Skip to content

Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Proton Beam Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Randomized Controlled Trial of Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Proton Beam Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00857805
Enrollment
76
Registered
2009-03-09
Start date
2009-01-07
Completion date
2021-07-07
Last updated
2024-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Keywords

Transarterial chemoembolization, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Proton Beam Radiotherapy

Brief summary

Patients with liver tumor burden that exceeds Milan criteria are considered to receive one of the following locoregional treatments: transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), percutaneous ethanol injection and proton beam radiation (PBR). The goals of these treatments are to control tumor growth, to downstage tumor size to meet Milan criteria, and to improve survival. Patients who exceed the Milan criteria benefit from tumor downstaging as a result of treatment. Patients who meet Milan criteria benefit from tumor control to bridge them to liver transplantation. TACE is considered the most common locoregional treatment that is used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Proton beam radiotherapy has been used in treating HCC in a few centers across the globe. Phase I and II trials showed a satisfactory safety and efficacy results. Loma Linda University Medical Center is one of these pioneering centers that use proton beam as a treatment for HCC. This is the first randomized trial in the medical field that will compare head-to-head the efficacy of TACE versus proton beam in treating HCC patients.

Interventions

PROCEDURETransarterial Chemoembolization

Application of carboplatin, doxorubicin in ethiodol into the artery for one or more sessions.

Fifteen consecutive sessions

Sponsors

Loma Linda University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients are candidates to receive both proton beam and TACE 2. Patients with no evidence of metastasis or macrovascular invasion 3. Patients with tumor burden that meets San Francisco criteria

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients who are candidates for surgical resection 2. Patients with lesion \< 2 cm 3. Patients who have contraindication to receive either TACE or proton 4. Patients with serum alpha fetoprotein \> 500 5. Patients with metastasis or macrovascular invasion 6. Patients treated previously for HCC by any locoregional treatment 7. Patients with prior liver transplant 8. Patients with Child class C 9. Patients with MELD score of \> 25 10. Patients with other comorbid diseases that may impact survival 11. Patients with ongoing alcohol intake 12. Patients with active sepsis 13. Patients with gastrointestinal bleeding within a week 14. Patients unwilling to sign informed consent form 15. Patients with history of noncompliance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Two Year Overall Survival24 MonthsComparison between arms of the percentage of patient alive 2 years following study treatment.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Transarterial Chemoembolization
Transarterial Chemoembolization Transarterial Chemoembolization: Application of carboplatin, doxorubicin in ethiodol into the artery for one or more sessions.
39
Proton Beam Radiotherapy
Proton Beam Radiotherapy Proton Beam Radiotherapy: Fifteen consecutive sessions
35
Total74

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicProton Beam RadiotherapyTotalTransarterial Chemoembolization
Age, Customized61.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.51
60.65 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.83
59.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.15
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
35 Participants74 Participants39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants21 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants53 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
13 / 3916 / 35
other
Total, other adverse events
39 / 3935 / 35
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 392 / 35

Outcome results

Primary

Two Year Overall Survival

Comparison between arms of the percentage of patient alive 2 years following study treatment.

Time frame: 24 Months

Population: Eligible subjects were adult patients with newly diagnosed and previously untreated HCC. All subjects had characteristic findings of HCC on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or computed tomography (CT) scanning or histologic proof with biopsy. Patients were required to have tumors that were within the Milan or San Francisco criteria, although eligibility for transplant was not required.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Transarterial ChemoembolizationTwo Year Overall Survival65 percentage of participants
Proton Beam RadiotherapyTwo Year Overall Survival68 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026