Skip to content

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy vs Hybrid Natural Orifice Translumenal Surgery

Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Hybrid Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00835250
Enrollment
60
Registered
2009-02-03
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
2012-04-30
Last updated
2013-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cholelithiasis

Keywords

Transvaginal cholecystectomy, NOTES, Minilaparoscopy, Endoscopic surgery, Cholecystectomy, Surgical translumenal endoscopic surgery, Transvaginal translumenal endoscopic surgery

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to determine the feasibility of cholecystectomy made by a transvaginal approach with a NOTES procedure (natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery).

Detailed description

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) makes it possible to perform intraperitoneal surgical procedures with a minimal number of access points in the abdominal wall. At the present time these procedures are hybrids. It is expected a better cosmetic result and lower incidence in parietal complications in front of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, but is necessary to investigate that these benefits should not be associated with complications of the new access to abdominal cavity. Methods. Prospective randomized clinical series of 60 female patients with gallstones that underwent endoscopic surgery, 20 of them operated with conventional laparoscopic approach, 20 by transumbilical endoscopic approach and 20 of them by transvaginal endoscopic approach. Variables as surgical wound infection, urinary tract infection, evisceration, hernia, mortality and other complications will be analyzed.

Interventions

PROCEDURETransvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy

Cholecystectomy performed by using a combination of working tools inserted through the entry port for the minilaparoscopy and the videogastroscope, inserted into peritoneal cavity by transvaginal approach. The gallbladder is removed transvaginally through the videogastroscope.

PROCEDURECholecystectomy

Extirpation of the gallbladder by a surgical procedure

Sponsors

Hospital Son Llatzer
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age over 18 and under 65 * symptomatic cholelithiasis with an indication for performing laparoscopic surgery * absence of any gynecological condition that could complicate the procedure (pelvic inflammatory disease or endometriosis) * perforated hymen * agreement on the patient's part not to use the vagina for two weeks after the surgery * signed specific informed consent upon providing specific information about the new surgical approach.

Exclusion criteria

* age under 18 or over 65 * unperforated hymen * presence of illness or condition with an increased risk of pelvic damage with transvaginal approach.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Parietal complications after surgery (infection and hernia)One year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Surgical pain. General complications. Patient's preferences.One year

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026