Skip to content

rhBMP-2 Versus Autograft in Critical Size Tibial Defects

RhBMP-2 vs. Autograft for Critical Size Tibial Defects: A Multicenter Randomized Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00853489
Enrollment
33
Registered
2009-03-02
Start date
2011-08-31
Completion date
2017-02-17
Last updated
2018-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tibial Fractures

Keywords

Open tibia fractures, rhBMP-2, critical size defects, bone grafting

Brief summary

The purpose of our study is to evaluate the use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (RhBMP-2) as compared to standard ICBG in the treatment of severe open tibia fractures with a critical size bone defect (at least one centimeter in length compromising at least 50% of the circumference of the bone).

Detailed description

Open tibia fractures have a 15% or higher rate of not healing. Those fractures which do not heal are typically treated with bone from the hip (iliac crest autograft; or ICBG). The use of ICBG bone with the treatment of delayed unions/non-unions with critical defect, although successful, has its drawbacks. The bone graft sources are limited and the procedure is associated with additional operating room time plus a second incision with increased risk of infection, post operative pain and increased hospital stay. The purpose of this study is to determine if Rh-BMP2, a new bone graft substitute, is at least as effective as using bone from the hip (autograft) to help promote healing of open, tibia (shin bone) fractures. Research Questions: Primary: What is the relative effect of rhBMP-2 versus autogenous ICBG on rates of union in patients with critical size defects following tibial shaft fractures? Null hypothesis #1: rhBMP-2 has the same union rate when used in critical-sized defects as does ICBG. Secondary: What is the relative effect of rhBMP-2 versus autogenous ICBG on infection rates in patients with nonunion or critical size defects following tibial shaft fractures? Null hypothesis #2: The infection rate in open tibias with critical-sized defects treated with rhBMP-2 and autogenous ICBG are the same. What is the economic impact of the use of Rh-BMP 2 for tibial fractures with critical sized defects? Null hypothesis #3: There will be no difference in the economic cost of the treatment of critical sized defects using the RhBMP-2 versus iliac crest bone graft.

Interventions

DEVICErecombinant bone morphogenetic protein 2

Patients will receive 1.50 mg/ml -12 mg of rhBMP-2 soaked on a absorbable collagen sponge (rhBMP-2/ACS) as an adjuvant to a freeze-dried cancellous allograft

PROCEDUREAutogenous iliac crest bone graft

Patients will undergo autogenous iliac crest bone graft surgery per the surgeon's usual practice.

Sponsors

Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium
CollaboratorOTHER
St. Louis University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients 18-65 years old with an open tibia fracture involving diaphysis (if patient has a bilateral tibia fracture and both require a bone graft, then each will be randomized separately). * Tibia fractures with a circumferential bone defect of at least one centimeter in length compromising at least 50% of the circumference of the bone. * The definitive treatment of the tibia fracture must be with an intramedullary nail (may have temporary external fixation prior to IM nail placement). * Patients whose treatment plan includes placement of a bone graft between 6 to 16 weeks after their initial injury. * Patients who have no evidence of infection by clinical examination (defined as active infection at the operative site, purulent drainage from the fracture or evidence of active osteomyelitis at the time of bone graft). * Patients who are independent in living and ambulation prior to injury. * Patients who are English speaking. * Patients who are willing to provide consent and available for follow-up for at least 12 months following definitive surgical procedure.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are pregnant or lactating. * Patients with known hypersensitivity to rhBMP-2 or bovine type I collagen. * Patients with a history of tumor, a resected or extant tumor, an active malignancy, or patients undergoing treatment for malignancy. * Patients who are skeletally immature (\<18 years of age or no radiographic evidence of epiphyseal closure). * Patients with inadequate neurovascular status, e.g. high risk of amputation. * Patients with compartment syndrome of the affected limb. * Patients with immune deficiency or history of auto-immune disease, * Patients who have undergone treatment of any other investigational therapy within the month preceding implantation or planned within the 12 months following implantation. * Patients unable to return for required follow-up visits. * Patients who have medical co-morbidities that preclude treatment with a general anesthetic. * Patient who is pending incarceration or who is incarcerated. * Patients with an active infection at the operative site, purulent drainage from the fracture or evidence of active osteomyelitis at the time of bone grafting. * Patient has intraoperative positive gram stain or an elevated CRP after laboratory screening for infection. * Patient has segmental defects longer than 5cm in length. * Patients who have segmental defects that require more than 60 cc of bone graft. * Patients who require more than one large kit of rhBMP-2 at time of surgery. * Patient's anticipated treatment plan also includes the use of other procedures to promote fracture healing, e.g. ultrasound, magnetic field or electrical stimulation. * Patient's tibia fracture has been treated with additional fixation beyond the intramedullary nail, e.g. plates, wires or screws. * Patients who have pathological fractures; a known history of Paget's disease or known history of heterotropic calcification. * Patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale less than 15 (less than fully awake) at the time of informed consent. * Patients with previous hardware in place that prevents placement of an intramedullary nail for treatment of the tibial shaft fracture. * Patients with prior use of INFUSE. If the patient is a female of child bearing potential: * Does she have a negative pregnancy test (administered within 72 hours prior to surgery)? * Has she agreed to use adequate contraception for a period of at least 1 year following implementation of rhBMP-2?

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fracture Healing (Union) at 12 Months12 months post opUnion will be defined by: 1\. Radiographic union as defined by the Radiographic union scale in tibia fractures (RUST) score, Radiographic evaluation will be assessed by blinded orthopaedic surgeons.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Infection12 months post op.Infection will be assessed based on the CDC criteria for deep and superficial infection.
Medical Cost12 mos post opAn economic evaluation will also be performed including the costs of iliac crest bone graft harvest and complications from the bone graft surgery and the cost of the Rh-BMP 2 and the biologic implant used in the treatment group.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

34 consented One was inelgible at time of graft due to infection pre enrollment Two were outside study period One Administrative withdrawl Total randomized : 30

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Recombinant Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2
The patient will receive rhBMP-2 plus allograft chips in the bone defect site. Intervention type: surgical recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 2: Patients will receive 1.50 mg/ml -12 mg of rhBMP-2 soaked on a absorbable collagen sponge (rhBMP-2/ACS) as an adjuvant to a freeze-dried cancellous allograft
16
Autogenous Iliac Crest Bone Graft
Bone will be harvested from the iliac crest and placed in the bone defect. Autogenous iliac crest bone graft: Patients will undergo autogenous iliac crest bone graft surgery per the surgeon's usual practice.
14
Total30

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up52

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRecombinant Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2Autogenous Iliac Crest Bone GraftTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
16 Participants14 Participants30 Participants
Age, Continuous37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
35 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Count of participants16 Participants14 Participants30 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants11 Participants25 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
13 Participants13 Participants26 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
16 Participants14 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants11 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 160 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 161 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 160 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Fracture Healing (Union) at 12 Months

Union will be defined by: 1\. Radiographic union as defined by the Radiographic union scale in tibia fractures (RUST) score, Radiographic evaluation will be assessed by blinded orthopaedic surgeons.

Time frame: 12 months post op

Population: RUST scores were used to determine radiograpghic union at 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Recombinant Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2Fracture Healing (Union) at 12 Months12 Participants
Autogenous Iliac Crest Bone GraftFracture Healing (Union) at 12 Months11 Participants
Secondary

Infection

Infection will be assessed based on the CDC criteria for deep and superficial infection.

Time frame: 12 months post op.

Population: Infection was decribed in protocol

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Recombinant Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2Infection3 Participants
Autogenous Iliac Crest Bone GraftInfection0 Participants
Secondary

Medical Cost

An economic evaluation will also be performed including the costs of iliac crest bone graft harvest and complications from the bone graft surgery and the cost of the Rh-BMP 2 and the biologic implant used in the treatment group.

Time frame: 12 mos post op

Population: Hospital bills for bone graft surgery admission were available on 25 patients total

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Recombinant Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2Medical Cost13033 dollars for total admission cost
Autogenous Iliac Crest Bone GraftMedical Cost7535 dollars for total admission cost

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026