Skip to content

Enhance of Language Learning with Neurostimulation

Enhance of Language Learning with Neurostimulation (transcranial Direct Current Stimulation)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00854893
Enrollment
70
Registered
2009-03-03
Start date
2009-10-31
Completion date
2010-07-01
Last updated
2024-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aging, Aphasia, Stroke

Keywords

stroke, aphasia, aging, language learning

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to test the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation over the motor cortex of the language dominant hemisphere on language learning in healthy subjects and stroke patients with aphasia. We hypothesize that anodal stimulation enhances the learning of action words compared to sham and cathodal stimulation.

Detailed description

The motor cortex is involved at different levels of language processing. It has been demonstrated that the perception of action words activates motor representations in the language-dominant hemisphere. However, it is not known whether modulation of excitability has an effect on learning new action words. Thus, we hypothesize that transcranial direct current stimulation over the motor cortex of the language-dominant hemiphere modulates the acquisition of new action words. The results bear the potential to design new rehabilitative strategies in stroke patients with aphasia. The motor cortex might offer an access to the language network that can be used for interventional approaches such as neurostimulation.

Interventions

DEVICEtranscranial direct current stimulation

1 mV for 20 min (verum conditions: anodal and cathodal)or 30 seconds (placebo condition: sham) during language learning , active electrode over primary motor cortex of language dominant hemisphere, reference electrode over contralateral supraorbital area

Sponsors

German Research Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 86 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* age \>18 and \< 86 years * contractual capability * ischemic stroke excluding motor cortex (stroke patients) * minimum time since stroke 9 months * aphasia (stroke patients) * severe aphasia that impedes understanding of instructions (stroke patients)

Exclusion criteria

* sever head trauma in the past * seizures * pace maker * metal implants in the head/neck region * severe comorbidity, especially neurologic and psychiatric diseases * intake of illegal drugs * Mini Mental State examination score \< 27 * neuroactive substances, e.g. antidepressants * pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
word learningimmediately after intervention and after 1 weeklearning of new action words measured as learned words/all words in %

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026