Skip to content

A Four-Arm Study Comparing the Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Tramadol Once a Day 100, 200 and 300 mg Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00832416
Enrollment
565
Registered
2009-01-30
Start date
2003-01-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee, Pain

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of Tramadol Once a Day 100, 200, 300 mg and Placebo

Interventions

One Tramadol Once A Day tablet at randomized dose daily.

DRUGPlacebo

One Placebo tablet daily.

Sponsors

Labopharm Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males or Females between the ages of 40-75 with a diagnosis of moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee, consistent with the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Clinical Classification Criteria for Arthritis of the Knee: * Current knee pain * Less than 30 minutes of morning stiffness with or without crepitus on active motion. * Confirmation either by arthroscopy or radiologist's report (X-rays showing osteophytes, joint space narrowing or subchondral bone sclerosis {eburnation}) within five years prior to entry into the study. 2. C-reactive protein (CRP) \< 8 ug/ml (if available at local lab) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) \< 40 mm/hr 3. Total WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index) Pain Subscale Score of \> 150 mm at Baseline corresponding with moderate to severe Osteoarthritis. 4. Oral and written language comprehension at a level sufficient to comply with the protocol and complete study-related materials. 5. Research Ethics Board (REB) approval of the written Informed Consent Form in Spanish or English which was signed and dated by the patient and Investigator, prior to study participation.

Exclusion criteria

1. Known rheumatoid arthritis or any other rheumatoid disease. 2. Secondary arthritis i.e. any of the following: septic arthritis; inflammatory joint disease; gout; pseudogout; Paget's disease; joint fracture; acromegaly; fibromyalgia; Wilson's disease; ochronosis; haemochromatosis; osteochondromatosis; or collagen gene mutations. 3. Evidence of effusion greater than 15 cubic centimetre (cc) upon physical examination of the joint at Baseline (Visit 1). 4. Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 38. 5. Major illness, requiring hospitalization during the 3 months before commencement of the screening period. 6. The patient was unwilling to stop taking pain medication (for arthritis or other types of pain) or was unwilling to stop taking other medications for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). 7. Previous failure or discontinuation (due to adverse events) of tramadol hydrochloride (HCl) therapy. 8. Treatment within the last 3 weeks with any of the following medications: monoamine oxidase inhibitors; tricyclic antidepressants and other tricyclic compounds (e.g. cyclobenzaprine, promethazine); neuroleptics; selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; or any other drug that reduces seizure threshold. 9. Treatment with another investigational agent within the last 30 days. 10. A history of seizure disorder other than Infantile Febrile Seizures. 11. Previous or current opioid dependency. 12. Bowel disease causing malabsorption. 13. Pregnancy or lactating or childbearing potential and unwilling to utilize a medically approved method of contraception during participation in this clinical trial. 14. Significant liver disease, defined as active hepatitis or elevated liver enzymes \>3 times the upper boundary of the normal range. 15. Significant renal disease, defined as creatinine clearance \<30 mL/min as estimated by the method of Levey et al., 1999. 16. Current substance abuse or dependence, other than nicotine. 17. Allergy or adverse reaction to tramadol or any structurally similar drugs e.g. opiates. 18. Any other condition, that, in the opinion of the Investigators, would have adversely affected the patient's ability to complete the study or its measures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)12 weeks3-item Likert-scale: How do you rate overall pain relief with the drug? with 3 possible answers: very effective, effective, or ineffective. The average of ratings at visits 2-5 was calculated as median, rounded up to the closest integer.
Percentage Difference Between WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)Baseline to week 12Percentage of difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale score between baseline and week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Pain Subscale results from the sum of 5 questions.
Percentage Difference Between WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)Baseline to week 12Percentage of difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale score between baseline and week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Physical Function subscale results from the sum of 17 questions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Investigator Global Rating of Pain Relief12 weeksThe Investigator Global Rating of Pain is a 3-item Likert-scale to answer the following question: How do you rate this patient's overall pain relief with the drug? with 3 possible answers: very effective, effective, or ineffective.
Percentage Difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 0, week 3, week 6Percentage of difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale score between baseline and intervening visits 2-4. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Pain Subscale results from the sum of 5 questions.
Percentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout Reason12 weeksReasons for withdrawal from the trial were collected and the percentage of participants who dropped out from trial were calculated by dropout reason
Percentage Difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 0, week 3, week 6Percentage of difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale score between baseline and intervening visits 2-4. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales. The WOMAC Physical Function Subscale comprises 17 questions each rated on a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm).
Multiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain Questionnaire12 weeksPatients rated their knee pain by marking a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale, ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm).

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mg110
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mg113
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mg115
4: Placebo227
Total565

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdministrative0001
Overall StudyAdverse Event21194110
Overall StudyDeath1000
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy17151352
Overall StudyPhysician Decision212510
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject57210

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mg2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mg3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mg4: PlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0.0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
41 Participants36 Participants49 Participants88 Participants214.0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
69 Participants77 Participants66 Participants139 Participants351.0 Participants
Age Continuous59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
61.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
60.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
60.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants64 Participants72 Participants140 Participants341.0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
45 Participants49 Participants43 Participants87 Participants224.0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
31 / 11049 / 11357 / 11538 / 227
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 1101 / 1134 / 1153 / 227

Outcome results

Primary

Patient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)

3-item Likert-scale: How do you rate overall pain relief with the drug? with 3 possible answers: very effective, effective, or ineffective. The average of ratings at visits 2-5 was calculated as median, rounded up to the closest integer.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The analysis was performed using the full analysis population (All randomized patients who received at least one dose of the assigned study medication and had at least one post Baseline assessment of any functional scale). Last Individual value.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Very effective19 participants
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Ineffective39 participants
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Effective50 participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Very effective16 participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Ineffective37 participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Effective56 participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Ineffective31 participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Effective56 participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Very effective26 participants
4: PlaceboPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Ineffective100 participants
4: PlaceboPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Very effective29 participants
4: PlaceboPatient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)Effective94 participants
Primary

Percentage Difference Between WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)

Percentage of difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale score between baseline and week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Pain Subscale results from the sum of 5 questions.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: The analysis was performed using the full analysis population (All randomized patients who received at least one dose of the assigned study medication and had at least one post Baseline assessment of any functional scale). Missing Values at Last Visit Imputed by Individual Last Post Baseline Value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage Difference Between WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)36.3 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 45.3
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage Difference Between WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)36.6 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 40.9
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage Difference Between WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)41.0 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 44.5
4: PlaceboPercentage Difference Between WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)38.0 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 41.7
Primary

Percentage Difference Between WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)

Percentage of difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale score between baseline and week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Physical Function subscale results from the sum of 17 questions.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: The analysis was performed using the full analysis population (All randomized patients who received at least one dose of the assigned study medication and had at least one post Baseline assessment of any functional scale). Missing Values at Last Visit Imputed by Individual Last Post Baseline Value.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage Difference Between WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)31.9 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 46
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage Difference Between WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)37.0 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 39.3
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage Difference Between WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)37.3 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 41.7
4: PlaceboPercentage Difference Between WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)33.7 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 44.3
Secondary

Investigator Global Rating of Pain Relief

The Investigator Global Rating of Pain is a 3-item Likert-scale to answer the following question: How do you rate this patient's overall pain relief with the drug? with 3 possible answers: very effective, effective, or ineffective.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The analysis was performed using the full analysis population (All randomized patients who received at least one dose of the assigned study medication and had at least one post Baseline assessment of any functional scale). Last Individual value.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefVery effective20 participants
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefIneffective39 participants
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefEffective49 participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefVery effective14 participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefIneffective37 participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefEffective58 participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefEffective57 participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefVery effective22 participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefIneffective32 participants
4: PlaceboInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefVery effective29 participants
4: PlaceboInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefIneffective96 participants
4: PlaceboInvestigator Global Rating of Pain ReliefEffective98 participants
Secondary

Multiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain Questionnaire

Patients rated their knee pain by marking a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale, ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm).

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The analysis was performed using the full analysis population (All randomized patients who received at least one dose of the assigned study medication and had at least one post Baseline assessment of any functional scale). Missing Values at Last Visit Imputed by Individual Last Post Baseline Value.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnairePain at lunchtime (last individual visit)40.5 mmStandard Deviation 29.9
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnairePain Before next morning dose (last individ visit)41.1 mmStandard Deviation 30.1
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnairePain at bed time (last individual visit)41.2 mmStandard Deviation 30.7
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnairePain at lunchtime (last individual visit)38.2 mmStandard Deviation 29.6
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnairePain at bed time (last individual visit)41.1 mmStandard Deviation 29.9
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnairePain Before next morning dose (last individ visit)42.0 mmStandard Deviation 29.5
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnairePain Before next morning dose (last individ visit)35.5 mmStandard Deviation 29.3
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnairePain at bed time (last individual visit)37.3 mmStandard Deviation 30.2
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnairePain at lunchtime (last individual visit)36.6 mmStandard Deviation 29.4
4: PlaceboMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnairePain Before next morning dose (last individ visit)38.5 mmStandard Deviation 29.8
4: PlaceboMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnairePain at bed time (last individual visit)39.7 mmStandard Deviation 29.4
4: PlaceboMultiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain QuestionnairePain at lunchtime (last individual visit)38.5 mmStandard Deviation 29.5
Secondary

Percentage Difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)

Percentage of difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale score between baseline and intervening visits 2-4. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Pain Subscale results from the sum of 5 questions.

Time frame: Week 0, week 3, week 6

Population: The analysis was performed using the full analysis population (All randomized patients who received at least one dose of the assigned study medication and had at least one post Baseline assessment of any functional scale). Missing Values at Last Visit Imputed by Individual Last Post Baseline Value.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage Difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 6 (Visit 4)36.3 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 40.9
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage Difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 0 (Visit 2)26.7 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 36.9
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage Difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 3 (Visit 3)35.2 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 40.9
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage Difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 3 (Visit 3)36.0 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 40.3
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage Difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 0 (Visit 2)29.0 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 33.4
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage Difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 6 (Visit 4)36.4 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 39.5
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage Difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 0 (Visit 2)33.1 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 41.4
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage Difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 3 (Visit 3)42.3 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 40.6
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage Difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 6 (Visit 4)47.7 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 42.2
4: PlaceboPercentage Difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 0 (Visit 2)20.4 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 35.8
4: PlaceboPercentage Difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 6 (Visit 4)41.3 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 39.9
4: PlaceboPercentage Difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 3 (Visit 3)35.1 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 39.4
Secondary

Percentage Difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)

Percentage of difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale score between baseline and intervening visits 2-4. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales. The WOMAC Physical Function Subscale comprises 17 questions each rated on a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm).

Time frame: Week 0, week 3, week 6

Population: The analysis was performed using the full analysis population (All randomized patients who received at least one dose of the assigned study medication and had at least one post Baseline assessment of any functional scale). Missing Values at Last Visit Imputed by Individual Last Post Baseline Value.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage Difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 0 (Visit 2)23.4 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 37.1
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage Difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 6 (Visit 4)33.5 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 39.8
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage Difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 3 (Visit 3)33.3 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 40.7
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage Difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 3 (Visit 3)36.5 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 34.4
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage Difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 6 (Visit 4)37.0 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 36.8
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage Difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 0 (Visit 2)26.4 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 30.9
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage Difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 6 (Visit 4)47.7 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 43.8
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage Difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 3 (Visit 3)41.0 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 39.7
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage Difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 0 (Visit 2)29.3 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 37.9
4: PlaceboPercentage Difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 0 (Visit 2)18.5 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 37.7
4: PlaceboPercentage Difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 6 (Visit 4)38.3 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 37.8
4: PlaceboPercentage Difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)Week 3 (Visit 3)33.7 Percentage differenceStandard Deviation 38.2
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout Reason

Reasons for withdrawal from the trial were collected and the percentage of participants who dropped out from trial were calculated by dropout reason

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Safety population: all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the assigned study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonAdverse event19.1 percentage of participants
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonPatient request4.5 percentage of participants
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonDeath0.9 percentage of participants
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonInvestigator initiated discontinuation1.8 percentage of participants
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonAdministrative0 percentage of participants
1: Tramadol Once A Day 100mgPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonLack of efficacy15.5 percentage of participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonPatient request6.2 percentage of participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonLack of efficacy13.3 percentage of participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonInvestigator initiated discontinuation10.6 percentage of participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonAdverse event16.8 percentage of participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonAdministrative0 percentage of participants
2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mgPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonDeath0 percentage of participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonLack of efficacy11.3 percentage of participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonPatient request1.7 percentage of participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonAdverse event35.7 percentage of participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonAdministrative0 percentage of participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonDeath0 percentage of participants
3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mgPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonInvestigator initiated discontinuation4.3 percentage of participants
4: PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonDeath0 percentage of participants
4: PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonLack of efficacy22.9 percentage of participants
4: PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonPatient request4.4 percentage of participants
4: PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonInvestigator initiated discontinuation4.4 percentage of participants
4: PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonAdministrative0.4 percentage of participants
4: PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout ReasonAdverse event4.4 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026