Skip to content

Predictor for an Additional Benefit of Inhaled Corticosteroid in Patients Treated With Tiotropium for COPD

Predictor for an Additional Benefit of Inhaled Corticosteroid in Patients Treated With Tiotropium for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00860938
Enrollment
90
Registered
2009-03-13
Start date
2007-04-30
Completion date
2010-10-31
Last updated
2019-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COPD

Keywords

Inhaled corticosteroids, COPD, mannitol

Brief summary

Study purpose is to evaluate if subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are more likely to be responsive to additional inhaled corticosteroids if they have a positive response to hyperosmolar challenge with mannitol than if their response is negative.

Detailed description

In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is controversial. Preliminary results of our recent pilot study in 30 COPD patients showed for the first time, that ICS response mey be predicted by a bronchoprovocation challenge test with mannitol. However, this finding needs to be proven in a placebo-controlled trial. For this cohort study, 100 corticosteroid-naive, non reversible (FEV1) patients with COPD will be recruited. Spirometry before and after bronchodilation will be measured at study entry and at four weeks run-in (only tiotropium) and at three month of treatment with tiotropium and ICS or placebo. Quality of life (St. George Respiratory Quality of Life Questionnaire) and exacerbation rate of COPD will be assessed. Measurement of exhaled nitric oxide and mannitol challenge will be performed at study entry and at 1 and 4 month. Primary endpoint will be improvement in FEV1 in each group (positive and negative mannitol challenge) after 3 months follow up. Secondary endpoints will be the difference in dose-response-curve in the mannitol challenge, exacerbation rate and change in quality of life after three month follow-up.

Interventions

DRUGBudesonide

After 4 weeks of inhalative therapy with tiotropium (all patients), patient get randomized to receive either inhalative budesonide (1600ug per day or placebo

Sponsors

Cantonal Hosptal, Baselland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* FEV1/FVC \< 70% * FEV1 % predicted \> 60%

Exclusion criteria

* Other major disease * Asthma * Currently taking inhaled corticosteroids * oral corticosteroids in the last 3 month * significant cardiovascular disease * pregnancy/breast feeding * current use of salmeterol or other long acting bronchodilator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in Lung Function (FEV1)12 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Proportion Who Complete Follow-up Without Developing an Exacerbation12 weeks
Change in Quality of Life12 weeks, baseline to 3 months follow-upSt. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Disease-specific instrument designed to measure impact on overall health, daily life, and perceived well-being in patients with obstructive airways disease. Scores are calculated for three domains: Part I (Symptoms): several scales; Part II (Activity and Impacts): dichotomous (true/false) except last question (4-point Likert scale) Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations. Unit of Measure = Units on a scale A minimum change in score of 4 units was established as clinically relevant after patient and clinician testing. Based on empirical data and interviews with patients, a mean change score of 4 units is associated with slightly efficacious treatment, 8 units for moderately efficacious change and 12 units for very efficacious treatment. The higher the change in units, the better the treatment.
Change in logRDR Mannitol12 weeks

Countries

Switzerland

Participant flow

Recruitment details

out patient clinic

Pre-assignment details

run-in

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Budesonide31
Placebo37
Total68

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBudesonidePlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
18 Participants23 Participants41 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
13 Participants14 Participants27 Participants
Age, Continuous60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22
61.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20
FEV1/FVC63 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
64 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
64 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
31 participants37 participants68 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants19 Participants31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants18 Participants37 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 312 / 37
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 312 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Lung Function (FEV1)

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BudesonideChange in Lung Function (FEV1)0.05 litresStandard Deviation 0.01
PlaceboChange in Lung Function (FEV1)-0.05 litresStandard Deviation 0.01
Secondary

Change in logRDR Mannitol

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BudesonideChange in logRDR Mannitol0.12 %/mgStandard Deviation 0.1
PlaceboChange in logRDR Mannitol-0.09 %/mgStandard Deviation 0.01
Secondary

Change in Quality of Life

St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Disease-specific instrument designed to measure impact on overall health, daily life, and perceived well-being in patients with obstructive airways disease. Scores are calculated for three domains: Part I (Symptoms): several scales; Part II (Activity and Impacts): dichotomous (true/false) except last question (4-point Likert scale) Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations. Unit of Measure = Units on a scale A minimum change in score of 4 units was established as clinically relevant after patient and clinician testing. Based on empirical data and interviews with patients, a mean change score of 4 units is associated with slightly efficacious treatment, 8 units for moderately efficacious change and 12 units for very efficacious treatment. The higher the change in units, the better the treatment.

Time frame: 12 weeks, baseline to 3 months follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BudesonideChange in Quality of Life5.1 unitsStandard Deviation 5.8
PlaceboChange in Quality of Life1.8 unitsStandard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

The Proportion Who Complete Follow-up Without Developing an Exacerbation

Time frame: 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BudesonideThe Proportion Who Complete Follow-up Without Developing an Exacerbation31 number of participants
PlaceboThe Proportion Who Complete Follow-up Without Developing an Exacerbation37 number of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026