Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
bevacizumab, capecitabine, radiation therapy, oxaliplatin, multimodality treatments, TME (total mesorectal excision), Axe Beam, rectal cancer, neoadjuvant, pathological complete response, postoperative complications
Brief summary
Phase II clinical trial, open-label, randomized, two arms, multicentre (possibly multinational). Academic, investigator initiated. To assess the activity of bevacizumab (AvastinTM) in combination with capecitabine (XelodaTM) and radiation therapy with or without oxaliplatin (EloxatinTM) in the pre-operative treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer, followed by TME (total mesorectal excision).
Detailed description
See Synopsis
Interventions
Administered on days 15,22,29,36 en 43; 50 mg/m2
Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg
825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy
Total dose 45Gy
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adenocarcinoma of rectum measurable (RECIST), locally advanced (defined by MRI - Tumour beyond mesorectal fascia (T4) or Tumour ≤ 2 mm from mesorectal fascia or T3 tumour \< 5 cm from anal verge * Patient is at least 18 years of age * Good organ function
Exclusion criteria
* Evidence of distant metastases * Contraindication for bevacizumab * Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pathologic Response at Surgery. Overview of Complete Pathologic Responses, Good and Little Tumour Regression Rates at Surgery. | 4 months | Dworak tumour regression grades (TRG) were used to assess pathologic response: TRG0=no regression. TRG1=dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; TRG2=dominant fibrotic changes with few tumour cells or groups; TRG3=very few (difficult to find microscopically) tumour cells in fibrotic tissue with or without mucus substance. TRG4=no intact viable tumour cells, only fibrotic mass or presence of mucin lakes without associated malignant cells (total tumour regression). Pathologic assessments of tumour response post chemoradiotherapy as provided by investigators (read by local pathologists on operative specimens) were reviewed centrally for all pts for whom surgical materials were available (centrally reviewed set). The diagnosis of independent central reviewers primed. Pathologic complete response rates (TRG4) are reported (%). Good (TRG3 and TRG4 together) and little (TRG 0,1 and 2) tumour regression rates are summarized. For these 2 last rows, % add to 100. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response at Surgery. Number of Participants With Good or Little Pathological Tumour Regression at Surgery. | 4 months | Dworak tumour regression grades (TRG) were used to assess pathologic response: TRG0=no regression. TRG1=dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; TRG2=dominant fibrotic changes with few tumour cells or groups; TRG3=very few (difficult to find microscopically) tumour cells in fibrotic tissue with or without mucus substance. TRG4=no intact viable tumour cells, only fibrotic mass or presence of mucin lakes without associated malignant cells (total tumour regression). Pathologic assessments of tumour response post chemoradiotherapy as provided by investigators (read by local pathologists on operative specimens) were reviewed centrally for all pts for whom surgical materials were available (centrally reviewed set). The diagnosis of independent central reviewers primed. Pathologic complete response rates (TRG4) are reported (%). Good (TRG3 and TRG4 together) and little (TRG 0,1 and 2) tumour regression rates are summarized. For these 2 last rows, % add to 100. |
| Clinical Response Rate | 3 months | Baseline tumour measurements were performed within 4 weeks prior to treatment start (RECIST). The same methods of assessment (CT and/or MRI) were used for each measurable lesion at baseline and during follow-up. * Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumour (both target and non-target lesions). * Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of tumour longest diameters (LD). * Stable Disease (SD) is steady state of disease. Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. * Progressive Disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started. Appearance of new lesions constitutes PD. In exceptional circumstances, unequivocal progression of non-target lesions was considered evidence of PD. |
| Number of Participants With Histopathologic R0 and Negative CRM Resection | 4 months | Histopathologic R0 resection rate was defined as margins histologically negative for tumour involvement after resection. The circumferential resection margin (CRM) is considered to be involved if microscopic tumour is present \<1mm from or at the inked circumferential or radial resection margin. Data on quality of mesorectal excision were expected but not collected consistently. |
| Recurrence Rates and Disease Free Survival | up to 5 years | Counts and proportions of patients experiencing recurrence of disease (local and distant). |
| Death Rates and Overall Survival | up to 5 years | Counts and proportions of patients deceased (post-study). |
| Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General Overview | continuous up to 1 year | Adverse events graded as per NCI CTCAE (US National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) version 3.0. All Serious Adverse Events occurrences are reported and counts are summarized here; all Adverse Events (all grades) related and not related to study treatment are reported and summarized here; all severe laboratory events (hematology and biochemistry Gr 3 and higher) are reported and summarized here; all severe postoperative complications (Gr 3 and higher) occurred within the first month post surgery are reported and summarized here. See section Adverse events for details. |
Countries
Belgium
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Eighty-four patients were included. First patient enrolled: 22-Jun-2009. Last patient enrolled: 29-Sep-2013. Participating sites: UZ Leuven, Erasme Hospital Bruxelles, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc Bruxelles, AZ St. Lucas Brugge, AZ Groeninge Kortrijk, CHU Sart-Tilman Liege, OLVZ Aalst, H. Hart Ziekenhuis Roeselare, Cl. Saint Elisabeth Namur
Pre-assignment details
Target population was represented by patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (tumour beyond mesorectal fascia (T4) or tumour ≤ 2 mm from mesorectal fascia or T3 tumour \< 5 cm from anal verge by MRI), histologically confirmed. Pts were screened as per incl and excl criteria per protocol. Screening failures were not recorded in the eCRF.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| AXE (ARM 1) Oxaliplatin, Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy.
Oxaliplatin: Administered on days 15,22,29,36 en 43; 50 mg/m2
Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg
Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy
Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy | 43 |
| AX (ARM 2) Bevacizumab and Capecitabine concurrently with radiotherapy
Bevacizumab: Administered on days 1,15,29 and 43 ; 5mg/kg
Capecitabine: 825 mg/m2 ; 25 days - 5days per week, concurrent with radiotherapy
Radiotherapy: Total dose 45Gy | 41 |
| Total | 84 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Post-surgery (<30 Days) | No central review materials | 0 | 1 |
| Study Treatment | Adverse Event | 0 | 1 |
| Study Treatment | Complete response, no surgery | 1 | 1 |
| Study Treatment | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | AXE (ARM 1) | AX (ARM 2) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 14 Participants | 12 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 29 Participants | 29 Participants | 58 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 61 years | 59 years | 60 years |
| Distance from tumour to anal verge <5cm | 18 Participants | 15 Participants | 33 Participants |
| Distance from tumour to anal verge >=5cm | 13 Participants | 15 Participants | 28 Participants |
| Distance from tumour to anal verge NA | 12 Participants | 11 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Distance to CRM 0mm | 21 Participants | 24 Participants | 45 Participants |
| Distance to CRM <2mm | 6 Participants | 2 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Distance to CRM >=2mm | 9 Participants | 10 Participants | 19 Participants |
| Distance to CRM NA | 7 Participants | 5 Participants | 12 Participants |
| ECOG PS (Performance Status) ECOG PS=0 | 36 Participants | 37 Participants | 73 Participants |
| ECOG PS (Performance Status) ECOG PS=1 | 7 Participants | 4 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Nodal stage N0 (no regional lymph node metastase) | 7 Participants | 5 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Nodal stage N1 (metastasis in 1-3 regional lymp nodes) | 15 Participants | 18 Participants | 33 Participants |
| Nodal stage N2 (metastasis in 4 or more regional lymph nodes) | 20 Participants | 17 Participants | 37 Participants |
| Nodal stage Nx (regional nodes cannot be assessed) | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 14 Participants | 12 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 29 Participants | 29 Participants | 58 Participants |
| Tumour stage T2 (Tumor invades muscularis propria) | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Tumour stage T3 (tumor invades into pericolorectal tissues) | 34 Participants | 31 Participants | 65 Participants |
| Tumour stage T4 (tumor invades through peritoneum/other organs) | 7 Participants | 8 Participants | 15 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 43 | 1 / 41 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 18 / 43 | 15 / 41 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 21 / 43 | 12 / 41 |
Outcome results
Pathologic Response at Surgery. Overview of Complete Pathologic Responses, Good and Little Tumour Regression Rates at Surgery.
Dworak tumour regression grades (TRG) were used to assess pathologic response: TRG0=no regression. TRG1=dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; TRG2=dominant fibrotic changes with few tumour cells or groups; TRG3=very few (difficult to find microscopically) tumour cells in fibrotic tissue with or without mucus substance. TRG4=no intact viable tumour cells, only fibrotic mass or presence of mucin lakes without associated malignant cells (total tumour regression). Pathologic assessments of tumour response post chemoradiotherapy as provided by investigators (read by local pathologists on operative specimens) were reviewed centrally for all pts for whom surgical materials were available (centrally reviewed set). The diagnosis of independent central reviewers primed. Pathologic complete response rates (TRG4) are reported (%). Good (TRG3 and TRG4 together) and little (TRG 0,1 and 2) tumour regression rates are summarized. For these 2 last rows, % add to 100.
Time frame: 4 months
Population: Patients who had undertaken surgery and had pathology materials available for central review (centrally reviewed subset)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXE (ARM 1) | Pathologic Response at Surgery. Overview of Complete Pathologic Responses, Good and Little Tumour Regression Rates at Surgery. | Pathological complete response (Dworak TRG=4) % | 34 percentage of cases |
| AXE (ARM 1) | Pathologic Response at Surgery. Overview of Complete Pathologic Responses, Good and Little Tumour Regression Rates at Surgery. | Good tumour regression (Dworak TRG=3-4) % | 41 percentage of cases |
| AXE (ARM 1) | Pathologic Response at Surgery. Overview of Complete Pathologic Responses, Good and Little Tumour Regression Rates at Surgery. | Little tumour regression (Dworak TRG=0-1-2) % | 59 percentage of cases |
| AX (ARM 2) | Pathologic Response at Surgery. Overview of Complete Pathologic Responses, Good and Little Tumour Regression Rates at Surgery. | Pathological complete response (Dworak TRG=4) % | 11 percentage of cases |
| AX (ARM 2) | Pathologic Response at Surgery. Overview of Complete Pathologic Responses, Good and Little Tumour Regression Rates at Surgery. | Good tumour regression (Dworak TRG=3-4) % | 24 percentage of cases |
| AX (ARM 2) | Pathologic Response at Surgery. Overview of Complete Pathologic Responses, Good and Little Tumour Regression Rates at Surgery. | Little tumour regression (Dworak TRG=0-1-2) % | 76 percentage of cases |
Clinical Response Rate
Baseline tumour measurements were performed within 4 weeks prior to treatment start (RECIST). The same methods of assessment (CT and/or MRI) were used for each measurable lesion at baseline and during follow-up. * Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and radiological evidence of tumour (both target and non-target lesions). * Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of tumour longest diameters (LD). * Stable Disease (SD) is steady state of disease. Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. * Progressive Disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started. Appearance of new lesions constitutes PD. In exceptional circumstances, unequivocal progression of non-target lesions was considered evidence of PD.
Time frame: 3 months
Population: Intent to treat, all registered patients
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXE (ARM 1) | Clinical Response Rate | NA | 7 Participants |
| AXE (ARM 1) | Clinical Response Rate | SD | 9 Participants |
| AXE (ARM 1) | Clinical Response Rate | CR | 3 Participants |
| AXE (ARM 1) | Clinical Response Rate | PD | 0 Participants |
| AXE (ARM 1) | Clinical Response Rate | PR | 24 Participants |
| AX (ARM 2) | Clinical Response Rate | NA | 5 Participants |
| AX (ARM 2) | Clinical Response Rate | PD | 1 Participants |
| AX (ARM 2) | Clinical Response Rate | PR | 17 Participants |
| AX (ARM 2) | Clinical Response Rate | SD | 13 Participants |
| AX (ARM 2) | Clinical Response Rate | CR | 5 Participants |
Death Rates and Overall Survival
Counts and proportions of patients deceased (post-study).
Time frame: up to 5 years
Population: Intent to treat in follow up (one patient in Arm 1 lost to follow up).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXE (ARM 1) | Death Rates and Overall Survival | Lost to FU | 1 Participants |
| AXE (ARM 1) | Death Rates and Overall Survival | Deceased (Dec 2017) | 6 Participants |
| AXE (ARM 1) | Death Rates and Overall Survival | Alive (Dec 2017) | 36 Participants |
| AX (ARM 2) | Death Rates and Overall Survival | Lost to FU | 0 Participants |
| AX (ARM 2) | Death Rates and Overall Survival | Deceased (Dec 2017) | 7 Participants |
| AX (ARM 2) | Death Rates and Overall Survival | Alive (Dec 2017) | 34 Participants |
Number of Participants With Histopathologic R0 and Negative CRM Resection
Histopathologic R0 resection rate was defined as margins histologically negative for tumour involvement after resection. The circumferential resection margin (CRM) is considered to be involved if microscopic tumour is present \<1mm from or at the inked circumferential or radial resection margin. Data on quality of mesorectal excision were expected but not collected consistently.
Time frame: 4 months
Population: Patient in Arm 2 that discontinued chemoradiotherapy due to major toxicity and had surgery off protocol is counted here as well
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXE (ARM 1) | Number of Participants With Histopathologic R0 and Negative CRM Resection | Negative resection margins | 40 Participants |
| AXE (ARM 1) | Number of Participants With Histopathologic R0 and Negative CRM Resection | Positive resection margins | 1 Participants |
| AX (ARM 2) | Number of Participants With Histopathologic R0 and Negative CRM Resection | Negative resection margins | 37 Participants |
| AX (ARM 2) | Number of Participants With Histopathologic R0 and Negative CRM Resection | Positive resection margins | 2 Participants |
Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response at Surgery. Number of Participants With Good or Little Pathological Tumour Regression at Surgery.
Dworak tumour regression grades (TRG) were used to assess pathologic response: TRG0=no regression. TRG1=dominant tumor mass with obvious fibrosis and/or vasculopathy; TRG2=dominant fibrotic changes with few tumour cells or groups; TRG3=very few (difficult to find microscopically) tumour cells in fibrotic tissue with or without mucus substance. TRG4=no intact viable tumour cells, only fibrotic mass or presence of mucin lakes without associated malignant cells (total tumour regression). Pathologic assessments of tumour response post chemoradiotherapy as provided by investigators (read by local pathologists on operative specimens) were reviewed centrally for all pts for whom surgical materials were available (centrally reviewed set). The diagnosis of independent central reviewers primed. Pathologic complete response rates (TRG4) are reported (%). Good (TRG3 and TRG4 together) and little (TRG 0,1 and 2) tumour regression rates are summarized. For these 2 last rows, % add to 100.
Time frame: 4 months
Population: Centrally reviewed subset
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXE (ARM 1) | Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response at Surgery. Number of Participants With Good or Little Pathological Tumour Regression at Surgery. | Complete response, no tumour left Dworak TRG=4 | 14 Participants |
| AXE (ARM 1) | Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response at Surgery. Number of Participants With Good or Little Pathological Tumour Regression at Surgery. | Good tumour regression TRG=3-4 | 17 Participants |
| AXE (ARM 1) | Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response at Surgery. Number of Participants With Good or Little Pathological Tumour Regression at Surgery. | No or little tumour regression Dworak TRG=0-1-2 | 24 Participants |
| AX (ARM 2) | Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response at Surgery. Number of Participants With Good or Little Pathological Tumour Regression at Surgery. | Complete response, no tumour left Dworak TRG=4 | 4 Participants |
| AX (ARM 2) | Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response at Surgery. Number of Participants With Good or Little Pathological Tumour Regression at Surgery. | Good tumour regression TRG=3-4 | 9 Participants |
| AX (ARM 2) | Number of Participants With Pathologic Complete Response at Surgery. Number of Participants With Good or Little Pathological Tumour Regression at Surgery. | No or little tumour regression Dworak TRG=0-1-2 | 29 Participants |
Recurrence Rates and Disease Free Survival
Counts and proportions of patients experiencing recurrence of disease (local and distant).
Time frame: up to 5 years
Population: Intent to treat (one patient lost to follow-up)
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXE (ARM 1) | Recurrence Rates and Disease Free Survival | Recurred Dec 2017 | 9 Participants |
| AXE (ARM 1) | Recurrence Rates and Disease Free Survival | Not recurred Dec 2017 | 33 Participants |
| AXE (ARM 1) | Recurrence Rates and Disease Free Survival | Lost to FU | 1 Participants |
| AX (ARM 2) | Recurrence Rates and Disease Free Survival | Recurred Dec 2017 | 9 Participants |
| AX (ARM 2) | Recurrence Rates and Disease Free Survival | Not recurred Dec 2017 | 32 Participants |
| AX (ARM 2) | Recurrence Rates and Disease Free Survival | Lost to FU | 0 Participants |
Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General Overview
Adverse events graded as per NCI CTCAE (US National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) version 3.0. All Serious Adverse Events occurrences are reported and counts are summarized here; all Adverse Events (all grades) related and not related to study treatment are reported and summarized here; all severe laboratory events (hematology and biochemistry Gr 3 and higher) are reported and summarized here; all severe postoperative complications (Gr 3 and higher) occurred within the first month post surgery are reported and summarized here. See section Adverse events for details.
Time frame: continuous up to 1 year
Population: Intent to treat
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXE (ARM 1) | Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General Overview | All adverse events | 564 counts of events |
| AXE (ARM 1) | Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General Overview | Post operative complications at 1 month | 14 counts of events |
| AXE (ARM 1) | Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General Overview | Severe lab events | 27 counts of events |
| AXE (ARM 1) | Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General Overview | Serious adverse events | 22 counts of events |
| AX (ARM 2) | Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General Overview | Serious adverse events | 12 counts of events |
| AX (ARM 2) | Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General Overview | All adverse events | 426 counts of events |
| AX (ARM 2) | Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General Overview | Severe lab events | 16 counts of events |
| AX (ARM 2) | Types and Numbers of Adverse Events - General Overview | Post operative complications at 1 month | 9 counts of events |