Skip to content

Acute Effects of Preladenant (SCH 420814) on Dyskinesia and Parkinsonism in Levodopa Treated Participants (P05550)

Acute Effects of SCH 420814 on Dyskinesia and Parkinsonism in Levodopa Treated Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00845000
Enrollment
12
Registered
2009-02-16
Start date
2009-04-21
Completion date
2010-05-14
Last updated
2018-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Brief summary

This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, 3-period crossover, balanced, single-site, third party-blind study of preladenant (SCH 420814) in participants with Parkinson disease (PD) to be conducted in conformance with Good Clinical Practices. This trial will investigate the effects of single doses of preladenant and placebo on the dyskinesia and antiparkinsonian actions of a levodopa infusion. The study will examine 10 mg (low dose) or 100 mg (high dose) study drug, given as single, oral administrations in conjunction with intravenous (IV) levodopa infusion and oral carbidopa.

Interventions

DRUGSCH 420814 10 mg

one 10-mg capsule, orally, at hour 0 of treatment period

DRUGSCH 420814 100 mg

single oral dose of four SCH 420814 25-mg capsules at hour 0 of treatment period

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo capsule, oral, at hour 0 of treatment period

DRUGLevodopa

levodopa intravenous (IV) infusion (1 mg/kg body weight) was beginning 1 hour after study drug administration and continued for 2 hours

DRUGCarbidopa

one 25-mg table, orally, at hours 0, 2 and 4 of each treatment period

Sponsors

Oregon Health and Science University
CollaboratorOTHER
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant must have a diagnosis of idiopathic PD based on history, exam and any relevant laboratory tests * Participants must have been treated with levodopa for one or more years * Participants must have motor fluctuations that can be measured as a 10% change in tapping speed between on and off and concurrent motor Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) must also show a 20% improvement when on * Participants must have dyskinesia when on measured as at least 2 in one or more body parts on scale using 0 (absent) to 4 (severe) for four limbs, trunk, neck and face (total 7 body parts and 28 points) * Participant must be free of any clinically significant disease that would interfere with the study evaluations * Female participants must be postmenopausal and/or surgically sterilized and have a negative serum pregnancy test at the screening visit and a negative urine or serum pregnancy test upon each admission to the study center * Premenopausal, unsterilized female participants have to agree to use a medically accepted method of contraception * Male participants must agree to use a medically accepted method of contraception as or abstain from sexual intercourse during the trial and for 2 months after stopping the medication.

Exclusion criteria

* Female participants who are pregnant, intend to become pregnant (within 3 months of ending the study), or are lactating * Participants with dementia (mini-mental state examination \[MMSE\] \<23), hallucinations, confusion, major psychiatric disorders, and unstable medical conditions * Participants with any stable surgical or medical condition which might significantly alter the absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of any drug * Participants with a positive screen for drugs of abuse * Participants who are positive for hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibodies or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) * Participants who are currently participating in another medical interventional clinical study or have participated in a medical interventional clinical study within 30 days and who have previously received this compound.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Peak Dyskinesia ScoreHours 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0 of each treatment periodDyskinesia was scored on a scale of 0 (absent), 1 (mild) , 2 (moderate), 3 (severe) and 4 (incapacitating) for seven body parts (face, neck, trunk, each arm and each leg) based on the worse dyskinesia noted during the entire measurement time. Scores were assessed at Hours 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0. The dyskinesia score was the sum of the scores for the seven body parts. The peak dyskinesia score was recorded for each participant regardless of what timepoint the score was achieved. The total possible score for an individual at each timepoint could range from 0 to 28 with higher scores indicating greater effects of the dyskinesia. The mean peak dyskinesia score was calculated using the individual peak values.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Peak Finger Tapping ScoreHours 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0 of each treatment periodTapping was measured with two manual counters with keys that were depressed to register a count. The participant alternately tapped each counter using the index finger of the more affected hand for 60 seconds and was not allowed to use more than one finger to tap. The participant was instructed to tap as rapidly as possible while being timed for 60 seconds. The counts were recorded for the two counters at Hours 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0. The peak tapping score was recorded for each participant regardless of what timepoint the score was achieved. The mean peak finger tapping score was calculated using the individual peak values.
Mean Peak Tremor ScoreHours 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0 of each treatment periodTremor was scored on a scale of 0 (absent), 1 (mild, 2 (moderate), 3 (severe) and 4 (incapacitating) for seven body parts (face, neck, trunk, each arm and each leg) based on the worse tremor observed during the time spent with participant while taking other study measurements(vital signs, drawing samples, performing the tapping and walking tasks). Scores were assessed at Hours 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0. The tremor score was the sum of scores for seven body parts. The peak tremor score was recorded for each participant regardless of what timepoint the score was achieved. The total possible score for an individual at each timepoint could range from 0 to 28 with higher scores indicating more effects of the tremors. The mean peak tremor score was calculated using the individual peak values.
Mean Peak Walking SpeedHours 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0 of each treatment periodWalking speed assessment began with the participant being seated in an armless chair. Then while being timed, the participant stood up with their arms crossed on their chest and walked 6 meters, turned around, returned to the chair and sat. Timing was stopped when the participant's buttocks hit the chair and the total time was recorded. If the participant could not arise in 60 seconds, 60 seconds was entered in this line of the report form and the participant was tested again but allowed to push off to get out of the chair. Sixty seconds was the maximum time allowed to complete the walking assessment, thus 60 seconds was recorded as the time if they could not complete the task within this time limit. Walking speed was assessed at Hours 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 7.0 and 8. The peak walking speed was recorded for each participant regardless of what timepoint the score was achieved. The mean peak walking speed was calculated using the individual peak values.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
SCH 420814 10 mg→SCH 420814 100 mg→Placebo
Participants were to receive their assigned experimental treatment based on randomly assigned treatment sequence at Hour 0 following an overnight withdrawal of their antiparkinsonian medications of each treatment period. The levodopa infusion was to be started at Hour 1 and was to run for 2 hours. The participants were to also receive 25 mg of carbidopa at the following times: Hours 0, 2, and 4. Treatment periods were to be separated by at least 7 days but not more than 28 days washout between each dose.
2
SCH 420814 100 mg→Placebo→ SCH 420814 10 mg
Participants were to receive their assigned experimental treatment based on randomly assigned treatment sequence at Hour 0 following an overnight withdrawal of their antiparkinsonian medications of each treatment period. The levodopa infusion was to be started at Hour 1 and was to run for 2 hours. The participants were to also receive 25 mg of carbidopa at the following times: Hours 0, 2, and 4. Treatment periods were to be separated by at least 7 days but not more than 28 days washout between each dose.
2
Placebo→SCH 420814 10 mg→SCH 420814 100 mg
Participants were to receive their assigned experimental treatment based on randomly assigned treatment sequence at Hour 0 following an overnight withdrawal of their antiparkinsonian medications of each treatment period. The levodopa infusion was to be started at Hour 1 and was to run for 2 hours. The participants were to also receive 25 mg of carbidopa at the following times: Hours 0, 2, and 4. Treatment periods were to be separated by at least 7 days but not more than 28 days washout between each dose.
2
SCH 420814 10 mg→ Placebo→ SCH 420814 100 mg
Participants were to receive their assigned experimental treatment based on randomly assigned treatment sequence at Hour 0 following an overnight withdrawal of their antiparkinsonian medications of each treatment period. The levodopa infusion was to be started at Hour 1 and was to run for 2 hours. The participants were to also receive 25 mg of carbidopa at the following times: Hours 0, 2, and 4. Treatment periods were to be separated by at least 7 days but not more than 28 days washout between each dose.
2
SCH 420814 100 mg→ SCH 420814 10 mg→Placebo
Participants were to receive their assigned experimental treatment based on randomly assigned treatment sequence at Hour 0 following an overnight withdrawal of their antiparkinsonian medications of each treatment period. The levodopa infusion was to be started at Hour 1 and was to run for 2 hours. The participants were to also receive 25 mg of carbidopa at the following times: Hours 0, 2, and 4. Treatment periods were to be separated by at least 7 days but not more than 28 days washout between each dose.
2
Placebo→ SCH 420814 100 mg→SCH 420814 10 mg
Participants were to receive their assigned experimental treatment based on randomly assigned treatment sequence at Hour 0 following an overnight withdrawal of their antiparkinsonian medications of each treatment period. The levodopa infusion was to be started at Hour 1 and was to run for 2 hours. The participants were to also receive 25 mg of carbidopa at the following times: Hours 0, 2, and 4. Treatment periods were to be separated by at least 7 days but not more than 28 days washout between each dose.
2
Total12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSCH 420814 10 mg→SCH 420814 100 mg→PlaceboSCH 420814 100 mg→Placebo→ SCH 420814 10 mgPlacebo→SCH 420814 10 mg→SCH 420814 100 mgSCH 420814 10 mg→ Placebo→ SCH 420814 100 mgSCH 420814 100 mg→ SCH 420814 10 mg→PlaceboPlacebo→ SCH 420814 100 mg→SCH 420814 10 mgTotal
Age, Continuous57.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
59.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
65.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.2
63.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
68.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
57.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5
61.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 124 / 124 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 120 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Peak Dyskinesia Score

Dyskinesia was scored on a scale of 0 (absent), 1 (mild) , 2 (moderate), 3 (severe) and 4 (incapacitating) for seven body parts (face, neck, trunk, each arm and each leg) based on the worse dyskinesia noted during the entire measurement time. Scores were assessed at Hours 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0. The dyskinesia score was the sum of the scores for the seven body parts. The peak dyskinesia score was recorded for each participant regardless of what timepoint the score was achieved. The total possible score for an individual at each timepoint could range from 0 to 28 with higher scores indicating greater effects of the dyskinesia. The mean peak dyskinesia score was calculated using the individual peak values.

Time frame: Hours 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0 of each treatment period

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data for endpoint. Results pooled by study drug and not by randomly assigned sequence.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SCH 420814 10 mgMean Peak Dyskinesia Score11.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.15
SCH 420814 100 mgMean Peak Dyskinesia Score11.42 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.81
PlaceboMean Peak Dyskinesia Score8.50 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.92
Secondary

Mean Peak Finger Tapping Score

Tapping was measured with two manual counters with keys that were depressed to register a count. The participant alternately tapped each counter using the index finger of the more affected hand for 60 seconds and was not allowed to use more than one finger to tap. The participant was instructed to tap as rapidly as possible while being timed for 60 seconds. The counts were recorded for the two counters at Hours 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0. The peak tapping score was recorded for each participant regardless of what timepoint the score was achieved. The mean peak finger tapping score was calculated using the individual peak values.

Time frame: Hours 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0 of each treatment period

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data for endpoint. Results pooled by study drug and not by randomly assigned sequence.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SCH 420814 10 mgMean Peak Finger Tapping Score44.33 taps per 60 secondsStandard Deviation 27.76
SCH 420814 100 mgMean Peak Finger Tapping Score41.58 taps per 60 secondsStandard Deviation 22.31
PlaceboMean Peak Finger Tapping Score45.75 taps per 60 secondsStandard Deviation 28.26
Secondary

Mean Peak Tremor Score

Tremor was scored on a scale of 0 (absent), 1 (mild, 2 (moderate), 3 (severe) and 4 (incapacitating) for seven body parts (face, neck, trunk, each arm and each leg) based on the worse tremor observed during the time spent with participant while taking other study measurements(vital signs, drawing samples, performing the tapping and walking tasks). Scores were assessed at Hours 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0. The tremor score was the sum of scores for seven body parts. The peak tremor score was recorded for each participant regardless of what timepoint the score was achieved. The total possible score for an individual at each timepoint could range from 0 to 28 with higher scores indicating more effects of the tremors. The mean peak tremor score was calculated using the individual peak values.

Time frame: Hours 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0 of each treatment period

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data for endpoint. Results pooled by study drug and not by randomly assigned sequence.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SCH 420814 10 mgMean Peak Tremor Score3.5 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.76
SCH 420814 100 mgMean Peak Tremor Score3.33 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.66
PlaceboMean Peak Tremor Score4.42 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.3
Secondary

Mean Peak Walking Speed

Walking speed assessment began with the participant being seated in an armless chair. Then while being timed, the participant stood up with their arms crossed on their chest and walked 6 meters, turned around, returned to the chair and sat. Timing was stopped when the participant's buttocks hit the chair and the total time was recorded. If the participant could not arise in 60 seconds, 60 seconds was entered in this line of the report form and the participant was tested again but allowed to push off to get out of the chair. Sixty seconds was the maximum time allowed to complete the walking assessment, thus 60 seconds was recorded as the time if they could not complete the task within this time limit. Walking speed was assessed at Hours 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 7.0 and 8. The peak walking speed was recorded for each participant regardless of what timepoint the score was achieved. The mean peak walking speed was calculated using the individual peak values.

Time frame: Hours 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0 of each treatment period

Population: All participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had available data for endpoint. Results pooled by study drug and not by randomly assigned sequence.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SCH 420814 10 mgMean Peak Walking Speed16.64 SecondsStandard Deviation 18.98
SCH 420814 100 mgMean Peak Walking Speed14.45 SecondsStandard Deviation 15.73
PlaceboMean Peak Walking Speed20.00 SecondsStandard Deviation 20.64

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026