Skip to content

GSK2190915 Moderate to Severe Asthma Study

The Efficacy of Orally Administered GSK2190915 as an add-on to Current Therapy in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Asthma Who Have Elevated Sputum Neutrophils

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00850642
Enrollment
7
Registered
2009-02-25
Start date
2009-06-26
Completion date
2010-06-02
Last updated
2020-11-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

Sputum cell counts, Neutrophils, Severe Asthma, ICS, Inhaled corticosteroids

Brief summary

A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the effect of treatment with GSK2190915, a FLAP inhibitor, as add-on to current inhaled corticosteroid therapy in patients with moderate to severe asthma with elevated sputum neutrophils.

Interventions

DRUGGSK2190195 100mg

GSK2190915 is a high affinity 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein (FLAP) inhibitor.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo : 2% (w/w) Ethanol, sucralose (5 mg/100 mL of oral solution) to 100 % (w/w) aqueous sodium carbonate buffer (0.010 M, pH 9-10)

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

A subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if all of the following criteria apply: * Males and females aged 18 to 65 years inclusive. * Body mass index within the range 18.5-37.0 kilograms/metre2 (kg/m2). * An established clinical history of Asthma in accordance with the definition by the GINA Guidelines \[GINA, 2006\]. Subjects should have at screening or within the last year documented reversibility (\>12 %) to short acting bronchodilator, or positive methacholine challenge, or positive histamine challenge (PC20 \<8mg/ml). * A female subject is eligible to participate if she is of: non-childbearing potential defined as pre-menopausal females with documented (medical report verification) hysterectomy or double oophrectomy or postmenopausal defined as 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea or 6 months of spontaneous amenorrhea with serum FSH levels \> 40 mIU/mL and estradiol \< 40 pg/ml (\<140 pmol/L) or 6 weeks postsurgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy; childbearing potential and agrees to use one of the contracception methods listed in Section 8.1 for an appropriate period of time prior to the start of dosing and until 3 months after last dose. * Male subjects must agree to use one of the contraception methods listed in Section 8.1. This criterion must be followed from the time of the first dose of study medication until 3 months after the last dose. * Subject with moderate to severe asthma with forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) ≥ 50% of predicted. * Subject who are on regular inhaled corticosteroids without or in combination with a regular long acting Beta 2 Agonist. The dose should be stable for at least 4 weeks before screening. * Subjects who are taking a minimum of FP 250mg BID or equivalent. * Persistent sputum neutrophilia defined by sputum neutrophils ≥ 65% with TTC \< 15 million cells/g with no evidence of eosinophilia (sputum eosinophils \< 2%). Persistent is defined as the criteria being met at screening (or within the 6 months preceding screening) and on visit 1. * Signed and dated written informed consent is obtained from the subject * The subject is able to understand and comply with the protocol requirements, instructions and protocol-stated restrictions.

Exclusion criteria

A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria apply: * Past or present disease, which as judged by the investigator or medical monitor, may affect the outcome of this study. These diseases include, but are not limited to, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, gastrointestinal disease, hepatic disease, renal disease, haematological disease, neurological disease, endocrine disease or pulmonary disease (excluding asthma but including but not confined to chronic bronchitis, emphysema, bronchiectasis, eosinophilic bronchitis or pulmonary fibrosis). * Clinically significant abnormalities in safety laboratory analysis at screening. * Subject has uncontrolled hypertension or is hypertensive at screening. Hypertension at screening is defined as persistent systolic BP \>150 mmHg or diastolic BP \> 90mmHg. * History of asthma exacerbations or acute intercurrent respiratory illness (viral respiratory syndrome, bronchitis, pneumonia) for a four week period before the screening visit * History of life-threatening asthma, defined as an asthma episode that required intubations and/or was associated with hypercapnoea, respiratory arrest and/or hypoxic seizures. * Subject is unable to abstain from taking prescription or non-prescription drugs (including vitamins and dietary or herbal supplements) including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), anti-depressant drugs, anti-histamines and anti-asthma, anti-rhinitis or hay fever medication, with the exception of ICS, LABA and short action beta agonists, from 14 days before screening until the follow-up visit unless in the opinion of the Investigator and sponsor the medication will not interfere with the study * Administration of oral or injectable steroids within 6 weeks of screening. * The subject has participated in a study with a new molecular entity during the previous 3 months or has participated in 4 or more clinical studies in the previous 12 months prior to the first dosing day. * Administration of anti -leukotrienne therapies for 14 days before screening and during the study. * Administration of any vaccinations within 1 month of screening or during the study. * Administration of biological therapies within 3 months of the screening visit or during the study * Subject is undergoing allergen desensitisation therapy. * Administration of OATP1B1 substrates from 2 weeks before dosing, and until all follow-up assessments are completed. * There is a risk of non-compliance with study procedures. * History of blood donation (500 mL) within 3 months of starting the clinical study. * The subject regularly drinks more than 28 units of alcohol in a week if male, or 21 units per week if female. One unit of alcohol is defined as a medium (125 ml) glass of wine, half a pint (250 ml) of beer or one measure (25 ml) of spirits. * The subject has a screening QTc value of \>450msec, PR interval outside the range 120 to 220msec or an ECG that is not suitable for QT measurements (e.g. poorly defined termination of the T-wave). * The subject has tested positive for hepatitis C antibody or hepatitis B surface antigen. * The subject has tested positive for HIV antibodies. * The subject has a positive pre-study urine drug or urine or breath alcohol screen. A minimum list of drugs that will be screened for include Amphetamines, Barbituates, Cocaine, Opiates, Cannabinoids and Benzodiazepines.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Numbers of Neutrophils in Induced Sputum-Absolute Neutrophil CountDay -9 to -7, Day 1, Day 12 and follow-up (Day 24-28)The neutrophils play an important role in participants with more severe asthma. The reduction in number of neutrophils in induced sputum was evaluated to study the effect of treatment with repeat oral doses of GSK2190915, in asthma participants. Sputum samples were evaluated at central laboratory. The samples were rejected, if the weight was less than 100 grams (g), or if excessive cell degeneration or due to excessive squamous cells and insufficient inflammatory cells. The total cell count of neutrophil was reported as total cell count × 10\^6 /g.
Percentage of Neutrophils in Induced SputumDay -9 to -7, Day 1, Day 12 and follow-up (Day 24-28)The neutrophils play an important role in participants with more severe asthma. The reduction in number of neutrophils in induced sputum was evaluated to study the effect of treatment with repeat oral doses of GSK2190915, in asthma participants. Sputum samples were evaluated at central laboratory. The samples were rejected, if the weight was less than 100 g, or if excessive cell degeneration or due to excessive squamous cells and insufficient inflammatory cells. The total cell count of neutrophil was reported as percentage of cells.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Vital Sign of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)Visit 2 (Day 1) to Upto follow-up (Day 28)The vital sign measurement included measurement of systolic and diastolic blood pressure alongwith pulse rate. The PCC values reported for systolic blood pressure were \< 85 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) and \>160 mmHg; that for diastolic was \<45 mmHg and \>100 mmHg. The PCC values for pulse rate were \<40 and \> 110 beats per minute. The number of participants with values outside the PCC for systolic, diastolic blood pressure and vitals during the treatment duration were reported.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsVisit 2 (Day 1) to Upto follow-up (Day 28)The number of participants with abnormal ECG values were reported. The data was reported as Abnormal clinically significant (CS), abnormal not clinically significant (NCS), and No result.
Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Values of PCCVisit 2 (Day 1) to Upto follow-up (Day 28)The clinical chemistry parameters evaluated were albumin, calcium, creatinine, glucose, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, sodium, urea, gamma glutamyl transferase, and bicarbonate. The number of participants with values outside the PCC values were reported. The PCC value observed for bicarbonate was reported.
Number of Participants With Hematology Values of PCCVisit 2 (Day 1) to Upto follow-up (Day 28)The hematology parameters evaluated were white blood cells, neutrophils, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets and lymphocytes. The number of participants with values outside the PCC values were reported. The PCC value observed for lymphocyte was reported.
Plasma Concentration of GSK2190915At Day 1, pre-dose; Day 1, 2 hour; Day 12, pre-dose; and Day 12, 2 hourThe blood samples for analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters were collected at pre-dose and 2 hours post dose on Day 1 and pre-dose trough and 2 hour post dose on Day 12, to evaluate the concentration of the drug GSK2190915 in plasma.
Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Visit 2 (Day 1), visit 3 (Day 5 to 7) and visit 4 (Day 12)FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcefully exhaled in 1 second. It was assessed using a spirometry. Due to early termination of the study, the data of individual participants is reported.
Percentage Change From Baseline of LTB4 Biomarker in PlasmaDay 1 and Day 12The plasma samples were evaluated for presence of LTB4 biomarkers. The percentage change from baseline was calculated by dividing the post-randomization change by the baseline value from the individual and multiplying by a 100. If either the baseline or post-randomization value is missing, the change from baseline is set to missing. Baseline was defined as Day 1(pre-dose).
Concentration of LTB4 in SputumDay 1 and Day 12The concentration of LTB4 levels in sputum were evaluated. However due to early termination of the study, the data was not collected.
Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-17 and High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) in BloodDay 1 and Day 12The blood samples were collected to evaluate the concentration of IL-17 and hsCRP in blood. However due to early termination of the study, the data was not collected.
Assessment of Established Markers of Anti-inflammatory Activity in Sputum: the Measurements Will Include IL-17, Neutrophil Elastase, Myeloperoxidase and IL-8Day 1 and Day 12During the study conduct it was observed that the levels of IL-17, measured in both blood and sputum were below limit of quantification; for neutrophil elastase, in sputum no inference could be made as most levels were above the limit of quantification. Thus due to limited amount of data the analysis was not summarized.
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) AssessmentAt Day 1, Day 5 to 7 and Day 12ACQ measures the adequacy of asthma control. It includes 5 questions about symptoms of asthma, 1 question about the rescue medication used and 1 about lung function (FEV1% predicted). This is a 7-item scale where the items are equally weighted and the ACQ score is the mean of 7 items which ranges from 0 to 6. 0= Well controlled and 6=extremely poorly controlled. Mean scores of =\<0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.76 and \< 1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and a score \>= 1.5 indicates uncontrolled asthma. Thus for ACQ a higher score indicates severe disease and a low score indicative of less severe disease.
Percentage Change From Baseline Urine LTE4 BiomarkerDay 1 and Day 12The urine spot samples were collected from the participants at pre-dose on day 1 and trough day 12 for evaluation of LTE4 biomarker. This evaluated the level of inflammation in the airways of the asthma participants. The percentage change from baseline was calculated by dividing the post randomization change by the baseline value from the individual and multiplying by a 100. If either the baseline or post-randomization value is missing, the change from baseline is set to missing. Baseline was defined as Day 1(pre-dose).
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From visit 1 (Day -7 to Day -9) to upto follow-up (upto Day 28)An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical events that jeopardize the participants or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the above definition, or a drug-induced liver injury.

Countries

Canada, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was terminated prior to completion due to difficulties in recruiting the required participants. A total of 7 asthmatic participants completed the study prior to termination. The study was, conducted from 26 June 2009 to 02 June 2010, at three centers in Canada and three centers in the United Kingdom.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
The eligible participants in this arm were administered with matching placebo, orally once daily for 12-days.
3
GSK2190915
The eligible participants in this arm received GSK2190915 as 100 mg, orally, once daily for 12-days.
4
Total7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGSK2190915TotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous57.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.65
55.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.98
52.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.12
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 30 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 33 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 30 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Neutrophils in Induced Sputum

The neutrophils play an important role in participants with more severe asthma. The reduction in number of neutrophils in induced sputum was evaluated to study the effect of treatment with repeat oral doses of GSK2190915, in asthma participants. Sputum samples were evaluated at central laboratory. The samples were rejected, if the weight was less than 100 g, or if excessive cell degeneration or due to excessive squamous cells and insufficient inflammatory cells. The total cell count of neutrophil was reported as percentage of cells.

Time frame: Day -9 to -7, Day 1, Day 12 and follow-up (Day 24-28)

Population: All Subject Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercentage of Neutrophils in Induced SputumDay -9 to -784.00 Percentage of neutrophilsStandard Deviation 9.469
PlaceboPercentage of Neutrophils in Induced SputumDay 1, pre-dose68.00 Percentage of neutrophilsStandard Deviation 10.607
PlaceboPercentage of Neutrophils in Induced SputumDay 12, 2 hour86.30 Percentage of neutrophilsStandard Deviation 16.263
PlaceboPercentage of Neutrophils in Induced SputumFollow-up65.75 Percentage of neutrophilsStandard Deviation 0.071
GSK2190915Percentage of Neutrophils in Induced SputumFollow-up78.33 Percentage of neutrophilsStandard Deviation 14.64
GSK2190915Percentage of Neutrophils in Induced SputumDay -9 to -774.88 Percentage of neutrophilsStandard Deviation 2.269
GSK2190915Percentage of Neutrophils in Induced SputumDay 12, 2 hour56.33 Percentage of neutrophilsStandard Deviation 19.732
GSK2190915Percentage of Neutrophils in Induced SputumDay 1, pre-dose74.77 Percentage of neutrophilsStandard Deviation 18.351
Primary

The Numbers of Neutrophils in Induced Sputum-Absolute Neutrophil Count

The neutrophils play an important role in participants with more severe asthma. The reduction in number of neutrophils in induced sputum was evaluated to study the effect of treatment with repeat oral doses of GSK2190915, in asthma participants. Sputum samples were evaluated at central laboratory. The samples were rejected, if the weight was less than 100 grams (g), or if excessive cell degeneration or due to excessive squamous cells and insufficient inflammatory cells. The total cell count of neutrophil was reported as total cell count × 10\^6 /g.

Time frame: Day -9 to -7, Day 1, Day 12 and follow-up (Day 24-28)

Population: All Subject Population was defined as all participants who receive at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboThe Numbers of Neutrophils in Induced Sputum-Absolute Neutrophil CountDay -9 to -75.205 Giga cells per gStandard Deviation 2.8415
PlaceboThe Numbers of Neutrophils in Induced Sputum-Absolute Neutrophil CountDay 13.142 Giga cells per gStandard Deviation 3.2449
PlaceboThe Numbers of Neutrophils in Induced Sputum-Absolute Neutrophil CountDay 1213.534 Giga cells per gStandard Deviation 13.6394
PlaceboThe Numbers of Neutrophils in Induced Sputum-Absolute Neutrophil CountFollow-up5.359 Giga cells per gStandard Deviation 1.1681
GSK2190915The Numbers of Neutrophils in Induced Sputum-Absolute Neutrophil CountFollow-up2.995 Giga cells per gStandard Deviation 3.6389
GSK2190915The Numbers of Neutrophils in Induced Sputum-Absolute Neutrophil CountDay -9 to -73.096 Giga cells per gStandard Deviation 2.6093
GSK2190915The Numbers of Neutrophils in Induced Sputum-Absolute Neutrophil CountDay 120.396 Giga cells per gStandard Deviation 0.0801
GSK2190915The Numbers of Neutrophils in Induced Sputum-Absolute Neutrophil CountDay 114.667 Giga cells per gStandard Deviation 20.8291
Secondary

Assessment of Established Markers of Anti-inflammatory Activity in Sputum: the Measurements Will Include IL-17, Neutrophil Elastase, Myeloperoxidase and IL-8

During the study conduct it was observed that the levels of IL-17, measured in both blood and sputum were below limit of quantification; for neutrophil elastase, in sputum no inference could be made as most levels were above the limit of quantification. Thus due to limited amount of data the analysis was not summarized.

Time frame: Day 1 and Day 12

Population: All Subjects Population. Collected data were below the limit of quantification, so data could not be summarized

Secondary

Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4

FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcefully exhaled in 1 second. It was assessed using a spirometry. Due to early termination of the study, the data of individual participants is reported.

Time frame: Visit 2 (Day 1), visit 3 (Day 5 to 7) and visit 4 (Day 12)

Population: All Subject population. Individual participant data reported, due to early termination of study. Data for only those participants available at the indicated time points were collected and analyzed. Data points with null value for participants analyzed indicate data not collected for respective category and treatment arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboAssessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Participant 1, Day 5 to 7/ Visit 32.56 Liters
PlaceboAssessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Participant 1, Day 12, Pre-dose2.83 Liters
PlaceboAssessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Particpant 1, Day 12, 2 hour2.77 Liters
PlaceboAssessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Particpant 2, Day 1, Pre-dose2.88 Liters
PlaceboAssessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Particpant 2, Day 1, 2 hour3.06 Liters
PlaceboAssessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Participant 2, Day 5 to 7/Visit 32.96 Liters
PlaceboAssessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Participant 2, Day 12, Pre-dose3.26 Liters
PlaceboAssessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Particpant 2, Day 12, 2 hour3.14 Liters
PlaceboAssessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Particpant 3, Day 1, Pre-dose1.65 Liters
PlaceboAssessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Particpant 3, Day 1, 2 hour1.98 Liters
PlaceboAssessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Participant 3, Day 5 to 7/ Visit 31.92 Liters
PlaceboAssessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Participant 3, Day 12, Pre-dose1.81 Liters
PlaceboAssessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Particpant 3, Day 12, 2 hour1.83 Liters
PlaceboAssessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Particpant 1, Day 1, Pre-dose2.33 Liters
PlaceboAssessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Particpant 1, Day 1, 2 hour2.55 Liters
GSK2190915Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Particpant 7, Day 1, Pre-dose1.03 Liters
GSK2190915Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Particpant 7, Day 1, 2 hour1.13 Liters
GSK2190915Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Participant 7, Day 5 to 7/ Visit 31.14 Liters
GSK2190915Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Participant 5, Day 5 to 7/ Visit 32.07 Liters
GSK2190915Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Participant 7, Day 12, Pre-dose1.11 Liters
GSK2190915Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Participant 5, Day 12, Pre-dose1.89 Liters
GSK2190915Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Particpant 4, Day 1, Pre-dose1.97 Liters
GSK2190915Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Particpant 4, Day 1, 2 hour2.14 Liters
GSK2190915Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Participant 4, Day 5 to 7/ Visit 32.22 Liters
GSK2190915Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Participant 4, Day 12, Pre-dose2.02 Liters
GSK2190915Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Particpant 4, Day 12, 2 hour1.90 Liters
GSK2190915Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Particpant 5, Day 1, Pre-dose2.24 Liters
GSK2190915Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Particpant 5, Day 1, 2 hour2.78 Liters
GSK2190915Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Particpant 5, Day 12, 2 hour2.02 Liters
GSK2190915Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Particpant 6, Day 1, Pre-dose1.10 Liters
GSK2190915Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Particpant 6, Day 1, 2 hour1.22 Liters
GSK2190915Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Participant 6, Day 5 to 7/ Visit 31.22 Liters
GSK2190915Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Participant 6, Day 12, Pre-dose1.10 Liters
GSK2190915Assessment of FEV1 on Visit 2, 3 and Visit 4Particpant 6, Day 12, 2 hour1.19 Liters
Secondary

Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Assessment

ACQ measures the adequacy of asthma control. It includes 5 questions about symptoms of asthma, 1 question about the rescue medication used and 1 about lung function (FEV1% predicted). This is a 7-item scale where the items are equally weighted and the ACQ score is the mean of 7 items which ranges from 0 to 6. 0= Well controlled and 6=extremely poorly controlled. Mean scores of =\<0.75 indicate well-controlled asthma, scores between 0.76 and \< 1.5 indicate partly controlled asthma, and a score \>= 1.5 indicates uncontrolled asthma. Thus for ACQ a higher score indicates severe disease and a low score indicative of less severe disease.

Time frame: At Day 1, Day 5 to 7 and Day 12

Population: All Subject Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) AssessmentDay 11.19 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 0.218
PlaceboAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) AssessmentDay 5 to 71.29 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 0.286
PlaceboAsthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) AssessmentDay 121.14 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 0.429
GSK2190915Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) AssessmentDay 11.57 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 0.857
GSK2190915Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) AssessmentDay 5 to 71.50 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 0.474
GSK2190915Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) AssessmentDay 121.54 Scores on scaleStandard Deviation 0.811
Secondary

Concentration of Interleukin (IL)-17 and High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) in Blood

The blood samples were collected to evaluate the concentration of IL-17 and hsCRP in blood. However due to early termination of the study, the data was not collected.

Time frame: Day 1 and Day 12

Population: All Subject Population. Data not summarized for this parameter.

Secondary

Concentration of LTB4 in Sputum

The concentration of LTB4 levels in sputum were evaluated. However due to early termination of the study, the data was not collected.

Time frame: Day 1 and Day 12

Population: All Subject Population. Data not collected.

Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

The number of participants with abnormal ECG values were reported. The data was reported as Abnormal clinically significant (CS), abnormal not clinically significant (NCS), and No result.

Time frame: Visit 2 (Day 1) to Upto follow-up (Day 28)

Population: All Subject Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsAbnormal NCS, Day 1, pre-dose1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsNo results, Day 1 pre-dose 21 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsNo results, Day 1 pre-dose 31 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsAbnormal NCS, Day 1, pre-dose 2 hour1 Participants
GSK2190915Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsAbnormal NCS, Day 1, pre-dose 2 hour0 Participants
GSK2190915Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsAbnormal NCS, Day 1, pre-dose1 Participants
GSK2190915Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsNo results, Day 1 pre-dose 30 Participants
GSK2190915Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) FindingsNo results, Day 1 pre-dose 20 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Values of PCC

The clinical chemistry parameters evaluated were albumin, calcium, creatinine, glucose, magnesium, phosphorus, potassium, sodium, urea, gamma glutamyl transferase, and bicarbonate. The number of participants with values outside the PCC values were reported. The PCC value observed for bicarbonate was reported.

Time frame: Visit 2 (Day 1) to Upto follow-up (Day 28)

Population: All subject population.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Values of PCC0 Participants
GSK2190915Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Values of PCC1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Hematology Values of PCC

The hematology parameters evaluated were white blood cells, neutrophils, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets and lymphocytes. The number of participants with values outside the PCC values were reported. The PCC value observed for lymphocyte was reported.

Time frame: Visit 2 (Day 1) to Upto follow-up (Day 28)

Population: All subject population.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Hematology Values of PCC0 Participants
GSK2190915Number of Participants With Hematology Values of PCC1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical events that jeopardize the participants or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the above definition, or a drug-induced liver injury.

Time frame: From visit 1 (Day -7 to Day -9) to upto follow-up (upto Day 28)

Population: All Subject Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any AE2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any SAE0 Participants
GSK2190915Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any AE3 Participants
GSK2190915Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Any SAE0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Vital Sign of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)

The vital sign measurement included measurement of systolic and diastolic blood pressure alongwith pulse rate. The PCC values reported for systolic blood pressure were \< 85 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) and \>160 mmHg; that for diastolic was \<45 mmHg and \>100 mmHg. The PCC values for pulse rate were \<40 and \> 110 beats per minute. The number of participants with values outside the PCC for systolic, diastolic blood pressure and vitals during the treatment duration were reported.

Time frame: Visit 2 (Day 1) to Upto follow-up (Day 28)

Population: All subject population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Sign of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)Systolic blood pressure0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Sign of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)Diastolic blood pressure0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Sign of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)Heart rate0 Participants
GSK2190915Number of Participants With Vital Sign of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)Systolic blood pressure0 Participants
GSK2190915Number of Participants With Vital Sign of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)Diastolic blood pressure0 Participants
GSK2190915Number of Participants With Vital Sign of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC)Heart rate0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline of LTB4 Biomarker in Plasma

The plasma samples were evaluated for presence of LTB4 biomarkers. The percentage change from baseline was calculated by dividing the post-randomization change by the baseline value from the individual and multiplying by a 100. If either the baseline or post-randomization value is missing, the change from baseline is set to missing. Baseline was defined as Day 1(pre-dose).

Time frame: Day 1 and Day 12

Population: All subject population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercentage Change From Baseline of LTB4 Biomarker in PlasmaDay 1, 2 hour-24.72 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 53.13
PlaceboPercentage Change From Baseline of LTB4 Biomarker in PlasmaDay 12, pre-dose282.81 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 452.763
PlaceboPercentage Change From Baseline of LTB4 Biomarker in PlasmaDay 12, 2 hour-22.05 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 58.391
GSK2190915Percentage Change From Baseline of LTB4 Biomarker in PlasmaDay 1, 2 hour-95.24 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 6.711
GSK2190915Percentage Change From Baseline of LTB4 Biomarker in PlasmaDay 12, pre-dose-95.29 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 7.326
GSK2190915Percentage Change From Baseline of LTB4 Biomarker in PlasmaDay 12, 2 hour-99.23 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 1.01
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline Urine LTE4 Biomarker

The urine spot samples were collected from the participants at pre-dose on day 1 and trough day 12 for evaluation of LTE4 biomarker. This evaluated the level of inflammation in the airways of the asthma participants. The percentage change from baseline was calculated by dividing the post randomization change by the baseline value from the individual and multiplying by a 100. If either the baseline or post-randomization value is missing, the change from baseline is set to missing. Baseline was defined as Day 1(pre-dose).

Time frame: Day 1 and Day 12

Population: All subject population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercentage Change From Baseline Urine LTE4 Biomarker26.22 Percent changeStandard Deviation 89.173
GSK2190915Percentage Change From Baseline Urine LTE4 Biomarker-89.62 Percent changeStandard Deviation 4.996
Secondary

Plasma Concentration of GSK2190915

The blood samples for analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters were collected at pre-dose and 2 hours post dose on Day 1 and pre-dose trough and 2 hour post dose on Day 12, to evaluate the concentration of the drug GSK2190915 in plasma.

Time frame: At Day 1, pre-dose; Day 1, 2 hour; Day 12, pre-dose; and Day 12, 2 hour

Population: All Subject Population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPlasma Concentration of GSK2190915Day 1, pre-dose0.000 Nanogram per millilitre
PlaceboPlasma Concentration of GSK2190915Day 1, 2 hour1609.303 Nanogram per millilitreStandard Deviation 958.4609
PlaceboPlasma Concentration of GSK2190915Day 12, pre-dose1073.623 Nanogram per millilitreStandard Deviation 627.7852
PlaceboPlasma Concentration of GSK2190915Day 12, 2 hour2334.238 Nanogram per millilitreStandard Deviation 1252.5057

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026