome and face-to- face individualised workshop sessions. Tailoring of the education programme is carried out in a three step process: 1) an educational needs analysis is carried our using a standard checklist to identify aspects of dementia care which the practice perceives as problematic for them; 2) a prescription for education is then written to address shortcomings; 3) the best forms of learning are then identified.

Sponsors

National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
King's College London
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Hertfordshire
CollaboratorOTHER
St George's, University of London
CollaboratorOTHER
London School of Economics and Political Science
CollaboratorOTHER
Imperial College London
CollaboratorOTHER
University College, London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with memory or other cognitive impairments suggestive of dementia syndrome * those with a formal diagnosis of dementia, of any type.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients and carers who are already involved in concurrent research * If the key professional feels that an approach to the person with dementia or their carer would be inappropriate, for example the dementia is very severe, or that an approach may increase distress * and any other important reason that the key professional may have for why the person with dementia or their carer should not be contacted.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
An increase in the proportion of patients with dementia receiving two dementia reviews per year, from 20% to 50%twelve month follow up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
documented concordance with intervention recommendations on recording disclosure decisions & consequencestwelve month follow up
documented concordance with screening for depressiontwelve month follow up
documented concordance with referral to social servicestwelve month follow up
quality of life, met and unmet need in carers and/or people with dementiatwelve month follow up
documented concordance with provision of legal informationtwelve month follow up
documented concordance with shared management of cholinesterase inhibitor medicationtwelve month follow up
documented concordance with informing people with dementia and their carers about relevant local voluntary organisationstwelve month follow up

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactSteve Iliffe, BScMBBSFRCGP
s.iliffe@pcps.ucl.ac.uk0044-207-830-2393
Backup ContactJane Wilcock, MA(hons) MSc
j.wilcock@pcps.ucl.ac.uk0044-207-830-2239

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 1, 2026