Skip to content

Minocycline for HIV+ Cognitive Impairment in Uganda

Minocycline in the Treatment of HIV-Associated Cognitive Impairment in Uganda

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00855062
Enrollment
73
Registered
2009-03-03
Start date
2008-04-30
Completion date
2009-12-31
Last updated
2011-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV-associated Cognitive Impairment, HIV Infections

Keywords

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), HIV associated cognitive impairment, HIV dementia, Uganda, Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), Treatment Naive

Brief summary

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of minocycline, an antibiotic, in the treatment of Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated cognitive impairment in Uganda. Study Design: Treatment, 24-week Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Phase with Optional 24-week Open Label Phase for Subjects with a cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) Count in the 251-350 Range * Arm 1: Minocycline 100 mg orally every 12 hours (50 subjects) * Arm 2: Matching placebo orally every 12 hours (50 subjects) Primary Objective: · To examine whether minocycline treatment will improve cognitive performance after 24 weeks compared to baseline Secondary Objectives: * To examine whether minocycline treatment for 24 weeks is safe and well-tolerated in individuals with HIV-associated cognitive impairment * To examine whether minocycline treatment for 48 weeks is safe and well-tolerated in individuals with HIV-associated cognitive impairment * To examine whether minocycline treatment for 24 weeks improves functional impairment

Interventions

DRUGminocycline

100 mg capsule every 12 hours by mouth

DRUGminocycline placebo capsule

1 capsule every 12 hours by mouth

Sponsors

Makerere University
CollaboratorOTHER
Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* HIV infection prior to study entry * Naïve to any antiretroviral regimen and ineligible to receive antiretroviral therapy by cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) criteria in Uganda * Negative serum or urine pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential * Willingness to use birth control * Age 18-65 years * AIDS Dementia Scale Stage 0.5 OR 1 * Impaired cognitive performance as evidenced by an International HIV Dementia Scale (HDS) as defined by the protocol * Ability to sit or stand and swallow intact capsules with an 8-ounce glass of water * Ability and willingness of subject or legal guardian/ representative to give written informed consent * Resident within a 20km radius of Kampala city

Exclusion criteria

* Current cancers other than basal cell carcinoma, in situ carcinoma of the cervix, or Kaposi's sarcoma without evidence of visceral involvement or which does not require systemic chemotherapy * Severe premorbid psychiatric illness, including schizophrenia and major depression which, in the in investigator's opinion, is likely to interfere with study compliance * Active symptomatic AIDS-defining opportunistic infection within 45 days prior to study entry * Confounding neurological disorders as defined in the protocol * Central nervous system infections or cancers as defined in the protocol * Systemic lupus * Thyroid disease diagnosed within 24 weeks prior to entry * Breastfeeding * Active drug or alcohol use or dependence that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements * Serious illness requiring systemic treatment and/or hospitalization until subject either completes therapy or is clinically stable on therapy, in the opinion of the investigator * History of allergy/sensitivity to minocycline or other tetracyclines and their formulations * Any other clinically significant condition or laboratory abnormality that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the subject's ability to participate in the study. This includes an individual found to have an HIV dementia scale stage 3 or 4. * Any esophageal or other condition that would interfere with the swallowing of the study medication * Use of excluded drugs as defined by the protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
24-week Change of Uganda Neuropsychological Test Battery Summary Measure (U NP Sum)At baseline and week 24The U NP Sum is defined as the average of z scores for 9 neuropsychological test subcomponents in the neuropsychological test battery (i.e. the average of norm-adjusted (z) scores for Grooved Pegboard Dominant Hand, Grooved Pegboard Non-dominant Hand, Color Trails 1, Color Trails 2, Symbol Digit, WHO-UCLA Verbal Learning test Trial 5, WHO-UCLA Verbal Learning test delayed recall, Digit Span forward and Digit Span backward). The outcome is defined as U NP Sum at week 24 - U NP Sum at baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
24-week Change of Karnofsky Performance ScoreAt baseline and week 24The outcome is a new dichotomous variable: no change/worse vs. better at 24 weeks compared to baseline.
Time From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms.Time of initial Grade ≥ 2 toxicity and/or sign and symptom event up to week 24The outcome is the time to first Grade ≥ 2 toxicity and/or sign and symptoms from study treatment initiation up to week 24. The grade was determined by clinicians and an Grade ≥ 2 event means moderate, severe, life-threatening, or death event.
Time From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and SymptomsTime of first Grade ≥ 2 toxicity and/or sign and symptom event up to 48 weeksThe outcome is the time of first Grade ≥ 2 toxicity and/or sign and symptoms from treatment initiation up to 48 weeks. The grade was determined by clinicians and an Grade ≥ 2 event means moderate, severe, life-threatening, or death event.
24-week Change of CD4 Cell CountsAt baseline and week 24The outcome is defined as CD4 cell count at week 24 - CD4 cell count at baseline. The unit is cells/mm\^3.
24-week Change of Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) HIV Dementia StageAt baseline and week 24The outcome is a new dichotomous variable: no change/worse vs. better at 24 weeks compared to baseline.
24-week Change of Instrumental Activities of Daily LivingAt baseline and week 24The outcome is a new dichotomous variable: no change/worse vs. better at 24 weeks compared to baseline.
24-week Change of HIV RNA Plasma Viral Loads (Log10 Transformed)At baseline and week 24The outcome is the HIV RNA plasma viral loads (Log10 transformed) at week 24 - the viral loads (Log10 transformed) at baseline.
24-week Change of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) ScoreAt baseline and week 24The outcome is the total CES-D score at week 24 - the total CES-D score at baseline. The total CES-D score is based on 20 CES-D items, such as I was bothered by things that usually don't bother me and I did not feel like eating, my appetite was poor. Patients were asked to answer each item by 4 scales: (1) Rarely, (2) Sometimes, (3) Occasionally, and (4) Most of the time. After 4 negative items were multiplied by -1, the total CES-D score is a simple sum of all items. The min and Max are 0 and 60, respectively. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
48-week Change of CD4 Cell CountsAt baseline and week 48The outcome is defined as CD4 cell count at week 48 - CD4 cell count at baseline. The unit is cells/mm\^3.

Countries

Uganda

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The recruitment period was from Mar 2008 to Oct 2009 when the study was stopped early (Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) decision based on futility) on Nov 2009. The study participants were recruited from the Infectious Disease Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Pre-assignment details

Total of 353 participants were screened; only 73 were randomized and thus 280 were not enrolled: 146 of them did not have cognitive impairment, 55 of them lacked laboratory inclusion criteria, and 79 of them had others.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Minocycline
Minocycline 100 mg orally every 12 hours
36
Placebo
Placebo minocycline capsules every 12 hours
37
Total73

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Step1Adverse Event11
Step1Early Study Closure57
Step1Pregnancy10
Step1Protocol Violation10
Step1Withdrawal by Subject23
Step2Adverse Event03
Step2Early Study Closure62
Step2Initiation of antiretroviral therapy/ART01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMinocyclinePlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
36 Participants37 Participants73 Participants
Age Continuous37.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.21
36.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.17
37.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.66
Baseline Cluster of Differentiation Four (CD4) Count319 cells/mm^3305 cells/mm^3313 cells/mm^3
Baseline Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Not having any difficulties on the tasks
29 Participants35 Participants64 Participants
Baseline Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Primarily cognitive problems
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Baseline Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Primarily physical problems
6 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
Baseline Karnofsky's Performance Score
100 (Karnofsky Score)
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Baseline Karnofsky's Performance Score
80 (Karnofsky Score)
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Baseline Karnofsky's Performance Score
90 (Karnofsky Score)
35 Participants34 Participants69 Participants
Baseline Log10(Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Viral Load (VL))4.41 copies/mL4.59 copies/mL4.50 copies/mL
Baseline Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Dementia Scale
Equivocal/subclinical
35 Participants37 Participants72 Participants
Baseline Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Dementia Scale
Mild
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Baseline Overall Neurological Assessment
Can not assess
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Baseline Overall Neurological Assessment
Central Nervous System (CNS) abnormality only
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Baseline Overall Neurological Assessment
CNS and PNS abnormality
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Baseline Overall Neurological Assessment
Normal neurological assessment
26 Participants30 Participants56 Participants
Baseline Overall Neurological Assessment
Peripheral Nervous System (PNS) abnormality only
4 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Baseline Uganda Neuropsychological Test Battery Summary measure (U NP Sum)-0.97 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.78
-0.97 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.86
-0.97 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.82
Color Trails 1-1.35 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.03
-1.65 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.03
-1.51 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
Color Trails 2-2.55 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.07
-2.33 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.05
-2.44 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.05
Digit Span Backward-0.68 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.75
-0.94 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.06
-0.81 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.93
Digit Span Forward0.02 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.79
0.19 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.99
0.11 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Grooved Pegboard Dominant-0.34 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.58
-0.03 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.14
-0.18 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.37
Grooved Pegboard Non-dominant-0.56 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.82
-0.48 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.42
-0.52 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.61
Region of Enrollment
Uganda
36 participants37 participants73 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants32 Participants66 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Symbol Digit-0.87 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96
-0.86 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
-0.86 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.88
WHO-UCLA Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT): Delayed-1.17 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.79
-1.15 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.18
-1.16 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
WHO-UCLA Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT): Trials Total-1.28 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.88
-1.48 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.14
-1.38 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.02

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
26 / 3625 / 37
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 361 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

24-week Change of Uganda Neuropsychological Test Battery Summary Measure (U NP Sum)

The U NP Sum is defined as the average of z scores for 9 neuropsychological test subcomponents in the neuropsychological test battery (i.e. the average of norm-adjusted (z) scores for Grooved Pegboard Dominant Hand, Grooved Pegboard Non-dominant Hand, Color Trails 1, Color Trails 2, Symbol Digit, WHO-UCLA Verbal Learning test Trial 5, WHO-UCLA Verbal Learning test delayed recall, Digit Span forward and Digit Span backward). The outcome is defined as U NP Sum at week 24 - U NP Sum at baseline.

Time frame: At baseline and week 24

Population: The descriptive statistics are based on per protocol analysis. For the statistical analysis, ITT analysis was used and the missing U NP Sums at week 24 were imputed using a multiple regression imputation method. The number of participants analyzed for the ITT analysis was 73 (36 for Minocycline and 37 for Placebo).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Minocycline24-week Change of Uganda Neuropsychological Test Battery Summary Measure (U NP Sum)0.44 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.74
Placebo24-week Change of Uganda Neuropsychological Test Battery Summary Measure (U NP Sum)0.49 z-scoreStandard Deviation 0.67
Comparison: The null hypothesis was that the 24-week changes of U NP Sum between the minocycline and placebo groups are the same.~The sample size calculation showed that 100 (50 participants in each group) were required to detect the clinically meaningful difference of 0.5 with 85% power, 0.05 Type I error, two-sample and two-sided test.p-value: 0.3795% CI: [-0.512, 0.46]Regression, Linear
Secondary

24-week Change of CD4 Cell Counts

The outcome is defined as CD4 cell count at week 24 - CD4 cell count at baseline. The unit is cells/mm\^3.

Time frame: At baseline and week 24

Population: This analysis used the participants with CD4 cell counts at baseline and week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Minocycline24-week Change of CD4 Cell Counts-25.28 cells/mm^3Standard Deviation 70.85
Placebo24-week Change of CD4 Cell Counts-28.57 cells/mm^3Standard Deviation 61.65
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean 24-week change of CD4 cell counts in the minocycline group is the same as the one in the placebo group.p-value: 0.64795% CI: [-27.23, 43.45]Regression, Linear
Secondary

24-week Change of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Score

The outcome is the total CES-D score at week 24 - the total CES-D score at baseline. The total CES-D score is based on 20 CES-D items, such as I was bothered by things that usually don't bother me and I did not feel like eating, my appetite was poor. Patients were asked to answer each item by 4 scales: (1) Rarely, (2) Sometimes, (3) Occasionally, and (4) Most of the time. After 4 negative items were multiplied by -1, the total CES-D score is a simple sum of all items. The min and Max are 0 and 60, respectively. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

Time frame: At baseline and week 24

Population: The analysis includes participants with CES-D scores at baseline and week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Minocycline24-week Change of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Score-4.19 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.86
Placebo24-week Change of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Score-4.04 scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.27
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean 24-week change of CES-D score in the minocycline group is the same as the one in the placebo group.p-value: 0.91595% CI: [-3.4, 3.78]Regression, Linear
Secondary

24-week Change of HIV RNA Plasma Viral Loads (Log10 Transformed)

The outcome is the HIV RNA plasma viral loads (Log10 transformed) at week 24 - the viral loads (Log10 transformed) at baseline.

Time frame: At baseline and week 24

Population: The analysis includes participants with HIV RNA viral loads at baseline and week 24.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Minocycline24-week Change of HIV RNA Plasma Viral Loads (Log10 Transformed)0.22 copies/mL
Placebo24-week Change of HIV RNA Plasma Viral Loads (Log10 Transformed)0.13 copies/mL
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the median log10-transformed HIV RNA viral loads in the minocycline group is the same as the one in the placebo group.p-value: 0.766Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

24-week Change of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

The outcome is a new dichotomous variable: no change/worse vs. better at 24 weeks compared to baseline.

Time frame: At baseline and week 24

Population: The analysis includes participants with IADL scores at baseline and week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Minocycline24-week Change of Instrumental Activities of Daily LivingBetter14 percentage of participants
Minocycline24-week Change of Instrumental Activities of Daily LivingNo Change/Worse86 percentage of participants
Placebo24-week Change of Instrumental Activities of Daily LivingBetter12 percentage of participants
Placebo24-week Change of Instrumental Activities of Daily LivingNo Change/Worse88 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the percentage of being better at week 24 compared to baseline in the minocycline group is the same as the one in the placebo group.p-value: 0.76495% CI: [0.26, 6.34]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

24-week Change of Karnofsky Performance Score

The outcome is a new dichotomous variable: no change/worse vs. better at 24 weeks compared to baseline.

Time frame: At baseline and week 24

Population: This analysis includes the participants with Karnofsky performance score at baseline and week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Minocycline24-week Change of Karnofsky Performance ScoreNo Change/Worse97 percentage of participants
Minocycline24-week Change of Karnofsky Performance ScoreBetter3 percentage of participants
Placebo24-week Change of Karnofsky Performance ScoreNo Change/Worse94 percentage of participants
Placebo24-week Change of Karnofsky Performance ScoreBetter6 percentage of participants
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the percentage of participants feeling better in the minocycline group after 24 week treatment is the same as the one in the placebo group.p-value: 0.61395% CI: [0.043, 0.062]Fisher Exact
Secondary

24-week Change of Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) HIV Dementia Stage

The outcome is a new dichotomous variable: no change/worse vs. better at 24 weeks compared to baseline.

Time frame: At baseline and week 24

Population: The descriptive statistics were based on observed data. Since all participants reported there were no change in the MSK score at week 24, no statistical test was conducted.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Minocycline24-week Change of Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) HIV Dementia StageNo Change/Worse28 participants
Minocycline24-week Change of Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) HIV Dementia StageBetter0 participants
Placebo24-week Change of Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) HIV Dementia StageNo Change/Worse27 participants
Placebo24-week Change of Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) HIV Dementia StageBetter0 participants
Secondary

48-week Change of CD4 Cell Counts

The outcome is defined as CD4 cell count at week 48 - CD4 cell count at baseline. The unit is cells/mm\^3.

Time frame: At baseline and week 48

Population: This analysis used the participants with CD4 cell counts at baseline and week 48.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Minocycline48-week Change of CD4 Cell Counts-61.15 cells/mm^3Standard Deviation 80.46
Placebo48-week Change of CD4 Cell Counts-56.50 cells/mm^3Standard Deviation 84.97
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the mean 48-week change in CD4 cell counts in the minocycline group is the same as the one in the placebo group.p-value: 0.81395% CI: [-59.07, 74.6]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Time From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms

The outcome is the time of first Grade ≥ 2 toxicity and/or sign and symptoms from treatment initiation up to 48 weeks. The grade was determined by clinicians and an Grade ≥ 2 event means moderate, severe, life-threatening, or death event.

Time frame: Time of first Grade ≥ 2 toxicity and/or sign and symptom event up to 48 weeks

Population: This analysis includes every randomized participants. A total of 22 minocycline and 21 placebo participants reported at least one Grade ≥ 2 toxicity and/or sign and symptoms during 48 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MinocyclineTime From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms0-4 weeks12 participants with an event
MinocyclineTime From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms4.01-12 weeks6 participants with an event
MinocyclineTime From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms12.01-24 weeks3 participants with an event
MinocyclineTime From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms24.01-48 weeks1 participants with an event
PlaceboTime From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms24.01-48 weeks1 participants with an event
PlaceboTime From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms0-4 weeks10 participants with an event
PlaceboTime From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms12.01-24 weeks3 participants with an event
PlaceboTime From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms4.01-12 weeks7 participants with an event
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the 48-week survival curve for the first Grade ≥ 2 toxicity and/or sign and symptoms in the minocycline group is the same as the one in the placebo group.p-value: 0.941Log Rank
Secondary

Time From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms.

The outcome is the time to first Grade ≥ 2 toxicity and/or sign and symptoms from study treatment initiation up to week 24. The grade was determined by clinicians and an Grade ≥ 2 event means moderate, severe, life-threatening, or death event.

Time frame: Time of initial Grade ≥ 2 toxicity and/or sign and symptom event up to week 24

Population: This analysis includes every randomized participants. A total of 21 minocycline and 20 placebo participants reported at least one Grade ≥ 2 toxicity and/or sign and symptoms during 24 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MinocyclineTime From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms.12.01 - 24 weeks3 participants with an event
MinocyclineTime From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms.0-4 weeks12 participants with an event
MinocyclineTime From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms.4.01 - 12 weeks6 participants with an event
PlaceboTime From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms.4.01 - 12 weeks7 participants with an event
PlaceboTime From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms.0-4 weeks10 participants with an event
PlaceboTime From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms.12.01 - 24 weeks3 participants with an event
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that the survival curve for the first Grade ≥ 2 toxicity and/or sign and symptoms in the minocycline group is the same as the one in the placebo group.p-value: 0.661Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026