Skip to content

Concentration and Activity of Lapatinib in Vestibular Schwannomas

Exploration and Estimation of Intratumoral Concentration and Activity of Lapatinib in Vivo in Vestibular Schwannomas

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00863122
Enrollment
26
Registered
2009-03-17
Start date
2009-06-30
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2021-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acoustic Neuroma, Auditory Tumor, Neurofibromatosis 2, NF2, Vestibular Schwannoma

Keywords

Lapatinib, Tykerb, EGFR inhibitor, ErbB2 inhibitor, Pharmacokinetics

Brief summary

Tumors can grow on the auditory nerves and can cause hearing loss. A common type of tumor that does this is a vestibular schwannoma (VS), or acoustic neuroma. These tumors are not cancerous. Most often, people have only one VS. Occasionally, people have more than one VS and may have a condition called neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). Because VS can cause hearing loss, many people with VS will have treatment to preserve their hearing. This treatment usually involves surgery or radiation therapy. There are risks to these procedures, and sometimes they do not work to prevent hearing loss. Because surgery and radiation have risks and are not able to help everyone with VS, other methods of treatment are being explored. One area of exploration is looking to see if there is a drug that can be taken that might prevent the VS from growing larger and causing hearing loss, and might possibly even cause the VS to shrink in size. This study is exploring whether a drug that is approved by the FDA and is currently used to treat breast cancer might also work to treat VS. This study will measure the amount of drug that travels from the bloodstream and arrives at the tumor. This drug is safe and has few side effects. If this drug is shown to reach the tumor, it might be used in the future to treat VS without needing surgery or radiation. This study is recruiting people who are having surgery for VS. If you are going to have surgery to treat a VS, you may be eligible to participate.

Detailed description

Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is a rare autosomal dominant genetic disorder with an incidence of approximately 1/40,000. The most common tumor type in NF2 is vestibular schwannoma and the majority of NF2 patients develop progressive hearing loss in adolescence or young adulthood due to bilateral vestibular schwannoma (VS). In addition to hearing loss, VS can cause significant morbidity, and in some cases mortality, due to brain stem compression. Currently, the only accepted modality for treatment of VS in patients with NF2 is surgical resection. Although surgical resection is effective at tumor reduction, it is often associated with morbid complications such as hearing loss, facial palsy, CSF leaks, chronic headache and infection. In addition, the tumors often recur after surgery. Radiation therapy (RT) has been proposed as an alternative, however, its safety in the NF2 population has not been established and there is concern about long term efficacy. For a distinct population of NF2 patients, surgery and RT at not feasible and no additional therapy is currently available. Hence, a systemic therapy is needed. Sporadic VS are common with roughly 3,000 new cases per year in the United States and a growing incidence in recent years. These tumors cause unilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, and vertigo. The primary treatment modality for these tumors is surgical resection or radiosurgery. Surgery is associated with the same complications listed above for NF2-related VS. Hence, RT is often offered in place of surgery. Although considered safe in sporadic VS, it may not have good long term efficacy and may complicate future procedures. Again, a systemic therapy that could control tumor progression obviating the need for an invasive procedure is needed. As the understanding of tumor molecular biology continues to advance, there are an increasing number of attractive targets for VS growth inhibition. EGFR and ErbB2 have been identified as important targets for VS. In a study of 21 sporadic and 17 NF2-related VS samples, both EGFR and ErbB2 were found to be upregulated in the majority of tumors. In addition, an anti-ErbB2 monoclonal antibody reduced schwannoma cell proliferation in vitro. Collectively, this data suggests that abnormal signaling via EGFR and ErbB2 is a major contributor to tumor growth and progression in both sporadic and NF2-related VS, and that inhibition of this signaling pathway can result in decreased tumor growth. Although agents targeting these pathways are commercially available, there is little pre-clinical data to assist in prioritizing which agents to advance to clinical trials. Given the relative rarity of the disorder and the enormous patient, financial and time commitments an efficacy study requires, there is a need to carefully select agents for testing that have the best chance of success. In this trial, we propose to assess the delivery of lapatinib, a commercially available inhibitor of ErbB2 and EGFR, to VS via tissue sampling at the time of clinically indicated surgery. Demonstrating that lapatinib reaches meaningful intratumoral concentrations is important data to recommend this drug above other small molecule inhibitors for efficacy trials for VS. The primary objective is to determine the steady state concentration of lapatinib in VS in patients with NF2 and in patients with sporadic VS. Patient who are planning to have surgical resection of their tumor for clinical indications will be given lapatinib for 15 days prior to resection. At the time of resection, VS tissue will be assessed for drug concentration and molecular markers of drug activity. Demonstrating that lapatinib reaches meaningful concentrations within VS would support selecting this agent for investigation in efficacy studies for VS, and tissue-based molecular studies will provide corollary information about the behavior of VS in general and about lapatinib specifically in VS tissue. This may further our understanding of the pathophysiology of VS, the similarities and differences between NF2-related and sporadic VS, and inform the design of subsequent efficacy trials.

Interventions

DRUGlapatinib

1500 mg lapatinib by mouth per day for 10 days

Sponsors

The Children's Tumor Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
GlaxoSmithKline
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
New York University
CollaboratorOTHER
Ohio State University
CollaboratorOTHER
House Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Washington University School of Medicine
CollaboratorOTHER
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
CollaboratorOTHER
Massachusetts General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Meet diagnostic criteria for NF2 including presence of bilateral VS or idiopathic VS without evidence of genetic syndrome. * VS surgery determined clinically necessary by the treating physician and scheduled within 4 weeks. * Normal cardiac left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by multiple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan or transthoracic echocardiogram. * Karnofsky performance status 60% (i.e. the patient must be able to care for himself/herself with occasional help from others). * Must have the following hematologic, renal and liver function: Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,000/mm³ (unsupported); platelet count ≥ 75,000/mm³ (unsupported); hemoglobin ≥ 8 g/dL (transfusion support allowed); Creatinine ≤ 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) OR glomerular filtration rate ≥ 70 ml/min; Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times ULN; ALT ≤ 2.5 times ULN. * Be able to provide written informed consent. * Any neurologic deficits must be stable for ≥ 1 week. * Be able to swallow tablets. * Subjects with the potential for pregnancy or impregnating their partner must agree to follow acceptable birth control methods to avoid conception. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test. * Suspend the use of P450 inducing or P450 suppressing agents for a minimum of 10 days prior to starting lapatinib.

Exclusion criteria

* Serious concurrent infection or medical illness, which would jeopardize the ability of the patient to receive the treatment outlined in this protocol with reasonable safety. * Pregnant or breast-feeding. * Receiving concurrent therapy for their tumor (i.e. chemotherapeutics or investigational agents, radiation or immunotherapy) within 4 weeks of the first dose of the study drug. * Concurrent or prior malignancy, other than curatively treated carcinoma-in-situ or basal cell carcinoma of the skin. Subjects who have been free of disease (any prior malignancy) for five years are eligible for this study. * Received cytochrome P450-inducing anticonvulsants (EIADs; e.g., phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, primidone, oxcarbazepine) or similar agents (e.g., rifampin) or P450 inhibiting agents (Ketoconazole, Itraconazole, Clarithromycin, Atazanavir, Indinavir, Nefazodone, Nelfinavir, Ritonavir, Saquinavir, Telithromycin, Voriconazole) within 10 days prior to starting lapatinib. * Significant gastrointestinal disorder(s)(e.g., Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, extensive gastric resection). * Neurologic deficits that are rapidly progressing. * Known cardiac disease (either arrhythmia or congestive heart failure) requiring treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Median Steady-state Lapatinib Plasma Concentrations at the Time of Surgical ResectionAt time of surgery, 10-13 days from starting drug.Steady-state plasma concentrations of lapatinib (ng/mL) at time of surgery, 10-13 days from starting drug.
To Assess Whether Lapatinib Can Reach a Minimum Tumor Concentration Level of >3uM in VS After Oral Dosing.one yearCount of tissue samples with lapatinib concentration \>3uM

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assess the Level of ErbB2 Phosphorylation in VS.at time of surgeryAssessed number of samples with high expression of phospho-ErbB2 in tissue at time of surgery
Assess Markers of Tumor Proliferation and Cell Death in VS After Exposure to Lapatinib.At time of surgery
Explore the Difference in the Concentration of Lapatinib Achieved in NF2-related Versus Idiopathic VS.one yearA comparison in the median lapatinib concentration (ng/g) in vestibular schwannomas associated with neurofibromatosis type 2 and sporadic vestibular schwannomas
Perform NF2 Gene Mutation Analysis Via Exon Scanning and MLPA as Well as Protein Expression in All VS and Explore Differences Between Sporadic and NF2 Related VS.at time of surgeryDue to the sample sizes, a comparison between sporadic and NF2-related vestibular schwannomas could not be made. Instead we report the mutational status.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

All patients undergoing surgery for vestibular schwannoma resection who met eligibility criteria were invited to participate

Pre-assignment details

Patients could enroll on control (no drug) or lapatinib arms. 20 people were consented for the the lapatinib arm, but one patient withdrew consent prior to completion of eligibility screening and enrollment. So 19 patients enrolled on the lapatinib arm.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lapatinib
Subjects received lapatinib for 1500 mg by mouth daily for 10 days prior to surgery for vestibular schwannoma resection
19
Control
Control subjects did not receive any intervention prior to surgery for vestibular schwannoma resection
7
Total26

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLapatinibControlTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
19 Participants7 Participants26 Participants
Age, Continuous44 years40 years43.5 years
Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS)90 units on a scale (percent)90 units on a scale (percent)
Patients with a diagnosis of NF29 participants0 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
19 participants7 participants26 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants6 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants1 Participants5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 190 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Median Steady-state Lapatinib Plasma Concentrations at the Time of Surgical Resection

Steady-state plasma concentrations of lapatinib (ng/mL) at time of surgery, 10-13 days from starting drug.

Time frame: At time of surgery, 10-13 days from starting drug.

Population: In the lapatinib group, 10 tissue and plasma samples were lost from analysis due to a freezer failure during a natural disaster denaturing the samples. 1 blood sample was contaminated, but tissue was available. Control group did not get any drug. A total of 8 participants of 19 given drug had data for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LapatinibMedian Steady-state Lapatinib Plasma Concentrations at the Time of Surgical Resection3149 ng/mL
Primary

To Assess Whether Lapatinib Can Reach a Minimum Tumor Concentration Level of >3uM in VS After Oral Dosing.

Count of tissue samples with lapatinib concentration \>3uM

Time frame: one year

Population: In the lapatinib group, 10 tissue and plasma samples were lost from analysis due to a freezer failure during a natural disaster denaturing the samples. Nine samples were available for tissue concentration assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LapatinibTo Assess Whether Lapatinib Can Reach a Minimum Tumor Concentration Level of >3uM in VS After Oral Dosing.7 Participants
Secondary

Assess Markers of Tumor Proliferation and Cell Death in VS After Exposure to Lapatinib.

Time frame: At time of surgery

Population: The experiment to assess this outcome measure failed and no interpretable data could be collected.

Secondary

Assess the Level of ErbB2 Phosphorylation in VS.

Assessed number of samples with high expression of phospho-ErbB2 in tissue at time of surgery

Time frame: at time of surgery

Population: 10 lapatinib participants and 3 control participants did not have adequate tissue for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LapatinibAssess the Level of ErbB2 Phosphorylation in VS.5 Participants
ControlAssess the Level of ErbB2 Phosphorylation in VS.2 Participants
Secondary

Explore the Difference in the Concentration of Lapatinib Achieved in NF2-related Versus Idiopathic VS.

A comparison in the median lapatinib concentration (ng/g) in vestibular schwannomas associated with neurofibromatosis type 2 and sporadic vestibular schwannomas

Time frame: one year

Population: Of the nine participants in the lapatinib who had tumor available for analysis, four had a vestibular schwnannoma associated with a diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2); five had sporadic vestibular schwannomas.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LapatinibExplore the Difference in the Concentration of Lapatinib Achieved in NF2-related Versus Idiopathic VS.8367 ng/g
ControlExplore the Difference in the Concentration of Lapatinib Achieved in NF2-related Versus Idiopathic VS.4502 ng/g
Secondary

Perform NF2 Gene Mutation Analysis Via Exon Scanning and MLPA as Well as Protein Expression in All VS and Explore Differences Between Sporadic and NF2 Related VS.

Due to the sample sizes, a comparison between sporadic and NF2-related vestibular schwannomas could not be made. Instead we report the mutational status.

Time frame: at time of surgery

Population: 6 of the 7 participants had sporadic VS; 1 of 7 had NF2-associated VS. As such, we were unable to explore differences between the groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LapatinibPerform NF2 Gene Mutation Analysis Via Exon Scanning and MLPA as Well as Protein Expression in All VS and Explore Differences Between Sporadic and NF2 Related VS.Hemizygous deletion in NF2 gene4 Participants
LapatinibPerform NF2 Gene Mutation Analysis Via Exon Scanning and MLPA as Well as Protein Expression in All VS and Explore Differences Between Sporadic and NF2 Related VS.Homozygous deletion in NF2 gene1 Participants
LapatinibPerform NF2 Gene Mutation Analysis Via Exon Scanning and MLPA as Well as Protein Expression in All VS and Explore Differences Between Sporadic and NF2 Related VS.No deletion in NF2 gene2 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026