Skip to content

Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of BDP HFA Nasal Aerosol in Patients 12 Years and Older With SAR

Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multi-Center, Dose-Range-Finding Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of BDP HFA Nasal Aerosol in Adult and Adolescent Patients (12 Years and Older) With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00854360
Enrollment
487
Registered
2009-03-03
Start date
2009-03-31
Completion date
2009-05-31
Last updated
2012-05-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hayfever, Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Keywords

Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis, Hayfever

Brief summary

This is a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 2-week, multi-center, dose-range-finding study in male or female patients (12 years and older) with SAR.

Interventions

DRUGBeclomethasone dipropionate HFA Nasal Aerosol

Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) Nasal Aerosol

DRUGPlacebo

HFA Vehicle Aerosol

Sponsors

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Male or female patients 12 years of age and older, as of the Screening Visit (SV). * General good health, and free of any concomitant conditions or treatment that could interfere with study conduct, influence the interpretation of study observations/results, or put the patient at increased risk during the study. * A history of SAR to relevant seasonal allergen (tree/grass pollen) for a minimum of two years immediately preceding the study Screening Visit (SV). The SAR must have been of sufficient severity to have required treatment (either continuous or intermittent) in the past and in the investigator's judgment is expected to be exposed to the allergen and require treatment throughout the entire study period. * A demonstrated sensitivity to relevant tree/grass pollen known to produce SAR through a standard skin prick test. A positive test is defined as a wheal diameter at least 3 mm larger than the control wheal for the skin prick test. Documentation of a positive result within 12 months prior to Screening Visit (SV) is acceptable. * Other criteria apply Key

Exclusion criteria

* Participation in any investigational drug study within the 30 days preceding the Screening Visit (SV) or planned participation in another investigational drug study at any time during this study. * History of physical findings of nasal pathology, including nasal polyps or other clinically significant respiratory tract malformations, recent nasal biopsy, nasal trauma or surgery, atrophic rhinitis, or rhinitis medicamentosa (all within the last 60 days prior to the SV). * History of a respiratory infection or disorder \[including, but not limited to bronchitis, pneumonia, chronic sinusitis, influenza, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)\] within the 14 days preceding the Screening Visit (SV), or development of a respiratory infection during the Run-in Period. * Use of any prohibited concomitant medications within the prescribed (per protocol) time since the last dosing period prior to the Screening Visit (SV) and/or plans for use during the entire treatment duration. * Other criteria apply

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Average AM and PM Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) Over the Two-week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Day -6 to 0) and Days 1-15 (2-week Treatment Period)Participants recorded the severity of their nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, itchy nose and nasal congestion) over the past 12 hours twice daily (AM & PM) using the following scale: 0=absent (no sign/symptom); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (awareness of sign/symptom, bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (sign/symptoms hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities and/or sleeping). The total nasal symptom score (sum of the 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from Baseline score indicates symptom improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Average AM and PM Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) Over the Two Week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Day -6 to 0) and Days 1-15 (2-week Treatment Period)Participants recorded the severity of their nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, itchy nose and nasal congestion) over the 10 minutes prior to the assessment, twice daily (AM & PM) using the following scale: 0=absent (no sign/symptom); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (awareness of symptom, bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (symptoms hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities and/or sleeping). The total nasal symptom score (sum of 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from Baseline score indicates symptom improvement.
Change From Baseline in Morning Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) Over the Two-week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Day -6 to 0) and Days 1-15 (2-week Treatment Period)Change from Baseline in the morning patient-reported instantaneous TNSS. Participants recorded the severity of their nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, itchy nose and nasal congestion) over the past 10 minutes (prior to the assessment) in the morning on a scale from 0 (mild symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). The total nasal symptom score (sum of the 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from Baseline score indicates symptom improvement.
Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ)Baseline and Week 2The adult RQLQ has 28 questions in 7 domains (activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotional). Participants were asked to recall their experiences during the previous week and to give their responses on a 7-point scale (0 = Least severe to 6 = Extremely severe). The overall RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses, and ranges from 0 to 7. A negative change from Baseline score indicates symptom improvement.
Change From Baseline in Morning 24-hour Reflective Ocular Symptom Score Over the Two-week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Day -6 to 0) and Days 1-15 (2-week Treatment Period)Participants recorded the severity of their symptoms (itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes and redness of eyes) for the past 24 hours each morning using the following scale: 0=absent (no sign/symptoms); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, minimal awareness, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (awareness of sign/symptom, bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (sign/symptom hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities or sleeping). The total ocular symptom score (sum of 3 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 9 (worst symptoms). A negative change from Baseline score indicates symptom improvement.
Change From Baseline in Morning 24-hour Reflective Non-nasal Symptom Score Over the Two-week Treatment PeriodBaseline (Day -6 to 0) and Days 1-15 (2-week Treatment Period)Participants recorded the severity of their symptoms (itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, redness of eyes and itching of ears or palate) for the past 24 hours each morning using the following scale: 0=absent (no sign/symptom); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (awareness of sign/symptom, bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (symptoms hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities or sleeping). Total non-nasal symptom score (sum of 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from Baseline score indicates symptom improvement.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 685 patients were screened and 635 were enrolled in the study and participated in the Run-in Period. Of the 635 enrolled patients, 487 were randomized to treatment. The study was performed in the spring during tree and grass pollen seasons.

Pre-assignment details

During the 7 - 21 day Run-in Period, patients self-administered a single-blind placebo nasal aerosol once daily in the morning and assessed and recorded their twice daily allergic rhinitis symptoms to determine eligibility for randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
BDP HFA 80 µg/Day
During the 2-week double-blind Treatment Period participants self-administered two actuations (one per nostril) of 40 (µg) BDP HFA and two actuations of placebo HFA once daily.
118
BDP HFA 160 µg/Day
During the 2-week double-blind Treatment Period participants self-administered four actuations (two per nostril) of 40 µg BDP HFA once daily.
123
BDP HFA 320 µg/Day
During the 2-week double-blind Treatment Period participants self-administered 4 actuations (two per nostril) of 80 µg BDP HFA once daily.
122
Placebo
During the 2-week double-blind Treatment Period participants self-administered four actuations (two per nostril) of placebo HFA once daily.
123
Total486

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0126
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy2100
Overall StudyOther0003
Overall StudyPregnancy0100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBDP HFA 80 µg/DayBDP HFA 160 µg/DayBDP HFA 320 µg/DayPlaceboTotal
Age Continuous37.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.86
39.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.26
38.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.74
38.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.95
38.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.45
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants5 Participants0 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
23 Participants18 Participants22 Participants19 Participants82 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
14 participants10 participants17 participants15 participants56 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
104 participants113 participants105 participants108 participants430 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
92 Participants99 Participants98 Participants97 Participants386 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
118 participants123 participants122 participants123 participants486 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
76 Participants86 Participants81 Participants73 Participants316 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
42 Participants37 Participants41 Participants50 Participants170 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 1183 / 1233 / 1221 / 123
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1182 / 1230 / 1220 / 123

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Average AM and PM Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) Over the Two-week Treatment Period

Participants recorded the severity of their nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, itchy nose and nasal congestion) over the past 12 hours twice daily (AM & PM) using the following scale: 0=absent (no sign/symptom); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (awareness of sign/symptom, bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (sign/symptoms hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities and/or sleeping). The total nasal symptom score (sum of the 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from Baseline score indicates symptom improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -6 to 0) and Days 1-15 (2-week Treatment Period)

Population: The Intent-to-treat population included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of randomized study medication and had at least one post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BDP HFA 80 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Average AM and PM Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) Over the Two-week Treatment Period-1.88 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
BDP HFA 160 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Average AM and PM Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) Over the Two-week Treatment Period-1.87 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
BDP HFA 320 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Average AM and PM Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) Over the Two-week Treatment Period-2.22 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average AM and PM Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) Over the Two-week Treatment Period-1.59 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Comparison: A priori threshold for statistical significance is p\<0.05.p-value: 0.25595% CI: [-0.8, 0.21]Repeated measures ANCOVA
Comparison: A priori threshold for statistical significance is p\<0.05.p-value: 0.25795% CI: [-0.78, 0.21]Repeated measures ANCOVA
Comparison: A priori threshold for statistical significance is p\<0.05.p-value: 0.01395% CI: [-1.13, -0.13]Repeated measures ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Average AM and PM Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) Over the Two Week Treatment Period

Participants recorded the severity of their nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, itchy nose and nasal congestion) over the 10 minutes prior to the assessment, twice daily (AM & PM) using the following scale: 0=absent (no sign/symptom); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (awareness of symptom, bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (symptoms hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities and/or sleeping). The total nasal symptom score (sum of 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from Baseline score indicates symptom improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -6 to 0) and Days 1-15 (2-week Treatment Period)

Population: Intent to treat population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BDP HFA 80 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Average AM and PM Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) Over the Two Week Treatment Period-1.77 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
BDP HFA 160 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Average AM and PM Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) Over the Two Week Treatment Period-1.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
BDP HFA 320 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Average AM and PM Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) Over the Two Week Treatment Period-2.10 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Average AM and PM Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) Over the Two Week Treatment Period-1.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Comparison: A priori threshold for statistical significance is p\<0.05.p-value: 0.27895% CI: [-0.77, 0.22]Repeated measures ANCOVA
Comparison: A priori threshold for statistical significance is p\<0.05.p-value: 0.38595% CI: [-0.7, 0.27]Repeated measures ANCOVA
Comparison: A priori threshold for statistical significance is p\<0.05.p-value: 0.01695% CI: [-1.09, -0.11]Repeated Measures ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Morning 24-hour Reflective Non-nasal Symptom Score Over the Two-week Treatment Period

Participants recorded the severity of their symptoms (itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes, redness of eyes and itching of ears or palate) for the past 24 hours each morning using the following scale: 0=absent (no sign/symptom); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (awareness of sign/symptom, bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (symptoms hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities or sleeping). Total non-nasal symptom score (sum of 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from Baseline score indicates symptom improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -6 to 0) and Days 1-15 (2-week Treatment Period)

Population: The non-nasal population included only those participants with adequate non-nasal symptoms during the Run-in Period as defined by a mean daily 24-hour reflective score of 6 or greater for the 24-hour reflective non-nasal symptom score, over the last 7 days of the Run-in Period.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BDP HFA 80 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Morning 24-hour Reflective Non-nasal Symptom Score Over the Two-week Treatment Period-1.55 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
BDP HFA 160 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Morning 24-hour Reflective Non-nasal Symptom Score Over the Two-week Treatment Period-1.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
BDP HFA 320 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Morning 24-hour Reflective Non-nasal Symptom Score Over the Two-week Treatment Period-1.91 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Morning 24-hour Reflective Non-nasal Symptom Score Over the Two-week Treatment Period-1.51 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
Comparison: A priori threshold for statistical significance is p\<0.05.p-value: 0.90395% CI: [-0.64, 0.57]Repeated measures ANCOVA
Comparison: A priori threshold for statistical significance is p\<0.05.p-value: 0.95295% CI: [-0.58, 0.62]Repeated measures ANCOVA
Comparison: A priori threshold for statistical significance is p\<0.05.p-value: 0.18795% CI: [-0.99, 0.19]Repeated measures ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Morning 24-hour Reflective Ocular Symptom Score Over the Two-week Treatment Period

Participants recorded the severity of their symptoms (itching/burning eyes, tearing/watering eyes and redness of eyes) for the past 24 hours each morning using the following scale: 0=absent (no sign/symptoms); 1=mild (sign/symptom present, minimal awareness, easily tolerated); 2=moderate (awareness of sign/symptom, bothersome but tolerable); 3=severe (sign/symptom hard to tolerate, interfere with daily activities or sleeping). The total ocular symptom score (sum of 3 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 9 (worst symptoms). A negative change from Baseline score indicates symptom improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -6 to 0) and Days 1-15 (2-week Treatment Period)

Population: The ocular population included only those participants with adequate ocular symptoms during the Run-in Period as defined by a mean daily 24-hour reflective score of 4 or greater for the 24-hour reflective ocular symptom score, over the last 7 days of the Run-in Period.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BDP HFA 80 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Morning 24-hour Reflective Ocular Symptom Score Over the Two-week Treatment Period-1.16 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
BDP HFA 160 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Morning 24-hour Reflective Ocular Symptom Score Over the Two-week Treatment Period-1.11 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
BDP HFA 320 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Morning 24-hour Reflective Ocular Symptom Score Over the Two-week Treatment Period-1.46 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Morning 24-hour Reflective Ocular Symptom Score Over the Two-week Treatment Period-1.17 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Comparison: A priori threshold for statistical significance is p\<0.05.p-value: 0.98995% CI: [-0.45, 0.46]Repeated measures ANCOVA
Comparison: A priori threshold for statistical significance is p\<0.05.p-value: 0.80895% CI: [-0.39, 0.5]Repeated measures ANCOVA
Comparison: A priori threshold for statistical significance is p\<0.05.p-value: 0.19595% CI: [-0.74, 0.15]Repeated measures ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Morning Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) Over the Two-week Treatment Period

Change from Baseline in the morning patient-reported instantaneous TNSS. Participants recorded the severity of their nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose, itchy nose and nasal congestion) over the past 10 minutes (prior to the assessment) in the morning on a scale from 0 (mild symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). The total nasal symptom score (sum of the 4 symptom scores) ranges from 0 to 12 (worst symptoms). A negative change from Baseline score indicates symptom improvement.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -6 to 0) and Days 1-15 (2-week Treatment Period)

Population: Intent to treat population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BDP HFA 80 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Morning Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) Over the Two-week Treatment Period-1.76 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
BDP HFA 160 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Morning Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) Over the Two-week Treatment Period-1.71 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
BDP HFA 320 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Morning Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) Over the Two-week Treatment Period-2.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Morning Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) Over the Two-week Treatment Period-1.31 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Comparison: A priori threshold for statistical significance is p\<0.05.p-value: 0.08295% CI: [-0.95, 0.06]Repeated measures ANCOVA
Comparison: A priori threshold for statistical significance is p\<0.05.p-value: 0.11495% CI: [-0.9, 0.1]Repeated measures ANCOVA
Comparison: A priori threshold for statistical significance is p\<0.05.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-1.33, -0.33]Repeated measures ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ)

The adult RQLQ has 28 questions in 7 domains (activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotional). Participants were asked to recall their experiences during the previous week and to give their responses on a 7-point scale (0 = Least severe to 6 = Extremely severe). The overall RQLQ score is the mean of all 28 responses, and ranges from 0 to 7. A negative change from Baseline score indicates symptom improvement.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 2

Population: The RQLQ population included only those participants over the age of 18 years with an impaired quality of life at Baseline as defined by a RQLQ score at the Randomization Visit of 3.0 or greater.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
BDP HFA 80 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ)-1.30 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
BDP HFA 160 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ)-1.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
BDP HFA 320 µg/DayChange From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ)-1.62 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ)-1.22 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Comparison: A priori threshold for statistical significance is p\<0.05.p-value: 0.74795% CI: [-0.52, 0.37]ANCOVA
Comparison: A priori threshold for statistical significance is p\<0.05.p-value: 0.60595% CI: [-0.53, 0.31]ANCOVA
Comparison: A priori threshold for statistical significance is p\<0.05.p-value: 0.08395% CI: [-0.84, 0.05]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026