Skip to content

Observational Study of Cognitive Outcomes for Subjects Who Have Had Prior PET Amyloid Imaging With Florbetapir F 18 (18F-AV-45)

Longitudinal Study of Long-term (36 Month) Cognitive Outcomes in Healthy Volunteers, Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Who Have Previously Had PET Imaging With 18F-AV-45 Injection.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00857506
Enrollment
152
Registered
2009-03-06
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2013-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer's Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

Cognitive outcome, 18F-AV-45 PET scan, Amyloid PET scan, Florbetapir F 18 amyloid PET scan, Normal cognition, Change in cognitive status in relation to brain amyloid on PET

Brief summary

The primary objective of this protocol is to determine if brain amyloid imaged with florbetapir F 18 (18F-AV-45) PET scans is predictive of progressive cognitive impairment during the subsequent 36 months for groups of: normal controls, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Hypothesis 1: The probability a subject will experience progressive cognitive impairment within 36 months of imaging will be greater in subjects whose 18F-AV-45 PET scan was rated amyloid positive compared to subjects whose PET scan was rated amyloid negative. The secondary objective is to determine the stability, over 36 months of a clinical diagnosis, of AD in patients with an amyloid positive 18F-AV-45 PET. Hypothesis 2: The diagnosis of AD will remain unchanged in patients whose PET scan were rated as amyloid positive.

Detailed description

Study AV-45-A11 is designed to determine if brain amyloid aggregation imaged on 18F-AV-45 PET scans is predictive of progression of cognitive impairment during the subsequent 36 months. Approximately 180 subjects enrolled in a prior clinical study (AV-45-A05\[NCT00702143\]) will be offered an opportunity to be studied under this protocol. The initial visit will occur as soon as possible following the AV-45-A05(NCT00702143) imaging day. Subjects who qualify for the study and their caregiver/partners will be contacted approximately 6,12,18,24 and 36 months after PET imaging in study AV-45-A05(NCT00702143), and will undergo a standardized functional and psychometric evaluation. NOTE: This study is a clinical follow-up of subjects previously enrolled in trial 18F-AV-45-A05(NCT00702143). No new patients are being enrolled in this trial.

Interventions

DRUGflorbetapir F 18

370 Mega Becquerel (10 mCi)

Sponsors

Avid Radiopharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All subjects who enrolled in study AV-45-A05(NCT00702143), received 18F-AV-45, and completed a PET scan will be eligible to enroll in this trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in ADAS-Cog for MCI SubjectsBaseline and 36 monthsThe primary analysis was the comparison in the magnitude of change from baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) between Aβ+ and Aβ- subjects in the Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) population at 36 months adjusting for baseline test score and age at informed consent. ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of 11 cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. Change in ADAS-Cog scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 36 month score (last observation carried forward \[LOCF\]). A change in ADAS-Cog greater than 0 indicates a deterioration in cognitive performance whereas a change in ADAS-Cog less than 0 indicates improved cognitive performance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cognitive Decline in MCI SubjectsBaseline and 36 monthsThe key secondary analyses compared the number of Aβ+ and Aβ- subjects in the MCI population with clinically significant deterioration in ADAS-Cog (≥4) and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) global score (≥0.5) and conversion in diagnosis from MCI at baseline to AD or Cognitively Normal (CN) at 36 months. ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of 11 cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. CDR scores (range 0-3) quantify the severity of the symptoms of dementia where 0 indicates no cognitive impairment and 3 indicates severe dementia. Changes in ADAS-Cog and CDR scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 36 month score (LOCF).
Change in ADAS-Cog in CN and AD SubjectsBaseline and 36 monthsThis analysis compared the magnitude of change from baseline in ADAS cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) scores between Aβ+ and Aβ- subjects in the CN and AD populations at 36 months adjusting for baseline test score and age at informed consent. ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of 11 cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. Change in ADAS-Cog scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 36 month score (LOCF). A change in ADAS-Cog greater than 0 indicates a deterioration in cognitive performance whereas a change in ADAS-Cog less than 0 indicates improved cognitive performance.
Cognitive Decline in CN and AD SubjectsBaseline and 36 monthsThe key secondary analyses compared the number of Aβ+ and Aβ- subjects in the CN and AD populations with clinically significant deterioration in ADAS-Cog (≥4) and CDR global score (≥0.5). ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. CDR scores (range 0-3) quantify the severity of the symptoms of dementia where 0 indicates no cognitive impairment and 3 indicates severe dementia. Changes in ADAS-Cog and CDR scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 36 month score (LOCF).
Covariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeBaseline and 36 monthsChange from baseline by diagnostic group in covariate-adjusted psychometric assessment scores at month 36 (LOCF). Assessments included Digit Symbol Substitution (DSS), Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Wechsler Logical Memory Scale (WLMS) delayed and immediate recall, Category Verbal Fluency (CVF) animals and vegetables, Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Studies Consortium Activities of Daily Living (ADCS ADL) and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). The ranges for these scales are as follows: DSS (0-93), CDR-SOB (0-18), MMSE (0-30), WLMS delayed and immediate recall (0-25), CVF animals and vegetables (0-total number of relevant items named in 60 seconds), ADCS ADL (0-78) and GDS (0-15). For all scales except CDR-SOB and GDS a higher score indicates greater cognitive function. For CDR-SOB and GDS a higher score indicates increased dementia or depression, respectively.
Correlation of Change in ADAS-Cog and SUVRBaseline and 36 monthsCorrelation between change from baseline to 36 month ADAS-Cog score and baseline global average SUVR by diagnostic group is provided below. ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of 11 cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. Change in ADAS-Cog scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 36 month score (LOCF). A change in ADAS-Cog greater than 0 indicates a deterioration in cognitive performance whereas a change in ADAS-Cog less than 0 indicates improved cognitive performance. Standard Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR) is the ratio of tracer uptake in the cortex and cerebellum. SUVR values higher than 1 indicate greater amyloid burden in the cortex as compared to the cerebellum whereas scores less than 1 indicate the opposite.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

All subjects were recruited from participants in study 18F-AV-45-A05 (NCT00702143)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Alzheimer's Disease31
Mild Cognitive Impairment52
Cognitively Normal69
Total152

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalAlzheimer's DiseaseMild Cognitive ImpairmentCognitively Normal
Age Continuous71.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.73
76.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.23
71.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.09
69.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.26
Region of Enrollment
United States
152 participants31 participants52 participants69 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
83 Participants13 Participants29 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
69 Participants18 Participants23 Participants28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 01 / 361 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 01 / 360 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Change in ADAS-Cog for MCI Subjects

The primary analysis was the comparison in the magnitude of change from baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) between Aβ+ and Aβ- subjects in the Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) population at 36 months adjusting for baseline test score and age at informed consent. ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of 11 cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. Change in ADAS-Cog scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 36 month score (last observation carried forward \[LOCF\]). A change in ADAS-Cog greater than 0 indicates a deterioration in cognitive performance whereas a change in ADAS-Cog less than 0 indicates improved cognitive performance.

Time frame: Baseline and 36 months

Population: Brain amyloid status was determined by baseline florbetapir F 18 PET scans performed in study 18F-AV-45-A05 (NCT00702143).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI SubjectsChange in ADAS-Cog for MCI Subjects5.664 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.4667
Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI SubjectsChange in ADAS-Cog for MCI Subjects-0.710 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.0905
Secondary

Change in ADAS-Cog in CN and AD Subjects

This analysis compared the magnitude of change from baseline in ADAS cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog) scores between Aβ+ and Aβ- subjects in the CN and AD populations at 36 months adjusting for baseline test score and age at informed consent. ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of 11 cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. Change in ADAS-Cog scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 36 month score (LOCF). A change in ADAS-Cog greater than 0 indicates a deterioration in cognitive performance whereas a change in ADAS-Cog less than 0 indicates improved cognitive performance.

Time frame: Baseline and 36 months

Population: Brain amyloid status was determined by baseline florbetapir F 18 PET scans performed in study 18F-AV-45-A05 (NCT00702143).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI SubjectsChange in ADAS-Cog in CN and AD Subjects3.237 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.9043
Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI SubjectsChange in ADAS-Cog in CN and AD Subjects-0.094 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.3679
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsChange in ADAS-Cog in CN and AD Subjects8.879 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.8812
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsChange in ADAS-Cog in CN and AD Subjects3.811 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.4261
Secondary

Cognitive Decline in CN and AD Subjects

The key secondary analyses compared the number of Aβ+ and Aβ- subjects in the CN and AD populations with clinically significant deterioration in ADAS-Cog (≥4) and CDR global score (≥0.5). ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. CDR scores (range 0-3) quantify the severity of the symptoms of dementia where 0 indicates no cognitive impairment and 3 indicates severe dementia. Changes in ADAS-Cog and CDR scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 36 month score (LOCF).

Time frame: Baseline and 36 months

Population: Brain amyloid status was determined by baseline florbetapir F 18 PET scans performed in study 18F-AV-45-A05 (NCT00702143).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI SubjectsCognitive Decline in CN and AD SubjectsADAS-Cog Deterioration ≥44 Participants
Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI SubjectsCognitive Decline in CN and AD SubjectsCDR Deterioration ≥0.54 Participants
Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI SubjectsCognitive Decline in CN and AD SubjectsCDR Deterioration ≥0.55 Participants
Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI SubjectsCognitive Decline in CN and AD SubjectsADAS-Cog Deterioration ≥43 Participants
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCognitive Decline in CN and AD SubjectsADAS-Cog Deterioration ≥414 Participants
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCognitive Decline in CN and AD SubjectsCDR Deterioration ≥0.512 Participants
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsCognitive Decline in CN and AD SubjectsADAS-Cog Deterioration ≥43 Participants
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsCognitive Decline in CN and AD SubjectsCDR Deterioration ≥0.52 Participants
Secondary

Cognitive Decline in MCI Subjects

The key secondary analyses compared the number of Aβ+ and Aβ- subjects in the MCI population with clinically significant deterioration in ADAS-Cog (≥4) and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) global score (≥0.5) and conversion in diagnosis from MCI at baseline to AD or Cognitively Normal (CN) at 36 months. ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of 11 cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. CDR scores (range 0-3) quantify the severity of the symptoms of dementia where 0 indicates no cognitive impairment and 3 indicates severe dementia. Changes in ADAS-Cog and CDR scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 36 month score (LOCF).

Time frame: Baseline and 36 months

Population: Brain amyloid status was determined by baseline florbetapir F 18 PET scans performed in study 18F-AV-45-A05 (NCT00702143).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI SubjectsCognitive Decline in MCI SubjectsADAS-Cog Deterioration ≥48 Participants
Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI SubjectsCognitive Decline in MCI SubjectsConversion to AD6 Participants
Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI SubjectsCognitive Decline in MCI SubjectsCDR Deterioration ≥0.55 Participants
Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI SubjectsCognitive Decline in MCI SubjectsConversion to CN1 Participants
Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI SubjectsCognitive Decline in MCI SubjectsConversion to CN5 Participants
Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI SubjectsCognitive Decline in MCI SubjectsADAS-Cog Deterioration ≥43 Participants
Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI SubjectsCognitive Decline in MCI SubjectsCDR Deterioration ≥0.54 Participants
Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI SubjectsCognitive Decline in MCI SubjectsConversion to AD3 Participants
Secondary

Correlation of Change in ADAS-Cog and SUVR

Correlation between change from baseline to 36 month ADAS-Cog score and baseline global average SUVR by diagnostic group is provided below. ADAS-Cog scores (range 0-70) indicate performance on a series of 11 cognitive tasks where 0 indicates the highest level of cognitive performance and 70 indicates the lowest level of cognitive performance. Change in ADAS-Cog scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline score from the 36 month score (LOCF). A change in ADAS-Cog greater than 0 indicates a deterioration in cognitive performance whereas a change in ADAS-Cog less than 0 indicates improved cognitive performance. Standard Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR) is the ratio of tracer uptake in the cortex and cerebellum. SUVR values higher than 1 indicate greater amyloid burden in the cortex as compared to the cerebellum whereas scores less than 1 indicate the opposite.

Time frame: Baseline and 36 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI SubjectsCorrelation of Change in ADAS-Cog and SUVR0.364 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI SubjectsCorrelation of Change in ADAS-Cog and SUVR0.502 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCorrelation of Change in ADAS-Cog and SUVR0.308 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
Secondary

Covariate Adjusted Psychometric Score Change

Change from baseline by diagnostic group in covariate-adjusted psychometric assessment scores at month 36 (LOCF). Assessments included Digit Symbol Substitution (DSS), Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Wechsler Logical Memory Scale (WLMS) delayed and immediate recall, Category Verbal Fluency (CVF) animals and vegetables, Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Studies Consortium Activities of Daily Living (ADCS ADL) and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). The ranges for these scales are as follows: DSS (0-93), CDR-SOB (0-18), MMSE (0-30), WLMS delayed and immediate recall (0-25), CVF animals and vegetables (0-total number of relevant items named in 60 seconds), ADCS ADL (0-78) and GDS (0-15). For all scales except CDR-SOB and GDS a higher score indicates greater cognitive function. For CDR-SOB and GDS a higher score indicates increased dementia or depression, respectively.

Time frame: Baseline and 36 months

Population: Brain amyloid status was determined by baseline florbetapir F 18 PET scans performed in study 18F-AV-45-A05 (NCT00702143).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeWLMS delayed recall-0.429 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.1278
Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeCVF vegetables-2.087 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.0202
Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeWLMS immediate recall-0.926 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.056
Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeCVF animals-2.785 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.5735
Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeCDR-SOB0.765 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.152
Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeADCS ADL-0.629 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.7272
Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeMMSE-0.740 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.3282
Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeGDS-0.164 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.478
Amyloid-Beta Positive MCI SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeDSS-6.521 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.9117
Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeDSS0.214 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.1709
Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeWLMS delayed recall0.970 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.4504
Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeCVF vegetables0.156 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.415
Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeGDS-0.182 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.1926
Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeADCS ADL-0.191 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.2796
Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeMMSE-0.396 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.1329
Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeCVF animals-0.617 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.6383
Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeWLMS immediate recall0.934 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.4211
Amyloid-Beta Negative MCI SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeCDR-SOB0.097 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.0632
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeWLMS immediate recall-1.875 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.9949
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeADCS ADL-4.932 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.204
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeCVF animals-3.177 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.098
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeCDR-SOB1.985 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.5321
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeMMSE-2.882 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.8053
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeWLMS delayed recall-1.459 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.125
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeCVF vegetables-2.278 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.8162
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeDSS-10.940 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.1569
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeGDS0.066 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.4753
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeCVF vegetables0.757 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.6109
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeGDS-0.171 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.3546
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeCDR-SOB0.392 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.3976
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeMMSE-0.300 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.6023
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeWLMS delayed recall0.493 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.8386
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeWLMS immediate recall0.496 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.7405
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeDSS0.133 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.6082
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeCVF animals-0.533 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.8213
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeADCS ADL-2.839 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.6288
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeCVF animals-4.772 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.8096
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeWLMS immediate recall-0.891 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.8151
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeWLMS delayed recall-0.179 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.6722
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeADCS ADL-20.789 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 4.5189
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeCVF vegetables-3.051 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.7022
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeMMSE-3.924 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.2418
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeCDR-SOB4.048 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.8008
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeGDS0.530 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.5679
Amyloid-Beta Positive AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeDSS-5.995 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 2.2381
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeGDS-0.727 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.8264
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeDSS-0.011 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 3.3534
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeMMSE1.173 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.8299
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeWLMS delayed recall1.490 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.10058
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeWLMS immediate recall-0.231 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.262
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeCVF animals0.085 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.2654
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeCVF vegetables0.621 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.0959
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeADCS ADL-5.668 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 6.6271
Amyloid-Beta Negative AD SubjectsCovariate Adjusted Psychometric Score ChangeCDR-SOB0.121 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 1.1739

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026