Skip to content

F38-27: An Evaluation of 2 Different Bowel Cleansing Preparations in Adult Subjects

F38-27: An Evaluation of 2 Different Bowel Cleansing Preparations in Adult Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00857272
Enrollment
308
Registered
2009-03-06
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2010-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colonoscopy

Keywords

colonoscopy, bowel preparation

Brief summary

To compare the safety and efficacy of 2 different bowel cleansing preparations prior to colonoscopy in adult subjects.

Interventions

DRUGPEG electrolyte lavage solution + bisacodyl - reformulation

multi dose formulation (tablet/solution) for oral administration prior to colonoscopy

DRUGPEG electrolyte lavage solution + bisacodyl

multi dose preparation (tablet/solution) for oral administration prior to colonoscopy

Sponsors

Braintree Laboratories
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female outpatients who are undergoing colonoscopy for a routinely accepted indications: 2. At least 18 years of age 3. Otherwise in good health, as determined by physical exam and medical history 4. If female, and of child-bearing potential, is using an acceptable form of birth control 5. Negative urine pregnancy test at screening, if applicable 6. In the Investigator's judgment, subject is mentally competent to provide informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects with known or suspected ileus, gastrointestinal obstruction, gastric retention, bowel perforation, toxic colitis, or toxic megacolon 2. Subjects with impaired consciousness that predisposes them to pulmonary aspiration 3. Subjects who are undergoing colonoscopy for foreign body removal and decompression 4. Subjects with pre-existing electrolyte disturbances, such as dehydration, or those secondary to the use of diuretics 5. Subjects who are taking drugs that may affect electrolyte levels with the exception of routine diuretics 6. Subjects with known clinically significant electrolyte abnormalities such as hypernatremia, hyperphosphatemia, hypokalemia, or hypocalcemia 7. Subjects who are pregnant or lactating, or intending to become pregnant during the study 8. Subjects of childbearing potential who refuse a pregnancy test 9. Subjects who are allergic to any preparation components 10. Subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, should not be included in the study for any reason, including inability to follow study procedures 11. Subjects who have participated in an investigational clinical, surgical, drug, or device study within the past 30 days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy: Percentage of Patients With Successful Preparations Based on a 4 Point Scaleduring colonoscopyCleansing was scored with a four point scale used in previous bowel cleansing studies where 4 = excellent (no more than small bits of adherent feces/fluid); 3 = good (small amounts of feces or fluid not interfering with the exam); 2 = fair (enough feces or fluid to prevent a completely reliable exam); 1 = poor (large amounts of fecal residue requiring additional cleansing). For the primary efficacy endpoint (preparation success), grades of 4 and 3 were considered a success and grades of 2 or 1 were considered a failure.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HalfLytely With 5mg Bisacodyl
Investigational dose
154
HalfLytely With 10mg Bisacodyl
Active Control
154
Total308

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHalfLytely With 10mg BisacodylHalfLytely With 5mg BisacodylTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
38 Participants44 Participants82 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
116 Participants110 Participants226 Participants
Age Continuous55.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
56.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
55.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
Region of Enrollment
United States
154 participants154 participants308 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
90 Participants78 Participants168 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
64 Participants76 Participants140 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
117 / 154129 / 154
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1541 / 154

Outcome results

Primary

Efficacy: Percentage of Patients With Successful Preparations Based on a 4 Point Scale

Cleansing was scored with a four point scale used in previous bowel cleansing studies where 4 = excellent (no more than small bits of adherent feces/fluid); 3 = good (small amounts of feces or fluid not interfering with the exam); 2 = fair (enough feces or fluid to prevent a completely reliable exam); 1 = poor (large amounts of fecal residue requiring additional cleansing). For the primary efficacy endpoint (preparation success), grades of 4 and 3 were considered a success and grades of 2 or 1 were considered a failure.

Time frame: during colonoscopy

Population: The analysis population consists of patients that were randomized and took any portion of the study preparation and who did not discontinue prior to colonoscopy due to a reason of safety or efficacy.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HalfLytely With 5mg BisacodylEfficacy: Percentage of Patients With Successful Preparations Based on a 4 Point Scale77.6 percent of participants
HalfLytely With 10mg BisacodylEfficacy: Percentage of Patients With Successful Preparations Based on a 4 Point Scale80.1 percent of participants
Comparison: The primary endpoint of preparation success was tested using a non-inferiority test based upon the difference D=P1-P2,~Null Hypothesis H0: P1-P2\<=D0 versus Alternative Hypothesis H1: P1-P2=D1\>D0,~Where P1 is the % of patients with successful preps in the HalfLytely 5mg group and P2 is the % of patients with successful preps in the HalfLytely 10mg group and D0 is the acceptable margin of equivalence equal to an absolute margin of 15%.p-value: 0.00595% CI: [-11.9, 6.8]Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026