Skip to content

IES-ACap: Influence of Atrial Pulse Width in the Behaviour of ACap™ Confirm Algorithm.

Influence of Atrial Pulse Width in the Behaviour of ACap™ Confirm Algorithm.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00832260
Acronym
IES-ACap
Enrollment
70
Registered
2009-01-30
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2019-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrio-ventricular Block, Sinus Bradycardia, Sinus Node Disease

Brief summary

The purpose of this observational study is to collect data regarding the population of patients with a pacemaker implanted.

Detailed description

The purpose of this observational study is to collect data regarding the population of patients whit a Zephyr™ pacemaker implanted, models 5826 and 5820, and active or passive fixation leads , when the Algorithms Acap Confirm, which automatically regulates the Atrial Pulse Width, is enabled.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient has an indication for implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker; * Patient is older than 18 years of age * Patient has signed the study specific Informed consent document. * Primo implant.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient is pregnant or nursing * Patient is less than 18 years of age * Patient is in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV. * Patient has a pacemaker replacement; * Patient is unable to attend the follow-up visits;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of Patients in Whom ACap™ Confirm Algorithm is Programmed Safely to ON During the First 12 Months.12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of Patients in Whom ACap™ Confirm Algorithm is Recommended at a Pulse Width of 0.4 Milliseconds (ms) During All Follow-ups (Implant, Staples Removal, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months).12 months

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Zephyr Pacemaker
Non-randomized study. Patients with indication of a Pacemaker model Zephyr of St. Jude Medical
70
Total70

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicZephyr Pacemaker
Age, Continuous73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
41 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 70
serious
Total, serious adverse events
18 / 70

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Patients in Whom ACap™ Confirm Algorithm is Programmed Safely to ON During the First 12 Months.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Zephyr PacemakerPercentage of Patients in Whom ACap™ Confirm Algorithm is Programmed Safely to ON During the First 12 Months.61.9 percentage of patients
Secondary

Percentage of Patients in Whom ACap™ Confirm Algorithm is Recommended at a Pulse Width of 0.4 Milliseconds (ms) During All Follow-ups (Implant, Staples Removal, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months).

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Zephyr PacemakerPercentage of Patients in Whom ACap™ Confirm Algorithm is Recommended at a Pulse Width of 0.4 Milliseconds (ms) During All Follow-ups (Implant, Staples Removal, 3, 6, 9 and 12 Months).21.4 percentage of patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026