Skip to content

The Efficacy of Oral Everolimus in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

A Randomized, Double-masked, Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy of Oral Everolimus, Either Alone or Added to Lucentis, in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00857259
Enrollment
16
Registered
2009-03-06
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2011-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Age-related Macular Degeneration, Choroidal Neo-Vascular Age-onset Macular Degeneration

Keywords

AMD, macular degeneration, Everolimus, Lucentis, Ranibizumab, Choroidal Neo-Vascular (CNV) age-onset macular degeneration, Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

Brief summary

The study will assess the safety and efficacy of Everolimus (RAD001) alone or in combination with Lucentis in patients with neo-vascular age related macular degeneration (AMD)

Interventions

DRUGEverolimus

5 mg oral tablet

DRUGRanibizumab

0.5 mg administered by intravitreal injection

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) * Best corrected visual acuity ( BCVA) of 20/40 or worse in study eye * Patients with predominantly classic, minimally classic, or occult choroidal neovascularization in the macula of one eye (the study eye) who have had an inadequate response to VEGF inhibitors in the study eye. Inadequate response is defined as a gain of less than one line of visual acuity and persistent macular edema (central sub-fiel thickness ≥ 300 μm as measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) despite a minimum of 3 treatments with Lucentis or Avastin

Exclusion criteria

* Any concurrent ocular condition in the study eye that may result in substantial change in vision during the study * Uncontrolled medical conditions such as cancer, angina, diabetes, viral or fungal infections, impaired lung function, history of stroke * Patients who have macular edema in the study eye that, in the judgment of the investigator, is unlikely to respond to treatment. Examples of features that may guide the investigator's judgment about unresponsiveness are large regions of geographic atrophy, retinal angiomatous proliferation, or large regions of sub-retinal fibrosis. The presence of one of these features excludes a patient only if the investigator judges the study eye to have irreversible macular edema. * active bacterial, fungal or viral infections at the time of enrollment, e.g. hepatitis B or C infection. Patients with risk factors for hepatitis B should be tested for hepatitis B viral load and serological markers at screening (a positive HBV-DNA, HBsAg). Patients with risk factors for hepatitis C should be tested using HCVRNA-PCR at screening. A clinical history of hepatitis B or hepatitis C will exclude the patient from the study. Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Central Retinal Thickness From Baseline to Week 4, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)Baseline and 4 weeksCentral retinal thickness was assessed by Optical coherence tomography (OCT). The primary thickness endpoint was the mean thickness of the foveal field of the macula map produced by the analysis of the sequence of six radial scans. Foveal field thickness was the average thickness of a circular field with a diameter of 1 mm. OCT images were analyzed by a central reading center.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to Week 4 in Patients Treated With EverolimusBaseline and week 4Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed on both eyes. BCVA measurements were taken in sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRs)-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance specific to test charts. BCVA is measured from the number of letters the patient can read on the eye chart.

Countries

United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Everolimus 5 mg
5 mg orally once daily plus sham ocular injection on Day 1 (Baseline)
8
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
Ranibizumab intra-vitreal therapy (IVT) 0.5 mg on Day 1 (baseline)
1
Everolimus and Ranibizumab
Everolimus oral 5 mg once daily plus ranibizumab Intra-vitreal therapy (IVT) 0.5 mg on day 1 (baseline)
7
Total16

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyProtocol Violation101

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEverolimus 5 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mgEverolimus and RanibizumabTotal
Age Continuous75.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.44
71.00 years78.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.23
76.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.49
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants0 Participants6 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants1 Participants1 Participants7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 85 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Central Retinal Thickness From Baseline to Week 4, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

Central retinal thickness was assessed by Optical coherence tomography (OCT). The primary thickness endpoint was the mean thickness of the foveal field of the macula map produced by the analysis of the sequence of six radial scans. Foveal field thickness was the average thickness of a circular field with a diameter of 1 mm. OCT images were analyzed by a central reading center.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks

Population: The Per Protocol Analysis Set (PPAS)consisted of all patients in the Full Analysis Set (FAS)who received study drug, completed the treatment phase of the trial without clinically significant protocol deviations and had non-missing central retinal thickness values for the study eye at both baseline and Day 28.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Everolimus 5 mgChange in Central Retinal Thickness From Baseline to Week 4, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)Week 4492.2 µmStandard Deviation 122.16
Oral Everolimus 5 mgChange in Central Retinal Thickness From Baseline to Week 4, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)Baseline454.8 µmStandard Deviation 59.56
Oral Everolimus 5 mgChange in Central Retinal Thickness From Baseline to Week 4, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)Change from Baseline37.3 µmStandard Deviation 67.31
Ranibizumab 0.5 mgChange in Central Retinal Thickness From Baseline to Week 4, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)Week 4308.0 µm
Ranibizumab 0.5 mgChange in Central Retinal Thickness From Baseline to Week 4, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)Baseline306.0 µm
Ranibizumab 0.5 mgChange in Central Retinal Thickness From Baseline to Week 4, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)Change from Baseline2.0 µm
Everolimus 5 mg and Ranibizumab 0.5 mgChange in Central Retinal Thickness From Baseline to Week 4, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)Baseline244.3 µmStandard Deviation 80.37
Everolimus 5 mg and Ranibizumab 0.5 mgChange in Central Retinal Thickness From Baseline to Week 4, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)Change from Baseline-41.0 µmStandard Deviation 56.18
Everolimus 5 mg and Ranibizumab 0.5 mgChange in Central Retinal Thickness From Baseline to Week 4, as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)Week 4217.6 µmStandard Deviation 33.87
Secondary

Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to Week 4 in Patients Treated With Everolimus

Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed on both eyes. BCVA measurements were taken in sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRs)-like visual acuity testing charts at an initial testing distance specific to test charts. BCVA is measured from the number of letters the patient can read on the eye chart.

Time frame: Baseline and week 4

Population: The Per Protocol Analysis Set (PPAS)consisted of all patients in the Full Analysis Set (FAS)who received study drug, completed the treatment phase of the trial without clinically significant protocol deviations and had non-missing central retinal thickness values for the study eye at both baseline and Day 28.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Oral Everolimus 5 mgChange in Visual Acuity From Baseline to Week 4 in Patients Treated With Everolimus4 Weeks43 LettersStandard Deviation 17.09
Oral Everolimus 5 mgChange in Visual Acuity From Baseline to Week 4 in Patients Treated With EverolimusBaseline46 LettersStandard Deviation 16.91
Oral Everolimus 5 mgChange in Visual Acuity From Baseline to Week 4 in Patients Treated With EverolimusChange in baseline-3 LettersStandard Deviation 7.59
Ranibizumab 0.5 mgChange in Visual Acuity From Baseline to Week 4 in Patients Treated With EverolimusBaseline67.0 Letters
Ranibizumab 0.5 mgChange in Visual Acuity From Baseline to Week 4 in Patients Treated With Everolimus4 Weeks69.0 Letters
Ranibizumab 0.5 mgChange in Visual Acuity From Baseline to Week 4 in Patients Treated With EverolimusChange in baseline2.0 Letters
Everolimus 5 mg and Ranibizumab 0.5 mgChange in Visual Acuity From Baseline to Week 4 in Patients Treated With EverolimusBaseline55.3 LettersStandard Deviation 10.54
Everolimus 5 mg and Ranibizumab 0.5 mgChange in Visual Acuity From Baseline to Week 4 in Patients Treated With EverolimusChange in baseline4.4 LettersStandard Deviation 5.73
Everolimus 5 mg and Ranibizumab 0.5 mgChange in Visual Acuity From Baseline to Week 4 in Patients Treated With Everolimus4 Weeks63.2 LettersStandard Deviation 12.32

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026