Skip to content

Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab, Capecitabine and Radiation Therapy With or Without Oxaliplatin Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

A Randomized Phase II Study of Bevacizumab, Capecitabine and Radiation Therapy With or Without Oxaliplatin in the Preoperative Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00828672
Acronym
AXEBEAM
Enrollment
84
Registered
2009-01-26
Start date
2009-06-30
Completion date
2019-03-31
Last updated
2019-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Keywords

bevacizumab, capecitabine, radiation therapy, oxaliplatin, multimodality treatments, TME (total mesorectal excision), Axe Beam, rectal cancer, neoadjuvant, pathological complete response, postoperative complications

Brief summary

Phase II clinical trial, open-label, randomized, two arms, multicentre (possibly multinational). Academic, investigator initiated. To assess the activity of bevacizumab (AvastinTM) in combination with capecitabine (XelodaTM) and radiation therapy with or without oxaliplatin (EloxatinTM) in the pre-operative treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer, followed by TME (total mesorectal excision).

Detailed description

See Synopsis

Interventions

DRUGOxaliplatin

Administered on days 15,22,29,36 en 43; 50 mg/m2

DRUGBevacizumab

Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg

DRUGCapecitabine

825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy

RADIATIONradiotherapy

Total dose 45Gy

Sponsors

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adenocarcinoma of rectum measurable (RECIST), locally advanced (defined by MRI - Tumour beyond mesorectal fascia (T4) or Tumour ≤ 2 mm from mesorectal fascia or T3 tumour \< 5 cm from anal verge * Patient is at least 18 years of age * Good organ function

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of distant metastases * Contraindication for bevacizumab * Pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pathologic Response at Surgery. Overview of Complete Pathologic Responses, Good and Little Tumour Regression Rates at Surgery.4 monthsDworak tumour regression grades (TRG) were used to assess pathologic response: TRG0=no regression. TRG1=dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; TRG2=dominant fibrotic changes with few tumour cells or groups; TRG3=very few (difficult to find microscopically) tumour cells in fibrotic tissue with or without mucus substance. TRG4=no intact viable tumour cells, only fibrotic mass or presence of mucin lakes without associated malignant cells (total tumour regression). Pathologic assessments of tumour response post chemoradiotherapy as provided by investigators (read by local pathologists on operative specimens) were reviewed centrally for all pts for whom surgical materials were available (centrally reviewed set). The diagnosis of independent central reviewers primed. Pathologic complete response rates (TRG4) are reported (%). Good (TRG3 and TRG4 together) and little (TRG 0,1 and 2) tumour regression rates are summarized. For these 2 last rows, % add to 100.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response at Surgery. Number of Participants With Good or Little Pathological Tumour Regression at Surgery.4 monthsDworak tumour regression grades (TRG) were used to assess pathologic response: TRG0=no regression. TRG1=dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; TRG2=dominant fibrotic changes with few tumour cells or groups; TRG3=very few (difficult to find microscopically) tumour cells in fibrotic tissue with or without mucus substance. TRG4=no intact viable tumour cells, only fibrotic mass or presence of mucin lakes without associated malignant cells (total tumour regression). Pathologic assessments of tumour response post chemoradiotherapy as provided by investigators (read by local pathologists on operative specimens) were reviewed centrally for all pts for whom surgical materials were available (centrally reviewed set). The diagnosis of independent central reviewers primed. Pathologic complete response rates (TRG4) are reported (%). Good (TRG3 and TRG4 together) and little (TRG 0,1 and 2) tumour regression rates are summarized. For these 2 last rows, % add to 100.
Clinical Response Rate3 monthsBaseline tumour measurements were performed within 4 weeks prior to treatment start (RECIST). The same methods of assessment (CT and/or MRI) were used for each measurable lesion at baseline and during follow-up. * Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumour (both target and non-target lesions). * Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of tumour longest diameters (LD). * Stable Disease (SD) is steady state of disease. Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. * Progressive Disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started. Appearance of new lesions constitutes PD. In exceptional circumstances, unequivocal progression of non-target lesions was considered evidence of PD.
Number of Participants With Histopathologic R0 and Negative CRM Resection4 monthsHistopathologic R0 resection rate was defined as margins histologically negative for tumour involvement after resection. The circumferential resection margin (CRM) is considered to be involved if microscopic tumour is present \<1mm from or at the inked circumferential or radial resection margin. Data on quality of mesorectal excision were expected but not collected consistently.
Recurrence Rates and Disease Free Survivalup to 5 yearsCounts and proportions of patients experiencing recurrence of disease (local and distant).
Death Rates and Overall Survivalup to 5 yearsCounts and proportions of patients deceased (post-study).
Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General Overviewcontinuous up to 1 yearAdverse events graded as per NCI CTCAE (US National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) version 3.0. All Serious Adverse Events occurrences are reported and counts are summarized here; all Adverse Events (all grades) related and not related to study treatment are reported and summarized here; all severe laboratory events (hematology and biochemistry Gr 3 and higher) are reported and summarized here; all severe postoperative complications (Gr 3 and higher) occurred within the first month post surgery are reported and summarized here. See section Adverse events for details.

Countries

Belgium

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Eighty-four patients were included. First patient enrolled: 22-Jun-2009. Last patient enrolled: 29-Sep-2013. Participating sites: UZ Leuven, Erasme Hospital Bruxelles, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc Bruxelles, AZ St. Lucas Brugge, AZ Groeninge Kortrijk, CHU Sart-Tilman Liege, OLVZ Aalst, H. Hart Ziekenhuis Roeselare, Cl. Saint Elisabeth Namur

Pre-assignment details

Target population was represented by patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (tumour beyond mesorectal fascia (T4) or tumour ≤ 2 mm from mesorectal fascia or T3 tumour \< 5 cm from anal verge by MRI), histologically confirmed. Pts were screened as per incl and excl criteria per protocol. Screening failures were not recorded in the eCRF.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
AXE (ARM 1)
Oxaliplatin, Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy. Oxaliplatin: Administered on days 15,22,29,36 en 43; 50 mg/m2 Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy
43
AX (ARM 2)
Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy
41
Total84

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Post-surgery (<30 Days)No central review materials01
Study TreatmentAdverse Event01
Study TreatmentComplete response, no surgery11
Study TreatmentLost to Follow-up10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAXE (ARM 1)AX (ARM 2)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
14 Participants12 Participants26 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
29 Participants29 Participants58 Participants
Age, Continuous61 years59 years60 years
Distance from tumour to anal verge
<5cm
18 Participants15 Participants33 Participants
Distance from tumour to anal verge
>=5cm
13 Participants15 Participants28 Participants
Distance from tumour to anal verge
NA
12 Participants11 Participants23 Participants
Distance to CRM
0mm
21 Participants24 Participants45 Participants
Distance to CRM
<2mm
6 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
Distance to CRM
>=2mm
9 Participants10 Participants19 Participants
Distance to CRM
NA
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
ECOG PS (Performance Status)
ECOG PS=0
36 Participants37 Participants73 Participants
ECOG PS (Performance Status)
ECOG PS=1
7 Participants4 Participants11 Participants
Nodal stage
N0 (no regional lymph node metastase)
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Nodal stage
N1 (metastasis in 1-3 regional lymp nodes)
15 Participants18 Participants33 Participants
Nodal stage
N2 (metastasis in 4 or more regional lymph nodes)
20 Participants17 Participants37 Participants
Nodal stage
Nx (regional nodes cannot be assessed)
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants12 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants29 Participants58 Participants
Tumour stage
T2 (Tumor invades muscularis propria)
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Tumour stage
T3 (tumor invades into pericolorectal tissues)
34 Participants31 Participants65 Participants
Tumour stage
T4 (tumor invades through peritoneum/other organs)
7 Participants8 Participants15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 431 / 41
other
Total, other adverse events
18 / 4315 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
21 / 4312 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

Pathologic Response at Surgery. Overview of Complete Pathologic Responses, Good and Little Tumour Regression Rates at Surgery.

Dworak tumour regression grades (TRG) were used to assess pathologic response: TRG0=no regression. TRG1=dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; TRG2=dominant fibrotic changes with few tumour cells or groups; TRG3=very few (difficult to find microscopically) tumour cells in fibrotic tissue with or without mucus substance. TRG4=no intact viable tumour cells, only fibrotic mass or presence of mucin lakes without associated malignant cells (total tumour regression). Pathologic assessments of tumour response post chemoradiotherapy as provided by investigators (read by local pathologists on operative specimens) were reviewed centrally for all pts for whom surgical materials were available (centrally reviewed set). The diagnosis of independent central reviewers primed. Pathologic complete response rates (TRG4) are reported (%). Good (TRG3 and TRG4 together) and little (TRG 0,1 and 2) tumour regression rates are summarized. For these 2 last rows, % add to 100.

Time frame: 4 months

Population: Patients who had undertaken surgery and had pathology materials available for central review (centrally reviewed subset)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AXE (ARM 1)Pathologic Response at Surgery. Overview of Complete Pathologic Responses, Good and Little Tumour Regression Rates at Surgery.Pathological complete response (Dworak TRG=4) %34 percentage of cases
AXE (ARM 1)Pathologic Response at Surgery. Overview of Complete Pathologic Responses, Good and Little Tumour Regression Rates at Surgery.Good tumour regression (Dworak TRG=3-4) %41 percentage of cases
AXE (ARM 1)Pathologic Response at Surgery. Overview of Complete Pathologic Responses, Good and Little Tumour Regression Rates at Surgery.Little tumour regression (Dworak TRG=0-1-2) %59 percentage of cases
AX (ARM 2)Pathologic Response at Surgery. Overview of Complete Pathologic Responses, Good and Little Tumour Regression Rates at Surgery.Pathological complete response (Dworak TRG=4) %11 percentage of cases
AX (ARM 2)Pathologic Response at Surgery. Overview of Complete Pathologic Responses, Good and Little Tumour Regression Rates at Surgery.Good tumour regression (Dworak TRG=3-4) %24 percentage of cases
AX (ARM 2)Pathologic Response at Surgery. Overview of Complete Pathologic Responses, Good and Little Tumour Regression Rates at Surgery.Little tumour regression (Dworak TRG=0-1-2) %76 percentage of cases
Secondary

Clinical Response Rate

Baseline tumour measurements were performed within 4 weeks prior to treatment start (RECIST). The same methods of assessment (CT and/or MRI) were used for each measurable lesion at baseline and during follow-up. * Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumour (both target and non-target lesions). * Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of tumour longest diameters (LD). * Stable Disease (SD) is steady state of disease. Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. * Progressive Disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started. Appearance of new lesions constitutes PD. In exceptional circumstances, unequivocal progression of non-target lesions was considered evidence of PD.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Intent to treat, all registered patients

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AXE (ARM 1)Clinical Response RateNA7 Participants
AXE (ARM 1)Clinical Response RateSD9 Participants
AXE (ARM 1)Clinical Response RateCR3 Participants
AXE (ARM 1)Clinical Response RatePD0 Participants
AXE (ARM 1)Clinical Response RatePR24 Participants
AX (ARM 2)Clinical Response RateNA5 Participants
AX (ARM 2)Clinical Response RatePD1 Participants
AX (ARM 2)Clinical Response RatePR17 Participants
AX (ARM 2)Clinical Response RateSD13 Participants
AX (ARM 2)Clinical Response RateCR5 Participants
Secondary

Death Rates and Overall Survival

Counts and proportions of patients deceased (post-study).

Time frame: up to 5 years

Population: Intent to treat in follow up (one patient in Arm 1 lost to follow up).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AXE (ARM 1)Death Rates and Overall SurvivalLost to FU1 Participants
AXE (ARM 1)Death Rates and Overall SurvivalDeceased (Dec 2017)6 Participants
AXE (ARM 1)Death Rates and Overall SurvivalAlive (Dec 2017)36 Participants
AX (ARM 2)Death Rates and Overall SurvivalLost to FU0 Participants
AX (ARM 2)Death Rates and Overall SurvivalDeceased (Dec 2017)7 Participants
AX (ARM 2)Death Rates and Overall SurvivalAlive (Dec 2017)34 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Histopathologic R0 and Negative CRM Resection

Histopathologic R0 resection rate was defined as margins histologically negative for tumour involvement after resection. The circumferential resection margin (CRM) is considered to be involved if microscopic tumour is present \<1mm from or at the inked circumferential or radial resection margin. Data on quality of mesorectal excision were expected but not collected consistently.

Time frame: 4 months

Population: Patient in Arm 2 that discontinued chemoradiotherapy due to major toxicity and had surgery off protocol is counted here as well

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AXE (ARM 1)Number of Participants With Histopathologic R0 and Negative CRM ResectionNegative resection margins40 Participants
AXE (ARM 1)Number of Participants With Histopathologic R0 and Negative CRM ResectionPositive resection margins1 Participants
AX (ARM 2)Number of Participants With Histopathologic R0 and Negative CRM ResectionNegative resection margins37 Participants
AX (ARM 2)Number of Participants With Histopathologic R0 and Negative CRM ResectionPositive resection margins2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response at Surgery. Number of Participants With Good or Little Pathological Tumour Regression at Surgery.

Dworak tumour regression grades (TRG) were used to assess pathologic response: TRG0=no regression. TRG1=dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; TRG2=dominant fibrotic changes with few tumour cells or groups; TRG3=very few (difficult to find microscopically) tumour cells in fibrotic tissue with or without mucus substance. TRG4=no intact viable tumour cells, only fibrotic mass or presence of mucin lakes without associated malignant cells (total tumour regression). Pathologic assessments of tumour response post chemoradiotherapy as provided by investigators (read by local pathologists on operative specimens) were reviewed centrally for all pts for whom surgical materials were available (centrally reviewed set). The diagnosis of independent central reviewers primed. Pathologic complete response rates (TRG4) are reported (%). Good (TRG3 and TRG4 together) and little (TRG 0,1 and 2) tumour regression rates are summarized. For these 2 last rows, % add to 100.

Time frame: 4 months

Population: Centrally reviewed subset

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AXE (ARM 1)Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response at Surgery. Number of Participants With Good or Little Pathological Tumour Regression at Surgery.Complete response, no tumour left Dworak TRG=414 Participants
AXE (ARM 1)Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response at Surgery. Number of Participants With Good or Little Pathological Tumour Regression at Surgery.Good tumour regression TRG=3-417 Participants
AXE (ARM 1)Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response at Surgery. Number of Participants With Good or Little Pathological Tumour Regression at Surgery.No or little tumour regression Dworak TRG=0-1-224 Participants
AX (ARM 2)Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response at Surgery. Number of Participants With Good or Little Pathological Tumour Regression at Surgery.Complete response, no tumour left Dworak TRG=44 Participants
AX (ARM 2)Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response at Surgery. Number of Participants With Good or Little Pathological Tumour Regression at Surgery.Good tumour regression TRG=3-49 Participants
AX (ARM 2)Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response at Surgery. Number of Participants With Good or Little Pathological Tumour Regression at Surgery.No or little tumour regression Dworak TRG=0-1-229 Participants
Secondary

Recurrence Rates and Disease Free Survival

Counts and proportions of patients experiencing recurrence of disease (local and distant).

Time frame: up to 5 years

Population: Intent to treat (one patient lost to follow-up)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AXE (ARM 1)Recurrence Rates and Disease Free SurvivalRecurred Dec 20179 Participants
AXE (ARM 1)Recurrence Rates and Disease Free SurvivalNot recurred Dec 201733 Participants
AXE (ARM 1)Recurrence Rates and Disease Free SurvivalLost to FU1 Participants
AX (ARM 2)Recurrence Rates and Disease Free SurvivalRecurred Dec 20179 Participants
AX (ARM 2)Recurrence Rates and Disease Free SurvivalNot recurred Dec 201732 Participants
AX (ARM 2)Recurrence Rates and Disease Free SurvivalLost to FU0 Participants
Secondary

Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General Overview

Adverse events graded as per NCI CTCAE (US National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) version 3.0. All Serious Adverse Events occurrences are reported and counts are summarized here; all Adverse Events (all grades) related and not related to study treatment are reported and summarized here; all severe laboratory events (hematology and biochemistry Gr 3 and higher) are reported and summarized here; all severe postoperative complications (Gr 3 and higher) occurred within the first month post surgery are reported and summarized here. See section Adverse events for details.

Time frame: continuous up to 1 year

Population: Intent to treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AXE (ARM 1)Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General OverviewAll adverse events564 counts of events
AXE (ARM 1)Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General OverviewPost operative complications at 1 month14 counts of events
AXE (ARM 1)Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General OverviewSevere lab events27 counts of events
AXE (ARM 1)Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General OverviewSerious adverse events22 counts of events
AX (ARM 2)Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General OverviewSerious adverse events12 counts of events
AX (ARM 2)Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General OverviewAll adverse events426 counts of events
AX (ARM 2)Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General OverviewSevere lab events16 counts of events
AX (ARM 2)Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General OverviewPost operative complications at 1 month9 counts of events

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026