Skip to content

A Four-Arm Study Comparing the Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Tramadol Once a Day 100, 200 and 300 mg Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee (With 7-Day Follow-up)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00852917
Enrollment
552
Registered
2009-02-27
Start date
2003-01-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

Pain due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of Tramadol Once a Day 100, 200, 300 mg and Placebo

Interventions

One Tramadol Once A Day tablet at randomized dose daily.

DRUGPlacebo

One Placebo tablet daily.

Sponsors

Labopharm Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males or Females between the ages of 40-75 with a diagnosis of moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee, consistent with the ACR Clinical Classification Criteria for Arthritis of the Knee: * Current knee pain. * Less than 30 minutes of morning stiffness with or without crepitus on active motion. * Confirmation either by arthroscopy or radiologist's report (X-rays showing osteophytes, joint space narrowing or subchondral bone sclerosis {eburnation}) within five years prior to entry into the study. 2. CRP \< 8 ug/mL (if available at local lab) or ESR \< 40 mm/hr. 3. Total WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index) Pain Subscale Score of \> 150 mm at Baseline corresponding with moderate to severe Osteoarthritis. 4. Oral and written language comprehension at a level sufficient to comply with the protocol and complete study-related materials. 5. REB approval of the written Informed Consent Form in Spanish or English which was signed and dated by the patient and Investigator, prior to study participation.

Exclusion criteria

1. Known rheumatoid arthritis or any other rheumatoid disease. 2. Secondary arthritis i.e. any of the following: septic arthritis; inflammatory joint disease; gout; pseudogout; Paget's disease; joint fracture; acromegaly; fibromyalgia; Wilson's disease; ochronosis; haemochromatosis; osteochondromatosis; or collagen gene mutations. 3. Evidence of effusion greater than 15 cc upon physical examination of the joint at Baseline (Visit 1). 4. BMI greater than or equal to 38. 5. Major illness, requiring hospitalization during the 3 months before commencement of the screening period. 6. Unwillingness to stop taking pain medication (for arthritis or other types of pain) or was unwilling to stop taking other medications for the treatment of OA. 7. Previous failure or discontinuation (due to adverse events) of tramadol HCl therapy. 8. Treatment within the last 3 weeks with any of the following medications: monoamine oxidase inhibitors; tricyclic antidepressants and other tricyclic compounds (e.g. cyclobenzaprine, promethazine); neuroleptics; selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; or any other drug that reduces seizure threshold. 9. Treatment with another investigational agent within the last 30 days. 10. A history of seizure disorder other than Infantile Febrile Seizures. 11. Previous or current opioid dependency. 12. Bowel disease causing malabsorption. 13. Pregnancy or lactating or childbearing potential and unwilling to utilize a medically approved method of contraception during participation in this clinical trial. 14. Significant liver disease, defined as active hepatitis or elevated liver enzymes \>3 times the upper boundary of the normal range. 15. Significant renal disease, defined as creatinine clearance \<30 mL/min as estimated by the method of Levey et al., 1999. 16. Current substance abuse or dependence, other than nicotine. 17. Allergy or adverse reaction to tramadol or any structurally similar drugs e.g. opiates. 18. Any other condition that, in the opinion of the Investigators, would have adversely affected the patient's ability to complete the study or its measures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)12 weeks3-item Likert-scale: How do you rate overall pain relief with the drug? with 3 possible answers: very effective, effective, or ineffective. The average of ratings at visits 2-5 was calculated as median, rounded up to the closest integer.
Percentage Difference Between WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)12 weeksPercentage of difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale score between baseline and week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Pain Subscale results from the sum of 5 of the questions.
Percentage Difference Between WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)12 weeksPercentage of difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale score between baseline and week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no difficulty (0mm) to extreme difficulty (100mm). The WOMAC Physical Function subscale results from the sum of 17 of the questions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Investigator Global Rating of Pain Relief12 weeksThe Investigator Global Rating of Pain is a 3-item Likert-scale to answer the following question: How do you rate this patient's overall pain relief with the drug? with 3 possible answers: very effective, effective, or ineffective.
Percentage Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 0, week 3, week 6Percentage of difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale score between baseline and intervening visits 2-4. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Pain Subscale results from the sum of 5 questions.
Dropout Rate12 weeksReasons for withdrawal from the trial were collected
Percentage Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 0, week 3, week 6Percentage of difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale score between baseline and intervening visits 2-4. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales. The WOMAC Physical Function Subscale comprises 17 questions each rated on a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from no difficulty (0mm) to extreme difficulty (100mm).
Multiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain Questionnaire12 weeksPatients rated their knee pain by marking a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale, ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm).

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mg106
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mg111
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mg108
4: Placebo227
Total552

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event13203517
Overall StudyDeath0001
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy21111147
Overall StudyPhysician Decision67219
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject48109

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mg2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mg3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mg4: PlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0.0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
48 Participants50 Participants36 Participants91 Participants225.0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
58 Participants61 Participants72 Participants136 Participants327.0 Participants
Age Continuous62.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
60.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants67 Participants72 Participants140 Participants344.0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
41 Participants44 Participants36 Participants87 Participants208.0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
30 / —55 / —56 / —37 / —
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / —0 / —1 / —2 / —

Outcome results

Primary

Patient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)

3-item Likert-scale: How do you rate overall pain relief with the drug? with 3 possible answers: very effective, effective, or ineffective. The average of ratings at visits 2-5 was calculated as median, rounded up to the closest integer.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The analysis was performed using the full analysis population (All randomized patients who received at least one dose of the assigned study medication and had at least one post Baseline assessment of any functional scale)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Very effective19 participants
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Ineffective34 participants
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Effective49 participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Very effective25 participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Ineffective27 participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Effective55 participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Very effective27 participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Effective57 participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Ineffective21 participants
4: PlaceboPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Very effective28 participants
4: PlaceboPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Ineffective93 participants
4: PlaceboPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Effective102 participants
Primary

Percentage Difference Between WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)

Percentage of difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale score between baseline and week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Pain Subscale results from the sum of 5 of the questions.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The analysis was performed using the full analysis population (All randomized patients who received at least one dose of the assigned study medication and had at least one post Baseline assessment of any functional scale). Missing Values at Last Visit Imputed by Individual Last Post Baseline Value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage Difference Between WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)41.6 Percentage difference in WOMAC PainStandard Deviation 50.2
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage Difference Between WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)42.8 Percentage difference in WOMAC PainStandard Deviation 46.4
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage Difference Between WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)46.0 Percentage difference in WOMAC PainStandard Deviation 39.9
4: PlaceboPercentage Difference Between WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)32.3 Percentage difference in WOMAC PainStandard Deviation 48.2
Primary

Percentage Difference Between WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)

Percentage of difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale score between baseline and week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no difficulty (0mm) to extreme difficulty (100mm). The WOMAC Physical Function subscale results from the sum of 17 of the questions.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The analysis was performed using the full analysis population (All randomized patients who received at least one dose of the assigned study medication and had at least one post Baseline assessment of any functional scale). Missing Values at Last Visit Imputed by Individual Last Post Baseline Value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage Difference Between WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)42.3 Percentage difference in WOMAC PhysicalStandard Deviation 46.1
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage Difference Between WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)42.0 Percentage difference in WOMAC PhysicalStandard Deviation 39.5
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage Difference Between WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)38.7 Percentage difference in WOMAC PhysicalStandard Deviation 70
4: PlaceboPercentage Difference Between WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)30.9 Percentage difference in WOMAC PhysicalStandard Deviation 44.4
Secondary

Dropout Rate

Reasons for withdrawal from the trial were collected

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Safety population: all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the assigned study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgDropout RateAdverse events12.3 percentage of participants
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgDropout RatePatient request3.8 percentage of participants
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgDropout RateDeath0 percentage of participants
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgDropout RateInvestigator initiated discontinuation5.7 percentage of participants
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgDropout RateLack of efficacy19.8 percentage of participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgDropout RateInvestigator initiated discontinuation6.3 percentage of participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgDropout RateAdverse events18.0 percentage of participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgDropout RateDeath0 percentage of participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgDropout RatePatient request7.2 percentage of participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgDropout RateLack of efficacy9.9 percentage of participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgDropout RateInvestigator initiated discontinuation1.9 percentage of participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgDropout RateLack of efficacy10.2 percentage of participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgDropout RatePatient request9.3 percentage of participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgDropout RateAdverse events32.4 percentage of participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgDropout RateDeath0 percentage of participants
4: PlaceboDropout RateAdverse events7.5 percentage of participants
4: PlaceboDropout RatePatient request4.0 percentage of participants
4: PlaceboDropout RateLack of efficacy20.7 percentage of participants
4: PlaceboDropout RateInvestigator initiated discontinuation8.4 percentage of participants
4: PlaceboDropout RateDeath0.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Investigator Global Rating of Pain Relief

The Investigator Global Rating of Pain is a 3-item Likert-scale to answer the following question: How do you rate this patient's overall pain relief with the drug? with 3 possible answers: very effective, effective, or ineffective.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The analysis was performed using the full analysis population (All randomized patients who received at least one dose of the assigned study medication and had at least one post Baseline assessment of any functional scale)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefVery effective20 participants
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefIneffective35 participants
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefEffective46 participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefVery effective26 participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefIneffective28 participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefEffective53 participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefEffective61 participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefVery effective26 participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefIneffective17 participants
4: PlaceboInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefVery effective26 participants
4: PlaceboInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefIneffective95 participants
4: PlaceboInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefEffective102 participants
Secondary

Multiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain Questionnaire

Patients rated their knee pain by marking a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale, ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm).

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The analysis was performed using the full analysis population (All randomized patients who received at least one dose of the assigned study medication and had at least one post Baseline assessment of any functional scale). Missing Values at Last Visit Imputed by Individual Last Post Baseline Value.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnaireLunchtime (last individual visit)35.1 mmStandard Deviation 29.4
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnaireBefore next morning dose (last individual visit)35.9 mmStandard Deviation 31.3
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnaireBed time (last individual visit)37.0 mmStandard Deviation 31.4
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnaireLunchtime (last individual visit)32.0 mmStandard Deviation 25.2
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnaireBefore next morning dose (last individual visit)34.3 mmStandard Deviation 27.6
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnaireBed time (last individual visit)34.3 mmStandard Deviation 26
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnaireBed time (last individual visit)34.7 mmStandard Deviation 29.9
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnaireLunchtime (last individual visit)34.4 mmStandard Deviation 28.6
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnaireBefore next morning dose (last individual visit)34.8 mmStandard Deviation 29.1
4: PlaceboMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnaireLunchtime (last individual visit)38.9 mmStandard Deviation 30.5
4: PlaceboMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnaireBefore next morning dose (last individual visit)40.6 mmStandard Deviation 31.5
4: PlaceboMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnaireBed time (last individual visit)41.9 mmStandard Deviation 32.6
Secondary

Percentage Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)

Percentage of difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale score between baseline and intervening visits 2-4. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Pain Subscale results from the sum of 5 questions.

Time frame: Week 0, week 3, week 6

Population: The analysis was performed using the full analysis population (All randomized patients who received at least one dose of the assigned study medication and had at least one post Baseline assessment of any functional scale)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 0 (Visit 2)30.0 Percentage difference in WOMAC PainStandard Deviation 41.1
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 6 (Visit 4)58.2 Percentage difference in WOMAC PainStandard Deviation 39.3
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 3 (Visit 3)56.4 Percentage difference in WOMAC PainStandard Deviation 39.2
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 0 (Visit 2)34.5 Percentage difference in WOMAC PainStandard Deviation 41.5
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 6 (Visit 4)48.8 Percentage difference in WOMAC PainStandard Deviation 39.8
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 3 (Visit 3)46.4 Percentage difference in WOMAC PainStandard Deviation 37.7
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 3 (Visit 3)51.7 Percentage difference in WOMAC PainStandard Deviation 41.9
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 0 (Visit 2)33.0 Percentage difference in WOMAC PainStandard Deviation 44.6
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 6 (Visit 4)57.2 Percentage difference in WOMAC PainStandard Deviation 37.6
4: PlaceboPercentage Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 0 (Visit 2)19.4 Percentage difference in WOMAC PainStandard Deviation 36.5
4: PlaceboPercentage Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 6 (Visit 4)44.7 Percentage difference in WOMAC PainStandard Deviation 41.8
4: PlaceboPercentage Change in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 3 (Visit 3)37.8 Percentage difference in WOMAC PainStandard Deviation 40
Secondary

Percentage Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)

Percentage of difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale score between baseline and intervening visits 2-4. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales. The WOMAC Physical Function Subscale comprises 17 questions each rated on a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from no difficulty (0mm) to extreme difficulty (100mm).

Time frame: Week 0, week 3, week 6

Population: The analysis was performed using the full analysis population (All randomized patients who received at least one dose of the assigned study medication and had at least one post Baseline assessment of any functional scale)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 0 (Visit 2)32.0 Percentage difference in WOMAC PhysicalStandard Deviation 36.8
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 6 (Visit 4)56.2 Percentage difference in WOMAC PhysicalStandard Deviation 37.6
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 3 (Visit 3)54.9 Percentage difference in WOMAC PhysicalStandard Deviation 37.9
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 0 (Visit 2)29.8 Percentage difference in WOMAC PhysicalStandard Deviation 35.6
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 6 (Visit 4)44.2 Percentage difference in WOMAC PhysicalStandard Deviation 40
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 3 (Visit 3)43.5 Percentage difference in WOMAC PhysicalStandard Deviation 37.1
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 3 (Visit 3)50.4 Percentage difference in WOMAC PhysicalStandard Deviation 36.8
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 0 (Visit 2)34.5 Percentage difference in WOMAC PhysicalStandard Deviation 35.9
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 6 (Visit 4)53.5 Percentage difference in WOMAC PhysicalStandard Deviation 58.9
4: PlaceboPercentage Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 0 (Visit 2)17.2 Percentage difference in WOMAC PhysicalStandard Deviation 36
4: PlaceboPercentage Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 6 (Visit 4)39.5 Percentage difference in WOMAC PhysicalStandard Deviation 41.3
4: PlaceboPercentage Change in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 3 (Visit 3)34.4 Percentage difference in WOMAC PhysicalStandard Deviation 38.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026