Laceration, Moderate Sedation
Conditions
Brief summary
* Ketamine provides effective and relatively safe sedation analgesia for primary closure of lacerated pediatric patients * However, deep sedation and adverse effects suggest the opportunity to develop alternative strategies * We compared the efficacy and adverse effects of ketamine to those of N2O gas for analgesia and anxiolysis during primary repair of lacerated pediatric patients
Detailed description
* There were 32 children who were randomly assigned * Recovery times were markedly shorter in the N2O group compared with those in the ketamine group (median, 0.0 min (interquartile range \[IQR\], 0.0-4.0 min) vs. median, 21.5 min (IQR, 12.5-37.5 min), N2O vs. ketamine, respectively, p \< 0.05) * Sedation levels were deeper in the ketamine group than in the N2O group, but pain scales were comparable between groups * No difference was observed in the satisfaction scores by physicians, parents, or nurses. * N2O inhalation was preferable to injectable ketamine for pediatric patients because it is safe, allows for a faster recovery, maintains sufficient sedation time, and does not induce unnecessarily deep sedation
Interventions
Ketamine : 2mg/kg IV N2O : 50%-70% N2O gas
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Pediatric patients with lacerated wound
Exclusion criteria
* Contraindication of ketamine or N2O gas * A wound around eye and mouth
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The recovery time (from completion of laceration repair to recovery of mental state) | before discharge |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Sedation scale | before discharge |
| pain scale | before discharge |
| Side effects | during procedure and bedore discharge and 1day after discharge |
| Satisfaction of parents and clinicians | before discharge |
Countries
South Korea