Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Trial to Treat Diastolic Heart Failure Using Ambrisentan

Safety and Efficacy Trial Using Ambrisentan for Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Congestive Heart Failure With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00840463
Enrollment
4
Registered
2009-02-10
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2020-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, Pulmonary Hypertension

Keywords

Pulmonary Hypertension, Diastolic Heart Failure

Brief summary

This is a randomized study of ambrisentan that will last 16 weeks. The study will include patients with diastolic heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to ambrisentan or placebo. The ambrisentan or matching placebo will be started at 2.5 mg by mouth daily and increased to 5mg and then 10mg daily, if tolerated. Patients will be seen at least monthly for 16 weeks. Adverse reactions will be reviewed and the required monthly laboratory tests (liver function testing and pregnancy testing, if applicable), will be performed. Patients will also complete an exercise test (six minute walk distance) and a quality of life survey at the baseline, week 4 and week 16 visit. An echocardiogram and a right heart catheterization and left ventricular end diastolic pressure measurement will be performed at the 16 week visit. The primary end-point is safety, and secondary end-points include the catheterization results, echocardiogram results, the walk distance and the quality of life survey. The expected completion of the study is 18 months from initiation. Ambrisentan is an FDA approved drug for PAH, but not for CHF.

Detailed description

Hypothesis: patients with pulmonary hypertension secondary to diastolic congestive heart failure (CHF) treated with ambrisentan for 16 weeks will have improved hemodynamics, increased exercise capacity and improved functional class with an acceptable safety profile, compared with placebo treated patients. Objectives: to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ambrisentan treatment in patients with pulmonary hypertension due to diastolic CHF. Efficacy will be assessed by improvement in hemodynamics (PVR(Pulmonary Vascular Resistance): primary efficacy endpoint), six minute walk distance (6MWD), World Health Organization (WHO) functional class and quality of life after 16 weeks of treatment with ambrisentan. Safety of ambrisentan will be compared to placebo. Concomitant Medication: Treatment with standard medications for CHF including diuretics and optimal blood pressure control with antihypertensive medications will be allowed throughout the study period. Diuretics adjustment will also be allowed and encouraged based on the planned diuretic management protocol. Approved medications for CHF in general are allowed as well, though it should be noted that there are no medications shown to have benefit in diastolic CHF. Patients may not be on an endothelin antagonist or sildenafil.

Interventions

DRUGAmbrisentan

Subjects will be initiated at 2.5 mg per day and increased to 5mg daily in 2 weeks and then 10mg daily if clinically tolerated (edema is controlled and symptoms are stable).

OTHERPlacebo

Sugar pill

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Catheterization 1. Elevated pulmonary arterial pressure (PA mean \>25mmHg) 2. Elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (\>240 dynes.cm.sec-5) or transpulmonary gradient (\>12 mmHg) 3. Elevated LVEDP (\>15mmHg, but ≤23 mmHg) 2. Evidence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: LA\>4.0, LVH or diastolic dysfunction by mitral filling pattern 3. Echocardiogram: Normal or mildly reduced LV ejection fraction (greater than or equal to 40%) 4. Symptomatic chronic HF (WHO functional class II-IV) 5. Baseline walk distance 100 to 400 meters 6. Age 18 - 80 (increased from 70) Maximal treatment of diastolic dysfunction as noted by the treating physicians with no change in medical therapy for one month prior to entry

Exclusion criteria

1. Use of endothelin receptor antagonist, prostacyclin or PDE-5 inhibitor within 4 weeks of enrollment 2. Exercise capacity limited by other illness (other lung disease, arthritis, mobility limitations) 3. Uncontrolled systemic hypertension 4. Uncontrolled atrial fibrillation 5. Severe valvular disease 6. Pregnant females- females of child bearing potential will need to use contraceptive agent barrier given the teratogenicity associated with ERA's 7. Uncontrolled OSA

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (Wood Units)Baseline and Four monthsThe primary efficacy outcome will be Pulmonary Vascular Resistance.PVR will be calculated as \[(PA mean - wedge) / Cardiac Output\]
Safety Assessment-Number of Subjects Who Are Free and Those Who Developed Clinically Significant Adverse Events (CSAEs)4 monthsFreedom from clinically significant adverse events will be measure by determining the number free from CSAEs and those who developed CSAEs

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in 6 Minute Walk DistanceBaseline and Four monthssubjects complete the 6 minute walk test to determine how far (in meters) they are able to walk in 6 minutes.
Change in Functional Classbasline and 4 monthsChange in functional class from baseline to month 4. This is graded from WHO FC I to FC IV. Assessment will be completed by an investigator on the study at every visit.
Change in Short Form-36 Physical Functioningbaseline 4 monthsChange between baseline and follow-up in the physical functioning items of the SF-36 questionnaire. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability. The eight sections are: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Recruitment occurred through the UTSW clinics. Recruitment difficulties arose and the study was halted due to poor recruitment

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ambrisentan
Ambrisentan: Subjects will be initiated at 2.5 mg per day and increased to 5mg daily in 2 weeks and then 10mg daily if clinically tolerated (edema is controlled and symptoms are stable).
3
Placebo
Placebo: Sugar pill
1
Total4

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAmbrisentanPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Age, Continuous62 years50 years59.5 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 30 / 1
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 31 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 30 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (Wood Units)

The primary efficacy outcome will be Pulmonary Vascular Resistance.PVR will be calculated as \[(PA mean - wedge) / Cardiac Output\]

Time frame: Baseline and Four months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
AmbrisentanChange in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (Wood Units)-0.75 wood units
PlaceboChange in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (Wood Units)2.81 wood units
Primary

Safety Assessment-Number of Subjects Who Are Free and Those Who Developed Clinically Significant Adverse Events (CSAEs)

Freedom from clinically significant adverse events will be measure by determining the number free from CSAEs and those who developed CSAEs

Time frame: 4 months

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AmbrisentanSafety Assessment-Number of Subjects Who Are Free and Those Who Developed Clinically Significant Adverse Events (CSAEs)Free from clinically significant AE2 Participants
AmbrisentanSafety Assessment-Number of Subjects Who Are Free and Those Who Developed Clinically Significant Adverse Events (CSAEs)Developed clinically significant AE1 Participants
PlaceboSafety Assessment-Number of Subjects Who Are Free and Those Who Developed Clinically Significant Adverse Events (CSAEs)Free from clinically significant AE1 Participants
PlaceboSafety Assessment-Number of Subjects Who Are Free and Those Who Developed Clinically Significant Adverse Events (CSAEs)Developed clinically significant AE0 Participants
Secondary

Change in 6 Minute Walk Distance

subjects complete the 6 minute walk test to determine how far (in meters) they are able to walk in 6 minutes.

Time frame: Baseline and Four months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
AmbrisentanChange in 6 Minute Walk Distance-22 meters
PlaceboChange in 6 Minute Walk Distance53 meters
Secondary

Change in Functional Class

Change in functional class from baseline to month 4. This is graded from WHO FC I to FC IV. Assessment will be completed by an investigator on the study at every visit.

Time frame: basline and 4 months

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AmbrisentanChange in Functional ClassImproved0 Participants
AmbrisentanChange in Functional ClassStable3 Participants
AmbrisentanChange in Functional ClassWorsened0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Functional ClassImproved0 Participants
PlaceboChange in Functional ClassStable1 Participants
PlaceboChange in Functional ClassWorsened0 Participants
Secondary

Change in Short Form-36 Physical Functioning

Change between baseline and follow-up in the physical functioning items of the SF-36 questionnaire. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability. The eight sections are: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health

Time frame: baseline 4 months

Population: note that there was no change in the SF-36 score (baseline to month 4) for the placebo arm hence the mean is not meaningful

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
AmbrisentanChange in Short Form-36 Physical Functioning12.5 score on a scale
PlaceboChange in Short Form-36 Physical Functioning0 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026