Skip to content

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Vertebroplasty in Treating Patients With Localized Spinal Metastasis

Phase II Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Vertebroplasty for Localized Spinal Metastasis (SBRT Spine)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00855803
Enrollment
35
Registered
2009-03-04
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
2021-01-20
Last updated
2022-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Cancer, Pain, Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific

Keywords

spinal cord metastases, unspecified adult solid tumor, protocol specific, pain

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy may be able to send x-rays directly to the tumor and cause less damage to normal tissue. Vertebroplasty may help prevent fractures and spinal cord compression caused by spinal metastasis. Giving stereotactic body radiation therapy together with vertebroplasty may help lessen pain and improve quality of life of patients with spinal metastasis. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well giving stereotactic body radiation therapy together with vertebroplasty works in treating patients with localized spinal metastasis.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: Primary * To determine the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in reducing pain at 3 months in patients with localized spinal metastasis. Secondary * To determine the duration of pain response at the treated site(s) scored as the time of maximal pain relief to an increase of 2 points on the Visual Analogue Scoring System. * To determine the functional preservation of improvement as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory. * To prospectively assess quality of life using the FACT-G and EQ-5D questionnaires. * To determine the long-term stability of the treated vertebral bone (e.g., fracture, sclerotic change, vertebral body height, or malalignment) as measured by MRI, CT scan, and plain radiographs. OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups according to prior radiotherapy to the planned treatment site(s). * Group 1 (prior radiotherapy): Patients undergo 5 fractions of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) over 30-90 minutes each. * Group 2 (no prior radiotherapy): Patients undergo 1 fraction of SBRT over 30-90 minutes. Within 1 month after the initiation of SBRT, patients in both groups undergo percutaneous vertebroplasty. Patients complete pain and quality-of-life questionnaires at baseline and periodically during study. Patients also undergo MRI and CT scan at baseline, at 1, 3, and 6 months, and then every 6 months for 3 years to assess changes in vertebral bone strength and stability. After completion of study therapy, patients are followed at 2 weeks, at 1, 3, and 6 months, and then every 6 months for 3 years.

Interventions

RADIATIONradiation

Given in 1 or 5 fractions

Sponsors

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Eligibility: Inclusion: * Patients must have localized spine metastasis (a solitary spine metastasis; two contiguous levels, or up to three separate single vertebral levels are permitted) * Patients must have a VAS of ≥4 at any of the planned treatment sites * Patient with epidural, spinal nerve, and/or cord compression on MRI may be included * Histologic confirmation of cancer is required by biopsy, prior surgery, or re-biopsy * Narcotic pain prescription and usage information must be available and documented * Patients must sign study specific consent * Above the age of 18 * For women of childbearing age a negative pregnancy test is required * Patients considered for the retreatment arm, must not of had prior radiation to the proposed spinal site within a 3 month interval prior to treatment * Zubrod score of 0-2 Exclusion: * Patients who have been non-ambulatory for more than 7 days * Patients with compression fractures * Spine instability requiring fixation * Patients with paraspinal extension * Patients with bony fragments * Planned systemic treatment within one week after treatment. * Absence of pathological diagnosis of cancer * Chemotherapy within one week of treatment * Patients with Multiple Myeloma, Lymphoma, or Plasmacytoma * Patient suffered from unstable angina and/or congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization within the last 6 months * Patient had a transmural myocardial infarction within the last 6 months * Patient has an acute bacterial or fungal infection requiring intravenous antibiotics at the time of registration * Patient has hepatic insufficiency resulting in clinical jaundice and/or coagulation defects * PT is not within normal limits or planned and feasible to be corrected to normal limits prior to vertebroplasy * PTT is not within normal limits or planned and feasible to be corrected to normal limits prior to vertebroplasy * Platelet count is \< 50,000 * History of significant psychiatric illness Note: Vertebroplasty may not be possible for certain patients due to tumor location or safety. In such cases, patients will omit the vertebroplasty but receive all other protocol care and follow-up Visual Analog Scoring

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Response as Measured by VAS at 3 Months3 monthPain reduction as measured by Visual Analogue Scoring System (VAS) at 3 months Patient pain was recorded on a 10-point scale (0: no pain, 10: most severe pain). At baseline patients were required to have a pain score of 4 or higher associated with spine metastases. Pain response was recorded again during follow-up visits to determine the pain response: A pain score of 0 represents a complete response A decrease in the pain score by at least 2 points represents a partial response VAS scores were used to determine the number of patients with a partial pain response, with a complete pain response, and without a pain response

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Response1 monthDuration of pain response as measured by VAS at 1 month Patient pain was recorded on a 10-point scale (0: no pain, 10: most severe pain). At baseline patients were required to have a pain score of 4 or higher associated with spine metastases. Pain response was recorded again during follow-up visits to determine the pain response: A pain score of 0 represents a complete response A decrease in the pain score by at least 2 points represents a partial response VAS scores were used to determine the number of patients with a partial pain response, with a complete pain response, and without a pain response
Overall Survival5 yearOverall survival measured from the date of accession to the date of death. Median times will be reported.
Daily FunctionBaselineTime to functional decline as measure by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at baseline. BPI has two sections that are scored- pain severity and pain interference. For each of these a numeric scale from 0-10 is used, with 0 being the worst pain and 10 being the worst pain.
Quality of Life Questionnaire Responses12 monthsNumber of participants who filled out the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- General (FACT-G) and the European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaires at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

3 withdrew before starting treatment, 1 had clinical decline prior to treatment and was removed, 1 was removed prior to treatment for local progression, and 1 was removed due to a pre-existing compression fracture prior to treatment, These 6 patients did start the study but were assessed for other outcomes.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Total Population
All patients enrolled to the study
35
Total35

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath2
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyNot evaluable at 3 month timepoint2
Overall StudyPhysician Decision3
Overall StudyTechnical inability to undergo procedure2
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotal Population
Age, Continuous60 years
Number of vertebrae treated
1
23 participants
Number of vertebrae treated
2
6 participants
Preexisting endplate fracture
No
24 participants
Preexisting endplate fracture
Yes
5 participants
Primary Site
Breast
4 participants
Primary Site
Colorectal
2 participants
Primary Site
Kidney
4 participants
Primary Site
Lung
10 participants
Primary Site
Melanoma
3 participants
Primary Site
Oropharyngeal
1 participants
Primary Site
Prostate
4 participants
Primary Site
Thyroid
1 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants
Spine Location
Cervical
4 participants
Spine Location
Lumbar
13 participants
Spine Location
Thoracic
12 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 29
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Pain Response as Measured by VAS at 3 Months

Pain reduction as measured by Visual Analogue Scoring System (VAS) at 3 months Patient pain was recorded on a 10-point scale (0: no pain, 10: most severe pain). At baseline patients were required to have a pain score of 4 or higher associated with spine metastases. Pain response was recorded again during follow-up visits to determine the pain response: A pain score of 0 represents a complete response A decrease in the pain score by at least 2 points represents a partial response VAS scores were used to determine the number of patients with a partial pain response, with a complete pain response, and without a pain response

Time frame: 3 month

Population: Patients who were evaluable at the 3-month timepoint

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Total PopulationPain Response as Measured by VAS at 3 MonthsPatients with a partial pain response at 3 months8 Participants
Total PopulationPain Response as Measured by VAS at 3 MonthsPatients with a complete pain response at 3 months12 Participants
Total PopulationPain Response as Measured by VAS at 3 MonthsPatients without a pain response1 Participants
Secondary

Daily Function

Time to functional decline as measure by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at baseline. BPI has two sections that are scored- pain severity and pain interference. For each of these a numeric scale from 0-10 is used, with 0 being the worst pain and 10 being the worst pain.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: Patients enrolled to the study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Total PopulationDaily FunctionPain Severity5.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Total PopulationDaily FunctionPain Interference6.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Overall Survival

Overall survival measured from the date of accession to the date of death. Median times will be reported.

Time frame: 5 year

Population: Patients who received spine SABR

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Total PopulationOverall Survival9 months
Secondary

Pain Response

Duration of pain response as measured by VAS at 1 month Patient pain was recorded on a 10-point scale (0: no pain, 10: most severe pain). At baseline patients were required to have a pain score of 4 or higher associated with spine metastases. Pain response was recorded again during follow-up visits to determine the pain response: A pain score of 0 represents a complete response A decrease in the pain score by at least 2 points represents a partial response VAS scores were used to determine the number of patients with a partial pain response, with a complete pain response, and without a pain response

Time frame: 1 month

Population: Patients who were evaluable at the 1 month timepoint

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Total PopulationPain ResponsePatients with a complete pain response10 Participants
Total PopulationPain ResponsePatients with a partial pain response10 Participants
Total PopulationPain ResponsePatients with no pain response5 Participants
Secondary

Quality of Life Questionnaire Responses

Number of participants who filled out the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- General (FACT-G) and the European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaires at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Enrolled participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Total PopulationQuality of Life Questionnaire ResponsesNumber of responses at 12 months7 participant responses
Total PopulationQuality of Life Questionnaire ResponsesNumber of responses at baseline35 participant responses
Total PopulationQuality of Life Questionnaire ResponsesNumber of responses at 1 month29 participant responses
Total PopulationQuality of Life Questionnaire ResponsesNumber of responses at 3 months21 participant responses
Total PopulationQuality of Life Questionnaire ResponsesNumber of responses at 6 months16 participant responses

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026