Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Disease, Coronary Restenosis
Conditions
Keywords
Bioabsorbable, Coronary Stent, Everolimus, Drug eluting stents, Stents, Angioplasty, Coronary artery disease (CAD), Total coronary occlusion, Coronary artery restenosis, Stent thrombosis, Vascular disease, Myocardial ischemia, Coronary artery stenosis
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and performance of the BVS Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (EECSS) in the treatment of patients with a maximum of two de novo native coronary artery lesions located in two different major epicardial vessels. Currently in development at Abbott Vascular. Not available for sale in the United States.
Interventions
Bioabsorbable drug eluting stent implantation in the treatment of coronary artery disease
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
General inclusion criteria 1. Patient must be at least 18 years of age. 2. Patient is able to verbally confirm understanding of risks, benefits and treatment alternatives of receiving the BVS Everolimus Eluting CSS and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any Clinical Investigation related procedure, as approved by the appropriate Ethics Committee of the respective clinical site. 3. Patient must have evidence of myocardial ischemia (e.g., stable or unstable angina, silent ischemia, positive functional study or a reversible change in the electrocardiogram (ECG) consistent with ischemia) 4. Patient must be an acceptable candidate for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery 5. Patient must agree to undergo all clinical investigation plan-required follow-up visits, angiograms, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), Palpography (optional), optical coherence tomography (OCT) (strongly recommended), multislice computed tomography (MSCT) (optional) and coronary vasomotion (optional) 6. Patient must agree not to participate in any other clinical investigation for a period of two years following the index procedure Angiographic Inclusion Criteria 1. Target lesion(s) must be located in a native coronary artery with visually estimated nominal vessel diameter of 3.0 mm 2. Target lesion(s) must measure ≤ 14 mm in length by visual estimation 3. Target lesion(s) must be in a major artery or branch with a visually estimated stenosis of ≥ 50% and \< 100% with a TIMI flow of ≥ 1 4. If two target lesions meet the inclusion criteria they must be in different major epicardial vessels left anterior descending artery (LAD) with septal and diagonal branches, left circumflex artery (LCX) with obtuse marginal and/or ramus intermedius branches and right coronary artery (RCA) and any of its branches 5. If two target lesion(s) are being treated, each of these lesions must meet all angiographic inclusion/
Exclusion criteria
6. Non-Clinical Investigation, percutaneous intervention for lesions in a non-target vessel is allowed if done ≥ 90 days prior to or if planned to be done 6 months after the index procedure 7. Non-Clinical Investigation percutaneous intervention for lesion in the target vessel is allowed if done \> 6 months prior to or if planned to be done 6 months after the index procedure General
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 30 days | Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction,and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR). |
| In-scaffold Late Loss: In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 1 Year | 1 year | In-scaffold Late Loss: in-scaffold MLD post-procedure - in-scaffold MLD at follow-up |
| In-scaffold Late Loss: In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 180 Days | 180 days | In-scaffold Late Loss: in-scaffold MLD post-procedure - in-scaffold MLD at follow-up. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| In-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS) | 180 days | Percent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 \* (1 - MLD/RVD) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by QCA. |
| Clinical Device Success (Per Lesion) | On day 0 (the day of procedure) | Successful delivery and deployment of the Clinical Investigation scaffold at the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the scaffold delivery system with attainment of final residual stenosis of less than 50% of the target lesion by QCA (by visual estimation if QCA unavailable). Standard pre-dilation catheters and post-dilatation catheters (if applicable) may be used. Bailout patients will be included as device success only if the above criteria for clinical device are met. |
| Clinical Procedure Success (Per Patient) | On day 0 (the day of procedure) | Successful delivery and deployment of the Clinical Investigation scaffold at the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the scaffold delivery system with attainment of final residual stenosis of less than 50% of the target lesion by QCA (by visual estimation if QCA unavailable) and/or using any adjunctive device without the occurrence of ischemia-driven major adverse cardiac event (MACE) during the hospital stay with a maximum of first seven days post index procedure. |
| Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 180 days | Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction,and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR). |
| Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 30 days | Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or Ischemic-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR). |
| Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 30 days | ID-TLR is defined as the revascularization at the target lesion associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study. |
| Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 30 days | ID-TVR is the revascularization in the target vessel associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study. |
| Cardiac Death | 30 days | Cardiac death is defined as any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. (This includes but is not limited to acute myocardial infarction, cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade, arrhythmia or conduction abnormality, cerebrovascular accident within 30 days of the procedure or cerebrovascular accident suspected of being related to the procedure, death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery.) |
| Aneurysm | 180 days | An abnormal expansion or protrusion of a coronary blood vessel resulting from a disease or weakening of the vessel's wall (all three layers) that exceeds the RVD of the vessel by 1.5 times. |
| Myocardial Infarction | 30 days | Myocardial Infarction (MI): * Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG. * Non-Q wave MI: Elevation of Creatine kinase (CK) levels to ≥ two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves. |
| Scaffold Thrombosis | 30 days | Scaffold thrombosis will be categorized as acute (≤ 1day), subacute (\>1day ≤ 30 days) and late (\>30 days) and will be defined as any of the following: * Clinical presentation of acute coronary syndrome with angiographic evidence of scaffold thrombosis (angiographic appearance of thrombus within or adjacent to a previously treated target lesion) * In the absence of angiography, any unexplained death, or acute MI (ST segment elevation or new Q-wave)\* in the distribution of the target lesion within 30 days \*(Non-specific ST /T changes and cardiac enzyme elevations do not suffice) Any thromboses that occur less than 30 days after the index procedure will not be counted as restenosis. |
| In-scaffold Late Loss (LL): In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 2 Years | 2 years | In-scaffold Late Loss: in-scaffold MLD post-procedure - in-scaffold MLD at follow-up. |
| In-scaffold Late Loss (LL): In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 3 Years | 3 years | In-scaffold Late Loss: in-scaffold MLD post-procedure - in-scaffold MLD at follow-up. |
| In-scaffold Late Loss (LL): In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 5 Years | 5 years | In-scaffold Late Loss: in-scaffold MLD post-procedure - in-scaffold MLD at follow-up. |
| Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 180 Days | 180 days | Proximal Late Loss: proximal MLD post-procedure - proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to scaffold placement). |
| Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 1 Year | 1 year | Proximal Late Loss: proximal MLD post-procedure - proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to scaffold placement). |
| Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 2 Years | 2 years | Proximal Late Loss: proximal MLD post-procedure - proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to scaffold placement). |
| Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 3 Years | 3 years | Proximal Late Loss: proximal MLD post-procedure - proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to scaffold placement). |
| Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 5 Years | 5 years | Proximal Late Loss: proximal MLD post-procedure - proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to scaffold placement). |
| Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 180 Days | 180 days | Distal Late Loss: distal MLD post-procedure - distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to scaffold placement). |
| Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 1 Year | 1 year | Distal Late Loss: distal MLD post-procedure - distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to scaffold placement). |
| Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 2 Years | 2 years | Distal Late Loss: distal MLD post-procedure - distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to scaffold placement). |
| Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 3 Years | 3 years | Distal Late Loss: distal MLD post-procedure - distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to scaffold placement). |
| Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 5 Years | 5 years | Distal Late Loss: distal MLD post-procedure - distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to scaffold placement). |
| In-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR) | 180 days | Percent of patients with a followup percent diameter stenosis of \>=50% per QCA. |
| Persisting Dissection | 180 days | Dissection at follow-up that was present post-procedure. |
| Thrombus | 180 days | — |
| Vasomotion Analysis: In-scaffold Mean Luminal Diameter | 5 years | Vasomotion function was assessed in reaction to nitrate administration. |
| Volume Obstruction (VO) | 180 days | Defined as scaffold intimal hyperplasia and calculated as 100\*(Scaffold Volume - Lumen Volume)/Scaffold Volume by IVUS. |
| Persisting Incomplete Apposition | 180 days | Persisting incomplete apposition is defined as incomplete apposition at follow-up that was present post-procedure. Incomplete Apposition: Failure of the scaffold to completely appose to the vessel wall after placement is defined as one or more scaffold strut separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in the ultrasound image. |
| Late Incomplete Apposition | 180 days | Late-Acquired Incomplete Apposition is defined as incomplete apposition of the scaffold at follow-up, which was not present post-procedure. Incomplete Apposition: Failure of the scaffold to completely appose to the vessel wall after placement is defined as one or more scaffold strut separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in the ultrasound image. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Reference Area | 1 year | — |
| Minimum Luminal Area | 1 year | — |
| Mean Luminal Area | 1 year | — |
| Mean Scaffold Area | 2 years | — |
| Minimum Stent Area | 1 year | — |
| Minimum Scaffold Area | 2 year | — |
| Luminal Volume | 1 year | — |
| Stent Volume | 1 year | — |
| Scaffold Volume | 2 years | — |
| Mean Luminal Diameter | 1 year | — |
| Minimum Luminal Diameter (MLD) | 1 year | The average of two orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment - in lesion, in scaffold or in segment. MLD is visually estimated during angiography by the Investigator; it is measured during QCA by the Angiographic Core Lab. |
| Minimum Luminal Diameter | 2 years | The average of two orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment - in lesion, in scaffold or in segment. MLD is visually estimated during angiography by the Investigator; it is measured during QCA by the Angiographic Core Lab. |
| Mean Stent Diameter | 1 year | — |
| Mean Scaffold Diameter | 2 years | — |
| Minimum Stent Diameter | 1 year | — |
| Minimum Scaffold Diameter | 2 years | — |
| Strut Volume | 1 year | — |
| Number of Struts Per BVS | 1 year | — |
| % of Covered Struts (150 µm) | 1 year | — |
| % of Acutely Covered Struts | 2 years | — |
| % of Uncovered Struts (150 µm) | 1 year | — |
| Number of Struts in Side Branch | 1 year | — |
| Tissue Coverage Area Classical | 1 year | — |
| Tissue Coverage Area BVS (Neointimal Area) | 1 year | — |
| Tissue Coverage Volume Classical | 1 year | — |
| Tissue Coverage Volume BVS | 1 year | — |
| Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume Classical | 1 year | — |
| Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume BVS | 1 year | — |
| Mean Flow Area | 1 year | — |
| Minimum Flow Area | 1 year | — |
| Mean Strut Core Area | 1 year | — |
| Percent (%) Lumen Area Stenosis | 1 year | — |
| Mean Stent Area | 1 year | — |
Countries
Australia, Belgium, Denmark, France, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Switzerland
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Total of 101 patients (intent to treat patient population \[ITT\]) were enrolled in the ABSORB Cohort B study at 12 clinical sites in Europe/Australia/New Zealand between March 19, 2009 and November 6, 2009. Only for assessing imaging outcomes at different follow-up periods, subjects were divided into Group 1 (n = 45) & Group 2 (n = 56).
Pre-assignment details
ITT population were assessed for all clinical endpoints. For imaging outcomes,Group 1 (n=45) patients were followed up at 180 days, 2 & 5 years; while Group 2 (n=56) patients at 1, 3 & 5 years. Therefore, data related to imaging outcomes are available only for Group 1 at 180 days, 2 & 5 years timeframe & only for Group 2 at 1, 3 & 5 years timeframe
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Absorb BVS Bioabsorbable Vascular Solutions Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (BVS EECSS)
Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent: Bioabsorbable drug eluting stent implantation in the treatment of coronary artery disease.
Investigational devices available for the study were the Absorb BVS with a diameter of 3.0 mm and length of 18 mm. A total of 249 Absorb BVS were received at twelve investigational sites in the ABSORB Cohort B clinical study. Of the 249 devices received by the study sites, 102 were implanted in patients and 147 were returned to the sponsor. | 101 |
| Total | 101 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| 2-year Clinical Follow-up | Lost to Follow-up | 1 |
| 4-year Clinical Follow-up | Missed visit | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Absorb BVS |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 62.3 years |
| Region of Enrollment Australia | 4 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Belgium | 14 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Denmark | 12 participants |
| Region of Enrollment France | 8 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Netherlands | 30 participants |
| Region of Enrollment New Zealand | 14 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 13 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Switzerland | 6 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 28 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 73 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 101 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 58 / 101 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 56 / 101 |
Outcome results
Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction,and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR).
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 6.9 percentage of participants |
Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction,and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR).
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 2.0 percentage of participants |
In-scaffold Late Loss: In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 180 Days
In-scaffold Late Loss: in-scaffold MLD post-procedure - in-scaffold MLD at follow-up.
Time frame: 180 days
Population: In Cohort B, Group 1. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | In-scaffold Late Loss: In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 180 Days | 0.19 Millimeter | Standard Deviation 0.18 |
In-scaffold Late Loss: In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 1 Year
In-scaffold Late Loss: in-scaffold MLD post-procedure - in-scaffold MLD at follow-up
Time frame: 1 year
Population: In Cohort B, Group 2. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | In-scaffold Late Loss: In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 1 Year | 0.27 Millimeter | Standard Deviation 0.32 |
Aneurysm
An abnormal expansion or protrusion of a coronary blood vessel resulting from a disease or weakening of the vessel's wall (all three layers) that exceeds the RVD of the vessel by 1.5 times.
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Aneurysm | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Aneurysm
An abnormal expansion or protrusion of a coronary blood vessel resulting from a disease or weakening of the vessel's wall (all three layers) that exceeds the RVD of the vessel by 1.5 times.
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.Cohort B, Group 1 and Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Aneurysm | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Aneurysm
An abnormal expansion or protrusion of a coronary blood vessel resulting from a disease or weakening of the vessel's wall (all three layers) that exceeds the RVD of the vessel by 1.5 times.
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Aneurysm | 2.6 Percentage of participants |
Aneurysm
An abnormal expansion or protrusion of a coronary blood vessel resulting from a disease or weakening of the vessel's wall (all three layers) that exceeds the RVD of the vessel by 1.5 times.
Time frame: 180 days
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Aneurysm | 2.4 Percentage of participants |
Aneurysm
An abnormal expansion or protrusion of a coronary blood vessel resulting from a disease or weakening of the vessel's wall (all three layers) that exceeds the RVD of the vessel by 1.5 times.
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Aneurysm | 2.08 Percentage of participants |
Cardiac Death
Cardiac death is defined as any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. (This includes but is not limited to acute myocardial infarction, cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade, arrhythmia or conduction abnormality, cerebrovascular accident within 30 days of the procedure or cerebrovascular accident suspected of being related to the procedure, death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery.)
Time frame: 4 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=43) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Two patients (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 4-year follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Cardiac Death | 0 percentage of participants |
Cardiac Death
Cardiac death is defined as any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. (This includes but is not limited to acute myocardial infarction, cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade, arrhythmia or conduction abnormality, cerebrovascular accident within 30 days of the procedure or cerebrovascular accident suspected of being related to the procedure, death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery.)
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 3-year follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Cardiac Death | 0 percentage of participants |
Cardiac Death
Cardiac death is defined as any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. (This includes but is not limited to acute myocardial infarction, cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade, arrhythmia or conduction abnormality, cerebrovascular accident within 30 days of the procedure or cerebrovascular accident suspected of being related to the procedure, death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery.)
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 2-year follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Cardiac Death | 0 percentage of participants |
Cardiac Death
Cardiac death is defined as any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. (This includes but is not limited to acute myocardial infarction, cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade, arrhythmia or conduction abnormality, cerebrovascular accident within 30 days of the procedure or cerebrovascular accident suspected of being related to the procedure, death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery.)
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Cardiac Death | 0 percentage of participants |
Cardiac Death
Cardiac death is defined as any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. (This includes but is not limited to acute myocardial infarction, cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade, arrhythmia or conduction abnormality, cerebrovascular accident within 30 days of the procedure or cerebrovascular accident suspected of being related to the procedure, death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery.)
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Cardiac Death | 0 percentage of participants |
Cardiac Death
Cardiac death is defined as any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. (This includes but is not limited to acute myocardial infarction, cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade, arrhythmia or conduction abnormality, cerebrovascular accident within 30 days of the procedure or cerebrovascular accident suspected of being related to the procedure, death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery.)
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient from Group 1 population had lost-to-follow-up. Where as,1 patient (Group 1) missed the 4-year follow up but returned for the 5-year follow up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Cardiac Death | 0 percentage of participants |
Clinical Device Success (Per Lesion)
Successful delivery and deployment of the Clinical Investigation scaffold at the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the scaffold delivery system with attainment of final residual stenosis of less than 50% of the target lesion by QCA (by visual estimation if QCA unavailable). Standard pre-dilation catheters and post-dilatation catheters (if applicable) may be used. Bailout patients will be included as device success only if the above criteria for clinical device are met.
Time frame: On day 0 (the day of procedure)
Population: Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Clinical Device Success (Per Lesion) | 100.0 percentage of lesions |
Clinical Procedure Success (Per Patient)
Successful delivery and deployment of the Clinical Investigation scaffold at the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the scaffold delivery system with attainment of final residual stenosis of less than 50% of the target lesion by QCA (by visual estimation if QCA unavailable) and/or using any adjunctive device without the occurrence of ischemia-driven major adverse cardiac event (MACE) during the hospital stay with a maximum of first seven days post index procedure.
Time frame: On day 0 (the day of procedure)
Population: Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Clinical Procedure Success (Per Patient) | 98.0 percentage of participants |
Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 180 Days
Distal Late Loss: distal MLD post-procedure - distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to scaffold placement).
Time frame: 180 days
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 180 Days | 0.07 Millimeter | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 1 Year
Distal Late Loss: distal MLD post-procedure - distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to scaffold placement).
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 1 Year | 0.07 Millimeter | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 2 Years
Distal Late Loss: distal MLD post-procedure - distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to scaffold placement).
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 2 Years | 0.04 Millimeter | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 3 Years
Distal Late Loss: distal MLD post-procedure - distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to scaffold placement).
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 3 Years | 0.08 Millimeter | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 5 Years
Distal Late Loss: distal MLD post-procedure - distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to scaffold placement).
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1 and Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 5 Years | 0.11 Millimeter | Standard Deviation 0.35 |
Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction,and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR).
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 2-year follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 9.0 percentage of participants |
Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction,and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR).
Time frame: 180 days
Population: Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 5.0 percentage of participants |
Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction,and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR).
Time frame: 270 days
Population: Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 5.0 percentage of participants |
Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction,and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR).
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 3-year follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 10.0 percentage of participants |
Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction,and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR).
Time frame: 4 years
Population: Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=43) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Two patients (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 4-year follow-up period. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 10.1 percentage of participants |
Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction,and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR).
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient from Group 1 population had lost-to-follow-up. Where as,1 patient (Group 1) missed the 4-year follow up but returned for the 5-year follow up. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) | 11.0 percentage of participants |
Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or Ischemic-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR).
Time frame: 270 days
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 5.0 Percentage of participants |
Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or Ischemic-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR).
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 6.9 percentage of participants |
Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or Ischemic-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR).
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 2-year follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 11.0 percentage of participants |
Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or Ischemic-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR).
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 3-year follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 13.0 percentage of participants |
Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or Ischemic-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR).
Time frame: 4 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=43) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Two patients (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 4-year follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 13.1 percentage of participants |
Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or Ischemic-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR).
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient from Group 1 population had lost-to-follow-up. Where as,1 patient (Group 1) missed the 4-year follow up but returned for the 5-year follow up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 14.0 percentage of participants |
Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or Ischemic-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR).
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 2.0 percentage of participants |
Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or Ischemic-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR).
Time frame: 180 days
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF) | 5.0 Percentage of participants |
In-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR)
Percent of patients with a followup percent diameter stenosis of \>=50% per QCA.
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | In-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR) | 3.5 Percentage of participants |
In-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR)
Percent of patients with a followup percent diameter stenosis of \>=50% per QCA.
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1 and Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | In-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR) | 7.8 Percentage of participants |
In-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR)
Percent of patients with a followup percent diameter stenosis of \>=50% per QCA.
Time frame: 180 days
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | In-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
In-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR)
Percent of patients with a followup percent diameter stenosis of \>=50% per QCA.
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | In-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR) | 7.8 Percentage of participants |
In-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR)
Percent of patients with a followup percent diameter stenosis of \>=50% per QCA.
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | In-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
In-scaffold Late Loss (LL): In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 2 Years
In-scaffold Late Loss: in-scaffold MLD post-procedure - in-scaffold MLD at follow-up.
Time frame: 2 years
Population: ITT population. In Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | In-scaffold Late Loss (LL): In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 2 Years | 0.27 Millimeter | Standard Deviation 0.19 |
In-scaffold Late Loss (LL): In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 3 Years
In-scaffold Late Loss: in-scaffold MLD post-procedure - in-scaffold MLD at follow-up.
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. In Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | In-scaffold Late Loss (LL): In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 3 Years | 0.29 Millimeter | Standard Deviation 0.43 |
In-scaffold Late Loss (LL): In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 5 Years
In-scaffold Late Loss: in-scaffold MLD post-procedure - in-scaffold MLD at follow-up.
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1 and Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | In-scaffold Late Loss (LL): In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 5 Years | 0.26 Millimeter | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
In-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)
Percent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 \* (1 - MLD/RVD) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by QCA.
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | In-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS) | 21.35 percentage of diameter stenosis | Standard Deviation 11.18 |
In-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)
Percent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 \* (1 - MLD/RVD) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by QCA.
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | In-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS) | 23.16 percentage of diameter stenosis | Standard Deviation 14.85 |
In-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)
Percent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 \* (1 - MLD/RVD) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by QCA.
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1 and Group2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | In-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS) | 22.74 percentage of diameter stenosis | Standard Deviation 13.94 |
In-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)
Percent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 \* (1 - MLD/RVD) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by QCA.
Time frame: 180 days
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | In-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS) | 19.21 percentage of diameter stenosis | Standard Deviation 7.62 |
In-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)
Percent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 \* (1 - MLD/RVD) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by QCA.
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | In-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS) | 20.94 percentage of diameter stenosis | Standard Deviation 7.63 |
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
ID-TLR is defined as the revascularization at the target lesion associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.
Time frame: 180 days
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 2.0 Percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
ID-TLR is defined as the revascularization at the target lesion associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 0 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
ID-TLR is defined as the revascularization at the target lesion associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.
Time frame: 270 days
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 2.0 Percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
ID-TLR is defined as the revascularization at the target lesion associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 4.0 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
ID-TLR is defined as the revascularization at the target lesion associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 2-year follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 6.0 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
ID-TLR is defined as the revascularization at the target lesion associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 3-year follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 7.0 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
ID-TLR is defined as the revascularization at the target lesion associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.
Time frame: 4 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=43) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Two patients (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 4-year follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 7.1 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
ID-TLR is defined as the revascularization at the target lesion associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient from Group 1 population had lost-to-follow-up. Where as,1 patient (Group 1) missed the 4-year follow up but returned for the 5-year follow up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR) | 8.0 percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
ID-TVR is the revascularization in the target vessel associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 3-year follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 10.0 Percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
ID-TVR is the revascularization in the target vessel associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.
Time frame: 4 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=43) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Two patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 4-year follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 10.0 Percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
ID-TVR is the revascularization in the target vessel associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient from Group 1 population had lost-to-follow-up. Where as,1 patient (Group 1) missed the 4-year follow up but returned for the 5-year follow up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 11.0 Percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
ID-TVR is the revascularization in the target vessel associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 2-year follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 8.0 Percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
ID-TVR is the revascularization in the target vessel associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 4.0 Percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
ID-TVR is the revascularization in the target vessel associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.
Time frame: 270 days
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 2.0 Percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
ID-TVR is the revascularization in the target vessel associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.
Time frame: 180 days
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 2.0 Percentage of participants |
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
ID-TVR is the revascularization in the target vessel associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Late Incomplete Apposition
Late-Acquired Incomplete Apposition is defined as incomplete apposition of the scaffold at follow-up, which was not present post-procedure. Incomplete Apposition: Failure of the scaffold to completely appose to the vessel wall after placement is defined as one or more scaffold strut separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in the ultrasound image.
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B, Group 2. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Late Incomplete Apposition | 3.6 Percentage of participants |
Late Incomplete Apposition
Late-Acquired Incomplete Apposition is defined as incomplete apposition of the scaffold at follow-up, which was not present post-procedure. Incomplete Apposition: Failure of the scaffold to completely appose to the vessel wall after placement is defined as one or more scaffold strut separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in the ultrasound image.
Time frame: 180 days
Population: Cohort B, Group 1. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Late Incomplete Apposition | 7.5 Percentage of participants |
Late Incomplete Apposition
Late-Acquired Incomplete Apposition is defined as incomplete apposition of the scaffold at follow-up, which was not present post-procedure. Incomplete Apposition: Failure of the scaffold to completely appose to the vessel wall after placement is defined as one or more scaffold strut separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in the ultrasound image.
Time frame: 3 year
Population: Cohort B, Group 2. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Late Incomplete Apposition | 7.0 Percentage of participants |
Late Incomplete Apposition
Late-Acquired Incomplete Apposition is defined as incomplete apposition of the scaffold at follow-up, which was not present post-procedure. Incomplete Apposition: Failure of the scaffold to completely appose to the vessel wall after placement is defined as one or more scaffold strut separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in the ultrasound image.
Time frame: 2 year
Population: Cohort B, Group 1. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Late Incomplete Apposition | 2.6 Percentage of participants |
Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial Infarction (MI): * Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG. * Non-Q wave MI: Elevation of CK levels to ≥ two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves.
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 3-year follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Myocardial Infarction | 3.0 percentage of participants |
Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial Infarction (MI): * Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG. * Non-Q wave MI: Elevation of CK levels to ≥ two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves.
Time frame: 4 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=43) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Two patients (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 4-year follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Myocardial Infarction | 3.0 percentage of participants |
Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial Infarction (MI): * Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG. * Non-Q wave MI: Elevation of CK levels to ≥ two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves.
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient from Group 1 population had lost-to-follow-up. Where as,1 patient (Group 1) missed the 4-year follow up but returned for the 5-year follow up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Myocardial Infarction | 3.0 percentage of participants |
Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial Infarction (MI): * Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG. * Non-Q wave MI: Elevation of Creatine kinase (CK) levels to ≥ two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves.
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Myocardial Infarction | 2.0 percentage of participants |
Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial Infarction (MI): * Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG. * Non-Q wave MI: Elevation of CK levels to ≥ two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves.
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Myocardial Infarction | 3.0 percentage of participants |
Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial Infarction (MI): * Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG. * Non-Q wave MI: Elevation of CK levels to ≥ two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves.
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 2-year follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Myocardial Infarction | 3.0 percentage of participants |
Persisting Dissection
Dissection at follow-up that was present post-procedure.
Time frame: 1 year
Population: ITT population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Persisting Dissection | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Persisting Dissection
Dissection at follow-up that was present post-procedure.
Time frame: 180 days
Population: ITT population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Persisting Dissection | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Persisting Dissection
Dissection at follow-up that was present post-procedure.
Time frame: 5 years
Population: ITT population. Cohort B, Group 1 and Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Persisting Dissection | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Persisting Dissection
Dissection at follow-up that was present post-procedure.
Time frame: 3 years
Population: ITT population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Persisting Dissection | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Persisting Dissection
Dissection at follow-up that was present post-procedure.
Time frame: 2 years
Population: ITT population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Persisting Dissection | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Persisting Incomplete Apposition
Persisting incomplete apposition is defined as incomplete apposition at follow-up that was present post-procedure. Incomplete Apposition: Failure of the scaffold to completely appose to the vessel wall after placement is defined as one or more scaffold strut separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in the ultrasound image.
Time frame: 180 days
Population: Cohort B, Group 1. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Persisting Incomplete Apposition | 2.3 Percentage of participants |
Persisting Incomplete Apposition
Persisting incomplete apposition is defined as incomplete apposition at follow-up that was present post-procedure. Incomplete Apposition: Failure of the scaffold to completely appose to the vessel wall after placement is defined as one or more scaffold strut separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in the ultrasound image.
Time frame: 3 year
Population: Cohort B, Group 2. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Persisting Incomplete Apposition | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Persisting Incomplete Apposition
Persisting incomplete apposition is defined as incomplete apposition at follow-up that was present post-procedure. Incomplete Apposition: Failure of the scaffold to completely appose to the vessel wall after placement is defined as one or more scaffold strut separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in the ultrasound image.
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B, Group 2. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Persisting Incomplete Apposition | 3.5 Percentage of participants |
Persisting Incomplete Apposition
Persisting incomplete apposition is defined as incomplete apposition at follow-up that was present post-procedure. Incomplete Apposition: Failure of the scaffold to completely appose to the vessel wall after placement is defined as one or more scaffold strut separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in the ultrasound image.
Time frame: 2 year
Population: Cohort B, Group 1. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Persisting Incomplete Apposition | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 180 Days
Proximal Late Loss: proximal MLD post-procedure - proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to scaffold placement).
Time frame: 180 days
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. In Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 180 Days | 0.07 Millimeter | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 1 Year
Proximal Late Loss: proximal MLD post-procedure - proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to scaffold placement).
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. In Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 1 Year | 0.12 Millimeter | Standard Deviation 0.29 |
Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 2 Years
Proximal Late Loss: proximal MLD post-procedure - proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to scaffold placement).
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. In Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 2 Years | 0.12 Millimeter | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 3 Years
Proximal Late Loss: proximal MLD post-procedure - proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to scaffold placement).
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. In Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 3 Years | 0.14 Millimeter | Standard Deviation 0.31 |
Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 5 Years
Proximal Late Loss: proximal MLD post-procedure - proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to scaffold placement).
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. In Cohort B, Group 1 and Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 5 Years | 0.14 Millimeter | Standard Deviation 0.43 |
Scaffold Thrombosis
Scaffold thrombosis will be categorized as acute (≤ 1day), subacute (\>1day ≤ 30 days) and late (\>30 days) and will be defined as any of the following: * Clinical presentation of acute coronary syndrome with angiographic evidence of scaffold thrombosis (angiographic appearance of thrombus within or adjacent to a previously treated target lesion) * In the absence of angiography, any unexplained death, or acute MI (ST segment elevation or new Q-wave)\* in the distribution of the target lesion within 30 days \*(Non-specific ST /T changes and cardiac enzyme elevations do not suffice) Any thromboses that occur less than 30 days after the index procedure will not be counted as restenosis.
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Scaffold Thrombosis | 0 percentage of participants |
Scaffold Thrombosis
Scaffold thrombosis will be categorized as acute (≤ 1day), subacute (\>1day ≤ 30 days) and late (\>30 days) and will be defined as any of the following: * Clinical presentation of acute coronary syndrome with angiographic evidence of scaffold thrombosis (angiographic appearance of thrombus within or adjacent to a previously treated target lesion) * In the absence of angiography, any unexplained death, or acute MI (ST segment elevation or new Q-wave)\* in the distribution of the target lesion within 30 days \*(Non-specific ST /T changes and cardiac enzyme elevations do not suffice) Any thromboses that occur less than 30 days after the index procedure will not be counted as restenosis.
Time frame: 30 days
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Scaffold Thrombosis | 0 percentage of participants |
Scaffold Thrombosis
Scaffold thrombosis will be categorized as acute (≤ 1day), subacute (\>1day ≤ 30 days) and late (\>30 days) and will be defined as any of the following: * Clinical presentation of acute coronary syndrome with angiographic evidence of scaffold thrombosis (angiographic appearance of thrombus within or adjacent to a previously treated target lesion) * In the absence of angiography, any unexplained death, or acute MI (ST segment elevation or new Q-wave)\* in the distribution of the target lesion within 30 days \*(Non-specific ST /T changes and cardiac enzyme elevations do not suffice) Any thromboses that occur less than 30 days after the index procedure will not be counted as restenosis.
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 2-year follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Scaffold Thrombosis | 0 percentage of participants |
Scaffold Thrombosis
Scaffold thrombosis will be categorized as acute (≤ 1day), subacute (\>1day ≤ 30 days) and late (\>30 days) and will be defined as any of the following: * Clinical presentation of acute coronary syndrome with angiographic evidence of scaffold thrombosis (angiographic appearance of thrombus within or adjacent to a previously treated target lesion) * In the absence of angiography, any unexplained death, or acute MI (ST segment elevation or new Q-wave)\* in the distribution of the target lesion within 30 days \*(Non-specific ST /T changes and cardiac enzyme elevations do not suffice) Any thromboses that occur less than 30 days after the index procedure will not be counted as restenosis.
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 3-year follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Scaffold Thrombosis | 0 percentage of participants |
Scaffold Thrombosis
Scaffold thrombosis will be categorized as acute (≤ 1day), subacute (\>1day ≤ 30 days) and late (\>30 days) and will be defined as any of the following: * Clinical presentation of acute coronary syndrome with angiographic evidence of scaffold thrombosis (angiographic appearance of thrombus within or adjacent to a previously treated target lesion) * In the absence of angiography, any unexplained death, or acute MI (ST segment elevation or new Q-wave)\* in the distribution of the target lesion within 30 days \*(Non-specific ST /T changes and cardiac enzyme elevations do not suffice) Any thromboses that occur less than 30 days after the index procedure will not be counted as restenosis.
Time frame: 4 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=43) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Two patients (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 4-year follow-up period.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Scaffold Thrombosis | 0 percentage of participants |
Scaffold Thrombosis
Scaffold thrombosis will be categorized as acute (≤ 1day), subacute (\>1day ≤ 30 days) and late (\>30 days) and will be defined as any of the following: * Clinical presentation of acute coronary syndrome with angiographic evidence of scaffold thrombosis (angiographic appearance of thrombus within or adjacent to a previously treated target lesion) * In the absence of angiography, any unexplained death, or acute MI (ST segment elevation or new Q-wave)\* in the distribution of the target lesion within 30 days \*(Non-specific ST /T changes and cardiac enzyme elevations do not suffice) Any thromboses that occur less than 30 days after the index procedure will not be counted as restenosis.
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient from Group 1 population had lost-to-follow-up. Where as,1 patient (Group 1) missed the 4-year follow up but returned for the 5-year follow up.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Scaffold Thrombosis | 0 percentage of participants |
Thrombus
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Thrombus | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Thrombus
Time frame: 180 days
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Thrombus | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Thrombus
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1 and Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Thrombus | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Thrombus
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Thrombus | 2.08 Percentage of participants |
Thrombus
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Thrombus | 2.6 Percentage of participants |
Vasomotion Analysis: In-scaffold Mean Luminal Diameter
Vasomotion function was assessed in reaction to nitrate administration.
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Vasomotion Analysis: In-scaffold Mean Luminal Diameter | Pre-Nitro | 2.49 Millimeter | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
| Absorb BVS | Vasomotion Analysis: In-scaffold Mean Luminal Diameter | Post-Nitro | 2.56 Millimeter | Standard Deviation 0.35 |
Volume Obstruction (VO)
Defined as scaffold intimal hyperplasia and calculated as 100\*(Scaffold Volume - Lumen Volume)/Scaffold Volume by IVUS.
Time frame: 2 year
Population: Cohort B, Group 1. ITT population; IVUS analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Volume Obstruction (VO) | 3.33 percent of scaffold volume | Standard Deviation 3.99 |
Volume Obstruction (VO)
Defined as scaffold intimal hyperplasia and calculated as 100\*(Scaffold Volume - Lumen Volume)/Scaffold Volume by IVUS.
Time frame: 3 year
Population: Cohort B, Group 2. ITT population; IVUS analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Volume Obstruction (VO) | 4.19 percent of scaffold volume | Standard Deviation 6.43 |
Volume Obstruction (VO)
Defined as scaffold intimal hyperplasia and calculated as 100\*(Scaffold Volume - Lumen Volume)/Scaffold Volume by IVUS.
Time frame: 180 days
Population: Cohort B, Group 1. ITT population; Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Volume Obstruction (VO) | 1.22 percent of scaffold volume | Standard Deviation 1.99 |
Volume Obstruction (VO)
Defined as scaffold intimal hyperplasia and calculated as 100\*(Scaffold Volume - Lumen Volume)/Scaffold Volume by IVUS.
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B, Group 2. ITT population; IVUS analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Volume Obstruction (VO) | 1.47 percent of scaffold volume | Standard Deviation 3.08 |
Luminal Volume
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Luminal Volume | 107.66 mm^3 | Standard Deviation 34.79 |
Luminal Volume
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Luminal Volume | 103.31 mm^3 | Standard Deviation 30.86 |
Luminal Volume
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Luminal Volume | 106.33 mm^3 | Standard Deviation 31.42 |
Luminal Volume
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1 and Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Luminal Volume | 106.36 mm^3 | Standard Deviation 32.72 |
Mean Flow Area
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Flow Area | 6.06 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
Mean Flow Area
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Flow Area | 5.90 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.66 |
Mean Flow Area
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Cohort B (Group 1 and Group 2), Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Flow Area | 6.21 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.83 |
Mean Flow Area
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Flow Area | 6.00 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.76 |
Mean Luminal Area
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Luminal Area | 6.00 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.76 |
Mean Luminal Area
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Luminal Area | 5.92 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.71 |
Mean Luminal Area
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Cohort B (Group 1 and Group 2), Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population.OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Luminal Area | 6.22 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.84 |
Mean Luminal Area
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Luminal Area | 6.06 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.7 |
Mean Luminal Diameter
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Luminal Diameter | 2.74 mm | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
Mean Luminal Diameter
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Luminal Diameter | 2.71 mm | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
Mean Luminal Diameter
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Luminal Diameter | 2.72 mm | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
Mean Luminal Diameter
It is measured during QCA by the Angiographic Core Lab.
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Cohort B (Group 1 and Group 2), Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Luminal Diameter | 2.77 mm | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
Mean Reference Area
Time frame: 3 years
Population: OCT analysis,Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Reference Area | 6.24 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.78 |
Mean Reference Area
Time frame: 2 years
Population: OCT analysis,Cohort B Group1 , Intent-to-Treat Population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Reference Area | 6.29 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 2.13 |
Mean Reference Area
Time frame: 5 years
Population: OCT analysis,Cohort B (Group 1 and Group 2), Intent-to-Treat Population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Reference Area | 6.13 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.96 |
Mean Reference Area
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) analysis,Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Reference Area | 6.34 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
Mean Scaffold Area
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Scaffold Area | 8.14 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.88 |
Mean Scaffold Area
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Scaffold Area | 8.50 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.93 |
Mean Scaffold Diameter
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Scaffold Diameter | 3.19 mm | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
Mean Scaffold Diameter
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Scaffold Diameter | 3.26 mm | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
Mean Stent Area
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Stent Area | 7.42 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.22 |
Mean Stent Diameter
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Stent Diameter | 3.06 mm | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
Mean Strut Core Area
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Strut Core Area | 0.19 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 0.04 |
Mean Strut Core Area
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Strut Core Area | 0.15 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 0.02 |
Mean Strut Core Area
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Mean Strut Core Area | 0.17 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 0.05 |
Minimum Flow Area
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Minimum Flow Area | 4.28 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.39 |
Minimum Flow Area
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Minimum Flow Area | 4.45 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.55 |
Minimum Flow Area
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Minimum Flow Area | 4.29 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.47 |
Minimum Flow Area
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Cohort B (Group 1 and Group 2), Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Minimum Flow Area | 4.15 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.69 |
Minimum Luminal Area
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Minimum Luminal Area | 4.29 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.48 |
Minimum Luminal Area
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Cohort B (Group 1 and Group 2), Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Minimum Luminal Area | 4.15 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.69 |
Minimum Luminal Area
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Minimum Luminal Area | 4.29 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.39 |
Minimum Luminal Area
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Minimum Luminal Area | 4.45 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.55 |
Minimum Luminal Diameter
The average of two orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment - in lesion, in scaffold or in segment. MLD is visually estimated during angiography by the Investigator; it is measured during QCA by the Angiographic Core Lab.
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Minimum Luminal Diameter | 2.34 mm | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
Minimum Luminal Diameter
The average of two orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment - in lesion, in scaffold or in segment. MLD is visually estimated during angiography by the Investigator; it is measured during QCA by the Angiographic Core Lab.
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1 , Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Minimum Luminal Diameter | 2.30 mm | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
Minimum Luminal Diameter
The average of two orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment - in lesion, in scaffold or in segment. MLD is visually estimated during angiography by the Investigator; it is measured during QCA by the Angiographic Core Lab.
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Cohort B (Group1 and Group 2), Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Minimum Luminal Diameter | 2.25 mm | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
Minimum Luminal Diameter (MLD)
The average of two orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment - in lesion, in scaffold or in segment. MLD is visually estimated during angiography by the Investigator; it is measured during QCA by the Angiographic Core Lab.
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Minimum Luminal Diameter (MLD) | 2.30 mm | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
Minimum Scaffold Area
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Minimum Scaffold Area | 6.66 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.67 |
Minimum Scaffold Area
Time frame: 2 year
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Minimum Scaffold Area | 6.33 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.45 |
Minimum Scaffold Diameter
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Minimum Scaffold Diameter | 2.89 mm | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
Minimum Scaffold Diameter
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Minimum Scaffold Diameter | 2.82 mm | Standard Deviation 0.33 |
Minimum Stent Area
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Minimum Stent Area | 5.96 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 1.14 |
Minimum Stent Diameter
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Minimum Stent Diameter | 2.74 mm | Standard Deviation 0.26 |
Number of Struts in Side Branch
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Cohort B (Group 1 and Group 2), Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Number of Struts in Side Branch | 0.0 Number of struts | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
Number of Struts in Side Branch
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Number of Struts in Side Branch | 0.2 Number of struts | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
Number of Struts in Side Branch
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Number of Struts in Side Branch | 0.2 Number of struts | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
Number of Struts in Side Branch
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Number of Struts in Side Branch | 0.1 Number of struts | Standard Deviation 0.4 |
Number of Struts Per BVS
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Number of Struts Per BVS | 162.1 Number of Struts | Standard Deviation 31.9 |
Number of Struts Per BVS
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Number of Struts Per BVS | 160.9 Number of Struts | Standard Deviation 27.9 |
Number of Struts Per BVS
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Number of Struts Per BVS | 145.2 Number of Struts | Standard Deviation 32.3 |
Number of Struts Per BVS
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Cohort B (Group 1 and Group 2), Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Number of Struts Per BVS | 7.1 Number of Struts | Standard Deviation 29.1 |
% of Acutely Covered Struts
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | % of Acutely Covered Struts | 98.07 Percent of Covered Struts | Standard Deviation 3.27 |
% of Acutely Covered Struts
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | % of Acutely Covered Struts | 97.90 Percent of Covered Struts | Standard Deviation 2 |
% of Covered Struts (150 µm)
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | % of Covered Struts (150 µm) | 96.86 Percent of Covered Struts | Standard Deviation 2.95 |
% of Uncovered Struts (150 µm)
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | % of Uncovered Struts (150 µm) | 2.10 Percent of Uncovered Struts | Standard Deviation 2 |
% of Uncovered Struts (150 µm)
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | % of Uncovered Struts (150 µm) | 1.93 Percent of Uncovered Struts | Standard Deviation 3.27 |
% of Uncovered Struts (150 µm)
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | % of Uncovered Struts (150 µm) | 3.14 Percent of Uncovered Struts | Standard Deviation 2.95 |
Percent (%) Lumen Area Stenosis
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Percent (%) Lumen Area Stenosis | 28.01 Percentage of Lumen Area Stenosis | Standard Deviation 13.68 |
Percent (%) Lumen Area Stenosis
Time frame: 5 years
Population: Cohort B (Group 1 and Group 2), Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Percent (%) Lumen Area Stenosis | 34.32 Percentage of Lumen Area Stenosis | Standard Deviation 16.21 |
Percent (%) Lumen Area Stenosis
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Percent (%) Lumen Area Stenosis | 28.70 Percentage of Lumen Area Stenosis | Standard Deviation 12.05 |
Percent (%) Lumen Area Stenosis
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Percent (%) Lumen Area Stenosis | 28.75 Percentage of Lumen Area Stenosis | Standard Deviation 10.58 |
Scaffold Volume
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Scaffold Volume | 145.07 mm^3 | Standard Deviation 36.69 |
Scaffold Volume
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Scaffold Volume | 145.78 mm^3 | Standard Deviation 38.28 |
Stent Volume
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Stent Volume | 132.90 mm^3 | Standard Deviation 21.64 |
Strut Volume
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Strut Volume | 3.02 mm^3 | Standard Deviation 0.66 |
Strut Volume
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Strut Volume | 2.61 mm^3 | Standard Deviation 0.45 |
Strut Volume
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Strut Volume | 3.28 mm^3 | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
Tissue Coverage Area BVS (Neointimal Area)
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Tissue Coverage Area BVS (Neointimal Area) | 1.99 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
Tissue Coverage Area BVS (Neointimal Area)
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Tissue Coverage Area BVS (Neointimal Area) | 2.25 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
Tissue Coverage Area BVS (Neointimal Area)
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Tissue Coverage Area BVS (Neointimal Area) | 1.38 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 0.75 |
Tissue Coverage Area Classical
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Tissue Coverage Area Classical | 1.54 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
Tissue Coverage Area Classical
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Tissue Coverage Area Classical | 2.44 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 0.61 |
Tissue Coverage Area Classical
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Tissue Coverage Area Classical | 2.13 mm^2 | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume BVS
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume BVS | 19.40 Percent of Tissue Coverage Obstruction | Standard Deviation 11.52 |
Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume BVS
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume BVS | 27.01 Percent of Tissue Coverage Obstruction | Standard Deviation 7.1 |
Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume BVS
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume BVS | 25.22 Percent of Tissue Coverage Obstruction | Standard Deviation 7.91 |
Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume Classical
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume Classical | 27.10 Percent of Tissue Coverage Obstruction | Standard Deviation 8.16 |
Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume Classical
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume Classical | 29.36 Percent of Tissue Coverage Obstruction | Standard Deviation 7.28 |
Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume Classical
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume Classical | 21.61 Percent of Tissue Coverage Obstruction | Standard Deviation 11.77 |
Tissue Coverage Volume BVS
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Tissue Coverage Volume BVS | 38.47 mm^3 | Standard Deviation 11.2 |
Tissue Coverage Volume BVS
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Tissue Coverage Volume BVS | 24.40 mm^3 | Standard Deviation 12.97 |
Tissue Coverage Volume BVS
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Tissue Coverage Volume BVS | 35.51 mm^3 | Standard Deviation 10.87 |
Tissue Coverage Volume Classical
Time frame: 2 years
Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Tissue Coverage Volume Classical | 38.12 mm^3 | Standard Deviation 10.99 |
Tissue Coverage Volume Classical
Time frame: 3 years
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Tissue Coverage Volume Classical | 41.76 mm^3 | Standard Deviation 11.46 |
Tissue Coverage Volume Classical
Time frame: 1 year
Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Tissue Coverage Volume Classical | 27.27 mm^3 | Standard Deviation 13.16 |