Skip to content

Does Adding Bevacizumab Therapy in Glaucoma Surgery Improve the Success of Needle Bleb Revisions?

Does a New Add on (or Adjunctive) Therapy Used in Glaucoma Surgery Improve the Success of Needle Bleb Revisions?

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00853073
Acronym
Avastin
Enrollment
63
Registered
2009-02-27
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2018-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma

Keywords

failing blebs, failing express shunt, avastin, bevacizumab, glaucoma, prior trabeculectomy, Express shunt placed under a scleral flap, subsequent filtration failure

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to see if a new add on (or adjunctive) therapy used in glaucoma surgery improves the success of needle bleb revisions.

Detailed description

To investigate the efficacy of needle bleb revisions with mitomycin C with subconjunctival bevacizumab in promoting both filtering success and favorable bleb morphologic features.

Interventions

DRUGbevacizumab

1.0mg (0.04 cc of 25 mg/ml subconjunctival bevacizumab following bleb needling procedure

0.04 cc of balanced salt solution injected to the bleb following bleb needling procedure

Sponsors

Wills Eye
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* require glaucoma bleb needle revision with Mitomycin-C

Exclusion criteria

* pregnant, nursing, or not using adequate contraception * other glaucoma eye surgery involving tube shunts * prior retinal detachments surgery with scleral buckle * infection, inflammation, or any abnormality preventing eye pressure measurement * enrolled in another investigational study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraocular Pressure (IOP)6 monthsmmHg (millimeters of mercury)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Surgical Success6 monthsSurgery was rated as complete success, qualified success or failure. Complete success was defined as 20% (percent) reduction in eye pressure (IOP) without any IOP lowering medications. Qualified success was defined as 20% reduction of IOP with IOP lowering medications. Failure was defined as IOP greater than 21 mmHG (millimeters of mercury), less than 20% IOP reduction or need for additional surgery.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Eligible patients were recruited between February 2009 and July 2011 from the Glaucoma Service located at Wills Eye Hospital in Philadelphia.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment A (Bevacizumab)
patients randomized to treatment A are given 1.0mg (0.04cc of 25 mg/mL) subconjunctival bevacizumab injection either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
29
Treatment B (Balanced Salt Solution)
patients randomized to treatment B are given 0.04cc of balanced salt solution injected in identical fashion either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
29
Total58

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment A (Bevacizumab)TotalTreatment B (Balanced Salt Solution)
Age, Continuous64.6 years67.9 years71.2 years
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
12 Participants27 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants29 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
29 participants58 participants29 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants23 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants35 Participants17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 290 / 29
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 2915 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Intraocular Pressure (IOP)

mmHg (millimeters of mercury)

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Treatment A (Bevacizumab)Intraocular Pressure (IOP)11.52 mmHg (millimeters of mercury)
Treatment B (Balanced Salt Solution)Intraocular Pressure (IOP)12.83 mmHg (millimeters of mercury)
Secondary

Number of Participants With Surgical Success

Surgery was rated as complete success, qualified success or failure. Complete success was defined as 20% (percent) reduction in eye pressure (IOP) without any IOP lowering medications. Qualified success was defined as 20% reduction of IOP with IOP lowering medications. Failure was defined as IOP greater than 21 mmHG (millimeters of mercury), less than 20% IOP reduction or need for additional surgery.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Treatment A (Bevacizumab)Number of Participants With Surgical SuccessComplete success17 Participants
Treatment A (Bevacizumab)Number of Participants With Surgical SuccessQualified success0 Participants
Treatment A (Bevacizumab)Number of Participants With Surgical SuccessFailure12 Participants
Treatment B (Balanced Salt Solution)Number of Participants With Surgical SuccessComplete success12 Participants
Treatment B (Balanced Salt Solution)Number of Participants With Surgical SuccessQualified success2 Participants
Treatment B (Balanced Salt Solution)Number of Participants With Surgical SuccessFailure15 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026