Skip to content

Effect of Platelet Rich Plasma and Keratinocyte Suspensions on Wound Healing

A New Model to Enhance Wound Healing Using Autologous Keratinocytes in Platelet Concentrates - a Prospective Randomized Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00856934
Enrollment
45
Registered
2009-03-06
Start date
2005-06-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2009-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skin Graft

Keywords

Skin graft donor site healing, skin, wound, platelet concentrate, keratinocytes, burns

Brief summary

This prospective randomized trial evaluated the impact of autologous keratinocytes suspended in platelet concentrates on healing skin graft donor site wounds. It was hypothesized that the treatment would speed and improve wound healing.

Interventions

Platelet Rich Plasma isolated from patient blood sprayed onto wound bed along with 10% Calcium Chloride solution in a 10 to 1 proportion.

BIOLOGICALKeratinocyte suspension

Autologous keratinocytes isolated from skin biopsy suspended in platelet rich plasma before spraying.

Three layers of paraffin gauze, topped with standard dry bandages and an elastic bandage.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Skin graft donor sites total surface \< 15% BSA * Skin graft donor site size: 0.2mm deep, 30 to 40 cm2 surface area

Exclusion criteria

* Patients treated with immunosuppressors * Patients treated with corticoids * Patients suffering from terminal renal insufficiency * Patients suffering from severe peripheral arteriopathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete Wound HealingPost operative day 5 and every other day thereafterTime required for complete epithelialization in days

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PainPost operative day 5Pain evaluated on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), specifically during dressing replacement.

Countries

Switzerland

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control
Wounds covered with standard dressings: three layers of paraffin gauze, standard bandages, elastic bandage.
15
PRP
Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) sprayed onto the wound bed with Calcium Chloride. Wounds covered with same standard dressings used in control group.
15
PRP+K
Keratinocytes suspended in Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) sprayed onto the wound bed with Calcium Chloride. Wounds covered with same standard dressings used in control group.
15
Total45

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlPRPPRP+KTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants14 Participants12 Participants41 Participants
Age Continuous42.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
45.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.3
46.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.5
44.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants9 Participants5 Participants25 Participants

Outcome results

Primary

Complete Wound Healing

Time required for complete epithelialization in days

Time frame: Post operative day 5 and every other day thereafter

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlComplete Wound Healing13.9 DaysStandard Deviation 2
PRPComplete Wound Healing7.2 DaysStandard Deviation 0.8
PRP+KComplete Wound Healing5.7 DaysStandard Deviation 0.7
p-value: 0.05ANOVA
Secondary

Pain

Pain evaluated on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), specifically during dressing replacement.

Time frame: Post operative day 5

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlPain7.2 VAS Pain ScoreStandard Deviation 0.7
PRPPain1.5 VAS Pain ScoreStandard Deviation 0.9
PRP+KPain0.4 VAS Pain ScoreStandard Deviation 0.7
p-value: 0.05ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026