Malnutrition
Conditions
Keywords
Usual Care Control Group
Brief summary
Background: Numerous studies have shown that many LTC residents receive inadequate staff assistance with eating, which places them at risk for under-nutrition, dehydration and weight loss. Moreover, improvements in feeding assistance care have been shown to improve residents' daily food and fluid consumption and weight loss outcomes. Objectives: The purpose of this program evaluation project is to train indigenous LTC staff how to improve nutritional care within the constraints of existing staffing resources. Methods: A multiple baseline design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the program in one federal and one state VA LTC facility. Research staff collected baseline measures related to nutritional care processes and resident outcomes. All LTC units in each of the two sites were divided into two groups for program implementation. The program was implemented with staff and residents on the units in the immediate intervention group; while, the delayed intervention group remained in usual care and continued to be monitored monthly for all care process and resident outcome measures. Status: This project ended 10/1/13. Five published papers resulted from this study.
Detailed description
Background: Numerous studies have shown that many long term care (LTC) residents receive inadequate staff assistance with eating, which places them at risk for under-nutrition, dehydration and weight loss. Moreover, improvements in feeding assistance care have been shown to improve residents' daily food and fluid consumption and weight loss outcomes. However, these improvements have only been achieved through the use of research staff as opposed to indigenous LTC staff due to staffing resource limitations that exist in most LTC facilities. The purpose of this program evaluation project is to train indigenous LTC staff how to improve nutritional care within the constraints of existing staffing resources. Objectives: The PI of this proposal has developed standardized assessment, monitoring and staffing needs projection tools that can be used by long-term care (LTC) providers to improve feeding assistance care delivery and unintentional weight loss outcomes. The primary objective of this project is to train indigenous LTC staff how to (1) identify residents in need of feeding assistance, (2) effectively monitor daily care delivery; and, (3) utilize existing, non-nursing staff for some mealtime tasks to improve care. Methods: A multiple baseline design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the program in one federal and one state VA long-term care (LTC) facility. Research staff collected baseline measures related to organizational characteristics, including staffing, nutritional care processes and resident outcomes including oral food and fluid intake and weight status. All LTC units in each of the two sites were divided into two groups for program implementation purposes (for a total of 4 groups across the 2 sites) based on the proximity of a unit to other units, resident and staff characteristics. The program was implemented with staff and residents on the units in the first site/group; while, the second site/group remained in usual care and continued to be monitored monthly for all care process and resident outcome measures. Research staff trained LTC staff in the implementation of program protocols during a 12-week intervention period. Research staff then monitored LTC staff implementation of the program monthly following intervention to determine the sustainability of the program in the absence of research staff. All staff training and monitoring was repeated for the LTC units in groups three and four. The intent of this program evaluation study was to determine the effectiveness and cost of translating efficacious research protocols into care practice to improve the nutritional status of LTC veterans. Status: This study is officially complete.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALImmediate Intervention Group
Unit staff received weekly training and feedback for 12-weeks to improve daily nutritional care processes.
BEHAVIORALDelayed Intervention Group
Research staff monitored this group under usual care conditions, then these units crossed over into intervention.
Sponsors
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Long-stay, * free of feeding tube, * not receiving hospice care, * not on a planned weight loss diet, * able to speak English
Exclusion criteria
* short stay/rehab only * feeding tube * hospice * planned weight loss diet
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of Feeding Assistance Care Processes | 3 month intervention and 3 month follow up periods | Research staff observed each participant during six meals per study phase. Research staff documented the total amount of staff time spent providing feeding assistance and each type of assistance per resident per meal. These data were used to construct standardized feeding assistance care quality indicators wherein the number of resident meal observations was variable. For example, one indicator was defined as: Percentage of meals during which resident intake was below 50% and staff offered and alternative to the served meal. Thus, the denominator for total number of observed meals scored varied by indicator. There were multiple indicators; thus, there is inadequate space to provide an adequate description of each measure and the corresponding scoring rules here. Please refer to published papers for a complete description of all outcome measures. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Overall (Both Groups Combined) Participants were randomized by unit and each unit received intervention so characteristics of participants are reported overall for both groups combined. | 200 |
| Total | 200 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Overall (Both Groups Combined) |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 76.00 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.97 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 29 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 171 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 200 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 23 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 177 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 200 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 200 |
Outcome results
Primary
Quality of Feeding Assistance Care Processes
Research staff observed each participant during six meals per study phase. Research staff documented the total amount of staff time spent providing feeding assistance and each type of assistance per resident per meal. These data were used to construct standardized feeding assistance care quality indicators wherein the number of resident meal observations was variable. For example, one indicator was defined as: Percentage of meals during which resident intake was below 50% and staff offered and alternative to the served meal. Thus, the denominator for total number of observed meals scored varied by indicator. There were multiple indicators; thus, there is inadequate space to provide an adequate description of each measure and the corresponding scoring rules here. Please refer to published papers for a complete description of all outcome measures.
Time frame: 3 month intervention and 3 month follow up periods
Population: Each participants was observed during six scheduled meals per person per study phase. A total of 130 participants completed all study phases and had complete data for analyses.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall (Both Groups Combined) | Quality of Feeding Assistance Care Processes | Percent of Meals with Accurate Chart Documentation | 66.7 percentage of meal observations |
| Overall (Both Groups Combined) | Quality of Feeding Assistance Care Processes | Percent of Meals with Social Interaction | 47.2 percentage of meal observations |
| Overall (Both Groups Combined) | Quality of Feeding Assistance Care Processes | Percent of Meals with Assistance | 61.4 percentage of meal observations |
p-value: <0.0595% CI: [0.59, 0.96]Mixed Models Analysis