Skip to content

A Study to Assess the Effect of Tocilizumab on Signs and Symptoms in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

An Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Reduction in Signs and Symptoms During Treatment With Tocilizumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00848120
Enrollment
29
Registered
2009-02-20
Start date
2008-12-31
Completion date
2010-02-13
Last updated
2017-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

This single arm, open label study will assess the safety and efficacy, with regard to reduction of signs and symptoms,of treatment with tocilizumab in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis. Patients will receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions. Patients already receiving methotrexate at entry into the study may continue with their treatment together with tocilizumab.The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is \<100 individuals.

Interventions

DRUGtocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]

8mg/kg iv every 4 weeks for 24 weeks

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients,\>=18 years of age; * rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed \>8 weeks and \<4 years prior to baseline; * naive to, or not responding well to, methotrexate; * swollen joint count \>=8 (66 joint count) and tender joint count\>=8 (68 joint count) at screening and baseline.

Exclusion criteria

* rheumatic autoimmune disease other than rheumatoid arthritis; * patients with functional class IV rheumatoid arthritis; * history of, or current, inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis, or other systemic autoimmune disorder.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Percent (%) Improvement (ACR20 Response) at Week 24Week 24ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (≥) 20% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity, 2) participant assessment of disease activity, 3) Patient Assessment of Pain (visual analog scale \[VAS\]), 4) participant assessment of functional disability via a Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and 5) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at each visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50% Improvement (ACR50 Response) at Week 24Week 24ACR50 response: ≥50% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and 50% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity, 2) participant assessment of disease activity, 3) Patient Assessment of Pain (VAS), 4) participant assessment of functional disability via a HAQ, and 5) ESR at each visit.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70 Response) at Week 24Week 24ACR70 response: ≥70% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity, 2) participant assessment of disease activity, 3) Patient Assessment of Pain (VAS), 4) participant assessment of functional disability via a HAQ, and 5) ESR at each visit.
HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline and Week 24Baseline and Week 24HAQ-DI is a participant-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 component sets: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. To calculate HAQ-DI the participant must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains. The HAQ-DI is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst).
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Baseline and Week 24Baseline and Week 24FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participants response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the health status.
Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count - Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) at Baseline and Week 24Baseline and Week 24DAS28-ESR calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28 joints count, the ESR (millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]) and Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment) with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS28 less than or equal to (≤)3.2 equals (=) low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (\>)3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.
Percentage of Participants With Disease Remission at Week 24 Assessed Using DAS28-ESRWeek 24DAS28-ESR calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28 joints count, the ESR (mm/hour) and Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment) with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS28 \<2.6=remission.
Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity at Week 24 Assessed Using DAS28-ESRWeek 24DAS28-ESR calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28 joints count, the ESR (mm/hour) and Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment) with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS28 \>2.6 and \<3.2=low disease activity.
Time to Onset of ACR20/50/70 ResponseWeeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24Time to onset of ACR 20/50/70 response was calculated as the number of weeks from the administration of the first dose of study drug until the date of first achievement of ACR 20/50/70 per criteria.

Countries

Philippines

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg
Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks.
29
Total29

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTocilizumab 8 mg/kg
Age, Continuous47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
24 / 29
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 29

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Percent (%) Improvement (ACR20 Response) at Week 24

ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (≥) 20% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity, 2) participant assessment of disease activity, 3) Patient Assessment of Pain (visual analog scale \[VAS\]), 4) participant assessment of functional disability via a Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and 5) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at each visit.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Percent (%) Improvement (ACR20 Response) at Week 2486 percentage of participants
Secondary

Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count - Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) at Baseline and Week 24

DAS28-ESR calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28 joints count, the ESR (millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]) and Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment) with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS28 less than or equal to (≤)3.2 equals (=) low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (\>)3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgDisease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count - Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) at Baseline and Week 24Baseline6.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgDisease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count - Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) at Baseline and Week 24Week 242.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
Comparison: Week 24 versus baselinep-value: 0.001ANOVA
Secondary

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Baseline and Week 24

FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participants response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the health status.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgFunctional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Baseline and Week 24Baseline1.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgFunctional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Baseline and Week 24Week 241.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
Comparison: Week 24 versus baselinep-value: <0.001ANOVA
Secondary

HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline and Week 24

HAQ-DI is a participant-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 component sets: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. To calculate HAQ-DI the participant must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains. The HAQ-DI is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline and Week 24Baseline0.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Baseline and Week 24Week 240.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Comparison: Week 24 versus baselinep-value: <0.001ANOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50% Improvement (ACR50 Response) at Week 24

ACR50 response: ≥50% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and 50% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity, 2) participant assessment of disease activity, 3) Patient Assessment of Pain (VAS), 4) participant assessment of functional disability via a HAQ, and 5) ESR at each visit.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50% Improvement (ACR50 Response) at Week 2466 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70 Response) at Week 24

ACR70 response: ≥70% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and 70% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity, 2) participant assessment of disease activity, 3) Patient Assessment of Pain (VAS), 4) participant assessment of functional disability via a HAQ, and 5) ESR at each visit.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70 Response) at Week 2448 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Disease Remission at Week 24 Assessed Using DAS28-ESR

DAS28-ESR calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28 joints count, the ESR (mm/hour) and Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment) with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS28 \<2.6=remission.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Disease Remission at Week 24 Assessed Using DAS28-ESR34 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity at Week 24 Assessed Using DAS28-ESR

DAS28-ESR calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28 joints count, the ESR (mm/hour) and Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment) with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS28 \>2.6 and \<3.2=low disease activity.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercentage of Participants With Low Disease Activity at Week 24 Assessed Using DAS28-ESR45 percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Onset of ACR20/50/70 Response

Time to onset of ACR 20/50/70 response was calculated as the number of weeks from the administration of the first dose of study drug until the date of first achievement of ACR 20/50/70 per criteria.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgTime to Onset of ACR20/50/70 ResponseACR204 weeks
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgTime to Onset of ACR20/50/70 ResponseACR5012 weeks
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgTime to Onset of ACR20/50/70 ResponseACR7024 weeks

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026