Skip to content

Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Comparing Division Versus Non-Division of Short Gastric Vessels

Randomized Clinic Trial of Total Fundoplication and Fundal Mobilization With or Without Division of Short Gastric Vessels: Long-Term Endoscopic Evaluation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00852098
Enrollment
2
Registered
2009-02-26
Start date
1997-11-30
Completion date
2008-05-31
Last updated
2009-02-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastroesophageal Reflux

Keywords

Fundoplication, gastroesophageal reflux, gastric vessels, surgery

Brief summary

Recently, total fundoplication followed by laparoscopic esophageal hiatoplasty has been the most common surgical treatment for gastro-esophageal reflux. Although this procedure is effective, some patients still develop complications. Indeed, dividing the short gastric vessels is claimed by many authors to confer benefit to patients even it could not be proved in other studies. In an attempt to evaluate the role of dividing the short gastric vessels and its long-term impact on the surgical treatment of the gastro-esophageal reflux, the investigators initiated a randomized clinical trial to clarify this important fact. Patients were recruited for this trial and short-term results had been already published in a national journal. The investigators are now registering this study which particularly focuses on the endoscopic outcome evaluated on long-term basis after gastro-esophageal reflux surgical treatment.

Interventions

PROCEDURELap Nissen fundoplication with division of short gastric vessels

Dividing short gastric vessels

PROCEDURELaparoscopic Nissen fundoplication without division of short gastric vessels

non-dividing short gastric vessels

Sponsors

Hospital State Public
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Federal University of São Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* objective gastroesophageal reflux in adults

Exclusion criteria

* esophageal motility disorder * hard stenosis * previous antireflux surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluate outcomes after Laparoscopic Nissen comparing division and non-division of short gastric vessels.two years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Long-term clinical and endoscopic outcome8-10 years

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026