Skip to content

Anidulafungin Versus Fluconazole for the Prevention of Fungal Infections in Liver Transplant Recipients

Anidulafungin Versus Fluconazole for the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Infections in High-risk Liver Transplant Recipients: a Randomized, Double-blind Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00841971
Enrollment
200
Registered
2009-02-12
Start date
2010-02-28
Completion date
2014-05-31
Last updated
2014-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Central Nervous System Fungal Infections, Fungemia, Lung Diseases, Fungal, Mycoses

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of anidulafungin versus fluconazole for the prevention of fungal diseases in liver transplant recipients

Detailed description

A number of well characterized risk factors have been shown to portend a high risk of opportunistic mycoses after liver transplantation. Retransplantation and renal failure are amongst the most significant risk factors for invasive fungal infections in these patients. Most Invasive fungal infections in these high-risk patients occur within the first month posttransplant. Studies utilizing universal prophylaxis have primarily employed fluconazole. A recent meta-analysis of prophylactic trials documented a beneficial effect on morbidity and attributable mortality, but an emergence of infections due to non-albicans Candida spp. in patients receiving prophylaxis. The availability of echinocandins has led to an expanded armamentarium of antifungal drugs with a potentially promising role as agents for targeted prophylaxis for invasive fungal infections in high-risk liver transplant recipients. Anidulafungin is unique amongst echinocandins in that it is eliminated from the body almost exclusively through biotransformation by slow non-enzymatic degradation in the blood, without hepatic metabolism or renal elimination. Anidulafungin has demonstrated good safety profile. We hypothesize that anidulafungin will be more effective and a better tolerated antifungal prophylactic agent in this setting.

Interventions

DRUGAnidulafungin

200 mg IV loading dose followed by 100 mg qd for 21 days

DRUGFluconazole

400 mg IV for 21 days

Sponsors

University of Pittsburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Liver transplant recipient at increased risk for infection increased risk include any of the following: * retransplantation * renal replacement therapy (dialysis), * post transplant abdominal surgery (within 21days) * receipt of corticosteroids for greater than 14 days within the 4 weeks -preceding transplant * ICU care for greater than 48 hours at the time of transplantation * colonization with Candida sps within 4 weeks of transplantation * requirement of 15 units or greater of packed red cell transfusions * Intraoperative time exceeding 6 hours

Exclusion criteria

* Hypersensitivity to azole or echinocandin antifungal agents * receipt of systemic antifungal therapy within 4 weeks prior to transplantation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Frequency of Fungal Infection90 days post enrollment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Need for Additional Antifungal Therapy90 days post enrollment

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Anidulafungin
anti-fungal agent Anidulafungin: 200 mg IV loading dose followed by 100 mg qd for 21 days
100
Fluconazole
anti-fungal agent Fluconazole: 400 mg IV for 21 days
100
Total200

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAnidulafunginFluconazoleTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
11 Participants11 Participants22 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
89 Participants89 Participants178 Participants
Age, Continuous58 years58 years58 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
27 Participants38 Participants65 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
73 Participants62 Participants135 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
100 participants100 participants200 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants28 Participants61 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
67 Participants72 Participants139 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 9811 / 99
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 980 / 99

Outcome results

Primary

Frequency of Fungal Infection

Time frame: 90 days post enrollment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginFrequency of Fungal Infection5 participants
FluconazoleFrequency of Fungal Infection8 participants
Secondary

Need for Additional Antifungal Therapy

Time frame: 90 days post enrollment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginNeed for Additional Antifungal Therapy11 participants
FluconazoleNeed for Additional Antifungal Therapy11 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026