Skip to content

ABSORB Clinical Investigation, Cohort B

A Clinical Evaluation of the Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (BVS EECSS) in the Treatment of Patients With de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00856856
Acronym
ABSORB B
Enrollment
101
Registered
2009-03-06
Start date
2009-03-31
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2019-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Disease, Coronary Restenosis

Keywords

Bioabsorbable, Coronary Stent, Everolimus, Drug eluting stents, Stents, Angioplasty, Coronary artery disease (CAD), Total coronary occlusion, Coronary artery restenosis, Stent thrombosis, Vascular disease, Myocardial ischemia, Coronary artery stenosis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and performance of the BVS Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (EECSS) in the treatment of patients with a maximum of two de novo native coronary artery lesions located in two different major epicardial vessels. Currently in development at Abbott Vascular. Not available for sale in the United States.

Interventions

Bioabsorbable drug eluting stent implantation in the treatment of coronary artery disease

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

General inclusion criteria 1. Patient must be at least 18 years of age. 2. Patient is able to verbally confirm understanding of risks, benefits and treatment alternatives of receiving the BVS Everolimus Eluting CSS and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any Clinical Investigation related procedure, as approved by the appropriate Ethics Committee of the respective clinical site. 3. Patient must have evidence of myocardial ischemia (e.g., stable or unstable angina, silent ischemia, positive functional study or a reversible change in the electrocardiogram (ECG) consistent with ischemia) 4. Patient must be an acceptable candidate for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery 5. Patient must agree to undergo all clinical investigation plan-required follow-up visits, angiograms, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), Palpography (optional), optical coherence tomography (OCT) (strongly recommended), multislice computed tomography (MSCT) (optional) and coronary vasomotion (optional) 6. Patient must agree not to participate in any other clinical investigation for a period of two years following the index procedure Angiographic Inclusion Criteria 1. Target lesion(s) must be located in a native coronary artery with visually estimated nominal vessel diameter of 3.0 mm 2. Target lesion(s) must measure ≤ 14 mm in length by visual estimation 3. Target lesion(s) must be in a major artery or branch with a visually estimated stenosis of ≥ 50% and \< 100% with a TIMI flow of ≥ 1 4. If two target lesions meet the inclusion criteria they must be in different major epicardial vessels left anterior descending artery (LAD) with septal and diagonal branches, left circumflex artery (LCX) with obtuse marginal and/or ramus intermedius branches and right coronary artery (RCA) and any of its branches 5. If two target lesion(s) are being treated, each of these lesions must meet all angiographic inclusion/

Exclusion criteria

6. Non-Clinical Investigation, percutaneous intervention for lesions in a non-target vessel is allowed if done ≥ 90 days prior to or if planned to be done 6 months after the index procedure 7. Non-Clinical Investigation percutaneous intervention for lesion in the target vessel is allowed if done \> 6 months prior to or if planned to be done 6 months after the index procedure General

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)30 daysMajor adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction,and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR).
In-scaffold Late Loss: In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 1 Year1 yearIn-scaffold Late Loss: in-scaffold MLD post-procedure - in-scaffold MLD at follow-up
In-scaffold Late Loss: In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 180 Days180 daysIn-scaffold Late Loss: in-scaffold MLD post-procedure - in-scaffold MLD at follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
In-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)180 daysPercent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 \* (1 - MLD/RVD) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by QCA.
Clinical Device Success (Per Lesion)On day 0 (the day of procedure)Successful delivery and deployment of the Clinical Investigation scaffold at the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the scaffold delivery system with attainment of final residual stenosis of less than 50% of the target lesion by QCA (by visual estimation if QCA unavailable). Standard pre-dilation catheters and post-dilatation catheters (if applicable) may be used. Bailout patients will be included as device success only if the above criteria for clinical device are met.
Clinical Procedure Success (Per Patient)On day 0 (the day of procedure)Successful delivery and deployment of the Clinical Investigation scaffold at the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the scaffold delivery system with attainment of final residual stenosis of less than 50% of the target lesion by QCA (by visual estimation if QCA unavailable) and/or using any adjunctive device without the occurrence of ischemia-driven major adverse cardiac event (MACE) during the hospital stay with a maximum of first seven days post index procedure.
Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)180 daysMajor adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction,and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR).
Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)30 daysTarget Vessel Failure (TVF) is the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or Ischemic-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR).
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)30 daysID-TLR is defined as the revascularization at the target lesion associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)30 daysID-TVR is the revascularization in the target vessel associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.
Cardiac Death30 daysCardiac death is defined as any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. (This includes but is not limited to acute myocardial infarction, cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade, arrhythmia or conduction abnormality, cerebrovascular accident within 30 days of the procedure or cerebrovascular accident suspected of being related to the procedure, death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery.)
Aneurysm180 daysAn abnormal expansion or protrusion of a coronary blood vessel resulting from a disease or weakening of the vessel's wall (all three layers) that exceeds the RVD of the vessel by 1.5 times.
Myocardial Infarction30 daysMyocardial Infarction (MI): * Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG. * Non-Q wave MI: Elevation of Creatine kinase (CK) levels to ≥ two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves.
Scaffold Thrombosis30 daysScaffold thrombosis will be categorized as acute (≤ 1day), subacute (\>1day ≤ 30 days) and late (\>30 days) and will be defined as any of the following: * Clinical presentation of acute coronary syndrome with angiographic evidence of scaffold thrombosis (angiographic appearance of thrombus within or adjacent to a previously treated target lesion) * In the absence of angiography, any unexplained death, or acute MI (ST segment elevation or new Q-wave)\* in the distribution of the target lesion within 30 days \*(Non-specific ST /T changes and cardiac enzyme elevations do not suffice) Any thromboses that occur less than 30 days after the index procedure will not be counted as restenosis.
In-scaffold Late Loss (LL): In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 2 Years2 yearsIn-scaffold Late Loss: in-scaffold MLD post-procedure - in-scaffold MLD at follow-up.
In-scaffold Late Loss (LL): In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 3 Years3 yearsIn-scaffold Late Loss: in-scaffold MLD post-procedure - in-scaffold MLD at follow-up.
In-scaffold Late Loss (LL): In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 5 Years5 yearsIn-scaffold Late Loss: in-scaffold MLD post-procedure - in-scaffold MLD at follow-up.
Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 180 Days180 daysProximal Late Loss: proximal MLD post-procedure - proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to scaffold placement).
Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 1 Year1 yearProximal Late Loss: proximal MLD post-procedure - proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to scaffold placement).
Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 2 Years2 yearsProximal Late Loss: proximal MLD post-procedure - proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to scaffold placement).
Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 3 Years3 yearsProximal Late Loss: proximal MLD post-procedure - proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to scaffold placement).
Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 5 Years5 yearsProximal Late Loss: proximal MLD post-procedure - proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to scaffold placement).
Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 180 Days180 daysDistal Late Loss: distal MLD post-procedure - distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to scaffold placement).
Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 1 Year1 yearDistal Late Loss: distal MLD post-procedure - distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to scaffold placement).
Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 2 Years2 yearsDistal Late Loss: distal MLD post-procedure - distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to scaffold placement).
Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 3 Years3 yearsDistal Late Loss: distal MLD post-procedure - distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to scaffold placement).
Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 5 Years5 yearsDistal Late Loss: distal MLD post-procedure - distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to scaffold placement).
In-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR)180 daysPercent of patients with a followup percent diameter stenosis of \>=50% per QCA.
Persisting Dissection180 daysDissection at follow-up that was present post-procedure.
Thrombus180 days
Vasomotion Analysis: In-scaffold Mean Luminal Diameter5 yearsVasomotion function was assessed in reaction to nitrate administration.
Volume Obstruction (VO)180 daysDefined as scaffold intimal hyperplasia and calculated as 100\*(Scaffold Volume - Lumen Volume)/Scaffold Volume by IVUS.
Persisting Incomplete Apposition180 daysPersisting incomplete apposition is defined as incomplete apposition at follow-up that was present post-procedure. Incomplete Apposition: Failure of the scaffold to completely appose to the vessel wall after placement is defined as one or more scaffold strut separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in the ultrasound image.
Late Incomplete Apposition180 daysLate-Acquired Incomplete Apposition is defined as incomplete apposition of the scaffold at follow-up, which was not present post-procedure. Incomplete Apposition: Failure of the scaffold to completely appose to the vessel wall after placement is defined as one or more scaffold strut separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in the ultrasound image.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Reference Area1 year
Minimum Luminal Area1 year
Mean Luminal Area1 year
Mean Scaffold Area2 years
Minimum Stent Area1 year
Minimum Scaffold Area2 year
Luminal Volume1 year
Stent Volume1 year
Scaffold Volume2 years
Mean Luminal Diameter1 year
Minimum Luminal Diameter (MLD)1 yearThe average of two orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment - in lesion, in scaffold or in segment. MLD is visually estimated during angiography by the Investigator; it is measured during QCA by the Angiographic Core Lab.
Minimum Luminal Diameter2 yearsThe average of two orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment - in lesion, in scaffold or in segment. MLD is visually estimated during angiography by the Investigator; it is measured during QCA by the Angiographic Core Lab.
Mean Stent Diameter1 year
Mean Scaffold Diameter2 years
Minimum Stent Diameter1 year
Minimum Scaffold Diameter2 years
Strut Volume1 year
Number of Struts Per BVS1 year
% of Covered Struts (150 µm)1 year
% of Acutely Covered Struts2 years
% of Uncovered Struts (150 µm)1 year
Number of Struts in Side Branch1 year
Tissue Coverage Area Classical1 year
Tissue Coverage Area BVS (Neointimal Area)1 year
Tissue Coverage Volume Classical1 year
Tissue Coverage Volume BVS1 year
Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume Classical1 year
Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume BVS1 year
Mean Flow Area1 year
Minimum Flow Area1 year
Mean Strut Core Area1 year
Percent (%) Lumen Area Stenosis1 year
Mean Stent Area1 year

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Denmark, France, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Switzerland

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Total of 101 patients (intent to treat patient population \[ITT\]) were enrolled in the ABSORB Cohort B study at 12 clinical sites in Europe/Australia/New Zealand between March 19, 2009 and November 6, 2009. Only for assessing imaging outcomes at different follow-up periods, subjects were divided into Group 1 (n = 45) & Group 2 (n = 56).

Pre-assignment details

ITT population were assessed for all clinical endpoints. For imaging outcomes,Group 1 (n=45) patients were followed up at 180 days, 2 & 5 years; while Group 2 (n=56) patients at 1, 3 & 5 years. Therefore, data related to imaging outcomes are available only for Group 1 at 180 days, 2 & 5 years timeframe & only for Group 2 at 1, 3 & 5 years timeframe

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Absorb BVS
Bioabsorbable Vascular Solutions Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (BVS EECSS) Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent: Bioabsorbable drug eluting stent implantation in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Investigational devices available for the study were the Absorb BVS with a diameter of 3.0 mm and length of 18 mm. A total of 249 Absorb BVS were received at twelve investigational sites in the ABSORB Cohort B clinical study. Of the 249 devices received by the study sites, 102 were implanted in patients and 147 were returned to the sponsor.
101
Total101

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
2-year Clinical Follow-upLost to Follow-up1
4-year Clinical Follow-upMissed visit1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAbsorb BVS
Age, Continuous62.3 years
Region of Enrollment
Australia
4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
14 participants
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
12 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
8 participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
30 participants
Region of Enrollment
New Zealand
14 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
13 participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
6 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
73 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 101
other
Total, other adverse events
58 / 101
serious
Total, serious adverse events
56 / 101

Outcome results

Primary

Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)

Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction,and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR).

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSHierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)6.9 percentage of participants
Primary

Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)

Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction,and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR).

Time frame: 30 days

Population: Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSHierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)2.0 percentage of participants
Primary

In-scaffold Late Loss: In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 180 Days

In-scaffold Late Loss: in-scaffold MLD post-procedure - in-scaffold MLD at follow-up.

Time frame: 180 days

Population: In Cohort B, Group 1. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSIn-scaffold Late Loss: In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 180 Days0.19 MillimeterStandard Deviation 0.18
Primary

In-scaffold Late Loss: In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 1 Year

In-scaffold Late Loss: in-scaffold MLD post-procedure - in-scaffold MLD at follow-up

Time frame: 1 year

Population: In Cohort B, Group 2. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSIn-scaffold Late Loss: In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 1 Year0.27 MillimeterStandard Deviation 0.32
Secondary

Aneurysm

An abnormal expansion or protrusion of a coronary blood vessel resulting from a disease or weakening of the vessel's wall (all three layers) that exceeds the RVD of the vessel by 1.5 times.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSAneurysm0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Aneurysm

An abnormal expansion or protrusion of a coronary blood vessel resulting from a disease or weakening of the vessel's wall (all three layers) that exceeds the RVD of the vessel by 1.5 times.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.Cohort B, Group 1 and Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSAneurysm0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Aneurysm

An abnormal expansion or protrusion of a coronary blood vessel resulting from a disease or weakening of the vessel's wall (all three layers) that exceeds the RVD of the vessel by 1.5 times.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSAneurysm2.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Aneurysm

An abnormal expansion or protrusion of a coronary blood vessel resulting from a disease or weakening of the vessel's wall (all three layers) that exceeds the RVD of the vessel by 1.5 times.

Time frame: 180 days

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSAneurysm2.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Aneurysm

An abnormal expansion or protrusion of a coronary blood vessel resulting from a disease or weakening of the vessel's wall (all three layers) that exceeds the RVD of the vessel by 1.5 times.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSAneurysm2.08 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Cardiac Death

Cardiac death is defined as any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. (This includes but is not limited to acute myocardial infarction, cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade, arrhythmia or conduction abnormality, cerebrovascular accident within 30 days of the procedure or cerebrovascular accident suspected of being related to the procedure, death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery.)

Time frame: 4 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=43) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Two patients (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 4-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSCardiac Death0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cardiac Death

Cardiac death is defined as any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. (This includes but is not limited to acute myocardial infarction, cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade, arrhythmia or conduction abnormality, cerebrovascular accident within 30 days of the procedure or cerebrovascular accident suspected of being related to the procedure, death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery.)

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 3-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSCardiac Death0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cardiac Death

Cardiac death is defined as any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. (This includes but is not limited to acute myocardial infarction, cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade, arrhythmia or conduction abnormality, cerebrovascular accident within 30 days of the procedure or cerebrovascular accident suspected of being related to the procedure, death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery.)

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 2-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSCardiac Death0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cardiac Death

Cardiac death is defined as any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. (This includes but is not limited to acute myocardial infarction, cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade, arrhythmia or conduction abnormality, cerebrovascular accident within 30 days of the procedure or cerebrovascular accident suspected of being related to the procedure, death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery.)

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSCardiac Death0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cardiac Death

Cardiac death is defined as any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. (This includes but is not limited to acute myocardial infarction, cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade, arrhythmia or conduction abnormality, cerebrovascular accident within 30 days of the procedure or cerebrovascular accident suspected of being related to the procedure, death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery.)

Time frame: 30 days

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSCardiac Death0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cardiac Death

Cardiac death is defined as any death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded. (This includes but is not limited to acute myocardial infarction, cardiac perforation/pericardial tamponade, arrhythmia or conduction abnormality, cerebrovascular accident within 30 days of the procedure or cerebrovascular accident suspected of being related to the procedure, death due to complication of the procedure, including bleeding, vascular repair, transfusion reaction, or bypass surgery.)

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient from Group 1 population had lost-to-follow-up. Where as,1 patient (Group 1) missed the 4-year follow up but returned for the 5-year follow up.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSCardiac Death0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Clinical Device Success (Per Lesion)

Successful delivery and deployment of the Clinical Investigation scaffold at the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the scaffold delivery system with attainment of final residual stenosis of less than 50% of the target lesion by QCA (by visual estimation if QCA unavailable). Standard pre-dilation catheters and post-dilatation catheters (if applicable) may be used. Bailout patients will be included as device success only if the above criteria for clinical device are met.

Time frame: On day 0 (the day of procedure)

Population: Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSClinical Device Success (Per Lesion)100.0 percentage of lesions
Secondary

Clinical Procedure Success (Per Patient)

Successful delivery and deployment of the Clinical Investigation scaffold at the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the scaffold delivery system with attainment of final residual stenosis of less than 50% of the target lesion by QCA (by visual estimation if QCA unavailable) and/or using any adjunctive device without the occurrence of ischemia-driven major adverse cardiac event (MACE) during the hospital stay with a maximum of first seven days post index procedure.

Time frame: On day 0 (the day of procedure)

Population: Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSClinical Procedure Success (Per Patient)98.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 180 Days

Distal Late Loss: distal MLD post-procedure - distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to scaffold placement).

Time frame: 180 days

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSDistal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 180 Days0.07 MillimeterStandard Deviation 0.3
Secondary

Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 1 Year

Distal Late Loss: distal MLD post-procedure - distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to scaffold placement).

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSDistal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 1 Year0.07 MillimeterStandard Deviation 0.27
Secondary

Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 2 Years

Distal Late Loss: distal MLD post-procedure - distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to scaffold placement).

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSDistal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 2 Years0.04 MillimeterStandard Deviation 0.25
Secondary

Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 3 Years

Distal Late Loss: distal MLD post-procedure - distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to scaffold placement).

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSDistal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 3 Years0.08 MillimeterStandard Deviation 0.37
Secondary

Distal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 5 Years

Distal Late Loss: distal MLD post-procedure - distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to scaffold placement).

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1 and Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSDistal Late Loss: Distal MLD Post-procedure - Distal MLD at 5 Years0.11 MillimeterStandard Deviation 0.35
Secondary

Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)

Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction,and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR).

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 2-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSHierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)9.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)

Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction,and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR).

Time frame: 180 days

Population: Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSHierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)5.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)

Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction,and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR).

Time frame: 270 days

Population: Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSHierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)5.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)

Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction,and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR).

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 3-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSHierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)10.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)

Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction,and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR).

Time frame: 4 years

Population: Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=43) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Two patients (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 4-year follow-up period. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSHierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)10.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Hierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)

Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction,and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR).

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient from Group 1 population had lost-to-follow-up. Where as,1 patient (Group 1) missed the 4-year follow up but returned for the 5-year follow up. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSHierarchical Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)11.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)

Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or Ischemic-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR).

Time frame: 270 days

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSHierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)5.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)

Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or Ischemic-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR).

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSHierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)6.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)

Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or Ischemic-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR).

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 2-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSHierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)11.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)

Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or Ischemic-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR).

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 3-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSHierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)13.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)

Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or Ischemic-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR).

Time frame: 4 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=43) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Two patients (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 4-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSHierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)13.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)

Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or Ischemic-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR).

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient from Group 1 population had lost-to-follow-up. Where as,1 patient (Group 1) missed the 4-year follow up but returned for the 5-year follow up.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSHierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)14.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)

Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or Ischemic-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR).

Time frame: 30 days

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSHierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)2.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Hierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)

Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or Ischemic-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR).

Time frame: 180 days

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSHierarchical Target Vessel Failure (TVF)5.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

In-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR)

Percent of patients with a followup percent diameter stenosis of \>=50% per QCA.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIn-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR)3.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

In-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR)

Percent of patients with a followup percent diameter stenosis of \>=50% per QCA.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1 and Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIn-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR)7.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

In-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR)

Percent of patients with a followup percent diameter stenosis of \>=50% per QCA.

Time frame: 180 days

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIn-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR)0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

In-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR)

Percent of patients with a followup percent diameter stenosis of \>=50% per QCA.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIn-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR)7.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

In-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR)

Percent of patients with a followup percent diameter stenosis of \>=50% per QCA.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIn-scaffold Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR)0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

In-scaffold Late Loss (LL): In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 2 Years

In-scaffold Late Loss: in-scaffold MLD post-procedure - in-scaffold MLD at follow-up.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: ITT population. In Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSIn-scaffold Late Loss (LL): In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 2 Years0.27 MillimeterStandard Deviation 0.19
Secondary

In-scaffold Late Loss (LL): In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 3 Years

In-scaffold Late Loss: in-scaffold MLD post-procedure - in-scaffold MLD at follow-up.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. In Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSIn-scaffold Late Loss (LL): In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 3 Years0.29 MillimeterStandard Deviation 0.43
Secondary

In-scaffold Late Loss (LL): In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 5 Years

In-scaffold Late Loss: in-scaffold MLD post-procedure - in-scaffold MLD at follow-up.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1 and Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSIn-scaffold Late Loss (LL): In-scaffold MLD Post-procedure - In-scaffold MLD at 5 Years0.26 MillimeterStandard Deviation 0.42
Secondary

In-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)

Percent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 \* (1 - MLD/RVD) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by QCA.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSIn-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)21.35 percentage of diameter stenosisStandard Deviation 11.18
Secondary

In-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)

Percent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 \* (1 - MLD/RVD) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by QCA.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSIn-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)23.16 percentage of diameter stenosisStandard Deviation 14.85
Secondary

In-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)

Percent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 \* (1 - MLD/RVD) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by QCA.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1 and Group2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSIn-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)22.74 percentage of diameter stenosisStandard Deviation 13.94
Secondary

In-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)

Percent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 \* (1 - MLD/RVD) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by QCA.

Time frame: 180 days

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSIn-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)19.21 percentage of diameter stenosisStandard Deviation 7.62
Secondary

In-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)

Percent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 \* (1 - MLD/RVD) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by QCA.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSIn-scaffold Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)20.94 percentage of diameter stenosisStandard Deviation 7.63
Secondary

Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)

ID-TLR is defined as the revascularization at the target lesion associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 180 days

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIschemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)2.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)

ID-TLR is defined as the revascularization at the target lesion associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 30 days

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIschemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)

ID-TLR is defined as the revascularization at the target lesion associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 270 days

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIschemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)2.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)

ID-TLR is defined as the revascularization at the target lesion associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIschemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)4.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)

ID-TLR is defined as the revascularization at the target lesion associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 2-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIschemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)6.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)

ID-TLR is defined as the revascularization at the target lesion associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 3-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIschemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)7.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)

ID-TLR is defined as the revascularization at the target lesion associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 4 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=43) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Two patients (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 4-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIschemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)7.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)

ID-TLR is defined as the revascularization at the target lesion associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target lesion with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient from Group 1 population had lost-to-follow-up. Where as,1 patient (Group 1) missed the 4-year follow up but returned for the 5-year follow up.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIschemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)8.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)

ID-TVR is the revascularization in the target vessel associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 3-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIschemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)10.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)

ID-TVR is the revascularization in the target vessel associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 4 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=43) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Two patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 4-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIschemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)10.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)

ID-TVR is the revascularization in the target vessel associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient from Group 1 population had lost-to-follow-up. Where as,1 patient (Group 1) missed the 4-year follow up but returned for the 5-year follow up.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIschemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)11.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)

ID-TVR is the revascularization in the target vessel associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 2-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIschemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)8.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)

ID-TVR is the revascularization in the target vessel associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIschemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)4.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)

ID-TVR is the revascularization in the target vessel associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 270 days

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIschemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)2.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)

ID-TVR is the revascularization in the target vessel associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 180 days

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIschemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)2.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)

ID-TVR is the revascularization in the target vessel associated with any of the following: * Positive functional ischemia study * Ischemic symptoms and an angiographic minimal lumen diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) * Revascularization of a target vessel with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without either ischemic symptoms or a positive functional study.

Time frame: 30 days

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSIschemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Late Incomplete Apposition

Late-Acquired Incomplete Apposition is defined as incomplete apposition of the scaffold at follow-up, which was not present post-procedure. Incomplete Apposition: Failure of the scaffold to completely appose to the vessel wall after placement is defined as one or more scaffold strut separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in the ultrasound image.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B, Group 2. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSLate Incomplete Apposition3.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Late Incomplete Apposition

Late-Acquired Incomplete Apposition is defined as incomplete apposition of the scaffold at follow-up, which was not present post-procedure. Incomplete Apposition: Failure of the scaffold to completely appose to the vessel wall after placement is defined as one or more scaffold strut separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in the ultrasound image.

Time frame: 180 days

Population: Cohort B, Group 1. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSLate Incomplete Apposition7.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Late Incomplete Apposition

Late-Acquired Incomplete Apposition is defined as incomplete apposition of the scaffold at follow-up, which was not present post-procedure. Incomplete Apposition: Failure of the scaffold to completely appose to the vessel wall after placement is defined as one or more scaffold strut separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in the ultrasound image.

Time frame: 3 year

Population: Cohort B, Group 2. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSLate Incomplete Apposition7.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Late Incomplete Apposition

Late-Acquired Incomplete Apposition is defined as incomplete apposition of the scaffold at follow-up, which was not present post-procedure. Incomplete Apposition: Failure of the scaffold to completely appose to the vessel wall after placement is defined as one or more scaffold strut separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in the ultrasound image.

Time frame: 2 year

Population: Cohort B, Group 1. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSLate Incomplete Apposition2.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Myocardial Infarction

Myocardial Infarction (MI): * Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG. * Non-Q wave MI: Elevation of CK levels to ≥ two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 3-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSMyocardial Infarction3.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Myocardial Infarction

Myocardial Infarction (MI): * Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG. * Non-Q wave MI: Elevation of CK levels to ≥ two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves.

Time frame: 4 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=43) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Two patients (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 4-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSMyocardial Infarction3.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Myocardial Infarction

Myocardial Infarction (MI): * Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG. * Non-Q wave MI: Elevation of CK levels to ≥ two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient from Group 1 population had lost-to-follow-up. Where as,1 patient (Group 1) missed the 4-year follow up but returned for the 5-year follow up.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSMyocardial Infarction3.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Myocardial Infarction

Myocardial Infarction (MI): * Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG. * Non-Q wave MI: Elevation of Creatine kinase (CK) levels to ≥ two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves.

Time frame: 30 days

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSMyocardial Infarction2.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Myocardial Infarction

Myocardial Infarction (MI): * Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG. * Non-Q wave MI: Elevation of CK levels to ≥ two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSMyocardial Infarction3.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Myocardial Infarction

Myocardial Infarction (MI): * Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG. * Non-Q wave MI: Elevation of CK levels to ≥ two times the upper limit of normal (ULN) with elevated CK-MB in the absence of new pathological Q waves.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 2-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSMyocardial Infarction3.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Persisting Dissection

Dissection at follow-up that was present post-procedure.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: ITT population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSPersisting Dissection0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Persisting Dissection

Dissection at follow-up that was present post-procedure.

Time frame: 180 days

Population: ITT population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSPersisting Dissection0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Persisting Dissection

Dissection at follow-up that was present post-procedure.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: ITT population. Cohort B, Group 1 and Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSPersisting Dissection0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Persisting Dissection

Dissection at follow-up that was present post-procedure.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: ITT population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSPersisting Dissection0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Persisting Dissection

Dissection at follow-up that was present post-procedure.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: ITT population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSPersisting Dissection0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Persisting Incomplete Apposition

Persisting incomplete apposition is defined as incomplete apposition at follow-up that was present post-procedure. Incomplete Apposition: Failure of the scaffold to completely appose to the vessel wall after placement is defined as one or more scaffold strut separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in the ultrasound image.

Time frame: 180 days

Population: Cohort B, Group 1. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSPersisting Incomplete Apposition2.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Persisting Incomplete Apposition

Persisting incomplete apposition is defined as incomplete apposition at follow-up that was present post-procedure. Incomplete Apposition: Failure of the scaffold to completely appose to the vessel wall after placement is defined as one or more scaffold strut separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in the ultrasound image.

Time frame: 3 year

Population: Cohort B, Group 2. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSPersisting Incomplete Apposition0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Persisting Incomplete Apposition

Persisting incomplete apposition is defined as incomplete apposition at follow-up that was present post-procedure. Incomplete Apposition: Failure of the scaffold to completely appose to the vessel wall after placement is defined as one or more scaffold strut separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in the ultrasound image.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B, Group 2. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSPersisting Incomplete Apposition3.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Persisting Incomplete Apposition

Persisting incomplete apposition is defined as incomplete apposition at follow-up that was present post-procedure. Incomplete Apposition: Failure of the scaffold to completely appose to the vessel wall after placement is defined as one or more scaffold strut separated from the vessel wall with evidence of blood speckles behind the strut in the ultrasound image.

Time frame: 2 year

Population: Cohort B, Group 1. Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSPersisting Incomplete Apposition0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 180 Days

Proximal Late Loss: proximal MLD post-procedure - proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to scaffold placement).

Time frame: 180 days

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. In Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSProximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 180 Days0.07 MillimeterStandard Deviation 0.27
Secondary

Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 1 Year

Proximal Late Loss: proximal MLD post-procedure - proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to scaffold placement).

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. In Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSProximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 1 Year0.12 MillimeterStandard Deviation 0.29
Secondary

Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 2 Years

Proximal Late Loss: proximal MLD post-procedure - proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to scaffold placement).

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. In Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSProximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 2 Years0.12 MillimeterStandard Deviation 0.36
Secondary

Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 3 Years

Proximal Late Loss: proximal MLD post-procedure - proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to scaffold placement).

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. In Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSProximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 3 Years0.14 MillimeterStandard Deviation 0.31
Secondary

Proximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 5 Years

Proximal Late Loss: proximal MLD post-procedure - proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to scaffold placement).

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. In Cohort B, Group 1 and Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSProximal Late Loss: Proximal MLD Post-procedure - Proximal MLD at 5 Years0.14 MillimeterStandard Deviation 0.43
Secondary

Scaffold Thrombosis

Scaffold thrombosis will be categorized as acute (≤ 1day), subacute (\>1day ≤ 30 days) and late (\>30 days) and will be defined as any of the following: * Clinical presentation of acute coronary syndrome with angiographic evidence of scaffold thrombosis (angiographic appearance of thrombus within or adjacent to a previously treated target lesion) * In the absence of angiography, any unexplained death, or acute MI (ST segment elevation or new Q-wave)\* in the distribution of the target lesion within 30 days \*(Non-specific ST /T changes and cardiac enzyme elevations do not suffice) Any thromboses that occur less than 30 days after the index procedure will not be counted as restenosis.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSScaffold Thrombosis0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Scaffold Thrombosis

Scaffold thrombosis will be categorized as acute (≤ 1day), subacute (\>1day ≤ 30 days) and late (\>30 days) and will be defined as any of the following: * Clinical presentation of acute coronary syndrome with angiographic evidence of scaffold thrombosis (angiographic appearance of thrombus within or adjacent to a previously treated target lesion) * In the absence of angiography, any unexplained death, or acute MI (ST segment elevation or new Q-wave)\* in the distribution of the target lesion within 30 days \*(Non-specific ST /T changes and cardiac enzyme elevations do not suffice) Any thromboses that occur less than 30 days after the index procedure will not be counted as restenosis.

Time frame: 30 days

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=45) and Group 2 (n=56) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSScaffold Thrombosis0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Scaffold Thrombosis

Scaffold thrombosis will be categorized as acute (≤ 1day), subacute (\>1day ≤ 30 days) and late (\>30 days) and will be defined as any of the following: * Clinical presentation of acute coronary syndrome with angiographic evidence of scaffold thrombosis (angiographic appearance of thrombus within or adjacent to a previously treated target lesion) * In the absence of angiography, any unexplained death, or acute MI (ST segment elevation or new Q-wave)\* in the distribution of the target lesion within 30 days \*(Non-specific ST /T changes and cardiac enzyme elevations do not suffice) Any thromboses that occur less than 30 days after the index procedure will not be counted as restenosis.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 2-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSScaffold Thrombosis0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Scaffold Thrombosis

Scaffold thrombosis will be categorized as acute (≤ 1day), subacute (\>1day ≤ 30 days) and late (\>30 days) and will be defined as any of the following: * Clinical presentation of acute coronary syndrome with angiographic evidence of scaffold thrombosis (angiographic appearance of thrombus within or adjacent to a previously treated target lesion) * In the absence of angiography, any unexplained death, or acute MI (ST segment elevation or new Q-wave)\* in the distribution of the target lesion within 30 days \*(Non-specific ST /T changes and cardiac enzyme elevations do not suffice) Any thromboses that occur less than 30 days after the index procedure will not be counted as restenosis.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 3-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSScaffold Thrombosis0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Scaffold Thrombosis

Scaffold thrombosis will be categorized as acute (≤ 1day), subacute (\>1day ≤ 30 days) and late (\>30 days) and will be defined as any of the following: * Clinical presentation of acute coronary syndrome with angiographic evidence of scaffold thrombosis (angiographic appearance of thrombus within or adjacent to a previously treated target lesion) * In the absence of angiography, any unexplained death, or acute MI (ST segment elevation or new Q-wave)\* in the distribution of the target lesion within 30 days \*(Non-specific ST /T changes and cardiac enzyme elevations do not suffice) Any thromboses that occur less than 30 days after the index procedure will not be counted as restenosis.

Time frame: 4 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=43) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. Two patients (Group 1) lost to follow-up at 4-year follow-up period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSScaffold Thrombosis0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Scaffold Thrombosis

Scaffold thrombosis will be categorized as acute (≤ 1day), subacute (\>1day ≤ 30 days) and late (\>30 days) and will be defined as any of the following: * Clinical presentation of acute coronary syndrome with angiographic evidence of scaffold thrombosis (angiographic appearance of thrombus within or adjacent to a previously treated target lesion) * In the absence of angiography, any unexplained death, or acute MI (ST segment elevation or new Q-wave)\* in the distribution of the target lesion within 30 days \*(Non-specific ST /T changes and cardiac enzyme elevations do not suffice) Any thromboses that occur less than 30 days after the index procedure will not be counted as restenosis.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Analysis population includes both Group 1 (n=44) and Group 2 (n=56) patients. One patient from Group 1 population had lost-to-follow-up. Where as,1 patient (Group 1) missed the 4-year follow up but returned for the 5-year follow up.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSScaffold Thrombosis0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Thrombus

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSThrombus0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Thrombus

Time frame: 180 days

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSThrombus0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Thrombus

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 1 and Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSThrombus0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Thrombus

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Cohort B, Group 2. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSThrombus2.08 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Thrombus

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.Cohort B, Group 1. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Absorb BVSThrombus2.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Vasomotion Analysis: In-scaffold Mean Luminal Diameter

Vasomotion function was assessed in reaction to nitrate administration.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed includes subjects who had available follow up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSVasomotion Analysis: In-scaffold Mean Luminal DiameterPre-Nitro2.49 MillimeterStandard Deviation 0.37
Absorb BVSVasomotion Analysis: In-scaffold Mean Luminal DiameterPost-Nitro2.56 MillimeterStandard Deviation 0.35
Secondary

Volume Obstruction (VO)

Defined as scaffold intimal hyperplasia and calculated as 100\*(Scaffold Volume - Lumen Volume)/Scaffold Volume by IVUS.

Time frame: 2 year

Population: Cohort B, Group 1. ITT population; IVUS analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSVolume Obstruction (VO)3.33 percent of scaffold volumeStandard Deviation 3.99
Secondary

Volume Obstruction (VO)

Defined as scaffold intimal hyperplasia and calculated as 100\*(Scaffold Volume - Lumen Volume)/Scaffold Volume by IVUS.

Time frame: 3 year

Population: Cohort B, Group 2. ITT population; IVUS analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSVolume Obstruction (VO)4.19 percent of scaffold volumeStandard Deviation 6.43
Secondary

Volume Obstruction (VO)

Defined as scaffold intimal hyperplasia and calculated as 100\*(Scaffold Volume - Lumen Volume)/Scaffold Volume by IVUS.

Time frame: 180 days

Population: Cohort B, Group 1. ITT population; Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSVolume Obstruction (VO)1.22 percent of scaffold volumeStandard Deviation 1.99
Secondary

Volume Obstruction (VO)

Defined as scaffold intimal hyperplasia and calculated as 100\*(Scaffold Volume - Lumen Volume)/Scaffold Volume by IVUS.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B, Group 2. ITT population; IVUS analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSVolume Obstruction (VO)1.47 percent of scaffold volumeStandard Deviation 3.08
Other Pre-specified

Luminal Volume

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSLuminal Volume107.66 mm^3Standard Deviation 34.79
Other Pre-specified

Luminal Volume

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSLuminal Volume103.31 mm^3Standard Deviation 30.86
Other Pre-specified

Luminal Volume

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSLuminal Volume106.33 mm^3Standard Deviation 31.42
Other Pre-specified

Luminal Volume

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1 and Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSLuminal Volume106.36 mm^3Standard Deviation 32.72
Other Pre-specified

Mean Flow Area

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Flow Area6.06 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.7
Other Pre-specified

Mean Flow Area

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Flow Area5.90 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.66
Other Pre-specified

Mean Flow Area

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Cohort B (Group 1 and Group 2), Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Flow Area6.21 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.83
Other Pre-specified

Mean Flow Area

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Flow Area6.00 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.76
Other Pre-specified

Mean Luminal Area

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Luminal Area6.00 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.76
Other Pre-specified

Mean Luminal Area

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Luminal Area5.92 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.71
Other Pre-specified

Mean Luminal Area

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Cohort B (Group 1 and Group 2), Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population.OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Luminal Area6.22 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.84
Other Pre-specified

Mean Luminal Area

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Luminal Area6.06 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.7
Other Pre-specified

Mean Luminal Diameter

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Luminal Diameter2.74 mmStandard Deviation 0.39
Other Pre-specified

Mean Luminal Diameter

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Luminal Diameter2.71 mmStandard Deviation 0.39
Other Pre-specified

Mean Luminal Diameter

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Luminal Diameter2.72 mmStandard Deviation 0.42
Other Pre-specified

Mean Luminal Diameter

It is measured during QCA by the Angiographic Core Lab.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Cohort B (Group 1 and Group 2), Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Luminal Diameter2.77 mmStandard Deviation 0.42
Other Pre-specified

Mean Reference Area

Time frame: 3 years

Population: OCT analysis,Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Reference Area6.24 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.78
Other Pre-specified

Mean Reference Area

Time frame: 2 years

Population: OCT analysis,Cohort B Group1 , Intent-to-Treat Population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Reference Area6.29 mm^2Standard Deviation 2.13
Other Pre-specified

Mean Reference Area

Time frame: 5 years

Population: OCT analysis,Cohort B (Group 1 and Group 2), Intent-to-Treat Population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Reference Area6.13 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.96
Other Pre-specified

Mean Reference Area

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) analysis,Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Reference Area6.34 mm^2Standard Deviation 2.3
Other Pre-specified

Mean Scaffold Area

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Scaffold Area8.14 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.88
Other Pre-specified

Mean Scaffold Area

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Scaffold Area8.50 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.93
Other Pre-specified

Mean Scaffold Diameter

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Scaffold Diameter3.19 mmStandard Deviation 0.38
Other Pre-specified

Mean Scaffold Diameter

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Scaffold Diameter3.26 mmStandard Deviation 0.36
Other Pre-specified

Mean Stent Area

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Stent Area7.42 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.22
Other Pre-specified

Mean Stent Diameter

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Stent Diameter3.06 mmStandard Deviation 0.24
Other Pre-specified

Mean Strut Core Area

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Strut Core Area0.19 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.04
Other Pre-specified

Mean Strut Core Area

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Strut Core Area0.15 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.02
Other Pre-specified

Mean Strut Core Area

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMean Strut Core Area0.17 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.05
Other Pre-specified

Minimum Flow Area

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMinimum Flow Area4.28 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.39
Other Pre-specified

Minimum Flow Area

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMinimum Flow Area4.45 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.55
Other Pre-specified

Minimum Flow Area

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMinimum Flow Area4.29 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.47
Other Pre-specified

Minimum Flow Area

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Cohort B (Group 1 and Group 2), Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMinimum Flow Area4.15 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.69
Other Pre-specified

Minimum Luminal Area

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMinimum Luminal Area4.29 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.48
Other Pre-specified

Minimum Luminal Area

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Cohort B (Group 1 and Group 2), Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMinimum Luminal Area4.15 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.69
Other Pre-specified

Minimum Luminal Area

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMinimum Luminal Area4.29 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.39
Other Pre-specified

Minimum Luminal Area

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMinimum Luminal Area4.45 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.55
Other Pre-specified

Minimum Luminal Diameter

The average of two orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment - in lesion, in scaffold or in segment. MLD is visually estimated during angiography by the Investigator; it is measured during QCA by the Angiographic Core Lab.

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMinimum Luminal Diameter2.34 mmStandard Deviation 0.46
Other Pre-specified

Minimum Luminal Diameter

The average of two orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment - in lesion, in scaffold or in segment. MLD is visually estimated during angiography by the Investigator; it is measured during QCA by the Angiographic Core Lab.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1 , Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMinimum Luminal Diameter2.30 mmStandard Deviation 0.4
Other Pre-specified

Minimum Luminal Diameter

The average of two orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment - in lesion, in scaffold or in segment. MLD is visually estimated during angiography by the Investigator; it is measured during QCA by the Angiographic Core Lab.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Cohort B (Group1 and Group 2), Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMinimum Luminal Diameter2.25 mmStandard Deviation 0.49
Other Pre-specified

Minimum Luminal Diameter (MLD)

The average of two orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment - in lesion, in scaffold or in segment. MLD is visually estimated during angiography by the Investigator; it is measured during QCA by the Angiographic Core Lab.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMinimum Luminal Diameter (MLD)2.30 mmStandard Deviation 0.42
Other Pre-specified

Minimum Scaffold Area

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMinimum Scaffold Area6.66 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.67
Other Pre-specified

Minimum Scaffold Area

Time frame: 2 year

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMinimum Scaffold Area6.33 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.45
Other Pre-specified

Minimum Scaffold Diameter

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMinimum Scaffold Diameter2.89 mmStandard Deviation 0.37
Other Pre-specified

Minimum Scaffold Diameter

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMinimum Scaffold Diameter2.82 mmStandard Deviation 0.33
Other Pre-specified

Minimum Stent Area

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMinimum Stent Area5.96 mm^2Standard Deviation 1.14
Other Pre-specified

Minimum Stent Diameter

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSMinimum Stent Diameter2.74 mmStandard Deviation 0.26
Other Pre-specified

Number of Struts in Side Branch

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Cohort B (Group 1 and Group 2), Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSNumber of Struts in Side Branch0.0 Number of strutsStandard Deviation 0.3
Other Pre-specified

Number of Struts in Side Branch

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSNumber of Struts in Side Branch0.2 Number of strutsStandard Deviation 0.4
Other Pre-specified

Number of Struts in Side Branch

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSNumber of Struts in Side Branch0.2 Number of strutsStandard Deviation 0.6
Other Pre-specified

Number of Struts in Side Branch

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSNumber of Struts in Side Branch0.1 Number of strutsStandard Deviation 0.4
Other Pre-specified

Number of Struts Per BVS

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSNumber of Struts Per BVS162.1 Number of StrutsStandard Deviation 31.9
Other Pre-specified

Number of Struts Per BVS

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSNumber of Struts Per BVS160.9 Number of StrutsStandard Deviation 27.9
Other Pre-specified

Number of Struts Per BVS

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSNumber of Struts Per BVS145.2 Number of StrutsStandard Deviation 32.3
Other Pre-specified

Number of Struts Per BVS

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Cohort B (Group 1 and Group 2), Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSNumber of Struts Per BVS7.1 Number of StrutsStandard Deviation 29.1
Other Pre-specified

% of Acutely Covered Struts

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVS% of Acutely Covered Struts98.07 Percent of Covered StrutsStandard Deviation 3.27
Other Pre-specified

% of Acutely Covered Struts

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVS% of Acutely Covered Struts97.90 Percent of Covered StrutsStandard Deviation 2
Other Pre-specified

% of Covered Struts (150 µm)

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVS% of Covered Struts (150 µm)96.86 Percent of Covered StrutsStandard Deviation 2.95
Other Pre-specified

% of Uncovered Struts (150 µm)

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVS% of Uncovered Struts (150 µm)2.10 Percent of Uncovered StrutsStandard Deviation 2
Other Pre-specified

% of Uncovered Struts (150 µm)

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVS% of Uncovered Struts (150 µm)1.93 Percent of Uncovered StrutsStandard Deviation 3.27
Other Pre-specified

% of Uncovered Struts (150 µm)

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVS% of Uncovered Struts (150 µm)3.14 Percent of Uncovered StrutsStandard Deviation 2.95
Other Pre-specified

Percent (%) Lumen Area Stenosis

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSPercent (%) Lumen Area Stenosis28.01 Percentage of Lumen Area StenosisStandard Deviation 13.68
Other Pre-specified

Percent (%) Lumen Area Stenosis

Time frame: 5 years

Population: Cohort B (Group 1 and Group 2), Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSPercent (%) Lumen Area Stenosis34.32 Percentage of Lumen Area StenosisStandard Deviation 16.21
Other Pre-specified

Percent (%) Lumen Area Stenosis

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSPercent (%) Lumen Area Stenosis28.70 Percentage of Lumen Area StenosisStandard Deviation 12.05
Other Pre-specified

Percent (%) Lumen Area Stenosis

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSPercent (%) Lumen Area Stenosis28.75 Percentage of Lumen Area StenosisStandard Deviation 10.58
Other Pre-specified

Scaffold Volume

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSScaffold Volume145.07 mm^3Standard Deviation 36.69
Other Pre-specified

Scaffold Volume

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSScaffold Volume145.78 mm^3Standard Deviation 38.28
Other Pre-specified

Stent Volume

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSStent Volume132.90 mm^3Standard Deviation 21.64
Other Pre-specified

Strut Volume

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSStrut Volume3.02 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.66
Other Pre-specified

Strut Volume

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSStrut Volume2.61 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.45
Other Pre-specified

Strut Volume

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSStrut Volume3.28 mm^3Standard Deviation 0.83
Other Pre-specified

Tissue Coverage Area BVS (Neointimal Area)

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSTissue Coverage Area BVS (Neointimal Area)1.99 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.58
Other Pre-specified

Tissue Coverage Area BVS (Neointimal Area)

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSTissue Coverage Area BVS (Neointimal Area)2.25 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.6
Other Pre-specified

Tissue Coverage Area BVS (Neointimal Area)

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSTissue Coverage Area BVS (Neointimal Area)1.38 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.75
Other Pre-specified

Tissue Coverage Area Classical

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSTissue Coverage Area Classical1.54 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.76
Other Pre-specified

Tissue Coverage Area Classical

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSTissue Coverage Area Classical2.44 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.61
Other Pre-specified

Tissue Coverage Area Classical

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSTissue Coverage Area Classical2.13 mm^2Standard Deviation 0.58
Other Pre-specified

Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume BVS

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSTissue Coverage Obstruction Volume BVS19.40 Percent of Tissue Coverage ObstructionStandard Deviation 11.52
Other Pre-specified

Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume BVS

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSTissue Coverage Obstruction Volume BVS27.01 Percent of Tissue Coverage ObstructionStandard Deviation 7.1
Other Pre-specified

Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume BVS

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSTissue Coverage Obstruction Volume BVS25.22 Percent of Tissue Coverage ObstructionStandard Deviation 7.91
Other Pre-specified

Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume Classical

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSTissue Coverage Obstruction Volume Classical27.10 Percent of Tissue Coverage ObstructionStandard Deviation 8.16
Other Pre-specified

Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume Classical

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSTissue Coverage Obstruction Volume Classical29.36 Percent of Tissue Coverage ObstructionStandard Deviation 7.28
Other Pre-specified

Tissue Coverage Obstruction Volume Classical

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSTissue Coverage Obstruction Volume Classical21.61 Percent of Tissue Coverage ObstructionStandard Deviation 11.77
Other Pre-specified

Tissue Coverage Volume BVS

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSTissue Coverage Volume BVS38.47 mm^3Standard Deviation 11.2
Other Pre-specified

Tissue Coverage Volume BVS

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSTissue Coverage Volume BVS24.40 mm^3Standard Deviation 12.97
Other Pre-specified

Tissue Coverage Volume BVS

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSTissue Coverage Volume BVS35.51 mm^3Standard Deviation 10.87
Other Pre-specified

Tissue Coverage Volume Classical

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Cohort B Group 1, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSTissue Coverage Volume Classical38.12 mm^3Standard Deviation 10.99
Other Pre-specified

Tissue Coverage Volume Classical

Time frame: 3 years

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSTissue Coverage Volume Classical41.76 mm^3Standard Deviation 11.46
Other Pre-specified

Tissue Coverage Volume Classical

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Cohort B Group 2, Intent-to-Treat Population. OCT analysis. The number of participants analyzed include subjects who had available follow-up data at that time frame.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Absorb BVSTissue Coverage Volume Classical27.27 mm^3Standard Deviation 13.16

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026