Skip to content

p53 Synthetic Long Peptides Vaccine With Cyclophosphamide for Ovarian Cancer

p53 Synthetic Long Peptides Vaccine With Cyclophosphamide for Ovarian Cancer a Phase II Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00844506
Acronym
ISA-P53-CTX
Enrollment
19
Registered
2009-02-16
Start date
2008-10-31
Completion date
2009-07-31
Last updated
2011-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ovarian Cancer

Keywords

Ovarian cancer patients with recurrent disease

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the addition of cyclophosphamide to the treatment with the p53-SLP vaccine improves clinical efficacy and immunogenicity of the p53-SLP vaccine in ovarian cancer patients.

Interventions

DRUGP53-SLP vaccine

The P53-SLP vaccine is a vaccine consisting of a total of 10 long (30 amino acids on average length) peptides, covering the p53 protein sequence from amino acid 70 to 251, combined with Montanide ISA51 an adjuvant with a sustained dendritic cell activating ability. Patients will be immunised subcutaneously with the peptide vaccine four times with a three week interval (300μg/peptide).

DRUGCyclophosphamide

Two days prior to each peptide vaccination, patients will receive 300mg/m2 cyclophosphamide i.v.

Sponsors

ISA Pharmaceuticals B.V.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Dutch Cancer Society
CollaboratorOTHER
University Medical Center Groningen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent. * Histological proven epithelial ovarian carcinoma. * At least 4 weeks after termination of the last course of chemotherapy. * Rising CA-125 serum levels after first line treatment and no measurable disease according to the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours) criteria, or Rising CA-125 serum levels after first line treatment with measurable disease according to the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours) criteria, but not willing or otherwise not fit to receive second line chemotherapy. * Age 18 years or older, and an life expectancy of at least 3 months. * Absence of any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration in the trial. * Performance status 0 to 2 (WHO scale). * Adequate hepatic, renal, and bone marrow function as defined: ASAT \< 100 U/l; ALAT \< 113 U/l; PT 9-12 seconds; APTT 23-33 seconds; creatinine \< 135 μmol/l; WBC \> 3.0 x 109/L; platelets \> 100 x 109/L; hemoglobin \> 6.0 mmol/l. \- Adequate venous access for blood collection and i.v. administration of cyclophosphamide.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy and / or breast feeding. * (A)symptomatic cystitis. * Other malignancies (previous or current), except basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. * Immunosuppressive agents, except for topical and inhalation corticosteroids. * Prior therapy with a biological response modifier. * Any other major disease that may interfere with the conduct of the study (e.g. uncontrolled hypertension, severe and/or unstable heart disease, neurological and psychiatric disorders). * Signs or symptoms of CNS metastases. * Known substance abuse (drug or alcohol).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical responses to the p53 synthetic long peptide vaccine preceded by cyclophosphamide will be assessed by measurement of serum CA-125 levels and CT-scan.day 105 - 126 after first gift of cyclophosphamide
Immunogenicity will be evaluated by assessing induction and frequency of p53-specific T cells by proliferation and IFN-γ ELISPOT.after fourth immunization

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Safety of the vaccine preceded by cyclophosphamide will be assessed by monitoring the incidence and severity of adverse events using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0.durante study

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026