Skip to content

A Comparison of Subvastus and Midvastus Approaches in Minimally-Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty

A Comparison of Subvastus and Midvastus Approaches in Minimally-Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00848133
Enrollment
51
Registered
2009-02-20
Start date
2004-07-31
Completion date
2009-02-28
Last updated
2009-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Total Knee Arthroplasty

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the early clinical outcomes of minimally invasive bilateral subvastus and midvastus approaches for total knee arthroplasty.

Interventions

PROCEDUREmini-midvastus surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty
PROCEDUREmini-subvastus surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty

Sponsors

Bonutti Clinic
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Sinai Hospital of Baltimore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with advanced bilateral osteoarthritis of the knee for treatment with total knee arthroplasty * patients who wish to undergo bilateral total knee arthroplasty as part of a single surgical procedure

Exclusion criteria

* patients who were previously treated with knee arthroplasty

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Knee Society ScoreFinal follow-up (minimum 24 months)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Radiographic alignment and fixationFinal follow-up (minimum 24 months)

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026