Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
Conditions
Brief summary
There are still no established protocols for maintenance therapy with intravenous or oral vitamin D preparations after the iPTH target has been achieved. Therefore, the present study compared the efficacy of two maintenance therapy protocols, i.e., oral administration of alfacalcidol (an oral vitamin D preparation) at a dose of 1.0 ug/day (higher-dose group) or at a dose of 0.25 ug/day (lower-dose group), in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism who responded to initial maxacalcitol therapy, resulting in the control of iPTH to \< 150 pg/mL.
Detailed description
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) causes various bone mineral disorders, which have recently been named CKD mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). CKD-MBD presents a spectrum of skeletal abnormalities ranging from high bone turnover state such as osteitis fibrosa, which is seen with SHPT, to states of low bone turnover, which includes osteomalacia and adynamic bone disease. This disease not only increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality, but also increases the risk of fracture. Therefore, it is important to correct the serum inorganic phosphorus (Pi), calcium (Ca) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels in dialysis patients, to achieve both appropriate bone turnover and to improve mortality. The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) guidelines recommend that the target range of iPTH level for vitamin D therapy should be set at 150-300 pg/mL. In Japan, the mortality risk was significantly lower in the group of patients with iPTH levels \< 120 pg/mL than in the standard group set at 180 pg/mL \< iPTH \< 360 pg/mL, and lowest in the group of patients with 60 pg/mL \< iPTH \< 120 pg/mL . Based on these findings, Japanese guideline recommend that the target range of iPTH should be set at 60-180 pg/mL . The efficacies of various oral and intravenous vitamin D preparations for treating SHPT in hemodialysis patients have been reported. and oral or intravenous vitamin D pulse therapy has been clinically applied, especially for patients with severe SHPT. Up to now, the effectiveness of an oral daily alfacalcidol on SHPT has been confirmed at the dose of 0.25-0.5 μg /day (average 0.364μg /day), 0.5 μg /day, and 1.0 μg /day. The effective dose of OCT has also been verified, and furthermore, it has also been reported that intravenous vitamin D was more effective than oral vitamin D for suppressing PTH secretion. Accordingly, at present intravenous vitamin D therapy is the standard treatment for SHPT, and there are established protocols with regard to dosage and administration. However, no protocols have been established for maintenance therapy using intravenous or oral vitamin D preparations after the control of iPTH target range has been achieved. Therefore, the present study compared the efficacy of two maintenance therapy protocols for patients with SHPT who responded to initial OCT therapy, resulting in the control of iPTH to \<150pg/mL. One was oral administration of alfacalcidol (an oral vitamin D preparation) at a dose of 1.0 μg/day (higher-dose group) and the other was at a dose of 0.25 μg/day (lower-dose group), both of which are clinically effective doses for HD patients with SHPT.
Interventions
We compared the efficacy of two protocols for maintenance therapy, which were oral administration of alfacalcidol at a dose of 1.0 μg/day in patients whose iPTH level was controlled to \< 150 pg/mL by initial maxacalcitol therapy.
We compared the efficacy of two protocols for maintenance therapy, which were oral administration of alfacalcidol at a dose of 0.25 μg/day in patients whose iPTH level was controlled to \< 150 pg/mL by initial maxacalcitol therapy.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Clinical diagnosis of secondary hyperparathyroidism (iPTH \>200 pg/mL to \<500 pg/mL) * Serum Ca \< 11.0 mg/dL, and serum P \< 7.0 mg/dL. * At least one year of regular hemodialysis therapy
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to any ingredient of maxacalcitol * Patients who had received parathyroidectomy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Number of Participants With iPTH Levels Maintained at the Target Levels of 60-180 pg/mL iPTH Level | Participants were followed for 24 weeks |
Countries
Japan
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| High Dose Alfacalcidol oral administration of alfacalcidol at a dose of 1.0 ug/day in patients whose iPTH level was controlled to \< 150 pg/mL by initial maxacalcitol therapy. | 12 |
| Low Dose Alfacalcidol oral administration of alfacalcidol at a dose of 0.25 ug/day in patients whose iPTH level was controlled to \< 150 pg/mL by initial maxacalcitol therapy. | 11 |
| Total | 23 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Low Dose Alfacalcidol | High Dose Alfacalcidol | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 10 Participants | 11 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 69.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7 | 66.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 | 67.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 |
| Region of Enrollment Japan | 11 participants | 12 participants | 23 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 6 Participants | 3 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 5 Participants | 9 Participants | 14 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 12 | 0 / 11 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 12 | 0 / 11 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants With iPTH Levels Maintained at the Target Levels of 60-180 pg/mL iPTH Level
Time frame: Participants were followed for 24 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Dose Alfacalcidol | Number of Participants With iPTH Levels Maintained at the Target Levels of 60-180 pg/mL iPTH Level | Controlled cases | 10 participants |
| High Dose Alfacalcidol | Number of Participants With iPTH Levels Maintained at the Target Levels of 60-180 pg/mL iPTH Level | Uncontrolled cases | 2 participants |
| Low Dose Alfacalcidol | Number of Participants With iPTH Levels Maintained at the Target Levels of 60-180 pg/mL iPTH Level | Controlled cases | 4 participants |
| Low Dose Alfacalcidol | Number of Participants With iPTH Levels Maintained at the Target Levels of 60-180 pg/mL iPTH Level | Uncontrolled cases | 7 participants |