Skip to content

Quality of Life During Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C (P05278/MK-4031-336)

Evaluation of the Health-Related Quality of Life During Combined Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis Due to Hepatitis C Virus Under Habitual Clinical Practise Conditions.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00863109
Acronym
VIDA
Enrollment
133
Registered
2009-03-17
Start date
2009-04-30
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2017-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Genotype 1, HCV-1, Hepatitis C, Chronic

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of chronic hepatitis C (CHC), and the treatment thereof with peginterferon alpha-2b (PEG) and ribavirin (RBV) according to standard clinical practice, on the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of a cohort of participants throughout 72 weeks of follow-up. HRQL was assessed using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-Hepatitis C Virus (CLDQ-HCV).

Detailed description

As widely shown in previous reports Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) patients commonly experience fatigue, anxiety, and depression. These symptoms negatively affect patients' functional health, ability to work, self-perceived health, HRQL and well-being. Psychosocial issues and reduced HRQL are frequently experienced by HCV patients. HCV patients have more HRQL impairment than the general population. There is some evidence that HCV patients who experience greater fatigue, greater psychiatric symptoms, and poorer HRQL are more likely to discontinue treatment prematurely, with a negative impact on virological response. In addition to well-known side effects of interferon, one important determinant of HRQL during anti-viral therapy for HCV is development of RBV-induced anemia. Treatment of anemia improves HRQL, potentially impacting adherence to antiviral regimen and improving virologic response. These issues emphasize the importance of investigating the physical and psychosocial experiences and HRQL of HCV patients. The sample size of the study must allow evaluating HRQL of HCV patients based on the SF-36 before PEG treatment and at each of the following study visits. To be able to detect differences of or over 4.2 points in the vitality dimension between the basal visit and following visits, estimating a standard deviation of 22 points, a statistical power of 80%, and a level of significance of 0.05, 216 patients will be needed. Considering a loss of follow up of 15%, a total of 238 patients are planned for this study.

Interventions

Pegylated interferon alfa-2b was administered in accordance with the dosage and pattern prescribed by each participant's physician (standard clinical practice).

DRUGRibavirin (RBV)

Ribavirin was administered in accordance with the dosage and pattern prescribed by each participant's physician (standard clinical practice).

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) * Participants with HCV genotype 1 * Participants who, at the time of the study, are referred to the Hospital Pharmacy Service to begin treatment with PEG and RBV for 48 weeks * Available to understand and to give Informed Consent

Exclusion criteria

\- Participants co-infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) or Hepatitis B Virus (HBV)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresBaseline, Week 72SF-36 is a generic 36-item questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) covering 2 summary measures: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). The SF-36 consists of 8 subscales. The PCS is represented by 4 subscales: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, and general health perception. The MCS is represented by 4 subscales: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Participants self-report on items in a subscale that have between 2-6 choices per item using Likert-type responses (e.g. none of the time, some of the time, etc.). Summations of item scores of the same subscale give the subscale scores, which are transformed into a range from 0 to 100; zero= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. PCS and MCS scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score; higher scores indicate better health status.
Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-Hepatitis C Virus (CLDQ-HCV)Baseline, Week 72The CLDQ-HCV is a disease-specific questionnaire measuring HRQL that contains 29 items divided into 4 domains: emotional function (9 items), worry (6 items), systemic symptoms (8 items) and activity/energy (6 items). All items refer to the previous 2 weeks and are rated on a 7 point Likert scale, with 1 corresponding to the maximum frequency (all of the time) and 7 to the minimum (none of the time). Domain scores are the means of the items contained. A summary score is calculated by the mean of all domain scores (CLDQ-HCV Global). Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in SF-36 ScoresFrom Baseline Visit to Final Visit (up to 72 weeks)SF-36 is a 36-item questionnaire measuring HRQL covering 2 summary measures, PCS and MCS. The SF-36 consists of 8 subscales. PCS is represented by physical function, role limitations-physical, pain, and general health perception. MCS is represented by vitality, social function, role limitations-emotional, and mental health. Subscale items are summed and scaled from 0-100 to give subscale scores; 0= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. PCS and MCS summary scores are constructed as T-scores (mean =50, standard deviation=10) with no minimum or maximum score; higher scores indicate better health status. MCID was defined as the difference in questionnaire scores between baseline and final visits for those participants who had stated that their health status had changed at the end of the study (improved in one category of health status as perceived by themselves). The MCID was calculated for each subscale of the SF-36 and for PCS and MCS.
Change From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Baseline, Week 72SF-36 is a generic 36-item questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) covering 2 summary measures: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). The SF-36 consists of 8 subscales. The PCS is represented by 4 subscales: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, and general health perception. The MCS is represented by 4 subscales: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Participants self-report on items in a subscale that have between 2-6 choices per item using Likert-type responses (e.g. none of the time, some of the time, etc.). Summations of item scores of the same subscale give the subscale scores, which are transformed into a range from 0 to 100; zero= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. PCS and MCS scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score; higher scores indicate better health status.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Compliant With Treatment According To Medication Count (Subset Analysis)From Baseline Visit to Final Visit (up to 72 weeks)Compliance was calculated as the amount of dispensed medication minus the amount of medication returned by participants divided by amount of dispensed medication.
MCID in CLDQ-HCV ScoresFrom Baseline Visit to Final Visit (up to 72 weeks)The CLDQ-HCV is a disease-specific questionnaire measuring HRQL that contains 29 items divided into 4 domains: emotional function (9 items), worry (6 items), systemic symptoms (8 items) and activity/energy (6 items). All items refer to the previous 2 weeks and are rated on a 7 point Likert scale, with 1 corresponding to the maximum frequency (all of the time) and 7 to the minimum (none of the time). Domain scores are the means of the items contained. A summary score is calculated by the mean of all domain scores (CLDQ-HCV Global). Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. MCID was defined as the difference in questionnaire scores between baseline and final visits for those participants who had stated that their health status had changed at the end of the study (improved in one category of health status perceived by themselves). The MCID was calculated for each domain of the CLDQ-HCV and for the CLDQ-HCV summary score.
Change From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in CLDQ-HCV Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Baseline, Week 72The CLDQ-HCV is a disease-specific questionnaire measuring quality of life that contains 29 items divided into 4 domains: emotional function (9 items), worry (6 items), systemic symptoms (8 items) and activity/energy (6 items). All items refer to the previous 2 weeks and are rated on a 7 point Likert scale, with 1 corresponding to the maximum frequency (all of the time) and 7 to the minimum (none of the time). Domain scores are the means of the items contained. A summary score is calculated by the mean of all domain scores (CLDQ-HCV Global). Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Of 133 participants who enrolled on study, 3 participants failed screening and 130 were evaluable for this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)
Participants receive PEG and RBV in combination therapy for 48 weeks according to standard clinical practice followed by 24 weeks of observation.
130
Total130

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)
Age, Continuous47.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
63 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
67 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
116 / 130
serious
Total, serious adverse events
12 / 130

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scores

SF-36 is a generic 36-item questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) covering 2 summary measures: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). The SF-36 consists of 8 subscales. The PCS is represented by 4 subscales: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, and general health perception. The MCS is represented by 4 subscales: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Participants self-report on items in a subscale that have between 2-6 choices per item using Likert-type responses (e.g. none of the time, some of the time, etc.). Summations of item scores of the same subscale give the subscale scores, which are transformed into a range from 0 to 100; zero= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. PCS and MCS scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score; higher scores indicate better health status.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 72

Population: All Evaluable Participants (participants who had met the evaluation and eligibility criteria and were included in the study) who had SF-36 data available at baseline and Week 72.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical Function-WK72 (n=45)87.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.08
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical Function Change from BL (n=45)-1.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.3
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain-WK72 (n=46)82.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.41
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain Change from BL (n=46)-2.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.09
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral Health-BL (n=122)62.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.83
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral Health-WK72 (n=46)66.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.24
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresGeneral Health Change from BL (n=46)1.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.52
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial Function-WK72 (n=46)86.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.71
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresMental Health-BL (n=121)71.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.7
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresMental Health-WK72 (n=45)74.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.29
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresMental Health Change from BL (n=45)1.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.38
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPCS-BL (n=121)50.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.9
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPCS-WK72 (n=45)50.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.82
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPCS Change from BL (n=45)-0.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.38
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresMCS-WK72 (n=45)49.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.26
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical Function-BL (n=123)87.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.67
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical Role-BL (n=123)81.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 36.08
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical Role-WK72 (n=45)86.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.48
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPhysical Role Change from BL (n=45)-0.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.15
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresPain-BL (n=126)77.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.96
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresVitality-BL (n=121)67.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.23
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresVitality-WK72 (n=45)68.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.8
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresVitality Change from BL (n=45)-4.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.51
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial Function-BL (n=126)81.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.75
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresSocial Function Change from BL (n=46)2.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.56
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional Role-BL (n=123)79.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.63
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional Role-WK72 (n=45)87.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.39
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresEmotional Role Change from BL (n=45)1.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 39.54
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresMCS-BL (n=121)47.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.05
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) ScoresMCS Change from BL (n=45)0.54 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.51
Primary

Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-Hepatitis C Virus (CLDQ-HCV)

The CLDQ-HCV is a disease-specific questionnaire measuring HRQL that contains 29 items divided into 4 domains: emotional function (9 items), worry (6 items), systemic symptoms (8 items) and activity/energy (6 items). All items refer to the previous 2 weeks and are rated on a 7 point Likert scale, with 1 corresponding to the maximum frequency (all of the time) and 7 to the minimum (none of the time). Domain scores are the means of the items contained. A summary score is calculated by the mean of all domain scores (CLDQ-HCV Global). Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 72

Population: All Evaluable Participants (participants who had met the evaluation and eligibility criteria and were included in the study) who had CLDQ-HCV data available at baseline and Week 72.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-Hepatitis C Virus (CLDQ-HCV)Activity/Energy-BL (n=125)5.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.33
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-Hepatitis C Virus (CLDQ-HCV)Activity/Energy-WK72 (n=46)5.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.11
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-Hepatitis C Virus (CLDQ-HCV)Activity/Energy Change from BL (n=46)-0.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.16
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-Hepatitis C Virus (CLDQ-HCV)Emotional Function Change from BL (n=46)0.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-Hepatitis C Virus (CLDQ-HCV)Worry-BL (n=125)5.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.25
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-Hepatitis C Virus (CLDQ-HCV)Worry-WK72 (n=46)5.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.46
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-Hepatitis C Virus (CLDQ-HCV)CLDQ-HCV Global Change from BL (n=46)0.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-Hepatitis C Virus (CLDQ-HCV)Emotional Function-BL (n=125)5.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-Hepatitis C Virus (CLDQ-HCV)Emotional Function-WK72 (n=46)5.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.97
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-Hepatitis C Virus (CLDQ-HCV)Worry Change from BL (n=46)0.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.21
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-Hepatitis C Virus (CLDQ-HCV)Systemic Symptoms-BL (n=125)5.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.18
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-Hepatitis C Virus (CLDQ-HCV)Systemic Symptoms-WK72 (n=46)5.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-Hepatitis C Virus (CLDQ-HCV)Systemic Symptoms Change from BL (n=46)0.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-Hepatitis C Virus (CLDQ-HCV)CLDQ-HCV Global -BL (n=125)5.31 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.06
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline (BL) to Week 72 (WK72) in Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-Hepatitis C Virus (CLDQ-HCV)CLDQ-HCV Global-WK72 (n=46)5.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Comparison: Within-group comparison of Worry domain between BL Visit and WK72 Visitp-value: 0.027Student´s t-test for paired samples
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in CLDQ-HCV Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)

The CLDQ-HCV is a disease-specific questionnaire measuring quality of life that contains 29 items divided into 4 domains: emotional function (9 items), worry (6 items), systemic symptoms (8 items) and activity/energy (6 items). All items refer to the previous 2 weeks and are rated on a 7 point Likert scale, with 1 corresponding to the maximum frequency (all of the time) and 7 to the minimum (none of the time). Domain scores are the means of the items contained. A summary score is calculated by the mean of all domain scores (CLDQ-HCV Global). Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 72

Population: All Evaluable Participants (participants who had met the evaluation and eligibility criteria and were included in the study) who had CLDQ-HCV data available at baseline and Week 72. Analysis Population included 38 participants who completed 48 weeks of treatment and 8 participants who did not complete 48 weeks of treatment (early end).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in CLDQ-HCV Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Activity/Energy (n=38, n=8)0.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in CLDQ-HCV Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Emotional Function (n=38, n=8)0.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in CLDQ-HCV Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Worry (n=38, n=8)0.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.18
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in CLDQ-HCV Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)CLDQ-HCV Global (n=38, n=8)0.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in CLDQ-HCV Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Systemic Symptoms (n=38, n=8)0.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice): Early End of TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in CLDQ-HCV Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Worry (n=38, n=8)-0.58 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice): Early End of TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in CLDQ-HCV Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Activity/Energy (n=38, n=8)-0.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.07
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice): Early End of TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in CLDQ-HCV Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Systemic Symptoms (n=38, n=8)-0.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice): Early End of TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in CLDQ-HCV Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Emotional Function (n=38, n=8)-0.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.72
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice): Early End of TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in CLDQ-HCV Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)CLDQ-HCV Global (n=38, n=8)-0.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
Comparison: Between-group comparison of change from baseline in Emotional Function domainp-value: 0.014Student´s t-test for paired samples
Comparison: Between-group comparison of change from baseline in Worry domainp-value: 0.009Student´s t-test for paired samples
Comparison: Between-group comparison of change from baseline in CLDQ-HCV Global domainp-value: 0.022Student´s t-test for paired samples
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)

SF-36 is a generic 36-item questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life (HRQL) covering 2 summary measures: physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). The SF-36 consists of 8 subscales. The PCS is represented by 4 subscales: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, and general health perception. The MCS is represented by 4 subscales: vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Participants self-report on items in a subscale that have between 2-6 choices per item using Likert-type responses (e.g. none of the time, some of the time, etc.). Summations of item scores of the same subscale give the subscale scores, which are transformed into a range from 0 to 100; zero= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. PCS and MCS scores are constructed as a T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 and no minimum or maximum score; higher scores indicate better health status.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 72

Population: All Evaluable Participants (participants who had met the evaluation and eligibility criteria and were included in the study) who had SF-36 data available at baseline and Week 72. Analysis Population included 38 participants who completed 48 weeks of treatment and 8 participants who did not complete 48 weeks of treatment (early end).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Physical Function (n=37, n=8)-1.08 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.88
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Physical Role (n=37, n=8)-1.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 38.62
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Pain (n=38, n=8)-3.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.32
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)General Health (n=38, n=8)4.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.38
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Mental Health (n=37, n=8)3.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.41
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Vitality (n=37, n=8)-1.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.54
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Social Function (n=38, n=8)4.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.4
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Emotional Role (n=37, n=8)4.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 40.19
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)PCS (n=37, n=8)-1.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.51
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Change From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)MCS (n=37, n=8)2.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.01
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice): Early End of TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)PCS (n=37, n=8)0.59 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice): Early End of TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)MCS (n=37, n=8)-7.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.36
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice): Early End of TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Physical Role (n=37, n=8)3.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.84
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice): Early End of TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Physical Function (n=37, n=8)-3.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.43
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice): Early End of TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Pain (n=38, n=8)4.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.75
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice): Early End of TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Social Function (n=38, n=8)-9.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.86
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice): Early End of TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)General Health (n=38, n=8)-10.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.42
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice): Early End of TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Vitality (n=37, n=8)-15.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.09
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice): Early End of TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Emotional Role (n=37, n=8)-12.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.36
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice): Early End of TreatmentChange From Baseline to Week 72 (WK72) in SF-36 Scores Among Participants Who Completed Treatment and Participants Who Had Early End of Treatment (Subset Analysis)Mental Health (n=37, n=8)-9.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.38
Comparison: Between-group comparison of change from baseline in MCSp-value: 0.038Student´s t-test for paired samples
Secondary

MCID in CLDQ-HCV Scores

The CLDQ-HCV is a disease-specific questionnaire measuring HRQL that contains 29 items divided into 4 domains: emotional function (9 items), worry (6 items), systemic symptoms (8 items) and activity/energy (6 items). All items refer to the previous 2 weeks and are rated on a 7 point Likert scale, with 1 corresponding to the maximum frequency (all of the time) and 7 to the minimum (none of the time). Domain scores are the means of the items contained. A summary score is calculated by the mean of all domain scores (CLDQ-HCV Global). Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. MCID was defined as the difference in questionnaire scores between baseline and final visits for those participants who had stated that their health status had changed at the end of the study (improved in one category of health status perceived by themselves). The MCID was calculated for each domain of the CLDQ-HCV and for the CLDQ-HCV summary score.

Time frame: From Baseline Visit to Final Visit (up to 72 weeks)

Population: All Evaluable Participants (participants who had met the evaluation and eligibility criteria and were included in the study) who had improved in one category of health status as perceived by themselves.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)MCID in CLDQ-HCV ScoresEmotional Function0.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.64
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)MCID in CLDQ-HCV ScoresWorry1.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.84
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)MCID in CLDQ-HCV ScoresSystemic Symptoms0.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)MCID in CLDQ-HCV ScoresCLDQ-HCV Global0.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)MCID in CLDQ-HCV ScoresActivity/Energy0.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.58
Secondary

Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in SF-36 Scores

SF-36 is a 36-item questionnaire measuring HRQL covering 2 summary measures, PCS and MCS. The SF-36 consists of 8 subscales. PCS is represented by physical function, role limitations-physical, pain, and general health perception. MCS is represented by vitality, social function, role limitations-emotional, and mental health. Subscale items are summed and scaled from 0-100 to give subscale scores; 0= worst HRQL, 100=best HRQL. PCS and MCS summary scores are constructed as T-scores (mean =50, standard deviation=10) with no minimum or maximum score; higher scores indicate better health status. MCID was defined as the difference in questionnaire scores between baseline and final visits for those participants who had stated that their health status had changed at the end of the study (improved in one category of health status as perceived by themselves). The MCID was calculated for each subscale of the SF-36 and for PCS and MCS.

Time frame: From Baseline Visit to Final Visit (up to 72 weeks)

Population: All Evaluable Participants (participants who had met the evaluation and eligibility criteria and were included in the study) who had improved in one category of health status as perceived by themselves.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in SF-36 ScoresPhysical Role3.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 50.89
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in SF-36 ScoresPain-0.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 39
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in SF-36 ScoresGeneral Health6.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.31
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in SF-36 ScoresVitality4.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.64
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in SF-36 ScoresSocial Function-5.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.47
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in SF-36 ScoresEmotional Role14.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.8
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in SF-36 ScoresMental Health4.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.35
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in SF-36 ScoresMCS2.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.43
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in SF-36 ScoresPhysical Function4.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.44
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in SF-36 ScoresPCS0.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.76
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were Compliant With Treatment According To Medication Count (Subset Analysis)

Compliance was calculated as the amount of dispensed medication minus the amount of medication returned by participants divided by amount of dispensed medication.

Time frame: From Baseline Visit to Final Visit (up to 72 weeks)

Population: All Evaluable Participants; participants who had met the evaluation and eligibility criteria and were included in the study. Analysis Population included 53 participants who completed 48 weeks of treatment and 77 participants who did not complete 48 weeks of treatment (early end).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Percentage of Participants Who Were Compliant With Treatment According To Medication Count (Subset Analysis)PEG98.1 percentage of participants 1.17
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Percentage of Participants Who Were Compliant With Treatment According To Medication Count (Subset Analysis)PEG + RBV81.1 percentage of participants 1.18
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice)Percentage of Participants Who Were Compliant With Treatment According To Medication Count (Subset Analysis)RBV81.1 percentage of participants 0.83
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice): Early End of TreatmentPercentage of Participants Who Were Compliant With Treatment According To Medication Count (Subset Analysis)PEG + RBV0 percentage of participants 0.82
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice): Early End of TreatmentPercentage of Participants Who Were Compliant With Treatment According To Medication Count (Subset Analysis)PEG0 percentage of participants 1.07
PEG + RBV (Standard Clinical Practice): Early End of TreatmentPercentage of Participants Who Were Compliant With Treatment According To Medication Count (Subset Analysis)RBV0 percentage of participants 0.72

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026