Skip to content

A Prospective, Observational Study On The Effectiveness Of New Antiepileptic Drugs As First Bitherapy In The Daily Clinical Practice

Liceo Study: A Prospective, Observational Study On The Effectiveness Of New Antiepileptic Drugs As First Bitherapy In The Daily Clinical Practice

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00855738
Enrollment
111
Registered
2009-03-04
Start date
2007-05-31
Completion date
2009-06-30
Last updated
2021-01-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Focal Epilepsy

Keywords

epilepsy antiepileptic biotherapy

Brief summary

Assessment of the efficacy under daily clinical conditions of the new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, tiagabine and topiramate, used as first-choice combination therapy (bitherapy) in patients with focal epilepsy.

Interventions

DRUGGabapentin, Lamotrigine, Levetiracetam, Pregabalin, Oxcarbacepine, Tiagabine, Topiramate, Zonisamide

* Gabapentin: up to 3.600 mg/d * Lamotrigine: up to 400 mg/d * Levetiracetam: up to 3.000 mg/d * Pregabalin: up to 600 mg/d * Oxcarbazepine: up to 2.400 mg/d * Tiagabine: up to 30 mg/d * Topiramate: up to 400 mg/d * Zonisamide: up to 500 mg/d

Sponsors

Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18 years or older. * Diagnosis of focal epilepsy. * Previous failure of one or more AEDs used in monotherapy. * Background treatment with an antiepileptic drug. * The investigator has considered that the patient must start treatment with some of the seven new AEDs in combination therapy: lamotrigine, levetiracetam, gabapentin, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, tiagabine and/or topiramate. * History of seizures in the patient in the past 3 months. * The patient or legal guardian must be able to understand the characteristics of the study and fill in the seizure diaries. * Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to comply with the study requirements. * Diagnosis of generalized epilepsy or inability to establish if focal or generalized. * Presence of serious or uncontrolled systemic disease, serious psychiatric disease or progressive neurological disease. * History of alcoholism, drug addiction, or abuse of medicines in the past two years. * Psychogenic seizures in the two years prior to inclusion in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Participants Classified as RespondersBaseline, Month 3, Month 6 (last 3 months of treatment)Responder = decrease in number of seizures by \>=50 percent (%) during the last 3 months of treatment before discontinuation (assessed at Month 3 and Month 6) versus the number of seizures that occurred during the 3 months before the baseline visit (baseline).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Seizure-free Participants During the Last 3 Months Before DiscontinuationBaseline, Month 3, Month 6 (last 3 months of treatment)
Percent Change From Baseline in the Median Number of Seizures During the Last 3 Months of TreatmentBaseline, Month 3, Month 6 (last 3 months of treatment)
Percent of Days Without Crisis During the StudyBaseline through Month 6 (or end of treatment)Crisis was defined as the total number of seizures during the study, the seizures at month 3 plus the seizures at month 6. The percent of days without crisis is number of days of study (date of last visit minus date of baseline visit) without crisis divided by number of days of study, multiplied by 100.
Time to First SeizureBaseline to Month 6 (or end of treatment)Number of days to first seizure after baseline.
Percent of Participants Who Continued on Study Medication to Month 6Baseline to Month 6Retention rate: percent of participants who continued on study medication throughout the 6 Month period after inclusion in the study.
Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of EfficacyBaseline, Month 3, Month 6
Time to Discontinuation Due to Safety, Tolerability, or Treatment ComplianceBaseline, Month 3, Month 6
Time to Discontinuation Due to Other ReasonsBaseline, Month 3, Month 6
Treatment Satisfaction Evaluated by Patient Global Impression of Change Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline, Month 3, Month 6Patient Global Impression of Change VAS: subject rated instrument to measure subject's change in overall status; range from 0 (much better) to 10 (much worse).
Percent of Participants Reaching MonotherapyBaseline through Month 6 (or end of study)Percent of participants who started on more than one treatment (bitherapy) and reached monotherapy by end of study.
Percent of Participants With Reduction in Number of Seizures >=25% and >=75% During the Last 3 Months of TreatmentBaseline, Month 3, Month 6 (last 3 months of treatment)Percent of participants with reduction in number of seizures \>=25% and \>=75% during the last 3 months of treatment before discontinuation (assessed at Month 3 and Month 6) versus the 3 month period before the baseline visit.
Percent of Participants That Reduced, Maintained and Increased the Doses of the Initial Treatment Administered in MonotherapyBaseline through Month 6 (or end of treatment)
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Baseline to Month 6HADS: subject rated questionnaire with 2 subscales. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms.
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Quality of Life 10 Domains (QOLIE-10)Baseline to Month 6QOLIE-10: 10-item questionnaire evaluates health-related quality of life in individuals with epliepsy. Comprised of 7 components: seizure worry, overall quality of life, emotional well-being, energy, cognitive functioning, medication effects (physical and mental effects), and social function (work, driving, social function). Total score rated 0 to 100; higher score = higher quality of life.
Change From Baseline to Months 3 and 6 in Health Condition: Euro Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline, Month 3, Month 6Assessment of the health condition of the subjects using the EQ-5D VAS: subject rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. Using the VAS subjects rated current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.
Change in Sleep Disturbances From Baseline to Month 6: Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)Baseline to Month 6Subject rated instrument to assess key constructs of sleep; assesses sleep quality and quantity. Consists of a 6-item and 9-item overall sleep problems index measuring time to fall asleep and sleep duration in past 4 weeks; 5 subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time): sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath, somnolence, and adequacy. Transformed scores range = 0 to 100; higher score indicates greater intensity of attribute. Two additional subscales = sleep quantity (range 0-24 hours) and optimal sleep (number of participants with optimal sleep 7-8 hours per night).
Percent of Participants Indicating Optimal Sleep on the Optimal Sleep Subscale: Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)Baseline, Month 6MOS-SS: subject rated instrument used to assess the key constructs of sleep; assesses sleep quantity and quality and is comprised of 12 items yielding 7 subscale scores and 2 composite index scores. Optimal sleep subscale is derived from sleep quantity average hours of sleep over the past 4 weeks; percent of participants with response YES (optimal) if sleep quantilty was 7-8 hours of sleep per night.
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Visits to a Specialist or the Emergency Room Because of EpilepsyBaseline to Month 6Numerical assessment of change in the number of visits to a specialist or the emergency room because of epilepsy needed during the study.
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Total Number of Days Hospitalized Because of EpilepsyBaseline to Month 6Numerical assessment of change in total number of days hospitalized because of epilepsy during the study.
Percent of Participants With Cessation of Occupation, Requirement of Caregiver, or Admission to Intensive Care UnitMonth 6Percent of participants with cessation of usual occupation, requirement of an informal caregiver, and who required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU).
Percent of Participants That Reduced, Maintained and Increased Their Doses of New Antiepileptic Drugs (AED)Baseline to Month 6 (or end of treatment)

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Given the observational nature of the study, the selection of treatment and dose of study medication was independent from participation in the study and was determined by daily clinical practice.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Antiepileptic Drugs
Pregabalin, Levetiracetam, Topiramate, Lamotrigine, Oxcarbazepine, Zonisamide, Gabapentin: treatment, dose and frequency of administration determined by daily clinical practice
111
Total111

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyDeath1
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudySubject Defaulted1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Antiepileptic Drugs
Age, Continuous45.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1
Sex: Female, Male
Female
52 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
59 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 1115 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1110 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Percent of Participants Classified as Responders

Responder = decrease in number of seizures by \>=50 percent (%) during the last 3 months of treatment before discontinuation (assessed at Month 3 and Month 6) versus the number of seizures that occurred during the 3 months before the baseline visit (baseline).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 (last 3 months of treatment)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): intent-to-treat population = those who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had post-baseline data for at least 1 efficacy endpoint. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) captures last 3 months of treatment for subjects who discontinued between Month 3 and Month 6 only. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Participants Classified as RespondersMonth 376.7 percent of participants
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Participants Classified as RespondersMonth 680.0 percent of participants
Comparison: Month 3: p-value versus baseline.p-value: <0.0001McNemar
Comparison: Month 6: p-value versus baseline.p-value: <0.0001McNemar
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Quality of Life 10 Domains (QOLIE-10)

QOLIE-10: 10-item questionnaire evaluates health-related quality of life in individuals with epliepsy. Comprised of 7 components: seizure worry, overall quality of life, emotional well-being, energy, cognitive functioning, medication effects (physical and mental effects), and social function (work, driving, social function). Total score rated 0 to 100; higher score = higher quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 6

Population: FAS; LOCF. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange From Baseline to Month 6 in Quality of Life 10 Domains (QOLIE-10)Emotions (mood)0.7 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 16
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange From Baseline to Month 6 in Quality of Life 10 Domains (QOLIE-10)Energy0.4 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 17.8
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange From Baseline to Month 6 in Quality of Life 10 Domains (QOLIE-10)Daily activities0.6 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 12.9
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange From Baseline to Month 6 in Quality of Life 10 Domains (QOLIE-10)Mental function1.2 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 20.8
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange From Baseline to Month 6 in Quality of Life 10 Domains (QOLIE-10)Medication effects (physical/ mental)-1.1 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 14.9
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange From Baseline to Month 6 in Quality of Life 10 Domains (QOLIE-10)Worry about seizures (impact of seizures)9.0 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 21.1
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange From Baseline to Month 6 in Quality of Life 10 Domains (QOLIE-10)Overall quality of life3.8 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
Comparison: Energy: p-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.8284t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Emotions (mood): p-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.6299t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Daily activities: p-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.6162t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Mental function: p-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.5609t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Medication effects (physical/ mental): p-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.4635t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Worry about seizures (impact of seizures): p-value versus baseline.p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Overall quality of life: p-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.0258t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

HADS: subject rated questionnaire with 2 subscales. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 6

Population: FAS; LOCF. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange From Baseline to Month 6 in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Depression-0.5 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange From Baseline to Month 6 in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)Anxiety-0.6 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 3
Comparison: Depression domain: P-value vs baseline.p-value: 0.1797t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Anxiety domain: P-value vs baseline.p-value: 0.0433t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Total Number of Days Hospitalized Because of Epilepsy

Numerical assessment of change in total number of days hospitalized because of epilepsy during the study.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 6

Population: FAS; LOCF. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange From Baseline to Month 6 in Total Number of Days Hospitalized Because of Epilepsy-8.0 DaysStandard Deviation 68.6
Comparison: P-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.3141t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Visits to a Specialist or the Emergency Room Because of Epilepsy

Numerical assessment of change in the number of visits to a specialist or the emergency room because of epilepsy needed during the study.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 6

Population: FAS; LOCF. Costs involved in health and non-health resources needed during the study were not analyzed as planned with this endpoint. N=number of subjects with visits to a specialist because of epilepsy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange From Baseline to Month 6 in Visits to a Specialist or the Emergency Room Because of EpilepsyNumber of visits to a specialist (n=94)-0.6 visitsStandard Deviation 2.3
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange From Baseline to Month 6 in Visits to a Specialist or the Emergency Room Because of EpilepsyNumber of visits to the emergency room (n=79)-0.3 visitsStandard Deviation 0.9
Comparison: Number of visits to a specialist because of epilepsy: p-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.0226t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Number of visits to the emergency room because of epilepsy: p-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.0017t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Months 3 and 6 in Health Condition: Euro Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Assessment of the health condition of the subjects using the EQ-5D VAS: subject rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. Using the VAS subjects rated current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: FAS LOCF. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange From Baseline to Months 3 and 6 in Health Condition: Euro Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Month 3-0.4 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 16.2
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange From Baseline to Months 3 and 6 in Health Condition: Euro Quality of Life Scale (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Month 61.2 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 15.6
Comparison: Month 3: p-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.7822t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Month 6: p-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.4471t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Sleep Disturbances From Baseline to Month 6: Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)

Subject rated instrument to assess key constructs of sleep; assesses sleep quality and quantity. Consists of a 6-item and 9-item overall sleep problems index measuring time to fall asleep and sleep duration in past 4 weeks; 5 subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time): sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath, somnolence, and adequacy. Transformed scores range = 0 to 100; higher score indicates greater intensity of attribute. Two additional subscales = sleep quantity (range 0-24 hours) and optimal sleep (number of participants with optimal sleep 7-8 hours per night).

Time frame: Baseline to Month 6

Population: FAS LOCF. Change from baseline in Optimal sleep is not shown as changes from baseline were only evaluated for continuous parameters. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange in Sleep Disturbances From Baseline to Month 6: Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)Snoring0.0 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 15.6
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange in Sleep Disturbances From Baseline to Month 6: Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)Sleep disturbance-1.7 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange in Sleep Disturbances From Baseline to Month 6: Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)Awake short of breath1.1 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 14.6
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange in Sleep Disturbances From Baseline to Month 6: Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)Quantity0.2 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange in Sleep Disturbances From Baseline to Month 6: Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)Adequacy2.8 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 15
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange in Sleep Disturbances From Baseline to Month 6: Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)Somnolence0.6 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 11
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange in Sleep Disturbances From Baseline to Month 6: Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)Sleep problems (summary 6)-0.9 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 11.7
All Antiepileptic DrugsChange in Sleep Disturbances From Baseline to Month 6: Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)Sleep problems (summary 9)-0.9 scores on scaleStandard Deviation 13.2
Comparison: Sleep disturbance: p-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.2452t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Snoring: p-value verus baseline.p-value: 1t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Awake short of breath: p-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.4253t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Quantity: p-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.0572t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Adequacy: p-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.0625t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Somnolence: p-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.554t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Sleep problems (summary 6): p-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.4204t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Sleep problems (summary 9): p-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.4869t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in the Median Number of Seizures During the Last 3 Months of Treatment

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 (last 3 months of treatment)

Population: FAS LOCF. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent Change From Baseline in the Median Number of Seizures During the Last 3 Months of Treatment-75.0 percent change
p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
Secondary

Percent of Days Without Crisis During the Study

Crisis was defined as the total number of seizures during the study, the seizures at month 3 plus the seizures at month 6. The percent of days without crisis is number of days of study (date of last visit minus date of baseline visit) without crisis divided by number of days of study, multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Baseline through Month 6 (or end of treatment)

Population: The percentage of days without crisis during the study was not evaluable because a diary with the daily number of crises was not collected.

Secondary

Percent of Participants Indicating Optimal Sleep on the Optimal Sleep Subscale: Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)

MOS-SS: subject rated instrument used to assess the key constructs of sleep; assesses sleep quantity and quality and is comprised of 12 items yielding 7 subscale scores and 2 composite index scores. Optimal sleep subscale is derived from sleep quantity average hours of sleep over the past 4 weeks; percent of participants with response YES (optimal) if sleep quantilty was 7-8 hours of sleep per night.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: FAS; LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Participants Indicating Optimal Sleep on the Optimal Sleep Subscale: Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)Month 665.7 percent of participants
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Participants Indicating Optimal Sleep on the Optimal Sleep Subscale: Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)Baseline56.5 percent of participants
Comparison: Month 6: p-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.0863McNemar
Secondary

Percent of Participants Reaching Monotherapy

Percent of participants who started on more than one treatment (bitherapy) and reached monotherapy by end of study.

Time frame: Baseline through Month 6 (or end of study)

Population: FAS; LOCF. N=number of participants who started on bitherapy.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Participants Reaching Monotherapy2.9 percent of partipants
Secondary

Percent of Participants That Reduced, Maintained and Increased the Doses of the Initial Treatment Administered in Monotherapy

Time frame: Baseline through Month 6 (or end of treatment)

Population: FAS; LOCF. N= number of subjects with initial treatment administered as monotherapy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Participants That Reduced, Maintained and Increased the Doses of the Initial Treatment Administered in MonotherapyReduced0.0 percent of participants
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Participants That Reduced, Maintained and Increased the Doses of the Initial Treatment Administered in MonotherapyMaintained100.0 percent of participants
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Participants That Reduced, Maintained and Increased the Doses of the Initial Treatment Administered in MonotherapyIncreased0.0 percent of participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants That Reduced, Maintained and Increased Their Doses of New Antiepileptic Drugs (AED)

Time frame: Baseline to Month 6 (or end of treatment)

Population: FAS; LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Participants That Reduced, Maintained and Increased Their Doses of New Antiepileptic Drugs (AED)Reduced0.9 percent of participants
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Participants That Reduced, Maintained and Increased Their Doses of New Antiepileptic Drugs (AED)Maintained68.5 percent of participants
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Participants That Reduced, Maintained and Increased Their Doses of New Antiepileptic Drugs (AED)Increased30.6 percent of participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants Who Continued on Study Medication to Month 6

Retention rate: percent of participants who continued on study medication throughout the 6 Month period after inclusion in the study.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 6

Population: FAS; LOCF.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Participants Who Continued on Study Medication to Month 697.1 percent of participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Cessation of Occupation, Requirement of Caregiver, or Admission to Intensive Care Unit

Percent of participants with cessation of usual occupation, requirement of an informal caregiver, and who required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU).

Time frame: Month 6

Population: FAS; LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Participants With Cessation of Occupation, Requirement of Caregiver, or Admission to Intensive Care UnitStopped Usual Occupation16.2 percent of participants
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Participants With Cessation of Occupation, Requirement of Caregiver, or Admission to Intensive Care UnitRequired Informal Caregiver6.6 percent of participants
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Participants With Cessation of Occupation, Requirement of Caregiver, or Admission to Intensive Care UnitRequired Admission to ICU0.0 percent of participants
Comparison: Cessation of usual occupation: p-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.0708t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Requirement of informal caregiver: p-value versus baseline.p-value: 1t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Required admission to ICU: p-value versus baseline.p-value: 1t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Reduction in Number of Seizures >=25% and >=75% During the Last 3 Months of Treatment

Percent of participants with reduction in number of seizures \>=25% and \>=75% during the last 3 months of treatment before discontinuation (assessed at Month 3 and Month 6) versus the 3 month period before the baseline visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 (last 3 months of treatment)

Population: FAS; LOCF. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Participants With Reduction in Number of Seizures >=25% and >=75% During the Last 3 Months of TreatmentMonth 3: >=25%86.7 percent of participants
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Participants With Reduction in Number of Seizures >=25% and >=75% During the Last 3 Months of TreatmentMonth 3: >=75%27.8 percent of participants
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Participants With Reduction in Number of Seizures >=25% and >=75% During the Last 3 Months of TreatmentMonth 6: >= 25%86.7 percent of participants
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Participants With Reduction in Number of Seizures >=25% and >=75% During the Last 3 Months of TreatmentMonth 6: >=75%54.4 percent of participants
Comparison: Month 3 \>=25% reduction: p-value versus baseline.p-value: <0.0001McNemar
Comparison: Month 3 \>=75% reduction: p-value versus baseline.p-value: <0.0001McNemar
Comparison: Month 6: \>=25% reduction: p-value versus baseline.p-value: <0.0001McNemar
Comparison: Month 6: \>=75% reduction: p-value versus baseline.p-value: <0.0001McNemar
Secondary

Percent of Seizure-free Participants During the Last 3 Months Before Discontinuation

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 (last 3 months of treatment)

Population: FAS; LOCF. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Seizure-free Participants During the Last 3 Months Before DiscontinuationMonth 310.0 percent of participants
All Antiepileptic DrugsPercent of Seizure-free Participants During the Last 3 Months Before DiscontinuationMonth 620.0 percent of participants
Comparison: Month 3: p-value versus baseline.p-value: 0.0039McNemar
Comparison: Month 6: p-value versus baseline.p-value: <0.0001McNemar
Secondary

Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: FAS; LOCF. As no participants discontinued due to lack of efficacy, the time to exit analysis was not performed.

Secondary

Time to Discontinuation Due to Other Reasons

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: FAS; LOCF. Due to the low number of participants who discontinued due to other reasons, the time to exit analyses was not performed.

Secondary

Time to Discontinuation Due to Safety, Tolerability, or Treatment Compliance

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: FAS; LOCF. Due to the low number of participants who discontinued due to safety, tolerability or compliance with treatment, the time to exit analysis was not performed.

Secondary

Time to First Seizure

Number of days to first seizure after baseline.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 6 (or end of treatment)

Population: FAS LOCF. N=number of subjects with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
All Antiepileptic DrugsTime to First Seizure35.9 daysStandard Deviation 40.2
Secondary

Treatment Satisfaction Evaluated by Patient Global Impression of Change Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Patient Global Impression of Change VAS: subject rated instrument to measure subject's change in overall status; range from 0 (much better) to 10 (much worse).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: FAS; LOCF. The scale for this endpoint was not collected and results were not analyzed as planned.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026