Skip to content

Assessment of Visual Performance in Patients With Low Levels of Astigmatism

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00842231
Enrollment
40
Registered
2009-02-12
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2010-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract Extraction, Corneal Astigmatism

Keywords

Corneal astigmatism, post-cataract surgery, visual performance, Corneal astigmatism 0.5-0.75 Diopter

Brief summary

To assess visual performance in patients with low levels (0.5-0.75 Diopters) of corneal astigmatism.

Interventions

OTHERVisual performance measures

Collection of visual performance measures in subjects with low levels of astigmatism.

Sponsors

Alcon Research
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 50-75 years of age * Proof of eye exam within the last 12 months * Operated for uncomplicated, age-related cataracts \>3 months * Corneal astigmatism of 0.5-0.75 diopter

Exclusion criteria

* Previous ocular or refractive surgery/trauma * Clinically severe corneal dystrophy * Amblyopia * Degenerative visual disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
High and Low Contrast AcuityDay of study visitVisual acuity differences between subjects tested with full correction and spherical equivalent (SE) correction at contrast levels of 9% and 25% (low contrast acuity) and 100% (high contrast acuity). LogMAR is the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. A lower logMAR value indicates better VA. These measurements were performed under photopic conditions by means of 9%, 25%, and 100% contrast ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) charts (Vector Vision).
Contrast SensitivityDay of Study VisitContrast Sensitivity (CS) differences between subjects tested with full correction & spherical equivalent (SE) correction. CS is the measurement of one's ability to detect slight changes in luminance before it becomes indistinguishable. CS is measured in logarithmic units by means of an illuminated box, the CSV 1000 by Vector Vision. Testing was performed under photopic conditions (no glare) & mesopic conditions (with & without glare), and was measured at four spatial frequencies of 3, 6, 9, and 12 cycles per degree (cpd). A higher value for the logarithmic units translates to better CS.
Reading Acuity and SpeedDay of Study VisitReading Acuity and Speed differences between subjects tested with full correction and spherical equivalent (SE) correction. Reading Acuity was measured using the Radner reading charts, which are logarithmically scaled at different acuity levels (print sizes), and expressed in terms of logRAD (logrithmic Reading Acuity Determination). Reading speed was measured in words per minute (wpm). The results were presented as Average Reading Speed by Print Size (logRAD).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Visual Performance Measures
Collection of visual performance measures in subjects with low levels of astigmatism.
40
Total40

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVisual Performance Measures
Age, Customized40 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Contrast Sensitivity

Contrast Sensitivity (CS) differences between subjects tested with full correction & spherical equivalent (SE) correction. CS is the measurement of one's ability to detect slight changes in luminance before it becomes indistinguishable. CS is measured in logarithmic units by means of an illuminated box, the CSV 1000 by Vector Vision. Testing was performed under photopic conditions (no glare) & mesopic conditions (with & without glare), and was measured at four spatial frequencies of 3, 6, 9, and 12 cycles per degree (cpd). A higher value for the logarithmic units translates to better CS.

Time frame: Day of Study Visit

Population: Data was collected for 40 eyes in 40 subjects. Only one operative eye of each subject was included in the study. If both eyes qualified, the dominant eye was selected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Visual Performance MeasuresContrast SensitivityMesopic 3 cycles per degree (cpd)-0.047 Logrithmic UnitsStandard Deviation 0.2917
Visual Performance MeasuresContrast SensitivityMesopic 6 cpd0.0896 Logrithmic UnitsStandard Deviation 0.3575
Visual Performance MeasuresContrast SensitivityMesopic 9 cpd0.0038 Logrithmic UnitsStandard Deviation 0.3597
Visual Performance MeasuresContrast SensitivityMesopic 12 cpd-0.009 Logrithmic UnitsStandard Deviation 0.371
Visual Performance MeasuresContrast SensitivityMesopic with glare 3 cpd0.0176 Logrithmic UnitsStandard Deviation 0.2271
Visual Performance MeasuresContrast SensitivityMesopic with glare 6 cpd0.0241 Logrithmic UnitsStandard Deviation 0.3146
Visual Performance MeasuresContrast SensitivityMesopic with glare 9 cpd0.0183 Logrithmic UnitsStandard Deviation 0.2728
Visual Performance MeasuresContrast SensitivityMesopic with glare 12 cpd0.0669 Logrithmic UnitsStandard Deviation 0.2559
Visual Performance MeasuresContrast SensitivityPhotopic 3 cpd0.0163 Logrithmic UnitsStandard Deviation 0.2257
Visual Performance MeasuresContrast SensitivityPhotopic 6 cpd0.0181 Logrithmic UnitsStandard Deviation 0.2539
Visual Performance MeasuresContrast SensitivityPhotopic 9 cpd0.0479 Logrithmic UnitsStandard Deviation 0.3866
Visual Performance MeasuresContrast SensitivityPhotopic 12 cpd0.0321 Logrithmic UnitsStandard Deviation 0.3215
Primary

High and Low Contrast Acuity

Visual acuity differences between subjects tested with full correction and spherical equivalent (SE) correction at contrast levels of 9% and 25% (low contrast acuity) and 100% (high contrast acuity). LogMAR is the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. A lower logMAR value indicates better VA. These measurements were performed under photopic conditions by means of 9%, 25%, and 100% contrast ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) charts (Vector Vision).

Time frame: Day of study visit

Population: Data was collected for 40 eyes in 40 subjects. Only one operative eye of each subject was included in the study. If both eyes qualified, the dominant eye was selected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Visual Performance MeasuresHigh and Low Contrast Acuity9% Contrast Acuity0.0855 logMARStandard Deviation 0.1111
Visual Performance MeasuresHigh and Low Contrast Acuity25% Contrast Acuity0.065 logMARStandard Deviation 0.1019
Visual Performance MeasuresHigh and Low Contrast Acuity100% Contrast Acuity0.082 logMARStandard Deviation 0.1013
Primary

Reading Acuity and Speed

Reading Acuity and Speed differences between subjects tested with full correction and spherical equivalent (SE) correction. Reading Acuity was measured using the Radner reading charts, which are logarithmically scaled at different acuity levels (print sizes), and expressed in terms of logRAD (logrithmic Reading Acuity Determination). Reading speed was measured in words per minute (wpm). The results were presented as Average Reading Speed by Print Size (logRAD).

Time frame: Day of Study Visit

Population: Data was collected for 40 eyes in 40 subjects. Only one operative eye of each subject was included in the study. If both eyes qualified, the dominant eye was selected.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Visual Performance MeasuresReading Acuity and SpeedlogRAD Line -0.12.7469 words per minute
Visual Performance MeasuresReading Acuity and SpeedlogRAD Line 07.3292 words per minute
Visual Performance MeasuresReading Acuity and SpeedlogRAD Line 0.111.7498 words per minute
Visual Performance MeasuresReading Acuity and SpeedlogRAD Line 0.217.5404 words per minute
Visual Performance MeasuresReading Acuity and SpeedlogRAD Line 0.310.1643 words per minute
Visual Performance MeasuresReading Acuity and SpeedlogRAD Line 0.413.4166 words per minute
Visual Performance MeasuresReading Acuity and SpeedlogRAD Line 0.512.7487 words per minute
Visual Performance MeasuresReading Acuity and SpeedlogRAD Line 0.611.9005 words per minute
Visual Performance MeasuresReading Acuity and SpeedlogRAD Line 0.715.1714 words per minute
Visual Performance MeasuresReading Acuity and SpeedlogRAD Line 0.89.7203 words per minute
Visual Performance MeasuresReading Acuity and SpeedlogRAD Line 0.911.4863 words per minute
Visual Performance MeasuresReading Acuity and SpeedlogRAD Line 1.116.4043 words per minute
Visual Performance MeasuresReading Acuity and SpeedlogRAD Line 1.28.8952 words per minute

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026