Skip to content

The Role of Affect Regulation and Self-presentation in the Expressive Writing Intervention

Examining Potential Moderators and Mediators in the Expressive Writing Intervention: The Role of Affect Regulation and Self-presentation.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00831727
Enrollment
75
Registered
2009-01-29
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
2010-11-30
Last updated
2016-05-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Posttraumatic Stress Disorders

Keywords

expressive writing, trauma, intervention, posttraumatic stress

Brief summary

The purpose of the present study is twofold. First, we will attempt to examine the role that emotion regulation and self-presentation play as potential moderators in the expressive writing paradigm. We hypothesize that expressive writing participants who demonstrate greater abilities to regulate their emotions at baseline will improve more on our outcome measures. We also hypothesize that those expressive writing participants who demonstrate higher levels of self-presentation at baseline will improve less on our outcome measures. The second aim of the study has two related objectives. First, we will attempt to investigate whether the expressive writing intervention can increase and enhance an individual's emotion regulation abilities. Related to this, we will then go on to examine whether emotion regulation can be looked at as a potential mechanism of action in the expressive writing procedure. Related to these two objectives, we hypothesize that in comparison to the control group, participants in the expressive writing condition will show increases in their ability to regulate their emotions from baseline to four week follow up. Moreover, we predict that greater gains in emotion regulation abilities for the expressive writing participants will be significantly related to greater gains in outcome measures.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALExpressive Writing

Participants will write about their experienced trauma for 20 minutes on each of three consecutive days using techniques associated with expressive writing

BEHAVIORALControl

Participants will write as factually as possible about an assigned trivial topic for 20 minutes on each of three consecutive days

Sponsors

University of Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Fluent in English * Previously experienced trauma (not current or ongoing; excluding bereavement) * Currently experiencing trauma-related distress

Exclusion criteria

* Currently involved in psychotherapy * Currently taking psychotropic medications * Imminent threat to self or others

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic ScaleInitial session; One month follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation ScaleInitial session; One month follow-up
Pennebaker Inventory of Limbic LanguidnessInitial session; One month follow-up
Beck Depression Inventory, Second EditionInitial session; One month follow-up

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026