Skip to content

Clinical Equivalence of Two Butenafine Hydrochloride 1% Creams in Patients With Interdigital Tinea Pedis

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Design, Multiple-Site Study to Evaluate the Clinical Equivalence of Two Butenafine Hydrochloride 1% Creams in Patients With Interdigital Tinea Pedis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00835510
Enrollment
548
Registered
2009-02-03
Start date
2008-06-30
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2014-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tinea Pedis

Keywords

Tinea pedis

Brief summary

To demonstrate comparable safety and efficacy of Taro Pharmaceuticals Inc. butenafine hydrochloride cream 1% (test product) and Lotrimin Ultra® cream (reference listed drug) in the treatment of interdigital tinea pedis, and to show the superiority of the active treatments over that of the placebo (vehicle).

Interventions

DRUGButenafine cream 1% manufactured by Taro

Treatment applied to affected area twice daily for 7 days

DRUGLotrimin Ultra (butenafine) 1%

Treatment applied to affected area twice daily for 7 days

DRUGButenafine Vehicle manufactured by Taro

Treatment applied to affected area twice daily for 7 days

Sponsors

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Microbiologically confirmed clinical diagnosis of interdigital tinea pedis * If female and of child bearing potential, prepare to abstain from sexual intercourse or use a reliable method of contraception during the study (e.g., condom, intra-uterine device (IUD), oral, transdermal, injected or implanted hormonal contraceptives). * A confirmed clinical diagnosis of interdigital tinea pedis. Lesions are to be predominately interdigital but may extend to other areas of the foot (the non-interdigital lesions must not be hyperkeratotic). * The presence of tinea pedis infection, confirmed by the observation of segmented fungal hyphae during a microscopic potassium hydroxide (KOH) wet mount examination (potassium hydroxide mount preparation). * Identification of an appropriate dermatophyte by culture sent to the central laboratory. The appropriate dermatophytes are Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton mentagrophyte or Epidermophyton floccosum.

Exclusion criteria

* Use of any of the following within the indicated timeline: * Oral or injectable steroids * Any oral anti-fungals within 4 weeks of the study start * Use of topical corticosteroids or any other topical antipruritics on the feet within 72 hours of the study start. * Any prescription or over-the-counter (OTC) topical antifungals on the feet within two weeks prior to study entry * Use of any antihistamines within 72 hours of the study start. * Any known hypersensitivity to butenafine or other antifungal agents. * Evidence of any concurrent dermatophytic infection of toe nails (onychomycosis) or other dermatological condition of the foot that may interfere with the Investigator's evaluation of tinea pedis. * Patients with recurrent tinea pedis (more than 3 infections in the past 12 months) who have been unresponsive to previous antifungal therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Therapeutic Cure - Superiority Analysis42 daysTherapeutic Cure requires both Clinical Cure and Mycological Cure. Clinical Cure was based on the following signs and symptoms: fissuring, erythema, maceration, vesiculation, scaling, exudation, pruritus, burning. Each clinical symptom was evaluated using a 0-3 point rating scale: none=0, mild=1, moderate=2 or severe=3. If the score for erythema was ≤ 2 and the sum for all of the other 7 signs and symptoms was \<2 then the patient was considered a Clinical Cure. Mycological Cure: The potassium hydroxide (KOH) and the fungal culture were both negative.
Therapeutic Cure Non-Inferiority Comparison of Butenafine Cream and Lotrimin Ultra42 daysPatient was cured both by symptoms (Clinical Cure) and by the results of fungal testing (Mycological Cure).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Therapeutic Cure7 daysSubject with clinical and mycological cure at day 7
Mycologic Cure42 daysNegative KOH and fungal culture at day 42
Clinical Cure42 daysThe following 8 signs and symptoms are rated at each visit: Erythema Fissuring Maceration Vesiculation Desquamation/scaling Exudation Pruritus Stinging/Burning Each symptom is evaluated using the following scale: 0 = None- Complete absence of any sign or symptom 1. = Mild - obvious but minimal involvement 2. = Moderate - something that is easily noted 3. = Severe - quite marked Clinical cure is defined as a score of 2 (moderate) or less for erythema and a total score for seven other signs and symptoms less than 2.
Safety and Adverse Event Profile42 days

Countries

Belize, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients 12 years of age and older, who presented with interdigital tinea pedis, with a positive potassium hydroxide test (KOH) and met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were enrolled in the trial. Subsequently samples were sent for culture to confirm that either T. rubrum, T. mentagrophytes, or E. floccosum were the causative organism.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Butenafine Cream 1% (Taro)
Butenafine cream manufactured by Taro applied for 7 days
149
Lotrimin Ultra (Butenafine) 1%
Lotrimin Ultra (butenafine) applied for 7 days
155
Vehicle
Butenafine vehicle applied for 7 days
71
Total375

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicButenafine Cream 1% (Taro)Lotrimin Ultra (Butenafine) 1%VehicleTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
4 Participants6 Participants2 Participants12 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
10 Participants7 Participants3 Participants20 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
135 Participants142 Participants66 Participants343 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belize
26 participants20 participants9 participants55 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
123 participants135 participants62 participants320 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants41 Participants23 Participants106 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
107 Participants114 Participants48 Participants269 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
14 / —21 / —5 / —
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / —0 / —1 / —

Outcome results

Primary

Therapeutic Cure Non-Inferiority Comparison of Butenafine Cream and Lotrimin Ultra

Patient was cured both by symptoms (Clinical Cure) and by the results of fungal testing (Mycological Cure).

Time frame: 42 days

Population: Patients with negative cultures excluded. Use per protocol population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Butenafine Cream 1% (Taro)Therapeutic Cure Non-Inferiority Comparison of Butenafine Cream and Lotrimin Ultra63 Participants
Lotrimin Ultra (Butenafine) 1%Therapeutic Cure Non-Inferiority Comparison of Butenafine Cream and Lotrimin Ultra97 Participants
90% CI: [-30.27, -9.29]
Primary

Therapeutic Cure - Superiority Analysis

Therapeutic Cure requires both Clinical Cure and Mycological Cure. Clinical Cure was based on the following signs and symptoms: fissuring, erythema, maceration, vesiculation, scaling, exudation, pruritus, burning. Each clinical symptom was evaluated using a 0-3 point rating scale: none=0, mild=1, moderate=2 or severe=3. If the score for erythema was ≤ 2 and the sum for all of the other 7 signs and symptoms was \<2 then the patient was considered a Clinical Cure. Mycological Cure: The potassium hydroxide (KOH) and the fungal culture were both negative.

Time frame: 42 days

Population: Patients with negative cultures at baseline are excluded. Efficacy ITT analysis includes all patients with positive baseline cultures, who received at least one dose of medication, had a follow-up visit and had data for the day 42 visit.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Butenafine Cream 1% (Taro)Therapeutic Cure - Superiority Analysis76 Participants
Lotrimin Ultra (Butenafine) 1%Therapeutic Cure - Superiority Analysis108 Participants
VehicleTherapeutic Cure - Superiority Analysis24 Participants
p-value: 0.0127Fisher Exact
p-value: <0.0001Fisher Exact
Secondary

Clinical Cure

The following 8 signs and symptoms are rated at each visit: Erythema Fissuring Maceration Vesiculation Desquamation/scaling Exudation Pruritus Stinging/Burning Each symptom is evaluated using the following scale: 0 = None- Complete absence of any sign or symptom 1. = Mild - obvious but minimal involvement 2. = Moderate - something that is easily noted 3. = Severe - quite marked Clinical cure is defined as a score of 2 (moderate) or less for erythema and a total score for seven other signs and symptoms less than 2.

Time frame: 42 days

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Butenafine Cream 1% (Taro)Clinical Cure83 Participants
Lotrimin Ultra (Butenafine) 1%Clinical Cure111 Participants
VehicleClinical Cure27 Participants
Secondary

Mycologic Cure

Negative KOH and fungal culture at day 42

Time frame: 42 days

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Butenafine Cream 1% (Taro)Mycologic Cure101 Participants
Lotrimin Ultra (Butenafine) 1%Mycologic Cure128 Participants
VehicleMycologic Cure33 Participants
Secondary

Safety and Adverse Event Profile

Time frame: 42 days

Secondary

Therapeutic Cure

Subject with clinical and mycological cure at day 7

Time frame: 7 days

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Butenafine Cream 1% (Taro)Therapeutic Cure30 Participants
Lotrimin Ultra (Butenafine) 1%Therapeutic Cure38 Participants
VehicleTherapeutic Cure11 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026