Skip to content

Treatment for Achilles Tendinopathy

Treatment for Achilles Tendinopathy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00835939
Enrollment
17
Registered
2009-02-04
Start date
2007-09-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2009-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Achilles Tendinopathy, Achilles Tendon Enthesopathy, Mid-Portion Achilles Tendinopathy, Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy, Non-Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy

Keywords

Achilles, Tendinopathy, Sclerotherapy, Neovascularisation, sports medicine, interventional radiology

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether sclerotherapy using a 25% dextrose and 1% lidocaine solution is an efficacious treatment for patients with chronic Achilles tendinopathy who have failed a home based, heavy load eccentric training program.

Detailed description

The purpose of this research project is to optimize the clinical outcome of patients with Achilles tendinopathy. Patients who fail a standardized physical therapy regiment (eccentric training protocol) will be randomly allocated into two groups with one group receiving an injection of hypertonic glucose and Lidocaine (sclerosing solution) and the other receiving an injection of Lidocaine (control). Neovascularisation (growth of new blood vessels and nerves into a damaged area of the tendon) appears to be associated with pain and subsequently a decrease in function and use of the affected tendon. Results of an observational study in Sweden revealed that in all patients for which eccentric training was unsuccessful neovascularisation was present. Sclerosis of neovessels appears to be successful in removing the pain associated with Achilles tendinopathy in both mid-portion and enthesitis patients. However, there are no studies that have administered this technique to a homogenous patient population in a prospective, controlled and randomized manner. In addition, there are no studies that have compared the effects of eccentric training in healthy individuals versus patients with painful Achilles tendinopathy in a controlled longitudinal study. It is expected that patients for whom eccentric training is unsuccessful and who subsequently receive sclerosing therapy will show a statistically significant improvement in pain and function.

Interventions

DRUG25% Dextrose and 1% Lidocaine

Up to 3 injections provided to neovessels outside of the tendon

DRUGLidocaine

Up to 3 injections provided to neovessels outside of the tendon

PROCEDUREsclerotherapy

Sponsors

Sport Science Association of Alberta (SSAA)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Calgary
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adults 18 years of age and older with a minimum of 3 months of clinically determinant history and symptoms (pain) consistent with unilateral Achilles tendinopathy (enthesitis or mid-portion) as diagnosed by a sport medicine physician. * Participants are not required to have tried other treatments, however, those who have tried other treatments (except injection treatments) including, but not restricted to, oral NSAIDs, topical NSAIDs, shoe modifications, and physical/athletic therapy will not be restricted from the study * Provide informed consent for the controlled longitudinal study and RCT

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals with physical ailments precluding them from performing the eccentric training program * Worker's Compensation Board (WCB) and elite athletes (varsity, national and professional level). * Individuals younger than 18 years of age will be excluded from this trial due to the complicating factors of musculoskeletal immaturity and the lack of relevant research of Achilles tendinopathy and neovascular bundles in this population. * Previous Achilles tendon rupture of the tendon in question * Individuals that have received any type of injection in or around the Achilles tendon * Known allergy to dextrose based sclerosing agent or other contraindications * Known allergy to Lidocaine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Victorian Institute for Sport Assessment - AchillesBaseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
100 mm Visual Analog ScaleBaseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year
Tegner Activity ScaleBaseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year
Number of NeovesselsBaseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026