Skip to content

Enhancing Function Using the RF Microstimulator Gait System Following Stroke 2008

Enhancing Function Using the RF Microstimulator Gait System Following Stroke 2008

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00864708
Enrollment
1
Registered
2009-03-19
Start date
2008-12-31
Completion date
2010-04-30
Last updated
2014-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

Functional Electrical Stimulation

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to investigate new Technology for recovery of ankle walking function after stroke.

Detailed description

Background and Purpose: Conventional rehabilitation does not restore normal, upper limb function or normal gait to many stroke survivors. Functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS) has shown promise for functional enhancement of both upper and lower limb motor control following stroke. Gains included muscle activation latencies, strength, coordination, upper limb functional tasks, gait kinematics, walking endurance, and quality of life. The purpose of the proposed work is to test the radio frequency-controlled (RF) Microstimulator (RFM) Gait System regarding system performance and subject response to treatment. Methods: This is a feasibility study in which up to four subjects will receive the (RFM) Gait System. Up to ten RFMs will be placed for a given subject. An RFM ankle muscle system will be used to train ankle gait components. A separate RFM system will be used to train knee gait components. Subjects will be treated for 6 months, four sessions/wk. Primary outcome measures for the RFM Gait System will be: kinematic swing phase gait components and walking endurance. Secondary outcome measures will include: strength, coordination, spasticity, function, and quality of life. Data collections will occur at months 1, 3 and 6, and for follow-up times up to a year after the end of treatment. The results of the RFM ankle system have the potential to provide a new technology for ankle muscle gait components.

Interventions

DEVICEradio frequency-controlled (RF) Microstimulator (RFM) Gait System

Fully Implanted FES system to assist patient with gait component practice

Sponsors

The Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research
CollaboratorOTHER
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Sufficient endurance to participate in rehabilitation sessions. * Medically Stable * Age \>21 years. * Inability to perform normal ankle coordinated gait components. * Participants should be able to walk and keep balance without physical assistance from another person

Exclusion criteria

* Acute or progressive cardiac, renal, respiratory, neurological disorders or malignancy. * Lower motor neuron damage or radiculopathy * Allergy or contraindication to anesthesia, Versed, (or comparable substitute. * Active implantable device (e.g. pacemaker, implantable cardiac defibrillator, neurostimulator, or drug infusion device. * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kinematic Gait MeasuresDay 1 and at 3 months, following treatmentassessment of the lower limb kinematics during ambulation at chosen speed.
Walking Endurance (6MWT)Day 1 and at 3 months, following treatmentThe Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is a measure of the distance measured in feet ambulated by the participant during six minutes. A further distance walked in 6 minutes indicates improvement on the measure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity ScoreDay 1 and at 3 months, following treatmentFugl-Meyer Lower Extremity Score (FMLE) is an itemized measure of lower extremity coordination following stroke. Scores for the FMLE range from 0 (most impaired) to 34 (normal).
Ashworth ScaleDay 1 and at 3 months, following treatmentThe Ashworth Scale is a measure of muscle spasticity; muscle groups are graded from 0 (no spasticity) to 4 (greatest spasticity/contracture). The lower limb muscle groups are summed for a total lower limb Ashworth score. A lower score indicates better performance. (range is 0-40)
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)Day 1 and at 3 months, following treatmentThe SIS is a measure of Quality of Life/Life Role Participation following stroke. Each item in a domain is scored between 0 and 5. A higher score indicates better performance (range 0-295).
Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)Day 1 and at 3 months, following treatmentThis is a measure of strength of the various muscle groups of the lower limb. Each is graded on a 0 to 5 scale; the final score is the summed total of the lower limb muscle groups tested. (score range of summed muscles is 0-50, with 50 being the maximum highest score)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Dec 2008 - October 2009, recruitment by flier and by word of mouth

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1
Gait training using radio frequency-controlled (RF) Microstimulator (RFM) Gait System )
1
Total1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm 1
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1 Participants
Age, Continuous37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0
Region of Enrollment
United States
1 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Kinematic Gait Measures

assessment of the lower limb kinematics during ambulation at chosen speed.

Time frame: Day 1 and at 3 months, following treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1Kinematic Gait Measures0 percentage of change Day 1 to 3 months
Primary

Walking Endurance (6MWT)

The Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is a measure of the distance measured in feet ambulated by the participant during six minutes. A further distance walked in 6 minutes indicates improvement on the measure.

Time frame: Day 1 and at 3 months, following treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1Walking Endurance (6MWT)Day 1-6MWT843 feet
Arm 1Walking Endurance (6MWT)After 3 months of treatment- 6MWT771 feet
Secondary

Ashworth Scale

The Ashworth Scale is a measure of muscle spasticity; muscle groups are graded from 0 (no spasticity) to 4 (greatest spasticity/contracture). The lower limb muscle groups are summed for a total lower limb Ashworth score. A lower score indicates better performance. (range is 0-40)

Time frame: Day 1 and at 3 months, following treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1Ashworth ScaleDay 1-Ashworth Score1.5 units on a scale
Arm 1Ashworth ScaleAfter 3 months of treatment- Ashworth Score1.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity Score

Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity Score (FMLE) is an itemized measure of lower extremity coordination following stroke. Scores for the FMLE range from 0 (most impaired) to 34 (normal).

Time frame: Day 1 and at 3 months, following treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity ScoreDay 1- Fugl Meyer Score22 units on a scale
Arm 1Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity ScoreAfter 3 months of treatment- Fugl Meyer Score26 units on a scale
Secondary

Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)

This is a measure of strength of the various muscle groups of the lower limb. Each is graded on a 0 to 5 scale; the final score is the summed total of the lower limb muscle groups tested. (score range of summed muscles is 0-50, with 50 being the maximum highest score)

Time frame: Day 1 and at 3 months, following treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)Day 1-MMT21.35 units on a scale
Arm 1Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)After 3 months of treatment- MMT23.33 units on a scale
Secondary

Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)

The SIS is a measure of Quality of Life/Life Role Participation following stroke. Each item in a domain is scored between 0 and 5. A higher score indicates better performance (range 0-295).

Time frame: Day 1 and at 3 months, following treatment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)Day 1-SIS261 units on a scale
Arm 1Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)After 3 months of treatment- SIS264 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026