Skip to content

Evaluation of VA's Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Clinical Reminder and Comprehensive TBI Evaluation (CTBIE)

Evaluation of VA's TBI Clinical Reminder And Secondary Level Evaluation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00852527
Acronym
TBI
Enrollment
456
Registered
2009-02-27
Start date
2009-06-30
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2015-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

Traumatic Brain Injury, Screening, Diagnosis, Rehabilitation Outcome

Brief summary

The purpose of the proposed study is to determine the clinical validity and reliability of the VA's Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Clinical Reminder Screen and the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation used to screen for mild traumatic brain injury. Examining the reliability of the two screens will determine whether they are dependable. Verifying the clinical validity is important because valid screening and evaluation of mild TBI leads to accurate diagnosis and timely treatment. Accurate screening also improves clinical efficiency and ensures that resources are provided to those who need them most. The project findings are expected to advance the science of screening and diagnosis of a mild TBI event.

Detailed description

A. Anticipated Impacts on Veterans' Healthcare: Determining the clinical validity of the VA's TBI Clinical Reminder Screen and Comprehensive TBI Evaluation is critical because valid screening and evaluation of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) leads to accurate diagnosis and timely treatment. Accurate screening improves clinical efficiency and ensures that resources are provided to those who need them most. The project findings are expected to advance the science of screening and diagnosis by clarifying whether symptoms are consistent with post-concussion syndrome due to an mTBI event. Findings are also expected to inform the development of the next generation of VA screening instruments for mild TBI. B. Project Background/Rationale: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading injury among military personnel serving in the Operation Enduring Freedom/ Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) combat theaters due largely to improvised explosive devices. While TBI severity ranges from mild to severe, mTBI is particularly difficult to identify, diagnose and treat. The VA modified a version of the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center (DVBIC) tool, which is used to screen returning OEF/OIF service members. The VA's modified screen, the TBI Clinical Reminder Screen, is used to screen a slightly different population. Therefore, results of the validity study for the DVBIC tool are not directly applicable. As a result, the General Accountability Office (GAO) recommended the VA expeditiously evaluate the clinical validity and reliability of its TBI screening tool. C. Primary Study Objectives are: (1) Develop the Diagnostic Assessment Battery for use as a proxy gold standard, and (2) Evaluate and compare the performance characteristics of the TBI Clinical Reminder Screen and the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation using the Diagnostic Assessment Battery. These objectives will be realized via: (a) An examination the performance characteristics (diagnostic validity) of the TBI Clinical Reminder Screen and the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation relative to the Diagnostic Assessment Battery to determine sensitivity and specificity, (b) Determining whether false positives and/or false negatives are related to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and how the performance characteristics of the tests differ for PTSD, (c) Ascertaining the concordance among measures of functional impairment, the TBI Clinical Reminder Screen and the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation, (d) Establishing the concurrent validity between the diagnosis of presence or absence of post-concussion syndrome due to mTBI and measures of functional impairment, (e) Verifying the test/retest reliability for the TBI Clinical Reminder Screen and the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation and (f) Identifying whether clusters of symptoms or subjects reporting similar patterns of symptoms correspond with clinical sub-groups (e.g., mTBI with PTSD, PTSD alone). D. Project Methods: An online Delphi process and will be conducted with mTBI experts to inform the development of the Diagnostic Assessment Battery. A sample of 500 OEF/OIF veterans will be recruited over 12-months at three VA Polytrauma Network Sites. The OEF/OIF veterans will have symptoms consistent with either a mild TBI event (True Positive) or symptoms inconsistent with such an event (True Negative). All subjects will be assessed by research clinicians using the TBI Clinical Reminder Screen, the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation and the Diagnostic Assessment Battery. Analysis will determine the sensitivity and specificity as well as the test/retest reliability of the TBI Clinical Reminder and the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation. The performance characteristics for the Diagnostic Assessment Battery will be ascertained and used to further our understanding of how best to distinguish mTBI symptoms from related and/or comorbid conditions (e.g., PTSD, anxiety, and depression).

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

US Department of Veterans Affairs
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Patients included are those service members or Veterans who have been deployed in the OEF/OIF conflict and have screened positive or negative on the TBI Clinical Reminder.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic Accuracy of the TBI Clinical Reminder Screen (TCRS)All OEF/OIF Veterans to receive TCRS upon enrollment in VAPatients were initially assessed with the TBI Clinical Screen at their local VA. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of the TCRS, a dual-criterion approach was used. The VA Comprehensive TBI Evaluation (CTBIE), a secondary evaluation, served as the first criterion and the Structured TBI Diagnostic Interview (STDI) as the second criterion.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

456 participants were selected from three VA Polytrauma Network Sites and represent urban, suburban, and rural catchment areas. 438 completed all assessments necessary for analysis.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
OEF/OIF Veterans
Operation Enduring Freedom /Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) Veterans seeking care at one of three VA Polytrauma Network Sites (PNS) who screen positive or negative for mild traumatic brain injury.
438
Total438

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOEF/OIF Veterans
Age, Continuous
Age
33 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African-American
39 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multi-Racial
30 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
14 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
25 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
330 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
438 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
392 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 433
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 433

Outcome results

Primary

Diagnostic Accuracy of the TBI Clinical Reminder Screen (TCRS)

Patients were initially assessed with the TBI Clinical Screen at their local VA. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of the TCRS, a dual-criterion approach was used. The VA Comprehensive TBI Evaluation (CTBIE), a secondary evaluation, served as the first criterion and the Structured TBI Diagnostic Interview (STDI) as the second criterion.

Time frame: All OEF/OIF Veterans to receive TCRS upon enrollment in VA

Population: Although 456 participants were consented and enrolled in the study, data for 13 participants had missing assessment data and another 5 were determined to have moderate TBI resulting in 438 cases for the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Veterans Assessed With the Comprehensive TBI EvaluationDiagnostic Accuracy of the TBI Clinical Reminder Screen (TCRS)Sensitivity71 Percentage of participants
Veterans Assessed With the Comprehensive TBI EvaluationDiagnostic Accuracy of the TBI Clinical Reminder Screen (TCRS)Specificity74 Percentage of participants
Veterans Assessed With the Comprehensive TBI EvaluationDiagnostic Accuracy of the TBI Clinical Reminder Screen (TCRS)Positive Predictive Value32 Percentage of participants
Veterans Assessed With the Comprehensive TBI EvaluationDiagnostic Accuracy of the TBI Clinical Reminder Screen (TCRS)Negative Predictive Value94 Percentage of participants
Veterans Assessed With the Structured TBI Diagnostic InterviewDiagnostic Accuracy of the TBI Clinical Reminder Screen (TCRS)Negative Predictive Value96 Percentage of participants
Veterans Assessed With the Structured TBI Diagnostic InterviewDiagnostic Accuracy of the TBI Clinical Reminder Screen (TCRS)Sensitivity79 Percentage of participants
Veterans Assessed With the Structured TBI Diagnostic InterviewDiagnostic Accuracy of the TBI Clinical Reminder Screen (TCRS)Positive Predictive Value49 Percentage of participants
Veterans Assessed With the Structured TBI Diagnostic InterviewDiagnostic Accuracy of the TBI Clinical Reminder Screen (TCRS)Specificity85 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026