Skip to content

Outreach for Patients That Are Newly Eligible for Colorectal Cancer Screening

Using Precision Performance Measurement To Conduct Focused Quality Improvement. Sub-study 2

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00860249
Acronym
UPQUAL
Enrollment
60
Registered
2009-03-12
Start date
2009-03-31
Completion date
2009-12-31
Last updated
2011-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

education, preventive service, screening, Colorectal Cancer Screening, Prevention & Control

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether patient outreach is effective at increasing compliance with preventative screenings for those patients who, based on national quality standards, have become newly eligible for screening measures. We hypothesize that educational outreach may increase completion rates.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALLetter Only

Prior to a scheduled upcoming appointment, participants will get a letter signed by their physician that provides brief information about colorectal cancer (CRC) and notes the importance of CRC screening.

BEHAVIORALLetter and Educational DVD

Participants will get a letter from their physician that provides brief information about colorectal cancer (CRC) and notes the importance of CRC screening. It will be accompanied by an educational DVD about the screening. The participants will receive this prior to a scheduled upcoming appointment with their physician.

Sponsors

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
CollaboratorFED
Northwestern University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient of Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation General Internal Medicine * Patient has a scheduled appointment with a GIM physician in the next several weeks * Patient will be 50 years old at the time of this appointment * Patient is male or female

Exclusion criteria

* This is the first time the patient is seen in the NMFF GIM clinic * There is a prior completion of CRC screening noted in EHR. * There is a prior order placed for CRC screening in EHR. * Patient has a history of CRC * Patient has a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis, inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's Disease, or documented colectomy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Completion of CRC Screening6 months from initial contactWhat would have been reported as this Outcome Measure is the number of participants who completed screening. We planned to review electronic health records of participants 6 months post randomization to look for either: (1) note in free text MD note documenting receipt of one form of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening during study period or (2)lab results from fecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy. Screening completion equaled presence of a lab result or physician note in chart. No patient charts were reviewed due to low accrual.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Secondary Outcome for the Study is the Time to Screening Completion.6 months after randomizationThis Outcome Measure would have reported the length of time, measured in days, that occurred between the date of randomization and the completed screening date. We planned to review the electronic health records of participants 6 months post randomization to look for either: (1)note in free text MD note documenting receipt of one form of CRC screening during study period or (2)lab results from fecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy. Screening completion equaled presence of a lab result or physician note in chart. No patient charts were reviewed due to low accrual.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The trial took place at a large urban academic primary care internal medicine practice in Chicago, IL. The trial enrolled patients between March and December 2009.

Pre-assignment details

We used data contained in the clinic's electronic health record to identify eligible patients. All eligible patients were randomly assigned to one of the three study arms.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Usual Care
Usual Care. Participants in this arm will receive usual care until outcome assessment is performed at 6 months following randomization. At that time, they will be sent a letter reminding them to obtain the ordered preventative service test.
21
Behavioral: Letter Only
Behavioral: Letter Only Prior to a scheduled upcoming appointment, participants will get a letter signed by their physician that provides brief information about colorectal cancer (CRC) and notes the importance of CRC screening.
18
Behavioral: Letter and Educational DVD
Behavioral: Letter and Educational DVD Participants will get a letter from their physician that provides brief information about colorectal cancer (CRC) and notes the importance of CRC screening. It will be accompanied by an educational DVD about the screening. The participants will receive this prior to a scheduled upcoming appointment with their physician.
21
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall Studytrial was terminated prior to completion211821

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUsual CareBehavioral: Letter OnlyBehavioral: Letter and Educational DVDTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
21 Participants18 Participants21 Participants60 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
21 participants18 participants21 participants60 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants13 Participants14 Participants42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants5 Participants7 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 210 / 180 / 21
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 210 / 180 / 21

Outcome results

Primary

Completion of CRC Screening

What would have been reported as this Outcome Measure is the number of participants who completed screening. We planned to review electronic health records of participants 6 months post randomization to look for either: (1) note in free text MD note documenting receipt of one form of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening during study period or (2)lab results from fecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy. Screening completion equaled presence of a lab result or physician note in chart. No patient charts were reviewed due to low accrual.

Time frame: 6 months from initial contact

Population: Although 60 individuals were randomized to condition, the trial was halted prior to primary or secondary outcome chart reviews. Hence there are no results to report.

Comparison: Please note that no analyses were performed as the trial was stopped due to low enrollment.p-value: <0.017Chi-squared
Secondary

The Secondary Outcome for the Study is the Time to Screening Completion.

This Outcome Measure would have reported the length of time, measured in days, that occurred between the date of randomization and the completed screening date. We planned to review the electronic health records of participants 6 months post randomization to look for either: (1)note in free text MD note documenting receipt of one form of CRC screening during study period or (2)lab results from fecal occult blood test, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy. Screening completion equaled presence of a lab result or physician note in chart. No patient charts were reviewed due to low accrual.

Time frame: 6 months after randomization

Population: Although 60 individuals were randomized to condition, the trial was halted prior to primary or secondary outcome chart reviews. Hence there are no results to report.

Comparison: Please note that no analyses were performed as the trial was stopped due to low enrollment.p-value: <0.017Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026