Skip to content

Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Ventilated Patients Using Two Repositioning Regimens

Comparison of Two Turning Regimens (2 Versus Every 4 Hours) in the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in Patients on Mechanical Ventilation That Use Alternating-pressure Air Mattresses.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00847665
Acronym
PUPPAS
Enrollment
330
Registered
2009-02-19
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
2011-05-31
Last updated
2013-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pressure Ulcers

Keywords

Pressure ulcers, Repositioning, Prevention, Mechanical Ventilation, Critical care

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare a 2-hour versus every 4-hour turning regimen on the incidence of grade \> II pressure ulcers (PU) in patients in ICU on mechanical ventilation ≥ 24h that use alternating-pressure air mattresses (APAMs).

Detailed description

Pressure ulcers (PUs) pose a major healthcare challenge and are associated with an increased risk of infection and sepsis, longer hospital stay, and higher hospitalization costs. Their reported incidence in critical care patients varies widely from 1% to 56%. Therefore it is important to take appropriate preventive measures, which can often be successful and less costly than the treatment of established ulcers. Among these measures are the use of pressure-reducing surfaces and repositioning strategies in a protocolized way. Though there is general agreement that critical care patients, including those under mechanical ventilation must use pressure-reducing surfaces, there is no enough evidence in the literature about what is the best repositioning schedule when new, high technology mattresses are used. The use of this new technology has lead to propose that repositioning can be less frequent. In the only clinical trial where this subject (time interval turning) has been addressed (Vanderwee et al, Journal of Advanced Nursing), it is concluded that a turning regimen every 4 hours is equally effective than a 2-hour turning, using this kind of mattresses. Nonetheless this study is not made in critically ill patients, that have more risk factors for developing PUs, the reason we don´t share this findings and recommendations cannot be generalized. The study hypothesis is that in patients using APAMs, a turning regimen every 2 hour compared to a 4-hour is most effective in the prevention of PUs and could be equally safe. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of postural turnings every 2 hours compared to every 4 hours on the incidence of grade \> II pressure ulcers (PU) in patients in ICU on mechanical ventilation (MV) ≥ 24h that use alternating-pressure air mattresses (APAMs) The study is an open label, randomized, controlled clinical trial. The main variable is the incidence of Pus grade ≥ II. As secondary variables measures of efficacy and safety of patients will be registered. The study will take place in a 26 bed medical-surgical ICU with APAMs. Randomization will be done between 24h-48h from the beginning of MV. The final analysis will be by intention to treat.

Interventions

Turning every 4 or 2 hours

Sponsors

University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients admitted to the medical-surgical ICU, requiring more than 24 hours of mechanical ventilation. * Patients on alternating-pressure air mattresses. * Patients or their legal representative able to provide written informed consent to participate in the study * Patients whose weight are within the limits accepted by the mattresses (45-140 Kg) * Over 18 years

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with pressure ulcer at ICU admission. * Pregnant patients * Patients in which informed consent is not obtained in the first 48 hours of mechanical ventilation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Pressure Ulcer (PU) Grade ≥ IIIntensive Care Unit (ICU) length of stay (days)Pressure ulcers were categorized according to the EPUAP-classification system. A grade I PU is non-blanchable erythema, a grade II is an abrasion or blister, a grade III is a superficial ulcer and a grade IV is a deep ulcer

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ICU MortalityICU length of stay (an average of 28 days)ICU mortality (number of death in ICU)
Workload of Nursesicu length of stayTime actually spent to manual repositioning by nurses team, in minutes/day
Length of Mechanical Ventilation (MV)ICU length of stayTime from initiation to withdrawal of mechanical ventilation. Days

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A medical-surgical ICU of a university hospital. Patients were recruited from february 2009 to January 2011

Pre-assignment details

A total of 512 patients with more than 24 hours of mechanical ventilation were screened. 55 patients were excluded because of the presence of pressure ulcer. Other 126 patients were excluded because of the presence of other exclusion criteria (age, pregnancy, refusal of consent,...)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Turning Every 4 Hours
Repositioning by the nursing staff every four hours (left side, back with a 30º elevation of the head end and the foot end of the bed, right side, back), using the 30º tilt
165
Turning Every 2 Hours
Repositioning by the nursing staff every two hours (left side, back with a 30º elevation of the head end and the foot end of the bed, right side, back), using the 30º tilt
165
Total330

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTurning Every 2 HoursTurning Every 4 HoursTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
84 Participants76 Participants160 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
81 Participants89 Participants170 Participants
Age Continuous62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
Region of Enrollment
Spain
165 participants165 participants330 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
56 Participants54 Participants110 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
109 Participants111 Participants220 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
50 / 16460 / 165
serious
Total, serious adverse events
15 / 16423 / 165

Outcome results

Primary

Incidence of Pressure Ulcer (PU) Grade ≥ II

Pressure ulcers were categorized according to the EPUAP-classification system. A grade I PU is non-blanchable erythema, a grade II is an abrasion or blister, a grade III is a superficial ulcer and a grade IV is a deep ulcer

Time frame: Intensive Care Unit (ICU) length of stay (days)

Population: Intention to treat

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Turning Every 4 HoursIncidence of Pressure Ulcer (PU) Grade ≥ II22 participants
Turning Every 2 HoursIncidence of Pressure Ulcer (PU) Grade ≥ II17 participants
Secondary

ICU Mortality

ICU mortality (number of death in ICU)

Time frame: ICU length of stay (an average of 28 days)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Turning Every 4 HoursICU Mortality51 participants
Turning Every 2 HoursICU Mortality60 participants
Secondary

Length of Mechanical Ventilation (MV)

Time from initiation to withdrawal of mechanical ventilation. Days

Time frame: ICU length of stay

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Turning Every 4 HoursLength of Mechanical Ventilation (MV)8 days
Turning Every 2 HoursLength of Mechanical Ventilation (MV)7 days
Secondary

Workload of Nurses

Time actually spent to manual repositioning by nurses team, in minutes/day

Time frame: icu length of stay

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Turning Every 4 HoursWorkload of Nurses10.6 minutes per day
Turning Every 2 HoursWorkload of Nurses20.8 minutes per day

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026