Accidental Falls
Conditions
Keywords
staff education, complexity science, social constructivist theory
Brief summary
This is a randomized trial of 2 nursing home staff educational approaches to reduce falls in VA nursing home (CLC) residents. One is a traditional falls education program using web-based modules, feedback of quality indicators, and meetings with influential peers. The other is a 12 week program that trains staff to form better connections and use effective communication strategies with a diverse network of co-workers, so that problem solving about resident problems is enhanced. The study will test whether the second intervention increases the effectiveness of the traditional falls education program.
Detailed description
Background: The current standard to improve resident outcomes in VA nursing homes combines educational programs and quality improvement processes. These educational programs typically focus on individual staff members' behavior and mastery of content, and use such instructional techniques as didactic modules, audit and feedback of individual performance, and academic detailing by influential peers. However, social constructivism theory and complexity science suggests that learning is a social process that occurs within the context of the relationships and interactions of the individual in their environment. Thus, traditional QI educational programs will not result in optimal changes in staff behavior unless a context is present which allows social learning to occur. Objectives: Based on social constructivist theory, complexity science, and prior research we have developed an educational intervention (CONNECT) that teaches staff to improve connections within and between disciplines, improve information flow, and seek out cognitive diversity in problem-solving about resident issues. The objectives of this study are to: (a) determine whether CONNECT improves staff interaction measures, fall-related process measures, and fall rates when combined with standard training on fall risk factor reduction, and (b) use the insights gained about social constructivist learning in CLCs to develop other educational interventions that address multi-factorial geriatric syndromes and system issues such as patient safety in VA nursing homes. Methods: To achieve these objectives we are conducting a randomized, controlled, single-blind study in which nursing homes receive either CONNECT plus a falls QI educational intervention (FALLS) or FALLS alone. Four VA CLCs in VISN-6 will participate, with an estimated n=144 participating staff members, and n=340 unique individuals with falls. The CONNECT intervention will be delivered over 3 months, and includes interactive in-class learning sessions, unit-based mentoring, and relationship mapping, all focused on helping staff build networks and relationships for problem-solving. The FALLS intervention will be delivered over 3 months either alone or after the CONNECT intervention. It includes web-based modules, audit and feedback, and academic detailing, all focused on individual fall reduction behaviors. Measurement is performed prior to intervention (all measures), at the conclusion of intervention (staff interaction measures, work environment measures, and social constructivist learning focus groups), and 6 months after the intervention (fall-related process and outcome measures). Analysis will use mixed models to account for the complex nesting of patients and staff within facilities. Status: Funding will begin on August 1, 2009 with anticipated intervention start time of January, 2010.
Interventions
The CONNECT educational intervention is a training program for staff to improve communication with a more dense network of co-workers, in order to improve resident problem-solving. Includes in class sessions, group and individual mapping exercises, self-monitoring of interactions, and individual staff coaching.
FALLS is a traditional falls quality improvement education program including online modules, audit and feedback, and academic detailing sessions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* All clinical and support staff in participating VA Community Living Centers
Exclusion criteria
* Inability to speak and understand English
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Fall-related Process Measures | 6 months | The proportion of applicable fall quality indicators documented for residents with falls during the study period. Quality indicators are specific fall risk assessment or prevention activities including orthostatic blood pressure assessment, vision assessment, environmental modification (bedroom, bathroom), footwear change, physical or occupational therapy referral, psychoactive medication reduction. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Facility Fall Rates | 6 months | Change in the risk-adjusted facility fall rates in the 6 months post intervention(s) compared to the 6 months before the intervention(s). |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| FALLS Only Traditional falls educational intervention
FALLS educational intervention: Traditional falls quality improvement education program including online modules, audit and feedback, and academic detailing sessions | 361 |
| CONNECT + FALLS CONNECT intervention on relationship-building and communication
CONNECT educational intervention: Training program for staff to improve communication with a more dense network of co-workers, in order to improve resident problem-solving
FALLS educational intervention: Traditional falls quality improvement education program including online modules, audit and feedback, and academic detailing sessions | 328 |
| Total | 689 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | FALLS Only | CONNECT + FALLS | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 361 Participants | 328 Participants | 689 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 45 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6 | 42 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 | 44 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5 |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 361 participants | 328 participants | 689 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 307 Participants | 285 Participants | 592 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 54 Participants | 43 Participants | 97 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 361 | 0 / 328 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 361 | 0 / 328 |
Outcome results
Fall-related Process Measures
The proportion of applicable fall quality indicators documented for residents with falls during the study period. Quality indicators are specific fall risk assessment or prevention activities including orthostatic blood pressure assessment, vision assessment, environmental modification (bedroom, bathroom), footwear change, physical or occupational therapy referral, psychoactive medication reduction.
Time frame: 6 months
Population: Note that the number of participants analyzed is not the same as the number of participants in the flow module. This is because this outcome measure is based not on the consented staff participants in the intervention, but resident charts abstracted in the pre and post intervention periods (waiver of consent obtained).
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| FALLS | Fall-related Process Measures | 0.40 proportion of indicators completed | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
| CONNECT + FALLS | Fall-related Process Measures | 0.32 proportion of indicators completed | Standard Deviation 0.13 |
Change in Facility Fall Rates
Change in the risk-adjusted facility fall rates in the 6 months post intervention(s) compared to the 6 months before the intervention(s).
Time frame: 6 months
Population: This is a facility level analysis of the fall rates in the 4 facilities randomized to FALLS alone compared to the 4 receiving CONNECT + FALLS. Within these groups, medical records from 293 and 358 residents with falls were abstracted to calculate the fall rates, therefore the number of participants analyzed is not the same as the flow module.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| FALLS | Change in Facility Fall Rates | 0.03 change in falls per bed per year |
| CONNECT + FALLS | Change in Facility Fall Rates | -0.28 change in falls per bed per year |