Skip to content

Atrial Fibrillation: Canadian Atrial Fibrillation Evaluation (CAFE) Study -

the Use of Atrial Fibrillation Pacing Therapies in Patients With no Previous History of Atrial Fibrillation: Canadian Atrial Fibrillation Evaluation (CAFE) Study -

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00848445
Acronym
CAFE
Enrollment
270
Registered
2009-02-20
Start date
2002-10-31
Completion date
2007-11-30
Last updated
2021-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

To evaluate whether atrial fibrillation (AF) therapies in Guidant Pulsar Max II or Insignia Plus DR have an effect on the occurance of AF in patients with no prior history of AF

Detailed description

This multi-centre, randomized, cross-over, prospective study will evaluate the occurrence of AF with AF pacing therapies programmed on (APP and VRR) and with AF therapies programmed off (APP and VRR) in patients with no known prior history of AF (all patients have a pacing indication). The occurrence of AF as well as time to first event and AF burden (frequecy and duration).

Interventions

DEVICEGuidant Pulsar Max II or Insignia Plus DR

market approved pacemaker. programmed per protocol

DEVICEAtrial pacing preference turned on or off

programing changes in the device

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* No prior history of AF or atrial flutter, primary indication of SSS or AV block for dual chamber pacemaker, confidentiality agreement signed and dated before implant, available for follow-up at the study centre where they were enrolled at the protocol defined intervals, willing and capable of participating in all testing associated with the study, on stable regime of arrhythmia management drugs.

Exclusion criteria

* Documented history of AF or atrial flutter, clinically significant ventricular arrhythmias, \< 18 yrs old, life expectancy \< 1 year or expectation of heart transplantation during the study period, likely to or have received a mechanical tricuspid valve during the study, enrolled in other cardiovascular studies, women who are pregnant, inability or refusal to sign Patient Confidentiality Agreement, inability or refusal to complete the follow-up schedule at the study centre in which they were enrolled, exhibit arrhythmias due to reversible cause eg, digitalis toxicity, hypoxia, transient electrolyte imbalance, acute myocardial infarction or electrocution.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the occurrence of AF (>350 bpm) during a period when AF pacing therapies are programmed on (APP and VRR) and during when AF therapies are programmed off.one year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare AF burden between patients with AF therapies programmed on (APP and VRR) and patients with AF pacing therapies turned off (APP and VRR). Burden is defined as the product of the number of AF events and duration of events. To compare the time toone year

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026