Skip to content

Efficacy Study of Travoprost APS Versus TRAVATAN

A Multi-Center, Double-Masked Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Travoprost APS Compared to TRAVATAN® in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00848536
Enrollment
371
Registered
2009-02-20
Start date
2009-03-31
Completion date
2010-01-31
Last updated
2012-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ocular Hypertension, Open Angle Glaucoma

Keywords

OAG, OHT

Brief summary

A Multi-Center Double-masked Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Travoprost APS Compared to TRAVATAN in Patients with Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

Interventions

DRUGTravoprost 0.004% (POLYQUAD-preserved) Eye Drops, Solution

One drop once daily in the evening for 3 months

DRUGTravoprost 0.004% (BAK-preserved) Eye Drops, Solution

One drop once daily in the evening for 3 months

Sponsors

Alcon Research
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older, either gender and any race. * Open Angle Glaucoma (OAG) or Ocular Hypertension (OHT). * Not currently on any IOP-lowering medication or currently on a stable treatment (i.e, at least 30 days) with and IOP-lowering monotherapy. * All patients: Mean IOP in same eye (at both Eligibility 1 & 2 Visits): ≥ 24 and ≤ 36 mmHg at 9 AM; and ≥ 21 and ≤ 36 mmHg at 11 AM & 4 PM. * Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

* Females of childbearing potential not meeting conditions set in the protocol. * Severe central visual field loss. * Angle Shaffer grade \< 2. * Cup/disc ratio \> 0.8 (horizontal or vertical measurement). * Best corrected visual acuity (VA) score worse than 55 ETDRS letters read (equivalent to approximately 20/80 Snellen or 0.25 decimal). * Intraocular surgery or trauma within last 6 months. * Any abnormality preventing reliable applanation tonometry. * History of or current ocular pathology (including severe dry eye) that would affect the conduct of the study. * Allergy/hypersensitivity to study medications. * Unable to discontinue use of all IOP-lowering medications for a minimum wash-out period of 5 to 28 days prior to the Eligibility Visit. * Less than 30 days stable dosing regimen of medications used on a chronic basis that may affect IOP. * Use of any additional topical or systemic ocular hypotensive medication during the study. * Therapy with another investigational agent within 30 days prior to the Screening visit. * Other protocol-defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Intraocular Pressure at 9:00 am3 months (measured at 9:00 am)For an individual patient, two consecutive IOP measurements for each eye were taken. The mean IOP values for each individual patient's eye were rounded up to the next whole number if the value was ≥ 0.5 mmHg All IOP measurements were performed with a Goldmann applanation tonometer. All IOP measurements for any individual subject were to be performed preferably by the same operator using the same tonometer. Mean IOP for the patient's worse eye at baseline was used in the primary endpoint analysis. If both eyes were equal, then the right eye was selected for analysis
Mean Intraocular Pressure at 11:00 am3 months (measured at 11:00 am)For an individual patient, two consecutive IOP measurements for each eye were taken. The mean IOP values for each individual patient's eye were rounded up to the next whole number if the value was ≥ 0.5 mmHg All IOP measurements were performed with a Goldmann applanation tonometer. All IOP measurements for any individual subject were to be performed preferably by the same operator using the same tonometer. Mean IOP for the patient's worse eye at baseline was used in the primary endpoint analysis. If both eyes were equal, then the right eye was selected for analysis
Mean Intraocular Pressure at 4:00 pm3 months (measured at 4:00 pm)For an individual patient, two consecutive IOP measurements for each eye were taken. The mean IOP values for each individual patient's eye were rounded up to the next whole number if the value was ≥ 0.5 mmHg All IOP measurements were performed with a Goldmann applanation tonometer. All IOP measurements for any individual subject were to be performed preferably by the same operator using the same tonometer. Mean IOP for the patient's worse eye at baseline was used in the primary endpoint analysis. If both eyes were equal, then the right eye was selected for analysis

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were recruited from 30 study centers: 8 in the US, 6 in Mexico, 2 in Brazil, 4 in India, 2 in Australia, 2 in New Zealand, 2 in Latvia, and a single site in each: Taiwan, France, Belgium, and Italy.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TRAVATAN APS
One drop once daily in the evening for 3 months
185
TRAVATAN
One drop once daily in the evening for 3 months
186
Total371

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event22
Overall StudyInadequate Control of IOP11
Overall StudyNoncompliance10
Overall StudyPatient Moved02
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTRAVATAN APSTRAVATANTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
91 Participants77 Participants168 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
94 Participants109 Participants203 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
112 Participants115 Participants227 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
73 Participants71 Participants144 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
32 / 18535 / 186
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 1852 / 186

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Intraocular Pressure at 11:00 am

For an individual patient, two consecutive IOP measurements for each eye were taken. The mean IOP values for each individual patient's eye were rounded up to the next whole number if the value was ≥ 0.5 mmHg All IOP measurements were performed with a Goldmann applanation tonometer. All IOP measurements for any individual subject were to be performed preferably by the same operator using the same tonometer. Mean IOP for the patient's worse eye at baseline was used in the primary endpoint analysis. If both eyes were equal, then the right eye was selected for analysis

Time frame: 3 months (measured at 11:00 am)

Population: Per-Protocol. Patients who received study medication, satisfied pre-randomization criteria and satisfied protocol criteria at the specific time point were considered evaluable for PP analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
TRAVATAN APSMean Intraocular Pressure at 11:00 am17.4 mmHgStandard Error 0.25
TRAVATANMean Intraocular Pressure at 11:00 am17.5 mmHgStandard Error 0.25
Comparison: A hypothesis test was performed using a repeated measures analysis of variance model. For the test of non-inferiority, a two-sided 95% confidence intervals for the treatment group difference in mean IOP at each visit and time point was constructed based on analysis of variance.95% CI: [-0.8, 0.6]
Primary

Mean Intraocular Pressure at 4:00 pm

For an individual patient, two consecutive IOP measurements for each eye were taken. The mean IOP values for each individual patient's eye were rounded up to the next whole number if the value was ≥ 0.5 mmHg All IOP measurements were performed with a Goldmann applanation tonometer. All IOP measurements for any individual subject were to be performed preferably by the same operator using the same tonometer. Mean IOP for the patient's worse eye at baseline was used in the primary endpoint analysis. If both eyes were equal, then the right eye was selected for analysis

Time frame: 3 months (measured at 4:00 pm)

Population: Per-Protocol. Patients who received study medication, satisfied pre-randomization criteria and satisfied protocol criteria at the specific time point were considered evaluable for PP analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
TRAVATAN APSMean Intraocular Pressure at 4:00 pm16.9 mmHgStandard Error 0.25
TRAVATANMean Intraocular Pressure at 4:00 pm17.1 mmHgStandard Error 0.25
Comparison: A hypothesis test was performed using a repeated measures analysis of variance model. For the test of non-inferiority, a two-sided 95% confidence intervals for the treatment group difference in mean IOP at each visit and time point was constructed based on analysis of variance.95% CI: [-0.9, 0.5]
Primary

Mean Intraocular Pressure at 9:00 am

For an individual patient, two consecutive IOP measurements for each eye were taken. The mean IOP values for each individual patient's eye were rounded up to the next whole number if the value was ≥ 0.5 mmHg All IOP measurements were performed with a Goldmann applanation tonometer. All IOP measurements for any individual subject were to be performed preferably by the same operator using the same tonometer. Mean IOP for the patient's worse eye at baseline was used in the primary endpoint analysis. If both eyes were equal, then the right eye was selected for analysis

Time frame: 3 months (measured at 9:00 am)

Population: Per-Protocol. Patients who received study medication, satisfied pre-randomization criteria and satisfied protocol criteria at the specific time point were considered evaluable for PP analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
TRAVATAN APSMean Intraocular Pressure at 9:00 am17.9 mmHgStandard Error 0.25
TRAVATANMean Intraocular Pressure at 9:00 am18.1 mmHgStandard Error 0.25
Comparison: A hypothesis test was performed using a repeated measures analysis of variance model. For the test of non-inferiority, a two-sided 95% confidence intervals for the treatment group difference in mean IOP at each visit and time point was constructed based on analysis of variance.95% CI: [-0.9, 0.5]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026