Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Study of Several Replagal Dosing Regimens on Cardiac Function in Adults With Fabry Disease

A Multi-Center, Open-Label, Randomized Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Three Dosing Regimens of Replagal Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Adult Patients With Fabry Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00864851
Enrollment
44
Registered
2009-03-19
Start date
2008-12-29
Completion date
2012-07-05
Last updated
2021-06-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fabry Disease

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of various doses of Replagal in patients with cardiomyopathy due to Fabry disease.

Detailed description

Fabry disease is an inherited, metabolic disease caused by mutations in the GALA gene. Patients with Fabry disease accumulate a complex glycosphingolipid named globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) in various tissues and organs. All organs are affected in Fabry disease but the majority of the morbidity and mortality are caused by cardiac, renal and neurological dysfunction. Accumulation of Gb3 in the heart causes hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, valvular abnormalities, arrhythmias and infarctions. Replagal has been shown to reduce Gb3 from key tissues and organs, and stabilize renal function in patients with Fabry disease. Evidence suggests that Replagal reduces left ventricular mass (LVM) and improves midwall fractional shortening (MFS) of the heart. Left ventricular hypertrophy is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with Fabry disease. This is a study of the safety and effectiveness of 3 dosing regimens of Replagal in adult patients with left ventricular hypertrophy due to Fabry disease. The primary objective of the study is to compare the effects of 2 dosing regimens of Replagal (0.2 mg/kg IV every other week and 0.2 mg/kg IV weekly) on the reduction of left ventricular mass as measured by echocardiography. The secondary objectives of this study are to compare the effects of 2 dosing regimens of Replagal (0.2 mg/kg IV every other week and 0.2 mg/kg IV weekly) on each of the following: exercise tolerance; improvement in disease-specific quality of life in heart failure patients; improvement of heart failure symptoms; magnitude of reduction in Gb3; rate of decline in renal function and improvement in the severity of proteinuria/albuminuria; and safety. An alternative treatment regimen of 0.4 mg/kg Replagal IV weekly will also be explored but without formal comparison to the 0.2 mg/kg regimens. The investigation of the safety and efficacy of the 0.4 mg/kg IV weekly regimen is a secondary objective of this study.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALReplagal

Intravenous (IV) infusion for 12 months

Sponsors

Shire
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \>18 years-old; * Male:Fabry disease confirmed by deficiency of alfa galactosidase A activity OR Female:Fabry disease confirmed by a mutation of the alfa galactosidase A gene; * ERT-naïve; * LVM/h \> 50g/m2.7 for males and \>47 g/m2.7 for females; * Negative pregnancy test at enrollment and contraception use required throughout study for female patients; * Signed informed consent;

Exclusion criteria

* Class IV heart failure; * Clinically significant hypertension; * Hemodynamically significant valvular stenosis or regurgitation; * Morbid obesity; * Known autosomal dominant sarcoplasmic contractile protein gene mutation; * Treatment with any investigational drug or device within the 30 days; * Unable to comply with the protocol as determined by the Investigator; * Positive for hepatitis B, hepatitis C or HIV

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Left Ventricular Mass Indexed to Height (LVMI)Baseline, Month 12 (Week 53)Left ventricular mass (LVM) was measured through echocardiography.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Distance Walked in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)Baseline, Month 12 (Week 53)Exercise tolerance using the 6MWT was measured as the total distance walked in 6 minutes.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF-Q) Summary ScoreBaseline, Month 12 (Week 53)Quality of life (QoL) was evaluated using the MLHF-Q, version 2. The questionnaire is designed to assess the degree to which heart failure symptoms affect a patient's daily life. The summary score ranges from 0 to 105, with a score of 105 representing the highest adverse impact on a patient's QoL.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional ClassBaseline, Month 12 (Week 53)The NYHA functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. NYHA Classification - The Stages of Heart Failure: Class I (Mild): No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II (Mild): Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest, but ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Class III (Moderate): Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest, but less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Class IV (Severe): Unable to carry out any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Maximal Oxygen Consumption (VO2 Max) at Peak ExerciseBaseline, Month 12 (Week 53)Exercise tolerance as measured by VO2 max at peak exercise using the standard exponential exercise protocol (STEEP).
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)Baseline, Month 12 (Week 53)Renal function was assessed by an evaluation of change from baseline to Month 12 in eGFR as calculated using the Modification of Diet for Renal Disease (MDRD) equation.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine (A/Cr) RatioBaseline, Month 12 (Week 53)
Safety Evaluation56 WeeksAdverse events were collected throughout the study, from the time of informed consent to approximately 30 days post-final infusion.
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Plasma Globotriaosylceramide (GB3)Baseline, Month 12 (Week 53)

Countries

Australia, Czechia, Finland, Paraguay, Poland, Slovenia, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Every Other Week
Patients who received Replagal 0.2 mg/kg via intravenous infusion every other week for 52 weeks.
20
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Weekly
Patients who received Replagal 0.2 mg/kg via intravenous infusion every week for 52 weeks.
19
Replagal 0.4 mg/kg, IV, Weekly
Patients who received Replagal 0.4 mg/kg via intravenous infusion every week for 52 weeks.
5
Total44

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDeath100
Overall StudyPatient uncooperative100
Overall StudyPhysician Decision100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicReplagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, WeeklyTotalReplagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Every Other WeekReplagal 0.4 mg/kg, IV, Weekly
Age, Continuous51.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.42
50.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.34
50.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.23
49.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.75
Age, Customized
18 to <45 years
6 Participants12 Participants5 Participants1 Participants
Age, Customized
>=45 years
13 Participants32 Participants15 Participants4 Participants
Baseline Distance Walked in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)514.3 m
STANDARD_DEVIATION 87.3
492.8 m
STANDARD_DEVIATION 97
459.6 m
STANDARD_DEVIATION 103
530.7 m
STANDARD_DEVIATION 90.2
Baseline Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)78.1 mL/min/1.73 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.8
79.2 mL/min/1.73 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.1
82.0 mL/min/1.73 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34.1
72.1 mL/min/1.73 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.2
Baseline Left Ventricular Mass Indexed to Height (LVMI)82.6 g/m^2.7
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.3
81.5 g/m^2.7
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.5
76.1 g/m^2.7
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.8
99.3 g/m^2.7
STANDARD_DEVIATION 46.2
Baseline Maximal Oxygen Consumption (VO2 max) at Peak Exercise22.6 mL/min/kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.89
21.6 mL/min/kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.05
20.2 mL/min/kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
24.0 mL/min/kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.69
Baseline Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF-Q) Summary Score21.1 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21
28.1 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.8
37.0 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.8
19.6 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.5
Baseline New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class
Class I
10 Participants18 Participants6 Participants2 Participants
Baseline New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class
Class II
9 Participants22 Participants11 Participants2 Participants
Baseline New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class
Class III
0 Participants4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Baseline New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class
Class IV
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Baseline Plasma Globotriaosylceramide (GB3)5.652 nmol/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.212
5.800 nmol/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.104
6.067 nmol/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.388
5.292 nmol/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.865
Baseline Urinary Albumin/Creatinine (A/Cr) Ratio293.4 mg/g
STANDARD_DEVIATION 521.23
303.0 mg/g
STANDARD_DEVIATION 532.27
313.4 mg/g
STANDARD_DEVIATION 614.07
298.2 mg/g
STANDARD_DEVIATION 175.85
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants42 Participants19 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
19 Participants44 Participants20 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants18 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants26 Participants14 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 2017 / 195 / 541 / 44
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 205 / 192 / 515 / 44

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Left Ventricular Mass Indexed to Height (LVMI)

Left ventricular mass (LVM) was measured through echocardiography.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 (Week 53)

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 complete or partial dose of Replagal.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Every Other WeekChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Left Ventricular Mass Indexed to Height (LVMI)3.2 g/m^2.7Standard Deviation 12.5
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, WeeklyChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Left Ventricular Mass Indexed to Height (LVMI)0.5 g/m^2.7Standard Deviation 15.8
Replagal 0.4 mg/kg, IV, WeeklyChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Left Ventricular Mass Indexed to Height (LVMI)-10.3 g/m^2.7Standard Deviation 11.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Distance Walked in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

Exercise tolerance using the 6MWT was measured as the total distance walked in 6 minutes.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 (Week 53)

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 complete or partial dose of Replagal.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Every Other WeekChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Distance Walked in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)-10.4 mStandard Deviation 87.7
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, WeeklyChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Distance Walked in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)37.9 mStandard Deviation 70.5
Replagal 0.4 mg/kg, IV, WeeklyChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Distance Walked in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)24.7 mStandard Deviation 45.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)

Renal function was assessed by an evaluation of change from baseline to Month 12 in eGFR as calculated using the Modification of Diet for Renal Disease (MDRD) equation.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 (Week 53)

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 complete or partial dose of Replagal.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Every Other WeekChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)-1.2 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 12.2
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, WeeklyChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)-3.3 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 12.7
Replagal 0.4 mg/kg, IV, WeeklyChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)-1.7 mL/min/1.73m^2Standard Deviation 9.9
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Maximal Oxygen Consumption (VO2 Max) at Peak Exercise

Exercise tolerance as measured by VO2 max at peak exercise using the standard exponential exercise protocol (STEEP).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 (Week 53)

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 complete or partial dose of Replagal.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Every Other WeekChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Maximal Oxygen Consumption (VO2 Max) at Peak Exercise-2.0 mL/min/kgStandard Deviation 3.24
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, WeeklyChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Maximal Oxygen Consumption (VO2 Max) at Peak Exercise-0.3 mL/min/kgStandard Deviation 4.76
Replagal 0.4 mg/kg, IV, WeeklyChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Maximal Oxygen Consumption (VO2 Max) at Peak Exercise2.2 mL/min/kgStandard Deviation 5.85
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class

The NYHA functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. NYHA Classification - The Stages of Heart Failure: Class I (Mild): No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II (Mild): Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest, but ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Class III (Moderate): Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest, but less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Class IV (Severe): Unable to carry out any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 (Week 53)

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 complete or partial dose of Replagal.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Every Other WeekChange From Baseline to Month 12 in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional ClassMaintained NYHA Functional Class15 participants
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Every Other WeekChange From Baseline to Month 12 in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional ClassImproved ≥ 1 NYHA Functional Class2 participants
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, WeeklyChange From Baseline to Month 12 in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional ClassMaintained NYHA Functional Class16 participants
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, WeeklyChange From Baseline to Month 12 in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional ClassImproved ≥ 1 NYHA Functional Class2 participants
Replagal 0.4 mg/kg, IV, WeeklyChange From Baseline to Month 12 in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional ClassImproved ≥ 1 NYHA Functional Class2 participants
Replagal 0.4 mg/kg, IV, WeeklyChange From Baseline to Month 12 in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional ClassMaintained NYHA Functional Class3 participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Plasma Globotriaosylceramide (GB3)

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 (Week 53)

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 complete or partial dose of Replagal.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Every Other WeekChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Plasma Globotriaosylceramide (GB3)-1.046 nmol/mlStandard Deviation 2.256
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, WeeklyChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Plasma Globotriaosylceramide (GB3)-2.132 nmol/mlStandard Deviation 4.363
Replagal 0.4 mg/kg, IV, WeeklyChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Plasma Globotriaosylceramide (GB3)-2.076 nmol/mlStandard Deviation 1.248
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF-Q) Summary Score

Quality of life (QoL) was evaluated using the MLHF-Q, version 2. The questionnaire is designed to assess the degree to which heart failure symptoms affect a patient's daily life. The summary score ranges from 0 to 105, with a score of 105 representing the highest adverse impact on a patient's QoL.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 (Week 53)

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 complete or partial dose of Replagal.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Every Other WeekChange From Baseline to Month 12 in the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF-Q) Summary Score-3.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.7
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, WeeklyChange From Baseline to Month 12 in the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF-Q) Summary Score2.1 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.5
Replagal 0.4 mg/kg, IV, WeeklyChange From Baseline to Month 12 in the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF-Q) Summary Score-8.6 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine (A/Cr) Ratio

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 (Week 53)

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 complete or partial dose of Replagal.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Every Other WeekChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine (A/Cr) Ratio83.9 mg/gStandard Deviation 624.82
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, WeeklyChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine (A/Cr) Ratio-54.1 mg/gStandard Deviation 322.51
Replagal 0.4 mg/kg, IV, WeeklyChange From Baseline to Month 12 in Urinary Albumin/Creatinine (A/Cr) Ratio-54.2 mg/gStandard Deviation 294.86
Secondary

Safety Evaluation

Adverse events were collected throughout the study, from the time of informed consent to approximately 30 days post-final infusion.

Time frame: 56 Weeks

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) Population: All randomized patients who received at least 1 complete or partial dose of Replagal. Analyses were performed on the ITT population because it was identical to the safety population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Every Other WeekSafety EvaluationDeaths1 participants
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Every Other WeekSafety EvaluationAt least one serious AE (SAE)8 participants
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Every Other WeekSafety EvaluationAt least one severe or life-threatening AE8 participants
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Every Other WeekSafety EvaluationAt least one infusion-related AE5 participants
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Every Other WeekSafety EvaluationAt least one AE19 participants
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Every Other WeekSafety EvaluationNo adverse event (AE)1 participants
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Every Other WeekSafety EvaluationDiscontinued due to an AE0 participants
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Every Other WeekSafety EvaluationAt least one study drug-related SAE1 participants
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, Every Other WeekSafety EvaluationAt least one study drug-related AE6 participants
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, WeeklySafety EvaluationAt least one infusion-related AE4 participants
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, WeeklySafety EvaluationNo adverse event (AE)2 participants
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, WeeklySafety EvaluationAt least one AE17 participants
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, WeeklySafety EvaluationAt least one study drug-related AE6 participants
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, WeeklySafety EvaluationAt least one severe or life-threatening AE4 participants
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, WeeklySafety EvaluationAt least one serious AE (SAE)5 participants
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, WeeklySafety EvaluationAt least one study drug-related SAE0 participants
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, WeeklySafety EvaluationDiscontinued due to an AE0 participants
Replagal 0.2 mg/kg, IV, WeeklySafety EvaluationDeaths0 participants
Replagal 0.4 mg/kg, IV, WeeklySafety EvaluationAt least one severe or life-threatening AE0 participants
Replagal 0.4 mg/kg, IV, WeeklySafety EvaluationAt least one study drug-related AE2 participants
Replagal 0.4 mg/kg, IV, WeeklySafety EvaluationNo adverse event (AE)0 participants
Replagal 0.4 mg/kg, IV, WeeklySafety EvaluationAt least one serious AE (SAE)2 participants
Replagal 0.4 mg/kg, IV, WeeklySafety EvaluationDeaths0 participants
Replagal 0.4 mg/kg, IV, WeeklySafety EvaluationAt least one study drug-related SAE0 participants
Replagal 0.4 mg/kg, IV, WeeklySafety EvaluationAt least one AE5 participants
Replagal 0.4 mg/kg, IV, WeeklySafety EvaluationDiscontinued due to an AE0 participants
Replagal 0.4 mg/kg, IV, WeeklySafety EvaluationAt least one infusion-related AE2 participants
OverallSafety EvaluationAt least one study drug-related AE14 participants
OverallSafety EvaluationDeaths1 participants
OverallSafety EvaluationNo adverse event (AE)3 participants
OverallSafety EvaluationDiscontinued due to an AE0 participants
OverallSafety EvaluationAt least one serious AE (SAE)15 participants
OverallSafety EvaluationAt least one AE41 participants
OverallSafety EvaluationAt least one severe or life-threatening AE12 participants
OverallSafety EvaluationAt least one infusion-related AE11 participants
OverallSafety EvaluationAt least one study drug-related SAE1 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026