Skip to content

Oral Health Training Program for Pediatric Residents

Effective Educational Instruction in Preventive Oral Health: Hands On Training (HOT)Versus Web Based Training (WBT): A Randomized Control Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00846066
Enrollment
56
Registered
2009-02-18
Start date
2007-01-31
Completion date
2008-09-30
Last updated
2015-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Preventive Oral Health

Keywords

educational research,, instructional methods,, Hands on training,, Web based training,, pediatric residents, preventive oral health,, dental caries,, Instructional strategies in Preventive Oral health, Web-based training on Preventive Oral Health, Hands on Training on Preventive Oral Health

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of the addition of hands on training by a pediatric dentist on the pediatric residents skills, confidence, opinions and practice related to preventive oral health.

Detailed description

Objectives: To compare the addition of Hands on Training (HOT) to Web Based Training (WBT)on residents' skills, confidence, opinions and practice . Methods: Pediatric residents participated in WBT on preventive oral health. Then the WBT subjects were randomly assigned to receive HOT by a dentist, or WBT alone. All subjects were assessed on skills in the performance of an oral exam, by direct observation. Residents' confidence regarding oral health counseling, and their opinions about the importance of the incorporation of oral health into the well child visit, was measured by surveys utilizing a Likert scale. Residents' change in practice was assessed by a retrospective chart audit.

Interventions

OTHERHands on training

Hands on training by a pediatric dentist on preventive oral health

Web based training alone

Sponsors

Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Pediatric Residents in the Continuity Care Clinics at Children's Mercy Hospital during the months of January and February 2007

Exclusion criteria

1. Residents on leave of absence 2. Residents who have their Continuity Care Clinics off site 3. Residents refusing consent for inclusion of results in study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Percentage of Correct Skills3 months after Hands-on Training (HOT)Skills were observed by pediatric dentists for each resident utilizing a six item checklist 3 months after the intervention (HOT) was completed.Each correct skill demonstrated was scored as 1 (16.67%) with a maximum of 6 representing 100%.The mean pecentage of correct skills were measured by direct observation by a pediatric dentist among the WBT alone and WBT+HOT groups
Percent Change From Baseline in Confidence at 4 MonthsBaseline and 4 monthsConfidence was measured by self-administered surveys regarding knowledge and practice of oral health. The surveys used a 4 point Likert scale (1=not confident, 4=very confident).The mean percent of change in the responses of very confident was compared between both groups. The percentage change equals {(mean score at 4 months-mean score at baseline)/ mean score at baseline} \*100%
Percent Change From Baseline in Opinions Regarding Incorporating Oral Health Into a Well Child Visit at 4 MonthsBaseline and 4 monthsOpinions regarding incorporating oral health into a well child visit was measured by self administered surveys. The surveys used a 4 point Likert scale from 1 for (strongly disagree) to 4 for (strongly agree). Mean percentage change in the agree and strongly agree responses by the residents was compared between both groups. The percentage change equals {(mean score at 4 months-mean score at baseline)/ mean score at baseline} \*100%
Percent Change From Baseline in Practice of Oral Health Based on Pre and Post Study Chart Audit at 6 MonthsAt baseline and 6 monthsThe mean percent change in the documentation of oral health components at a well child visit. This was done by an audit of a random selection of 5 charts of patients who came in for well child visits, completed by each resident at baseline and at 6 months later.We scored this utilizing a 4 item checklist each correct item was scored as 1 (25%), with a maximum of 4(100%). The percentage change used the following formula {(mean score at 6 months-mean score at baseline)/mean score at baseline}\*100%

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

All Pediatric residents, in the Continuity Clinic Rotation (CCC) at a general pediatric ambulatory clinic, in an urban tertiary care children's hospital, were invited to participate. Residents in any year of training were considered eligible for the study, recruitment took place in January, 2007

Pre-assignment details

59 participants were evaluated for the pre-test knowledge, they were next administered the Web Based Training and were then evaluated for the post-test knowledge. 56 participants were then randomized into two groups, 3 were excluded, (2 refused consent and 1 deviated from the protocol).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
WBT Only
Control Group Web Based Training only
27
WBT+HOT
Web Based Training plus Hands on Training
29
Total56

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicWBT OnlyWBT+HOTTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
27 Participants29 Participants56 Participants
Level of Training
First year Residents
12 participants11 participants23 participants
Level of Training
Second and Third year Residents
15 participants18 participants33 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants23 Participants42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants6 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Percentage of Correct Skills

Skills were observed by pediatric dentists for each resident utilizing a six item checklist 3 months after the intervention (HOT) was completed.Each correct skill demonstrated was scored as 1 (16.67%) with a maximum of 6 representing 100%.The mean pecentage of correct skills were measured by direct observation by a pediatric dentist among the WBT alone and WBT+HOT groups

Time frame: 3 months after Hands-on Training (HOT)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
WBT OnlyMean Percentage of Correct Skills73 Percentage of correct skillsStandard Deviation 27
WBT+HOTMean Percentage of Correct Skills87 Percentage of correct skillsStandard Deviation 21
Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Confidence at 4 Months

Confidence was measured by self-administered surveys regarding knowledge and practice of oral health. The surveys used a 4 point Likert scale (1=not confident, 4=very confident).The mean percent of change in the responses of very confident was compared between both groups. The percentage change equals {(mean score at 4 months-mean score at baseline)/ mean score at baseline} \*100%

Time frame: Baseline and 4 months

Population: Only completed paired (pre/post intervention) surveys were analyzed

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
WBT OnlyPercent Change From Baseline in Confidence at 4 Months14 Percent change.Standard Deviation 0.33
WBT+HOTPercent Change From Baseline in Confidence at 4 Months19 Percent change.Standard Deviation 0.38
Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Opinions Regarding Incorporating Oral Health Into a Well Child Visit at 4 Months

Opinions regarding incorporating oral health into a well child visit was measured by self administered surveys. The surveys used a 4 point Likert scale from 1 for (strongly disagree) to 4 for (strongly agree). Mean percentage change in the agree and strongly agree responses by the residents was compared between both groups. The percentage change equals {(mean score at 4 months-mean score at baseline)/ mean score at baseline} \*100%

Time frame: Baseline and 4 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
WBT OnlyPercent Change From Baseline in Opinions Regarding Incorporating Oral Health Into a Well Child Visit at 4 Months-11 Percent changeStandard Deviation 0.33
WBT+HOTPercent Change From Baseline in Opinions Regarding Incorporating Oral Health Into a Well Child Visit at 4 Months-33 Percent changeStandard Deviation 0.42
Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Practice of Oral Health Based on Pre and Post Study Chart Audit at 6 Months

The mean percent change in the documentation of oral health components at a well child visit. This was done by an audit of a random selection of 5 charts of patients who came in for well child visits, completed by each resident at baseline and at 6 months later.We scored this utilizing a 4 item checklist each correct item was scored as 1 (25%), with a maximum of 4(100%). The percentage change used the following formula {(mean score at 6 months-mean score at baseline)/mean score at baseline}\*100%

Time frame: At baseline and 6 months

Population: Analysis per protocol. Subjects dropped from analysis because charts not available within the time frame of the study and incomplete data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
WBT OnlyPercent Change From Baseline in Practice of Oral Health Based on Pre and Post Study Chart Audit at 6 Months26.32 Percent changeStandard Deviation 13.25
WBT+HOTPercent Change From Baseline in Practice of Oral Health Based on Pre and Post Study Chart Audit at 6 Months36.67 Percent changeStandard Deviation 22.42

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026