Skip to content

Everolimus in Combination With Exemestane in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Estrogen Receptor Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Are Refractory to Letrozole or Anastrozole

A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Everolimus in Combination With Exemestane in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Estrogen Receptor Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Are Refractory to Letrozole or Anastrozole

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00863655
Acronym
BOLERO-2
Enrollment
724
Registered
2009-03-18
Start date
2009-06-03
Completion date
2014-12-04
Last updated
2017-05-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

Breast Cancer, Estrogen Receptor positive, ER+, exemestane, mTOR, everolimus, refractory, NSAI

Brief summary

There are no treatments specifically approved after recurrence or progression on a non steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAI). In light of the need for new treatment options for postmenopausal women after failure of prior NSAI therapy, the purpose of this Phase III study is to compare efficacy and safety of a treatment with exemestane + everolimus to exemestane + placebo in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer refractory to NSAI.

Interventions

DRUGEverolimus

Everolimus was formulated as tablets of 5-mg strength and was packaged into blister packs . Everolimus (two 5 mg tablets daily) were administered in a blinded manner on their respective treatment arms by continuous oral daily dosing.

DRUGExemestane

Exemestane 25 mg orally daily.

Placebo was formulated to be indistinguishable from the everolimus tablets. Matching placebo (two tablets daily) were administered in a blinded manner on their respective treatment arms by continuous oral daily dosing.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult women (≥ 18 years of age) with metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer not amenable to curative treatment by surgery or radiotherapy. * Histological or cytological confirmation of estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer * Postmenopausal women. * Disease refractory to non steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAI), * Radiological or clinical evidence of recurrence or progression on or after the last systemic therapy prior to randomization. * Patients must have at least one lesion that can be accurately measured or bone lesions in the absence of measurable disease as defined above.

Exclusion criteria

* HER2-overexpressing patients * Patients with only non-measurable lesions other than bone metastasis (e.g. pleural effusion, ascites etc.). * Patients who received more than one chemotherapy line for Advanced Breast Cancer. * Previous treatment with exemestane or mTOR inhibitors. * Known hypersensitivity to mTOR inhibitors, e.g. sirolimus (rapamycin). * Radiotherapy within four weeks prior to randomization * Currently receiving hormone replacement therapy, Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Local Radiology Review of Tumor Assessments.date of randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, reported between day of first patient randomized up to about 19 monthsProgression-free survival, the primary endpoint in this study, is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documented radiological progression or death due to any cause. Disease progression was based on the tumor assessment by the local radiologist or investigator using RECIST 1.0 criteria. If a patient did not progress or known to have died at the date of the analysis cut-off or start of another antineoplastic therapy, the PFS date was censored to the date of last adequate tumor assessment prior to cut-off date or start of antineoplastic therapy. For patients with lytic or mixed (lytic+sclerotic) bone lesions, the following is considered progression: appearance of ≥1 new lytic lesions in bone; the appearance of ≥ new lesions outside of bone and unequivocal progression of existing bone lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS) by Medianup to 53 monthsOverall survival, the key secondary endpoint in this study, is defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause.
Overall Response Rate (ORR)up to 21 monthsOverall response rate (ORR) is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.0. Per RECIST criteria 1.0, CR: Disappearance of all target lesions; PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters.
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)up to 21 monthsCBR is defined as the percentage of patients with best overall response of either complete response (CR), a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) \>= 24 weeks, according to RECIST 1.0. Per RECIST criteria 1.0, CR: Disappearance of all target lesions; PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters; SD = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for PD; PD = At least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of longest diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline.
Proportion of Patients With no Deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Using Kaplan-Meier2, 4, 6, 9 monthsThe ECOG PS (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale) is a standard criteria for measuring how treatment of cancer impacts level of functioning in terms of the ability to care for oneself, daily activity, & physical ability (walking, working, etc.). Scale score ranges:0 to 5, 5 being the worst. Scale index: 0: Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory & able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature. 2: Ambulatory & capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up & about more than 50% of waking hours. 3: Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4 - Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5 - Dead. A deterioration of ECOG is an increase of 1 of the ECOG PS without improvement back to initial level at a subsequent time of measurement.
Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Deterioration of PRO Scores Using Kaplan Meier - EORTC QLQ-C30Up to 21 monthsThe QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, a global health status - QoL scale, and 6 single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than 1 scale. All of the scales measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score = higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a healthy level of function, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high quality of life but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems. The principle for scoring these scales: 1.) Estimate the average of the items that contribute to the scale = raw score. 2.) Linear transformation to standardize the raw score, so that scores range from 0 to 100; a higher score represents a higher (better) level of functioning, or a higher (worse) level of symptoms.
Overall Survival (OS) by Number of Deathsup to 53 monthsOverall survival, the key secondary endpoint in this study, is defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. If a patient is not known to have died, survival was censored at the date of last contact.
Duration of Response (Among Participants With Best Overall Response of CR or PR) Estimated Per Kaplan-Meier21 monthsDuration of response of CR or PR based on investigator applies only to patients whose best overall response was CR or PR (RECIST 1.0). The start date was the date of first documented response (CR or PR) and the end date and censoring is defined the same as that for time to progression. Per RECIST criteria 1.0, CR: Disappearance of all target lesions; PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters.
Everolimus Concentrations at Week 4pre-dose, 2 hours post-doseCharacterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of everolimus in combination with exemestane using Cmin (pre-dose) and C2h (post-dose) at week 4 in a small group of patients.
Exemestane Concentrations at Week 4predose, 2 hours post-doseCharacterize the PK of exemestane in combination with or without everolimus using Cmin and C2h at week 4 in a small group of patients.
Estradiol Plasma ConcentrationsBaseline, Week 4Compare estradiol concentrations from baseline to week 4 in both treatment arms.
Proportion of Patients With Having no Overall Response Based on Investigator Assessment2, 4, 6, 9 monthsoverall response = complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) per RECIST 1.0 Time to overall response (CR or PR) based on investigator is the time between date of randomization/start of treatment until first documented response (CR or PR). This analysis included all patients/responders. Patients who did not achieve a confirmed PR or CR were censored at last adequate tumor assessment date when they did not progress. Per RECIST criteria 1.0, CR: Disappearance of all target lesions; PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Egypt, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Although 724 patients were randomized, 4 never received any study treatment and thus were excluded form the safety set.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Everolimus + Exemestane
Everolimus 10 mg daily in combination with exemestane 25 mg daily
485
Placebo + Exemestane
Placebo of everolimus in combination with exemestane 25 mg daily
239
Total724

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdministrative problems10
Overall StudyAdverse Event528
Overall StudyDeath71
Overall StudyDisease progression364221
Overall StudyNew cancer therapy51
Overall StudyProtocol Violation40
Overall StudyTreatment completed as per protocol51
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject477

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEverolimus + ExemestanePlacebo + ExemestaneTotal
Age, Continuous62.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.31
61.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.75
62.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.14
Age, Customized
< 65 years
290 Participants159 Participants449 Participants
Age, Customized
>= 65 years
195 Participants80 Participants275 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
485 Participants239 Participants724 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
479 / 482209 / 238
serious
Total, serious adverse events
158 / 48237 / 238

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Local Radiology Review of Tumor Assessments.

Progression-free survival, the primary endpoint in this study, is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documented radiological progression or death due to any cause. Disease progression was based on the tumor assessment by the local radiologist or investigator using RECIST 1.0 criteria. If a patient did not progress or known to have died at the date of the analysis cut-off or start of another antineoplastic therapy, the PFS date was censored to the date of last adequate tumor assessment prior to cut-off date or start of antineoplastic therapy. For patients with lytic or mixed (lytic+sclerotic) bone lesions, the following is considered progression: appearance of ≥1 new lytic lesions in bone; the appearance of ≥ new lesions outside of bone and unequivocal progression of existing bone lesions.

Time frame: date of randomization to the date of first documented tumor progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, reported between day of first patient randomized up to about 19 months

Population: All randomized patients were included in the Full Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Everolimus + ExemestaneProgression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Local Radiology Review of Tumor Assessments.6.93 months
Placebo + ExemestaneProgression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Local Radiology Review of Tumor Assessments.2.83 months
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.35, 0.54]Log Rank
Secondary

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)

CBR is defined as the percentage of patients with best overall response of either complete response (CR), a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) \>= 24 weeks, according to RECIST 1.0. Per RECIST criteria 1.0, CR: Disappearance of all target lesions; PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters; SD = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for PD; PD = At least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of longest diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline.

Time frame: up to 21 months

Population: All randomized patients were included in the Full Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus + ExemestaneClinical Benefit Rate (CBR)33.4 Percentage of participants
Placebo + ExemestaneClinical Benefit Rate (CBR)18.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Response (Among Participants With Best Overall Response of CR or PR) Estimated Per Kaplan-Meier

Duration of response of CR or PR based on investigator applies only to patients whose best overall response was CR or PR (RECIST 1.0). The start date was the date of first documented response (CR or PR) and the end date and censoring is defined the same as that for time to progression. Per RECIST criteria 1.0, CR: Disappearance of all target lesions; PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters.

Time frame: 21 months

Population: Randomized patients with best overall response of CR or PR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Everolimus + ExemestaneDuration of Response (Among Participants With Best Overall Response of CR or PR) Estimated Per Kaplan-Meier8.21 Months
Placebo + ExemestaneDuration of Response (Among Participants With Best Overall Response of CR or PR) Estimated Per Kaplan-MeierNA Months
Secondary

Estradiol Plasma Concentrations

Compare estradiol concentrations from baseline to week 4 in both treatment arms.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

Population: Safety Set population consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and who had at least one valid post-baseline safety assessment. Although the safety set was considered for the analysis (N), only participants (n) who had pre-dose \& 2 hours post-dose values for the given time points were analyzed for that time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus + ExemestaneEstradiol Plasma ConcentrationsWeek 4 (n: 38, 15)3.50 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2.551
Everolimus + ExemestaneEstradiol Plasma ConcentrationsBaseline (n: = 41, 14)5.62 pg/mLStandard Deviation 3.342
Placebo + ExemestaneEstradiol Plasma ConcentrationsBaseline (n: = 41, 14)4.09 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1.792
Placebo + ExemestaneEstradiol Plasma ConcentrationsWeek 4 (n: 38, 15)5.17 pg/mLStandard Deviation 6.919
Secondary

Everolimus Concentrations at Week 4

Characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of everolimus in combination with exemestane using Cmin (pre-dose) and C2h (post-dose) at week 4 in a small group of patients.

Time frame: pre-dose, 2 hours post-dose

Population: Safety Set population consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and who had at least one valid post-baseline safety assessment. Although the safety set was considered for the analysis (N), only participants (n) who had pre-dose \& 2 hours post-dose values for the given time points were analyzed for that time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus + ExemestaneEverolimus Concentrations at Week 4Pre-dose (Cmin) (n:22)16.04 ng/mLStandard Deviation 9.356
Everolimus + ExemestaneEverolimus Concentrations at Week 42 hours post-dose (C2h) (n:24)46.50 ng/mLStandard Deviation 17.954
Secondary

Exemestane Concentrations at Week 4

Characterize the PK of exemestane in combination with or without everolimus using Cmin and C2h at week 4 in a small group of patients.

Time frame: predose, 2 hours post-dose

Population: Safety Set population consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and who had at least one valid post-baseline safety assessment. Although the safety set was considered for the analysis (N), only participants (n) who had pre-dose \& 2 hours post-dose values for the given time points were analyzed for that time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus + ExemestaneExemestane Concentrations at Week 4Pre-dose (Cmin) (n: 34, n: 22)0.63 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.474
Everolimus + ExemestaneExemestane Concentrations at Week 42 hours post-dose (C2h) (n: 39, n: 22)23.16 ng/mLStandard Deviation 19.805
Placebo + ExemestaneExemestane Concentrations at Week 4Pre-dose (Cmin) (n: 34, n: 22)0.43 ng/mLStandard Deviation 0.376
Placebo + ExemestaneExemestane Concentrations at Week 42 hours post-dose (C2h) (n: 39, n: 22)13.30 ng/mLStandard Deviation 11.889
Secondary

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

Overall response rate (ORR) is the percentage of patients with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.0. Per RECIST criteria 1.0, CR: Disappearance of all target lesions; PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters.

Time frame: up to 21 months

Population: All randomized patients were included in the Full Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus + ExemestaneOverall Response Rate (ORR)9.5 Percentage of participants
Placebo + ExemestaneOverall Response Rate (ORR)0.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) by Median

Overall survival, the key secondary endpoint in this study, is defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause.

Time frame: up to 53 months

Population: All randomized patients were included in the Full Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Everolimus + ExemestaneOverall Survival (OS) by Median30.98 Months
Placebo + ExemestaneOverall Survival (OS) by Median26.55 Months
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) by Number of Deaths

Overall survival, the key secondary endpoint in this study, is defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. If a patient is not known to have died, survival was censored at the date of last contact.

Time frame: up to 53 months

Population: All randomized patients were included in the Full Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus + ExemestaneOverall Survival (OS) by Number of Deaths267 Participants
Placebo + ExemestaneOverall Survival (OS) by Number of Deaths143 Participants
Secondary

Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Deterioration of PRO Scores Using Kaplan Meier - EORTC QLQ-C30

The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, a global health status - QoL scale, and 6 single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than 1 scale. All of the scales measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score = higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a healthy level of function, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high quality of life but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems. The principle for scoring these scales: 1.) Estimate the average of the items that contribute to the scale = raw score. 2.) Linear transformation to standardize the raw score, so that scores range from 0 to 100; a higher score represents a higher (better) level of functioning, or a higher (worse) level of symptoms.

Time frame: Up to 21 months

Population: All randomized patients were included in the Full Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Everolimus + ExemestanePatient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Deterioration of PRO Scores Using Kaplan Meier - EORTC QLQ-C30Deterioration global health status score ≥ 5%4.53 Months
Everolimus + ExemestanePatient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Deterioration of PRO Scores Using Kaplan Meier - EORTC QLQ-C30Deterioration in PF domain score of ≥ 5%4.83 Months
Everolimus + ExemestanePatient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Deterioration of PRO Scores Using Kaplan Meier - EORTC QLQ-C30Deterioration in EF domain score of ≥ 5%6.93 Months
Everolimus + ExemestanePatient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Deterioration of PRO Scores Using Kaplan Meier - EORTC QLQ-C30Deterioration in SF domain score of ≥ 5%8.34 Months
Placebo + ExemestanePatient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Deterioration of PRO Scores Using Kaplan Meier - EORTC QLQ-C30Deterioration in SF domain score of ≥ 5%7.03 Months
Placebo + ExemestanePatient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Deterioration of PRO Scores Using Kaplan Meier - EORTC QLQ-C30Deterioration global health status score ≥ 5%4.40 Months
Placebo + ExemestanePatient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Deterioration of PRO Scores Using Kaplan Meier - EORTC QLQ-C30Deterioration in EF domain score of ≥ 5%6.93 Months
Placebo + ExemestanePatient-reported Outcomes (PROs): Time to Deterioration of PRO Scores Using Kaplan Meier - EORTC QLQ-C30Deterioration in PF domain score of ≥ 5%4.37 Months
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With Having no Overall Response Based on Investigator Assessment

overall response = complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) per RECIST 1.0 Time to overall response (CR or PR) based on investigator is the time between date of randomization/start of treatment until first documented response (CR or PR). This analysis included all patients/responders. Patients who did not achieve a confirmed PR or CR were censored at last adequate tumor assessment date when they did not progress. Per RECIST criteria 1.0, CR: Disappearance of all target lesions; PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters.

Time frame: 2, 4, 6, 9 months

Population: All randomized patients were included in the Full Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus + ExemestaneProportion of Patients With Having no Overall Response Based on Investigator Assessment4 months0.93 Proportion of patients
Everolimus + ExemestaneProportion of Patients With Having no Overall Response Based on Investigator Assessment2 months0.96 Proportion of patients
Everolimus + ExemestaneProportion of Patients With Having no Overall Response Based on Investigator Assessment6 months0.92 Proportion of patients
Everolimus + ExemestaneProportion of Patients With Having no Overall Response Based on Investigator Assessment9 months0.90 Proportion of patients
Placebo + ExemestaneProportion of Patients With Having no Overall Response Based on Investigator Assessment9 months1.00 Proportion of patients
Placebo + ExemestaneProportion of Patients With Having no Overall Response Based on Investigator Assessment6 months1.00 Proportion of patients
Placebo + ExemestaneProportion of Patients With Having no Overall Response Based on Investigator Assessment2 months1.00 Proportion of patients
Placebo + ExemestaneProportion of Patients With Having no Overall Response Based on Investigator Assessment4 months1.00 Proportion of patients
Secondary

Proportion of Patients With no Deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Using Kaplan-Meier

The ECOG PS (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale) is a standard criteria for measuring how treatment of cancer impacts level of functioning in terms of the ability to care for oneself, daily activity, & physical ability (walking, working, etc.). Scale score ranges:0 to 5, 5 being the worst. Scale index: 0: Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory & able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature. 2: Ambulatory & capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up & about more than 50% of waking hours. 3: Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4 - Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5 - Dead. A deterioration of ECOG is an increase of 1 of the ECOG PS without improvement back to initial level at a subsequent time of measurement.

Time frame: 2, 4, 6, 9 months

Population: All randomized patients were included in the Full Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Everolimus + ExemestaneProportion of Patients With no Deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Using Kaplan-Meier2 Months0.84 Proportion of patients
Everolimus + ExemestaneProportion of Patients With no Deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Using Kaplan-Meier4 Months0.74 Proportion of patients
Everolimus + ExemestaneProportion of Patients With no Deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Using Kaplan-Meier6 Months0.64 Proportion of patients
Everolimus + ExemestaneProportion of Patients With no Deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Using Kaplan-Meier9 Months0.57 Proportion of patients
Placebo + ExemestaneProportion of Patients With no Deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Using Kaplan-Meier9 Months0.47 Proportion of patients
Placebo + ExemestaneProportion of Patients With no Deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Using Kaplan-Meier2 Months0.87 Proportion of patients
Placebo + ExemestaneProportion of Patients With no Deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Using Kaplan-Meier6 Months0.67 Proportion of patients
Placebo + ExemestaneProportion of Patients With no Deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) Using Kaplan-Meier4 Months0.80 Proportion of patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 27, 2026