Skip to content

Comparison of Embedded and Added Motor Imagery Training in Patients After Stroke

Comparison of Embedded and Added Motor Imagery Training to Improve a Motor Skill in Patients After Stroke: a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial Using a Mixed Methods Approach

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00858910
Enrollment
90
Registered
2009-03-10
Start date
2009-03-31
Completion date
2010-05-31
Last updated
2013-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

Motor imagery, Motor skill, Performance improvement

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to examine if patients in the embedded motor imagery (MI) training group (EG1) need less time to perform the motor task than patients in the added MI training group (EG2).

Detailed description

The purpose of the study is to examine if patients in the embedded MI training into physiotherapy (EG1) need less time to perform the motor task than patients in the added MI training to physiotherapy (EG2). A third groups serves a control group (CG) to investigate the effect of the intervention versus a group with a control intervention. Additionally, semi-structured interviews before and after the intervention will give an insight in the patient's experience with motor imagery (MI), their expectations regarding the intervention and their opinions about MI after the intervention.

Interventions

OTHERMotor imagery (MI) training

MI training encloses the internal rehearsal of a known motor skill without any overt motor output.

OTHERControl intervention

The control intervention encloses relaxation and breathing exercises, and information about: * the disease (stroke), * therapy options, * self-help groups and their offers for support, * helping aids for independent living at home.

Sponsors

Oxford Brookes University
CollaboratorOTHER
Reha Rheinfelden
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients after a first-ever ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke * Outpatients or leaving inpatients 3 months after stroke * Ability to stand with or without a cane for at least 30 sec on a normal hard floor * Ability to walk for 20 metres with or without a cane or an orthosis * MMSE with at least 20 points * Age older than 18 years * Signed written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Joint replacements (knee, hip, shoulder) * Limiting pain in the upper or lower body * Limiting range of motion (ROM) in the hip, knee, ankle joint or toes * Body weight more than 90 kilograms * Compromised mental capacity to give written informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time in seconds to perform a motor task: Going down, laying on the floor and getting up again.2 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Further outcome measures: - Help needed to perform the task, scored on a 7-item scale (1 total help, 7 completely independent) - Stage of motor task (one out of 13 possible stages)2 weeks
Motor impairment and independence measured with the extended Barthel index (EBI).2 weeks
Balance measured with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS).2 weeks
Motor imagery ability measured with the kinesthetic and visual motor imagery questionnaire (KVIQ) and the 'Imaprax 1.1' software.2 weeks
Fear of falling (FOF) is measured with the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC-scale).2 weeks

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 27, 2026