Skip to content

Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) for Resistant Neuropathic Pain

IVIG for Treatment of Resistant Neuropathic Pain: a Preliminary Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00850005
Enrollment
12
Registered
2009-02-24
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2009-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuropathic Pain

Keywords

neuropathic pain, resistant, neuroinflammation, neuroinflammatory markers, Neuropathic pain that has not responded to standard therapy

Brief summary

This project addresses a vexing problem that has alluded the best efforts of the medical/scientific community: treatment of resistant neuropathic pain. Neuropathic pain is common and includes conditions such as diabetic neuropathy, post herpetic neuralgia and post stroke pain and is believed to affect at least 3% of adults. Surveys of patients with neuropathic pain indicate that 60% do not receive adequate relief with current treatment. Results from recent laboratory and human studies reveal a new approach to treatment. This approach is based on the findings that neuroinflammation appears to be involved in development and maintenance of neuropathic pain. This study explores the effects of an immune-modulating blood-derived product, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), in treating neuropathic pain. IVIG is thought to reduce neuroinflammation contributing to neuropathic pain. If successful, the study will provide important insights into pain mechanisms and a better understanding of how IVIG relieves neuropathic pain. Hypotheses: 1. Reduction in neuroinflammation (NI) markers will co-vary with clinical indicators of pain relief 2. Patients with higher levels of markers of NI will be more likely to respond to IVIG

Detailed description

This study will employ a randomized double blind cross-over design. A total of 12 subjects will be recruited for the study. Once each subject has satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria and provided informed consent, the subject will be randomized to either the IVIG or placebo treatment groups, using a pre-determined randomization list generated by the research office at the University of Calgary. Complete responders will begin a monitoring phase, partial and non-responders will return for a second cycle in one month. Complete responders, with prolonged relief, will cross-over to the alternative treatment when their pain returns if this occurs within 6 months of the infusion.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALIntravenous immunoglobulin

2 g/kg divided over five days

BIOLOGICALNormal Saline

Same volume as experimental arm

Sponsors

University of Calgary
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>18 years; Clinical diagnosis of treatment-resistant neuropathic pain; * Score of 4/10 or greater on the DN4 NeP screening questionnaire; * Bedside examination confirming symptoms of neuropathic pain; * Moderate to severe pain; * Completed adequate analgesic trials according to neuropathic pain clinical practice guidelines; * provides informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or lactating women; * Clinical diagnosis of phantom limb pain; * History of psychosis; * current, substance dependency disorder; * presence of clinically significant cardiac or pulmonary disorder that would compromise participants' safety; * severe pain disorder other than the chronic NeP under study; * Abnormalities above 1.5 times upper range of normal on screening CBC, blood chemistry; * Serum IgA less than \<0.05 g/L

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome measure will consist of change in mean daily pain diary score from baseline to each week post-treatmentPerformed at screening, before the initial infusion, 2 weeks and 4 weeks post treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Measurement of neuroinflammation (NI) markers (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, MMP-9, TIMP-1)Performed at screening, before the initial infusion, 2 weeks and 4 weeks post treatment

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactAlexander J Clark, MD, FRCPC
john.clark@albertahealthservices.ca403 943 9917

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026