Skip to content

Ovine Graft (Omniflow II) Versus PTFE in Below Knee Arterial Reconstruction

Ovine Graft (Omniflow II) Versus PTFE in Below Knee Arterial Reconstruction: A Prospective Randomized Multi Centre Study

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00845585
Enrollment
0
Registered
2009-02-18
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2015-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease

Keywords

arterial reconstruction, bypass, below knee, PZFE, Ovine graft, Omniflow II, graft patency

Brief summary

The study intends to compare commonly used PTFE grafts with the biologic ovine graft Ominiflow II for below-knee bypass surgery in patients with peripheral artery occlusive disease with no autologous vein graft available. The hypothesis of this randomized trial is that that Omniflow II does not have a higher patency than PTFE over 36 months (one-sided test). An interim analysis will be performed at 18

Detailed description

Background Despite advances in endovascular therapies, arterial bypass to restore blood flow to a patent distal artery often is the best option in the management of lower extremity occlusive arterial disease. The greater saphenous vein is the conduit of choice for infrainguinal reconstructions - but it is not always available or is otherwise unusable in a significant percentage of patients. In those situations, arterial reconstruction using prosthetic material is an option. Synthetic and biological vascular grafts have been used for some three decades. With time, synthetic conduits tend to increase their thrombogenic potential rather than diminish it by formation of neointima. Over time biological grafts have become alternatives to synthetic materials, mainly in the more demanding applications below the knee. For various reasons most biological grafts have been withdrawn from the market and Omniflow II (Bio Nova International, Mel-bourne, Australia) is currently the only biological vascular prosthesis available for peripheral revascularisation. Objective The Omniflow II prosthesis is a biosynthetic device formed from stabilised sheep collagen with an integral polyester mesh. It is produced by inserting polyester mesh-covered mandrels beneath the cutaneous trunci muscle of adult sheep for a period of 12-14 weeks. The collagen-encapsulated tubes are harvested and stabilised using glutaraldehyde. The design provides long-term structural stability of the prosthesis and compliance that is similar to that of an autologous artery. There are no randomised studies comparing the Omniflow II graft to either autologous vein or PTFE. Extensive in vivo testing has been performed for safety and efficacy. The Omniflow graft is registered in Europe, Australia, Canada and in a range of countries in South America and South East Asia. Methods All patients between the ages 20 to 90 with peripheral arterial disease with severe, life-style limiting claudication, rest pain or tissue lesions based on occlusion of the femoral or popliteal artery can be considered, if no suitable vein is available for the reconstruction in infrapopliteal reconstructions. Written consent is obtained from all volunteering patients including willingness to participate in the follow-up process. Primary end point of the study is primary patency, defined by duplex scan as freedom from binary restenosis of 50%.

Interventions

DEVICEBelow Knee Arterial Reconstruction

Patency, Reinterventions, Amputations, mortality

Sponsors

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 20 to 90 * Peripheral arterial occlusive disease with life-style limitation, claudication, rest pain, tissue loss, * No suitable vein for reconstruction available * Written consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

* Acute limb threatening ischaemia * Patient younger than 20 * Pregnant women * Myocardial infarction during past 30 days * Stroke * Life expectancy \< 1 year

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
primary patency, defined by duplex scan as freedom from binary restenosis of 50%36 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
secondary patency3 months
limb salvage6 months
mortality12 months
infections18 months
reinterventions24 and 36 months

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026